.

24

Comments

  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,662
    rgambs said:

    I've never read TKAMB. I suppose I should.

    As for books in the cirrocumulus that should be removed id vote for "A midsummer nights dream"

    Also to add isn't this the book that was supposedly written by Salinger?

    Never heard that, doesn't have Salinger's voice at all IMO.

    Also, yes that is one of the worst, along with Romeo and Juliet.
    It should be Merchant of Venice and Othello, along with Hamlet, Othello, and Julius Caesar.
    Holy Cow! You guys editing Shakespeare! LOL!

    I laugh, but as much at myself as I'm not that well versed in W.S. I think it got wrecked for me in middle school the day my voice cracked for the very first time right in the middle of English class, reading aloud as instructed by my teacher, and right in the middle of the line, "Et tu, Brute?"
    Holy f*ck! :rofl:
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • Shakespeare should be in an advanced high school English class and university elective classes.

    Reference and a small portion of study should be made to him in Social Studies.

    I'm not discrediting his work... I'm saying that outside of English Honours students... his work is challenging at best for kids to appreciate. I'm also not saying we serve them comic books either. I'm saying there are several great pieces of literature that have much more relevance to kids.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,662

    Shakespeare should be in an advanced high school English class and university elective classes.

    Reference and a small portion of study should be made to him in Social Studies.

    I'm not discrediting his work... I'm saying that outside of English Honours students... his work is challenging at best for kids to appreciate. I'm also not saying we serve them comic books either. I'm saying there are several great pieces of literature that have much more relevance to kids.

    Some familiarization, definitely. Same with performance. Generally not my thing but before it became chick, I saw a troupe do a W.S.play with the original language but punk costumes and black cloth angular sets at the Ashland, Oregon Shakespeare Festival. It was really different at the time and outstanding.

    As much as I'm very much a fan of all the classics offered in most schools, if I went back to teaching I would do what my 9th grade teacher did. She said, "OK, here's the reading list this year but I would encourage any of you to try something outside the norm." I had read most of them (Red Pony, The Pearl, TKAM, Old Man and the Sea, etc,) so she suggest that I might like Truman Capote. I read, Other Voices, Other Rooms. That book completely altered how I saw literature. It was literally like adding another voice, another room to the realm of literature. Reading Brautigan, Hesse, Saroyan and some others in high school did much the same. Today it would be more challenging because kids are more jaded. Catcher in the Rye was radical then, today maybe not so.

    I would hope teachers today are including some contemporary literature by people like Sherman Alexie, Barbara Kingsolver, T. C. Boyle, Annie Proulx, Mark Haddon, Toni Morrison, Haruki Murakami, etc.

    Others?

    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • Enkidu
    Enkidu So Cal Posts: 2,996
    Shakespeare is tough for kids. I think Julius Caesar was taught to kids in 8th grade in my hometown (I was in a different class and missed it). Julius Caesar is damn hard. It's one of my favorite Shakespeare plays now, but reading it in 7th grade? Impossible.

    However, I had a fantastic English teacher my junior year in high school and we read Macbeth and it was a fantastic experience. She made it come alive for us. We had to memorize passages, we read lots of it out loud, it was scary and bloody - perfect for high school juniors.

    My son read The Tempest in middle school and had the same experience - an amazing teacher who got him excited about the language. So he liked it.
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    Yeah, Shakespeare is for advanced students, and should not be forced too young. Macbeth is the best for youngins, I do feel they should be exposed to 1 play in it's entirety in high school. The sonnets are more appropriate for middle schoolers, they are much easier to comprehend, especially with a few notes. I love ol' Billy boy!

    When to the sessions of sweet silent thought
    I summon up remembrance of things past,
    I sigh the lack of many a thing I sought,
    And with old woes new wail my dear time's waste:
    Then can I drown an eye, unused to flow,
    For precious friends hid in death's dateless night,
    And weep afresh love's long since cancelled woe,
    And moan the expense of many a vanished sight:
    Then can I grieve at grievances foregone,
    And heavily from woe to woe tell o'er
    The sad account of fore-bemoanèd moan,
    Which I new pay as if not paid before.
    But if the while I think on thee, dear friend,
    All losses are restored and sorrows end.

    Anybody can understand most of these sonnets and they are deep and evocative.

