Boston Marathon - explosion

1…959698100101…113

Comments

  • Jason P
    Jason P Posts: 19,305
    Ibragim Todashev, the man shot and killed during an interview with FBI agents late Tuesday, reportedly confessed to being involved in a 2011 triple murder that the Boston Marathon bombing suspects have been linked to, investigators told NBC News.

    Todashev, 27, allegedly attacked an FBI agent with a knife right before he was about to sign a written statement based on his confession. The agent shot and killed Todashev during the confrontation.

    ....

    Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/ibragim- ... z2U2Ycze00
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • Jason P
    Jason P Posts: 19,305
    I always wondered how one person, even two could slash three people without getting some flak. They must have gotten behind the three guys and acted at the same time.
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • hedonist
    hedonist Posts: 24,524
    They don't search people during the confession process?
  • Jason P
    Jason P Posts: 19,305
    The Boston Bomber is up and walking.

    So. I have an idea. This book of rules he was following. Eye for an eye. He should be forced to make a decision. On TV.

    I'm sure he can justify blowing up 8 year olds based on the rules. Now let's see if he is OK with getting his legs sawed off based on the rules. These are God's rules afterall.

    I'm guessing he has a change of heart. God's rules are not as important when they affect you.

    Let the world see what B.S. it is. And what true cowards they are.
    Be Excellent To Each Other
    Party On, Dudes!
  • rearviewross
    rearviewross Posts: 3,055
    Bronx Bombers wrote:
    chadwick wrote:
    makes perfect sense to me that more are involved with the two brother bombing clowns. i'd bet dimes to donuts there's a whole fucking group of these assholes floating around just waiting for the right moment

    The dead assholes wife has lawyered up pretty heavily, it would be surprising if she wasn't at least aware of their plans if not involved directly.

    http://newyork.newsday.com/news/nation/ ... -1.5229719

    Of course she was aware. They made the bombs in her house. There is no way she didnt know. Even if she was locked out of the bomb making room, she knew something bad was going on.
    Forced to endure, what I cannot forgive.
  • chadwick
    chadwick up my ass Posts: 21,157
    Jason P wrote:
    The Boston Bomber is up and walking.

    So. I have an idea. This book of rules he was following. Eye for an eye. He should be forced to make a decision. On TV.

    I'm sure he can justify blowing up 8 year olds based on the rules. Now let's see if he is OK with getting his legs sawed off based on the rules. These are God's rules afterall.

    I'm guessing he has a change of heart. God's rules are not as important when they affect you.

    Let the world see what B.S. it is. And what true cowards they are.
    nicely thought out.
    for poetry through the ceiling. ISBN: 1 4241 8840 7

    "Hear me, my chiefs!
    I am tired; my heart is
    sick and sad. From where
    the sun stands I will fight
    no more forever."
    Chief Joseph - Nez Perce
  • Bronx Bombers
    Bronx Bombers Posts: 2,208
    rearviewross wrote:
    Bronx Bombers wrote:
    chadwick wrote:
    makes perfect sense to me that more are involved with the two brother bombing clowns. i'd bet dimes to donuts there's a whole fucking group of these assholes floating around just waiting for the right moment

    The dead assholes wife has lawyered up pretty heavily, it would be surprising if she wasn't at least aware of their plans if not involved directly.

    http://newyork.newsday.com/news/nation/ ... -1.5229719

    Of course she was aware. They made the bombs in her house. There is no way she didnt know. Even if she was locked out of the bomb making room, she knew something bad was going on.

    No doubt in the meantime they should at least charge this pig with welfare fraud while they build up a case against her.
  • Moonpig
    Moonpig Posts: 659
    Bronx Bombers wrote:
    No doubt in the meantime they should at least charge this pig with welfare fraud while they build up a case against her.

    innocent until proven guilty?? or that only apply when you say so?
  • Bronx Bombers
    Bronx Bombers Posts: 2,208
    Moonpig wrote:
    Bronx Bombers wrote:
    No doubt in the meantime they should at least charge this pig with welfare fraud while they build up a case against her.

    innocent until proven guilty?? or that only apply when you say so?

