Trump

Gern Blansten · May 2016

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/salter-clinton-over-trump

"If you can see him plainly and you love our country, you must vote against him. Even if that means electing Hillary Clinton," he wrote then.

Jason P · May 2016

I gotta go vote. Should I embrace the MADNESS and jump in the clown car??? Or vote for a weirdo?

Maybe I'll just go to Arby's instead. Another Roast Beef, Yes Sir!

Gern Blansten · May 2016

I was going to go vote for Trump (Indiana resident) as an anti-Pence vote...just can't do it

Wobbie · May 2016

this mother effer is gonna be the repub's nominee.

unreal.

Degeneratefk · May 2016

Jason P said:
Rasumussen Reports: Trump - 41% Clinton - 39%

rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/trump_41_clinton_39

There are many what ifs that give trump that egde. If the people that for now intend to stay home, actually vote for trump, then he gets the slight edge.

That's as good as a breibart poll.

josevolution · May 2016

Yep he's won it this will be great to watch it's insane that this guy will most likely end up in the WH ...

Degeneratefk · May 2016

muskydan said:

dignin said:

muskydan said:

Degeneratefk said:

muskydan said:

Degeneratefk said:
Btw, trump is less relevant than you think. Wait until November when Hilary crushes him
Is this guy for Real???? I am buying stock Tomorow in Kleenex...
I know it's hard for most trump thumpers to realize that a woman IS going to beat him. But look at the numbers. It's rigjt in front of your face. Show me 1 poll that has trump beating Clinton or sanders in the general that isn't from breibart. You're going to need those kleenex when trump us tucking his tail in November demanding a recount for the 25 point defeat.
Pay attention dude, I never said I was a Trump thumper ever. I just hate the Hildabeast and can't wait till The Don makes that beast Cry like a little girl during a debate. She is going to Win cause King Obummer says so.
Back to the sexist BS again. One trick pony.
That's right I forgot... It's completely acceptable on here to constantly rip and insult a billionaire w/ Bad hair who wants to make America great again, but when it comes to a woman on the other side no name is acceptable And if you do it's sexist.... That cake must be really really delicious but messy, Clenex works 4 that too.

What are you saying here? That making fun of trumps wig is not acceptable because you cant resort to name calling without being called a sexist?

Am I reading that correctly?

PJfanwillneverleave1 · May 2016

Good thing he won or their would've been riots I tell ya.
Can't wait for the Clinton/Trump debates!
It's not too late to donate to Trumps campaign if you want to
There seems to be a lot of Trumphadists in your country.

InHiding80 · May 2016

Degeneratefk said:

muskydan said:

dignin said:

muskydan said:

Degeneratefk said:

muskydan said:

Degeneratefk said:
Btw, trump is less relevant than you think. Wait until November when Hilary crushes him
Is this guy for Real???? I am buying stock Tomorow in Kleenex...
I know it's hard for most trump thumpers to realize that a woman IS going to beat him. But look at the numbers. It's rigjt in front of your face. Show me 1 poll that has trump beating Clinton or sanders in the general that isn't from breibart. You're going to need those kleenex when trump us tucking his tail in November demanding a recount for the 25 point defeat.
Pay attention dude, I never said I was a Trump thumper ever. I just hate the Hildabeast and can't wait till The Don makes that beast Cry like a little girl during a debate. She is going to Win cause King Obummer says so.
Back to the sexist BS again. One trick pony.
That's right I forgot... It's completely acceptable on here to constantly rip and insult a billionaire w/ Bad hair who wants to make America great again, but when it comes to a woman on the other side no name is acceptable And if you do it's sexist.... That cake must be really really delicious but messy, Clenex works 4 that too.
What are you saying here? That making fun of trumps wig is not acceptable because you cant resort to name calling without being called a sexist?

Am I reading that correctly?

It's hilarious how republicans want liberals to stop being PC yet cry foul whey go anti PC dissing their Nazi hero. Double standards, Murica!

Wobbie · May 2016

this just reinforces how low the collective IQ of our country is.

put on a hat that declares you'll "Make America Great Again" and the masses eat it up.....no specifics needed.