    Not marble, nor the gilded monuments
    Of princes, shall outlive this powerful rhyme;
    But you shall shine more bright in these contents
    Than unswept stone, besmear'd with sluttish time.
    When wasteful war shall statues overturn,
    And broils root out the work of masonry,
    Nor Mars his sword nor war's quick fire shall burn
    The living record of your memory.
    'Gainst death and all-oblivious enmity
    Shall you pace forth; your praise shall still find room
    Even in the eyes of all posterity
    That wear this world out to the ending doom.
    So, till the judgment that yourself arise,
    You live in this, and dwell in lovers' eyes.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    start kids off by reading the lyrics to Led Zeppelin songs,then move on to Shakespeare. LZ would prepare them well.
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,665
    edited February 2016
    Did you have trouble with english lit in grade 8? I remember completely understanding and appreciating the book's meaning and it's purpose as part of the curriculum and as a book that is important for people to read. I recall that it had a major impact on the class. Maybe it wasn't the book that lacked a reasonable purpose at that grade level. Maybe you and how you took in literature at that age, your reading comprehension, and/or your own mindset that was the problem?? I recall that book being THE book that opened my eyes to social and racial inequalities and injustice in the criminal justice system. Before that book I don't think I even knew that issue existed. I consider it to have had a significant impact on me.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • eddiec
    eddiec Posts: 3,959
    Removing Shakespeare from high school curriculum would be a travesty. That would be like removing Mozart from a music course because some kids don't get it.
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,665
    eddiec said:

    Removing Shakespeare from high school curriculum would be a travesty. That would be like removing Mozart from a music course because some kids don't get it.

    Good god, is that where the conversation has gone??
    Yeah, Shakespeare is tough for kids. That why it needs to stay in the curriculum. If it's tough, then the kids need to work really hard to understand it, and with ALL the resources available to help people comprehend it, that isn't too much to ask. Sounds ideal actually. Maybe there should be MORE Shakespeare, not less.
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    I was a top student in English. Shakespeare I just didn't get. what the hell he was trying to say. I honestly think his works probably belong in a higher learning atmosphere, like University. Most kids my age didn't get it either.

    TKAM is essential reading.
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,662
    PJ_Soul said:

    eddiec said:

    Removing Shakespeare from high school curriculum would be a travesty. That would be like removing Mozart from a music course because some kids don't get it.

    Good god, is that where the conversation has gone??
    Yeah, Shakespeare is tough for kids. That why it needs to stay in the curriculum. If it's tough, then the kids need to work really hard to understand it, and with ALL the resources available to help people comprehend it, that isn't too much to ask. Sounds ideal actually. Maybe there should be MORE Shakespeare, not less.
    I've noticed many of these forum topics veer off track frequently. Going from Harper Lee to Shakespeare is a bit like going from Pearl Jam to Mozart. Both are great but how did we get there?

    TKAMB is one of the greatest works of the 20th century, period!
    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni

  • Enkidu
    Enkidu So Cal Posts: 2,996
    PJ_Soul said:

    eddiec said:

    Removing Shakespeare from high school curriculum would be a travesty. That would be like removing Mozart from a music course because some kids don't get it.

    Good god, is that where the conversation has gone??
    Yeah, Shakespeare is tough for kids. That why it needs to stay in the curriculum. If it's tough, then the kids need to work really hard to understand it, and with ALL the resources available to help people comprehend it, that isn't too much to ask. Sounds ideal actually. Maybe there should be MORE Shakespeare, not less.
    TKAM is a classic. A different kind of classic than Shakespeare, but still quite worthy of reading.

    Yes, PJ Soul, more Shakespeare. I was lucky to have great English teachers who told us Shakespeare was meant to be spoken, not read. If any of you haven't read The Tempest, take a look. So beautiful. But I had to be a grown-up to really appreciate it.

    "Be not afeard; the isle is full of noises,
    Sounds, and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not..."
  • rgambs
    rgambs Posts: 13,576
    The Tempest doesn't have enough plot for many people, that's why Macbeth goes over well.
    Monkey Driven, Call this Living?
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,665
    edited February 2016

    I was a top student in English. Shakespeare I just didn't get. what the hell he was trying to say. I honestly think his works probably belong in a higher learning atmosphere, like University. Most kids my age didn't get it either.

    TKAM is essential reading.

