Blank Discussion Topic

Options
1275276278280281350

Comments

  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    unsung said:

    I honestly watched Fox News for a solid six months last year. I wanted to hear a different perspective, like maybe I wasn't getting it with the other news sources. It was truly terrible. The Five, Bill, and Hannity are just terrible. They don't even try to have credibility or journalistic integrity. I think the same can be said for the MSNBC prime time but it's to a whole other level on Fox. I can honestly say that the time I spent watching Fox, my level of personal paranoia on things increased. They're very good at that. Thankfully I'm aware of things like that, whereas their vast majority of the elderly market does not.

    I only like Tucker.
    I believe that. Tucker is the best of the opinion people. I would like to see him have his own channel or broadcast independent of a networks agenda. I feel like he tries to fill a role or play a part on the given network he's on. Him being independent could be something I'd tune into.
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,539
    On twitter he seems to have a better grasp on reality than some of the other Fox folks.
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    Tucker's face when his guests are talking is just intolerable, how has he not fixed that yet??

    It's truly intolerable.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,549
    In a Repudiation of Trump, a Senior House Leader Rejects Wiretap Claim - The New York Times
    https://apple.news/A9LQ63QulQwKPcLTfki6YWg

    Ok so maybe a bafoon supporter here can provide some evidence or anything to back up his claim hey pjfan do you have a link or anything to help clear this mess up ...
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • PJfanwillneverleave1
    PJfanwillneverleave1 Posts: 12,885
    edited March 2017

    In a Repudiation of Trump, a Senior House Leader Rejects Wiretap Claim - The New York Times
    https://apple.news/A9LQ63QulQwKPcLTfki6YWg

    Ok so maybe a bafoon supporter here can provide some evidence or anything to back up his claim hey pjfan do you have a link or anything to help clear this mess up ...

    I can't state it any more clear.
    I don't give a flying fuck if this story is true or not. It in no way affects me personally at all and I don't think it affects you either.
    As you pro-impeach people say "give it time"
    If the story ends up being true the media will be ashamed.

    edit - removed not
    Post edited by PJfanwillneverleave1 on
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,657
    edited March 2017

    In a Repudiation of Trump, a Senior House Leader Rejects Wiretap Claim - The New York Times
    https://apple.news/A9LQ63QulQwKPcLTfki6YWg

    Ok so maybe a bafoon supporter here can provide some evidence or anything to back up his claim hey pjfan do you have a link or anything to help clear this mess up ...

    I can't state it any more clear.
    I don't give a flying fuck if this story is true or not. It in no way affects me personally at all and I don't think it affects you either.
    As you pro-impeach people say "give it time"
    If the story ends up not being true the media will be ashamed.
    Plus you're not even a Trump supporter, so Jose shouldn't have asked you in the first place. :)

    Why do you think the media will be ashamed though? I think the media has mostly treated this under the assumption that it isn't true, and have mostly been talking about what that fact means. And I doubt the alt-right fake news folks will care one way or the other. They'll just say it's true, and there is a cover-up going on, lol.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • PJ_Soul said:

    In a Repudiation of Trump, a Senior House Leader Rejects Wiretap Claim - The New York Times
    https://apple.news/A9LQ63QulQwKPcLTfki6YWg

    Ok so maybe a bafoon supporter here can provide some evidence or anything to back up his claim hey pjfan do you have a link or anything to help clear this mess up ...

    I can't state it any more clear.
    I don't give a flying fuck if this story is true or not. It in no way affects me personally at all and I don't think it affects you either.
    As you pro-impeach people say "give it time"
    If the story ends up not being true the media will be ashamed.
    Plus you're not even a Trump supporter, so Jose shouldn't have asked you in the first place. :)

    Why do you think the media will be ashamed though? I think the media has mostly treated this under the assumption that it isn't true, and have mostly been talking about what that fact means. And I doubt the alt-right fake news folks will care one way or the other. They'll just say it's true, and there is a cover-up going on, lol.
    Not sure how the word not ended up in my post, I was typing too fast.
    I meant being true.
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,657

    PJ_Soul said:

    In a Repudiation of Trump, a Senior House Leader Rejects Wiretap Claim - The New York Times
    https://apple.news/A9LQ63QulQwKPcLTfki6YWg

    Ok so maybe a bafoon supporter here can provide some evidence or anything to back up his claim hey pjfan do you have a link or anything to help clear this mess up ...

