Should the US institute a ban on assault weapons.

1…1819212324…28

Comments

  • Thirty Bills Unpaid
    Thirty Bills Unpaid Posts: 16,881
    Yes
    No. I'm arguing anything that is hazardous to society should be banned.

    I think assault rifles fit the bill. They've proven their destructive capabilities more than enough. We don't need to see more classrooms, theaters, and nightclubs to establish the fact that they are extremely dangerous and their 'preference' to some shouldn't trump public safety.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    other
    Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

    No. I'm arguing anything that is hazardous to society should be banned.

    I think assault rifles fit the bill. They've proven their destructive capabilities more than enough. We don't need to see more classrooms, theaters, and nightclubs to establish the fact that they are extremely dangerous and their 'preference' to some shouldn't trump public safety.

    Again, this is where our opinions differ. Good luck getting your "assault weapons" banned. I guess California should be a pretty "safe space" for the like minded. I'll continue to push public awareness and life saving techniques. Whether they should or should not be banned is a circle argument that I am done arguing about here, I feel like I've said all that I could possibly say on that topic without repeating myself over and over. Good luck!!!
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 40,109
    Yes
    PJPOWER said:

    Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

    No. I'm arguing anything that is hazardous to society should be banned.

    I think assault rifles fit the bill. They've proven their destructive capabilities more than enough. We don't need to see more classrooms, theaters, and nightclubs to establish the fact that they are extremely dangerous and their 'preference' to some shouldn't trump public safety.

    Again, this is where our opinions differ. Good luck getting your "assault weapons" banned. I guess California should be a pretty "safe space" for the like minded. I'll continue to push public awareness and life saving techniques. Whether they should or should not be banned is a circle argument that I am done arguing about here, I feel like I've said all that I could possibly say on that topic without repeating myself over and over. Good luck!!!
    this made me laugh. so many times I have said to 30 "this argument is going nowhere, I'm out", only to be pulled back in. trust me.
    Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer



  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    other
    HughFreakingDillon said:

    PJPOWER said:

    Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

    No. I'm arguing anything that is hazardous to society should be banned.

    I think assault rifles fit the bill. They've proven their destructive capabilities more than enough. We don't need to see more classrooms, theaters, and nightclubs to establish the fact that they are extremely dangerous and their 'preference' to some shouldn't trump public safety.

    Again, this is where our opinions differ. Good luck getting your "assault weapons" banned. I guess California should be a pretty "safe space" for the like minded. I'll continue to push public awareness and life saving techniques. Whether they should or should not be banned is a circle argument that I am done arguing about here, I feel like I've said all that I could possibly say on that topic without repeating myself over and over. Good luck!!!
    this made me laugh. so many times I have said to 30 "this argument is going nowhere, I'm out", only to be pulled back in. trust me.
    Lol, I know!!!! I have too much free time right now to get sucked into these arguments. Closer to mid-August I'll be pretty much non-existent around here. Good to take a break from these forums from time to time :)
  • Thirty Bills Unpaid
    Thirty Bills Unpaid Posts: 16,881
    Yes
    HughFreakingDillon said:

    PJPOWER said:

    Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

    No. I'm arguing anything that is hazardous to society should be banned.

    I think assault rifles fit the bill. They've proven their destructive capabilities more than enough. We don't need to see more classrooms, theaters, and nightclubs to establish the fact that they are extremely dangerous and their 'preference' to some shouldn't trump public safety.

    Again, this is where our opinions differ. Good luck getting your "assault weapons" banned. I guess California should be a pretty "safe space" for the like minded. I'll continue to push public awareness and life saving techniques. Whether they should or should not be banned is a circle argument that I am done arguing about here, I feel like I've said all that I could possibly say on that topic without repeating myself over and over. Good luck!!!
    this made me laugh. so many times I have said to 30 "this argument is going nowhere, I'm out", only to be pulled back in. trust me.
    I know. I suck.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • Thirty Bills Unpaid
    Thirty Bills Unpaid Posts: 16,881
    Yes
    PJPOWER said:

    HughFreakingDillon said:

    PJPOWER said:

    Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

    No. I'm arguing anything that is hazardous to society should be banned.