    Sounds like you must have had shitty teachers or something? Or just didn't excel in poetry perhaps? Shakespeare definitely isn't incomprehensible to a lot of high school students - I know I got it, and loved it. I had some English teachers that were great though (I also got my degree in English Lit, so it was obviously particularly up my alley; I had a really focused interest in English Lit in high school). Perhaps it should only be offered in honours classes though.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • HughFreakingDillon
    HughFreakingDillon Winnipeg Posts: 39,473
    shitty teacher? um, no. not in the least. and again, i was in honours english. poetry isn't for everyone. especially shakespeare poetry. the language can be difficult to understand, never mind interpret. just because it's easy for you, doesn't mean it is for everyone.

    I excelled in math. just because others didn't, doesn't mean I assume they have shitty teachers or that they suck in math.
    By The Time They Figure Out What Went Wrong, We'll Be Sitting On A Beach, Earning Twenty Percent.




  • Who Princess
    Who Princess out here in the fields Posts: 7,305
    Shakespeare wrote for the stage. His works are best seen performed. If not that, listen to recorded performances. If not that, assign parts and read aloud in class. Which was what my ninth grade English teacher did with The Merchant of Venice. I can remember our class enjoying it hugely, especially since our teacher took the role of Shylock. It was an honors class but he used the same approach with his other classes.

    There's depth to Shakespeare that's definitely better appreciated by more mature students but I don't think he's beyond high schoolers. Again, it's the approach. Hearing the language, with tone and inflection, makes it much easier to comprehend.
    "The stars are all connected to the brain."
  • Enkidu
    Enkidu So Cal Posts: 2,996
    My daughter went to a small, very non-groovy (really) private school in LA. When her class did Romeo and Juliet in 7th grade, the father of one of the students came in with a friend and they did the sword-fighting scene b't Romeo and Tybalt. Gary Oldman was the father and my daughter still doesn't know who played the friend. Needless to say, she came home and announced that she loved Romeo and Juliet. The next year they read Macbeth and GO came in again and did several Macbeth monologues. That was a pretty cool way to introduce kids to Shakespeare.

    A book I remember that blew me away in high school was The Autobiography of Malcolm X. It stuck with me for a long, long time.
  • Who Princess
    Who Princess out here in the fields Posts: 7,305
    Gary Oldman sounds like a pretty cool dad.
    "The stars are all connected to the brain."
  • PJ_Soul
    PJ_Soul Vancouver, BC Posts: 50,665
    edited February 2016

    shitty teacher? um, no. not in the least. and again, i was in honours english. poetry isn't for everyone. especially shakespeare poetry. the language can be difficult to understand, never mind interpret. just because it's easy for you, doesn't mean it is for everyone.

    I excelled in math. just because others didn't, doesn't mean I assume they have shitty teachers or that they suck in math.

    I did not suggest that it should be easy for everyone, and in fact suggested that perhaps poetry was more difficult for you. I was just asking a question, so not sure why you seemed to have reacted to e defensively. Some teachers are actually shitty. And for the record, I absolutely fucking suck at math. I barely passed grade 11 math (in fact I didn't - my teacher just was nice and knew I tried hard). That doesn't mean I think the material was inappropriate.
    Post edited by PJ_Soul on
    With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world. Be careful. Strive to be happy. ~ Desiderata
  • brianlux
    brianlux Moving through All Kinds of Terrain. Posts: 43,662

    Shakespeare wrote for the stage. His works are best seen performed. If not that, listen to recorded performances. If not that, assign parts and read aloud in class. Which was what my ninth grade English teacher did with The Merchant of Venice. I can remember our class enjoying it hugely, especially since our teacher took the role of Shylock. It was an honors class but he used the same approach with his other classes.

    There's depth to Shakespeare that's definitely better appreciated by more mature students but I don't think he's beyond high schoolers. Again, it's the approach. Hearing the language, with tone and inflection, makes it much easier to comprehend.

    Good point. I find plays in general a bit more of a challenge to read. I've read a bunch of them but it always takes kind of getting in a play-reading mind set. Even more of a challenge for me for some reason are movie scripts. Which shoots my chances at an acting career.

    Speaking of plays, has anyone ever seen a good stage performance of TKAMB? I haven't but would.

    "It's a sad and beautiful world"
    -Roberto Benigni