    I can't state it any more clear.
    I don't give a flying fuck if this story is true or not. It in no way affects me personally at all and I don't think it affects you either.
    As you pro-impeach people say "give it time"
    If the story ends up not being true the media will be ashamed.
    Plus you're not even a Trump supporter, so Jose shouldn't have asked you in the first place. :)

    Why do you think the media will be ashamed though? I think the media has mostly treated this under the assumption that it isn't true, and have mostly been talking about what that fact means. And I doubt the alt-right fake news folks will care one way or the other. They'll just say it's true, and there is a cover-up going on, lol.
    Not sure how the word not ended up in my post, I was typing too fast.
    I meant being true.
    Huh? Sorry, I don't understand what you mean here.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • ^^^
    My first post said If the story ends up not being true the media will be ashamed.
  • mrussel1
    mrussel1 Posts: 30,879

    In a Repudiation of Trump, a Senior House Leader Rejects Wiretap Claim - The New York Times
    https://apple.news/A9LQ63QulQwKPcLTfki6YWg

    Ok so maybe a bafoon supporter here can provide some evidence or anything to back up his claim hey pjfan do you have a link or anything to help clear this mess up ...

    I can't state it any more clear.
    I don't give a flying fuck if this story is true or not. It in no way affects me personally at all and I don't think it affects you either.
    As you pro-impeach people say "give it time"
    If the story ends up being true the media will be ashamed.

    edit - removed not
    Are you saying you don't give a fuck if either
    A. the former president was illegally spying on a candidate or
    B. the current president lied to the nation and accused the president of committing a crime

    The only way you shouldn't care about this if you don't care about American politics. Considering your time spent here, I don't think that's the case. So please explain how you can care about American politics but not care about A or B? Both have extreme ramifications as to the trustworthiness and truthfullness of the chief executive.
  • ^^^
    The interview tonight with Tucker will address this issue so let's wait and see. http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/wiretap-claim-trump-tower-fbi-1.4026603
    In an excerpt from a Fox News interview, which will be broadcast in full Wednesday night, Trump suggested that there's more information about the wiretaps.
    "I think you're going to find some very interesting items coming to the forefront over the next two weeks," Trump said.
    He also said that "wiretap covers a lot of different things."


    A. If Presidents spy on people who are coming after them I see no reason why that should be of concern to the public.
    B. The current President hasn't been proved a liar yet about the wiretap.

    The American media is out of control sensationalizing everything. Politics are dirty and your President won.
  • Go Beavers
    Go Beavers Posts: 9,539
    I can't wait for all the info to come out about Obama's birth certificate, too.
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    edited March 2017

    ^^^
    The interview tonight with Tucker will address this issue so let's wait and see. http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/wiretap-claim-trump-tower-fbi-1.4026603
    In an excerpt from a Fox News interview, which will be broadcast in full Wednesday night, Trump suggested that there's more information about the wiretaps.
    "I think you're going to find some very interesting items coming to the forefront over the next two weeks," Trump said.
    He also said that "wiretap covers a lot of different things."


    A. If Presidents spy on people who are coming after them I see no reason why that should be of concern to the public.
    B. The current President hasn't been proved a liar yet about the wiretap.

    The American media is out of control sensationalizing everything. Politics are dirty and your President won.

    He's kicking the can down the road and giving it legs for a couple of weeks while his scaling back of environmental regulations goes under the radar in the press.
  • Halifax2TheMax
    Halifax2TheMax Posts: 42,011

    ^^^
    The interview tonight with Tucker will address this issue so let's wait and see. http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/wiretap-claim-trump-tower-fbi-1.4026603
    In an excerpt from a Fox News interview, which will be broadcast in full Wednesday night, Trump suggested that there's more information about the wiretaps.
    "I think you're going to find some very interesting items coming to the forefront over the next two weeks," Trump said.
    He also said that "wiretap covers a lot of different things."


    A. If Presidents spy on people who are coming after them I see no reason why that should be of concern to the public.
    B. The current President hasn't been proved a liar yet about the wiretap.

    The American media is out of control sensationalizing everything. Politics are dirty and your President won.

    He's kicking the can down the road and giving it legs for a couple of weeks while his scaling back of environmental regulations goes under the radar in the press.
    Or a 1,000 US troops get deployed to Syria.

    Yes, Donald, the congressional investigations will reveal some very interesting things. Namely, evidence for your impeachment.

    Follow the money, from Russia with love, all the way to impeachment.
    09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;

    Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.

    Brilliantati©
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,549
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • mfc2006
    mfc2006 HTOWN Posts: 37,489
    My guess is not well.
    I LOVE MUSIC.
    www.cluthelee.com
    www.cluthe.com
  • Merkin Baller
    Merkin Baller Posts: 12,754
    It's such BS that judges won't let him violate the constitution.

    They must not recognize his brilliance.
  • josevolution
    josevolution Posts: 31,549
    This guy is a crook that's as simple as you can label him , he has a total dishonest demeanor...
    jesus greets me looks just like me ....
  • Godfather.
    Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    you guy's act like President Trump is the only President to enact a travel ban, sometimes hard action needs to be taken, before everybody starts screaming racism take a look back at the past Presidents who've done this same thing, even the donkey had a hand in this right ?
    if it were up to me the travel ban would be much stricter, there are other countries that have stricter travel bans than the US but I don't see you all complaining about them and some of those specifically block anybody of the muslim faith and the funny thing about those countries...they don't have muslim related problems to deal with like the US and other sanctuary countries/cities.

This discussion has been closed.