    I think assault rifles fit the bill. They've proven their destructive capabilities more than enough. We don't need to see more classrooms, theaters, and nightclubs to establish the fact that they are extremely dangerous and their 'preference' to some shouldn't trump public safety.

    Again, this is where our opinions differ. Good luck getting your "assault weapons" banned. I guess California should be a pretty "safe space" for the like minded. I'll continue to push public awareness and life saving techniques. Whether they should or should not be banned is a circle argument that I am done arguing about here, I feel like I've said all that I could possibly say on that topic without repeating myself over and over. Good luck!!!
    this made me laugh. so many times I have said to 30 "this argument is going nowhere, I'm out", only to be pulled back in. trust me.
    Lol, I know!!!! I have too much free time right now to get sucked into these arguments. Closer to mid-August I'll be pretty much non-existent around here. Good to take a break from these forums from time to time :)
    Hey man. You keep posting aside from the exchanges we might have. Is it a case of you wanting to post and not be challenged on your posts? It is it a case of you not wishing to be challenged by me specifically?

    Because the way I see it... if I put something out there... I better be prepared to back it up versus thinking it should rest as is. And on an open forum... it's open to anyone seeking to take issue with it.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • PJPOWER
    PJPOWER Posts: 6,499
    other
    Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

    HughFreakingDillon said:

    PJPOWER said:

    Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

    No. I'm arguing anything that is hazardous to society should be banned.

    I think assault rifles fit the bill. They've proven their destructive capabilities more than enough. We don't need to see more classrooms, theaters, and nightclubs to establish the fact that they are extremely dangerous and their 'preference' to some shouldn't trump public safety.

    Again, this is where our opinions differ. Good luck getting your "assault weapons" banned. I guess California should be a pretty "safe space" for the like minded. I'll continue to push public awareness and life saving techniques. Whether they should or should not be banned is a circle argument that I am done arguing about here, I feel like I've said all that I could possibly say on that topic without repeating myself over and over. Good luck!!!
    this made me laugh. so many times I have said to 30 "this argument is going nowhere, I'm out", only to be pulled back in. trust me.
    I know. I suck.
    There are those of us that love debating...why aren't we all lawyers? Oh yeah, homework sucks, lol
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 40,109
    Yes
    Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

    HughFreakingDillon said:

    PJPOWER said:

    Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

    No. I'm arguing anything that is hazardous to society should be banned.

    I think assault rifles fit the bill. They've proven their destructive capabilities more than enough. We don't need to see more classrooms, theaters, and nightclubs to establish the fact that they are extremely dangerous and their 'preference' to some shouldn't trump public safety.

    Again, this is where our opinions differ. Good luck getting your "assault weapons" banned. I guess California should be a pretty "safe space" for the like minded. I'll continue to push public awareness and life saving techniques. Whether they should or should not be banned is a circle argument that I am done arguing about here, I feel like I've said all that I could possibly say on that topic without repeating myself over and over. Good luck!!!
    this made me laugh. so many times I have said to 30 "this argument is going nowhere, I'm out", only to be pulled back in. trust me.
    I know. I suck.
    not sure where this came from. my comment is more a testament to your ability to draw me back into a discussion whether i want to or not. it wasn't an insult.
    Your boos mean nothing to me, for I have seen what makes you cheer



  • Thirty Bills Unpaid
    Thirty Bills Unpaid Posts: 16,881
    Yes
    HughFreakingDillon said:

    Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

    HughFreakingDillon said:

    PJPOWER said:

    Thirty Bills Unpaid said:

    No. I'm arguing anything that is hazardous to society should be banned.

    I think assault rifles fit the bill. They've proven their destructive capabilities more than enough. We don't need to see more classrooms, theaters, and nightclubs to establish the fact that they are extremely dangerous and their 'preference' to some shouldn't trump public safety.