    The skanks lawyer said she was working 70-80 hours a week as a home healthcare aide so even at minimum wage that would put her well above the income limits for her household required for eligibility. That doesn't count any money they received from either of their parents which would be added to the totals.
  • Moonpig
    Moonpig Posts: 659
    Bronx Bombers wrote:

    The skanks lawyer said she was working 70-80 hours a week as a home healthcare aide so even at minimum wage that would put her well above the income limits for her household required for eligibility. That doesn't count any money they received from either of their parents which would be added to the totals.

    I guess you've made your mind up then, burn the bitch at the stake.
  • Bronx Bombers
    Bronx Bombers Posts: 2,208
    Moonpig wrote:
    Bronx Bombers wrote:

    The skanks lawyer said she was working 70-80 hours a week as a home healthcare aide so even at minimum wage that would put her well above the income limits for her household required for eligibility. That doesn't count any money they received from either of their parents which would be added to the totals.

    I guess you've made your mind up then, burn the bitch at the stake.

    If you understand basic math and read about welfare limits it doesn't take much to come to the obvious conclusion that she cheated the system. This is the least of her problems though, even if she had nothing to do with the actual attacks which is highly unlikely that phone call she got from her husband after the attack and after he was named a suspect will come back to bite her in the ass . :D
  • Moonpig
    Moonpig Posts: 659
    Bronx Bombers wrote:
    Moonpig wrote:
    Bronx Bombers wrote:

    The skanks lawyer said she was working 70-80 hours a week as a home healthcare aide so even at minimum wage that would put her well above the income limits for her household required for eligibility. That doesn't count any money they received from either of their parents which would be added to the totals.

    I guess you've made your mind up then, burn the bitch at the stake.

    If you understand basic math and read about welfare limits it doesn't take much to come to the obvious conclusion that she cheated the system. This is the least of her problems though, even if she had nothing to do with the actual attacks which is highly unlikely that phone call she got from her husband after the attack and after he was named a suspect will come back to bite her in the ass . :D

    I understand basic math, my point was not that. I am making reference to the vitriol you are typing about someone and something you neither know nothing about and have yet to receive full facts on.

    I'm not saying she's innocent at all, I'm simply referring to that god given notion that Americans preach tithe rest of the world about a fair justice system where the onus is on the accuser to prove guilt. (I guess that rule only applies sometimes though)
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,598
    Moonpig wrote:

    I'm not saying she's innocent at all, I'm simply referring to that god given notion that Americans preach tithe rest of the world about a fair justice system where the onus is on the accuser to prove guilt. (I guess that rule only applies sometimes though)

    I hear what you are saying but comments on a message board have nothing to do with the concept of innocent until proven guilty. She could be guilty as sin beyond all reasonable doubt and she still would be entitled to a fair trial by a jury of her peers. And if she is charged, she will receive one. I wouldn't use some of the language that has been tossed around here but if there is evidence that she was involved in this I would like to see her charged. I don't think that equates with calling for her to be burned at the stake.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • Moonpig
    Moonpig Posts: 659
    JimmyV wrote:
    Moonpig wrote:

    I'm not saying she's innocent at all, I'm simply referring to that god given notion that Americans preach tithe rest of the world about a fair justice system where the onus is on the accuser to prove guilt. (I guess that rule only applies sometimes though)

    I hear what you are saying but comments on a message board have nothing to do with the concept of innocent until proven guilty. She could be guilty as sin beyond all reasonable doubt and she still would be entitled to a fair trial by a jury of her peers. And if she is charged, she will receive one. I wouldn't use some of the language that has been tossed around here but if there is evidence that she was involved in this I would like to see her charged. I don't think that equates with calling for her to be burned at the stake.

    If she's guilty, throw the book at her, absolutely. My point is that some on here seem to be using this story as an outlet to their clear distaste for a certain religion.
  • Bronx Bombers
    Bronx Bombers Posts: 2,208
    She made a phone call where she warned her husband he was being watched when they appeared on tv as suspects. If she would've contacted authorities maybe they would've caught them before they murdered the cop. :fp:
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,598
    Moonpig wrote:
    JimmyV wrote:
    Moonpig wrote:

    I'm not saying she's innocent at all, I'm simply referring to that god given notion that Americans preach tithe rest of the world about a fair justice system where the onus is on the accuser to prove guilt. (I guess that rule only applies sometimes though)

    I hear what you are saying but comments on a message board have nothing to do with the concept of innocent until proven guilty. She could be guilty as sin beyond all reasonable doubt and she still would be entitled to a fair trial by a jury of her peers. And if she is charged, she will receive one. I wouldn't use some of the language that has been tossed around here but if there is evidence that she was involved in this I would like to see her charged. I don't think that equates with calling for her to be burned at the stake.