Jason P · May 2016

Degeneratefk said:

Jason P said:
Rasumussen Reports: Trump - 41% Clinton - 39%

rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/trump_41_clinton_39
There are many what ifs that give trump that egde. If the people that for now intend to stay home, actually vote for trump, then he gets the slight edge.

That's as good as a breibart poll.

Yet not a breibart pole! No indeed, good sir ...

Ye mentioned not of a parlay, only tis could name ye another pole that put the dreaded clown on da lead.

Now, where's me gold???

Jason P · May 2016

Wobbie said:
this just reinforces how low the collective IQ of our country is.

put on a hat that declares you'll "Make America Great Again" and the masses eat it up.....no specifics needed.

Not much different from Bernie's "They'll pay for it" rhetoric. No specifics needed.

Or Clinton's "One Ring to rule them all, One ring to find them; One ring to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them" rhetoric.

josevolution · May 2016

Jason P said:

Wobbie said:
this just reinforces how low the collective IQ of our country is.

put on a hat that declares you'll "Make America Great Again" and the masses eat it up.....no specifics needed.
Not much different from Bernie's "They'll pay for it" rhetoric. No specifics needed.

Or Clinton's "One Ring to rule them all, One ring to find them; One ring to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them" rhetoric.

So none of e'm are worthy of being POTUS !!

Jason P · May 2016

josevolution said:

Jason P said:

Wobbie said:
this just reinforces how low the collective IQ of our country is.

put on a hat that declares you'll "Make America Great Again" and the masses eat it up.....no specifics needed.
Not much different from Bernie's "They'll pay for it" rhetoric. No specifics needed.

Or Clinton's "One Ring to rule them all, One ring to find them; One ring to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them" rhetoric.
So none of e'm are worthy of being POTUS !!

I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords ...

http://youtu.be/8lcUHQYhPTE

Degeneratefk · May 2016

Jason P said:

Degeneratefk said:

Jason P said:
Rasumussen Reports: Trump - 41% Clinton - 39%

rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/trump_41_clinton_39
There are many what ifs that give trump that egde. If the people that for now intend to stay home, actually vote for trump, then he gets the slight edge.

That's as good as a breibart poll.
Yet not a breibart pole! No indeed, good sir ...

Ye mentioned not of a parlay, only tis could name ye another pole that put the dreaded clown on da lead.

Now, where's me gold???

You did provide such a poll. Good point. And trump mentioned it during his speech tonight. But he didn't specify the what ifs either. Make murica great again!!

Jason P · May 2016

Now Trump just needs to focus on a handful of states to get to 270: Florida, Ohio, Penn, Virginia, Michigan and Wisconsin. Even if he loses Michigan, Wisconsin and Virginia, he will get 279 electoral votes as long as he wins the other three.

Jason P · May 2016

Kasich is dropping out. All Hail the Clown!

Cliffy6745 · May 2016

The potential President of the United States, folks

WILLIE GEIST: What about what you told Chris Matthews a few weeks ago, which is that women who get abortions should be punished? Do you still believe that to be true?

TRUMP: No, he was asking me a theoretical, or just a question in theory, and I talked about it only from that standpoint. Of course not. And that was done, he said, you know, I guess it was theoretically, but he was asking a rhetorical question, and I gave an answer. And by the way, people thought from an academic standpoint, and, asked rhetorically, people said that answer was an unbelievable academic answer! But of course not, and I said that afterwards

brianlux · May 2016

Collusion!

(That's alright, no body got the joke when I posted this on FB either, LOL)

Gern Blansten · May 2016

Cliffy6745 said:
The potential President of the United States, folks

WILLIE GEIST: What about what you told Chris Matthews a few weeks ago, which is that women who get abortions should be punished? Do you still believe that to be true?

TRUMP: No, he was asking me a theoretical, or just a question in theory, and I talked about it only from that standpoint. Of course not. And that was done, he said, you know, I guess it was theoretically, but he was asking a rhetorical question, and I gave an answer. And by the way, people thought from an academic standpoint, and, asked rhetorically, people said that answer was an unbelievable academic answer! But of course not, and I said that afterwards

whenever Trump says "people thought" or "people say" he is referring to voices in his head

Trump

Comments

Categories