    Again, this is where our opinions differ. Good luck getting your "assault weapons" banned. I guess California should be a pretty "safe space" for the like minded. I'll continue to push public awareness and life saving techniques. Whether they should or should not be banned is a circle argument that I am done arguing about here, I feel like I've said all that I could possibly say on that topic without repeating myself over and over. Good luck!!!
    this made me laugh. so many times I have said to 30 "this argument is going nowhere, I'm out", only to be pulled back in. trust me.
    I know. I suck.
    not sure where this came from. my comment is more a testament to your ability to draw me back into a discussion whether i want to or not. it wasn't an insult.
    Sorry.

    We've had our moments and sometimes it's tough to discern what's more of the friendly nature outside of the Porch or Other Music forums.

    Thanks for clarifying.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    Yes
    Anyone change their mind?
  • lastexitlondon
    lastexitlondon Posts: 15,079
    edited November 2017
    Yes
    No guns at all are necessary.
    Post edited by lastexitlondon on


    this song is meant to be called i got shit,itshould be called i got shit tickets-hartford 06 -
  • dignin
    dignin Posts: 9,478
    Yes
    Bump
  • tbergs
    tbergs Posts: 10,513
    Semi-auto rifles, yes.
    It's a hopeless situation...
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,804
    Yes
    Still yes.  Of course still yes!
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • Meltdown99
    Meltdown99 None Of Your Business... Posts: 10,739
    tbergs said:
    Semi-auto rifles, yes.
    Ban all semi-auto weapons...why stop at rifles...
    Give Peas A Chance…
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,231
    No
    Meltdown99 said:
    tbergs said:
    Semi-auto rifles, yes.
    Ban all semi-auto weapons...why stop at rifles...
    Never gonna happen. 
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • Thirty Bills Unpaid
    Thirty Bills Unpaid Posts: 16,881
    Yes
    mcgruff10 said:
    Meltdown99 said:
    tbergs said:
    Semi-auto rifles, yes.
    Ban all semi-auto weapons...why stop at rifles...
    Never gonna happen. 

    Because the tail wags the dog, Scruffy!

    You're probably right... and that's too bad.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,231
    No
    Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    Meltdown99 said:
    tbergs said:
    Semi-auto rifles, yes.
    Ban all semi-auto weapons...why stop at rifles...
    Never gonna happen. 

    Because the tail wags the dog, Scruffy!

    You're probably right... and that's too bad.
    It's a dumb statement del.  are we going to ban semi auto shotguns and .22's?  come on.
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......
  • Thirty Bills Unpaid
    Thirty Bills Unpaid Posts: 16,881
    Yes
    mcgruff10 said:
    Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    Meltdown99 said:
    tbergs said:
    Semi-auto rifles, yes.
    Ban all semi-auto weapons...why stop at rifles...
    Never gonna happen. 

    Because the tail wags the dog, Scruffy!

    You're probably right... and that's too bad.
    It's a dumb statement del.  are we going to ban semi auto shotguns and .22's?  come on.

    Why are semi automatic guns necessary for civilian use, Scruffy?
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • mcgruff10
    mcgruff10 New Jersey Posts: 29,231
    No
    Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    Thirty Bills Unpaid said:
    mcgruff10 said:
    Meltdown99 said:
    tbergs said:
    Semi-auto rifles, yes.
    Ban all semi-auto weapons...why stop at rifles...
    Never gonna happen. 

    Because the tail wags the dog, Scruffy!

    You're probably right... and that's too bad.
    It's a dumb statement del.  are we going to ban semi auto shotguns and .22's?  come on.

    Why are semi automatic guns necessary for civilian use, Scruffy?
    you have never hunted with a semi automatic shotgun or .22?  don't get soft on me bro. ar-15's i agree with but not all semi-auto's.
    I'll ride the wave where it takes me......

Categories