    If she's guilty, throw the book at her, absolutely. My point is that some on here seem to be using this story as an outlet to their clear distaste for a certain religion.

    And I'm not saying you are wrong, some may be. For what it's worth, I do think that Katherine Russell, a white American girl from North Kingstown, Rhode Island, is not the spitting image these people you are referring to picture when thinking about this certain religion.

    kathrine-russel-dulu-e1366973337429.jpg

    Maybe it will be revealed that she is just someone who married poorly and that she had nothing to do with this at all. But the phone call to the husband is troubling, as is the lawyer she hired who has represented several high profile terrorism suspects. We'll see.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • dimitrispearljam
    dimitrispearljam Posts: 139,725
    im very curious how this will end up about the woman
    "...Dimitri...He talks to me...'.."The Ghost of Greece..".
    "..That's One Happy Fuckin Ghost.."
    “..That came up on the Pillow Case...This is for the Greek, With Our Apologies.....”
  • Moonpig
    Moonpig Posts: 659
    JimmyV wrote:


    And I'm not saying you are wrong, some may be. For what it's worth, I do think that Katherine Russell, a white American girl from North Kingstown, Rhode Island, is not the spitting image these people you are referring to picture when thinking about this certain religion.

    kathrine-russel-dulu-e1366973337429.jpg

    Maybe it will be revealed that she is just someone who married poorly and that she had nothing to do with this at all. But the phone call to the husband is troubling, as is the lawyer she hired who has represented several high profile terrorism suspects. We'll see.

    I get what you are saying, but to be fair, people on these boards have expressed on more than one occasion that they are against all of the muslim faith. Picking and choosing would somehow assume they are applying a certain logic to their stupidity.

    For what it's worth, if my face came up on the tv accompanied by a voice over saying authorities wanted to speak to me, I'm pretty sure my fiancee would call me too.

    Just saying
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,598
    I have walked by this memorial every morning since Copley Square reopened. It was a beautiful collection of tributes that mourners originally began leaving at the corner or Berkeley and Boylston Streets, the closest you could get to the bomb sites in the first few days after the attacks. When Copley reopened, city officials relocated the memorial and it grew. And grew.

    I am glad these tributes will be maintained in the city archives...but the time had come for this temporary memorial to come down. A permanent memorial should and will no doubt be erected in its place.

    http://www.boston.com/metrodesk/2013/06 ... story.html

    In the half-light of dawn, with runners and relatives of the victims watching, they snapped on rubber gloves, unfurled rolls of plastic bags, and began by untying the knots of all the tangled shoelaces.

    At the city’s behest, about a dozen people gathered at Copley Square and meticulously picked through the makeshift memorial of the Marathon bombings, preserving for posterity the hundreds of sodden shoes hanging from metal barriers, the weathered banners, the shirts, hats, and many other symbols of compassion left there over the past two months.

    Sarah Norcott, who was on Boylston Street on Marathon Day, and her friend Gina Gallagher, a runner who was stopped less than a mile from the finish line, jogged over to witness the dismantling of a place that has drawn thousands of people to seek solace and offer prayers since the attacks, which killed three people and wounded more than 260.

    “I wanted to pay my last respects,” said Norcott, 32, of South Boston, who was drinking a cocktail at Max Brenner when the bombs exploded on the sidewalk outside the restaurant.

    She and Gallagher teared up as the volunteers worked quickly before the morning commute. “It’s really hard to watch them doing this,” said Gallagher, 32, of Quincy, who was stopped near Massachusetts Avenue with thousands of other runners during the Marathon.

    City officials last week said the time had come to remove the temporary memorial, which has grown every day over the past two months with everything from stuffed animals to paper cranes. The material from the memorial will eventually be placed in the city archives.

    In a letter he sent to survivors and victims’ families, Mayor Thomas M. Menino wrote, “It is my hope that the respectful closing of the temporary memorial will help us all look to the future.”

    The somber work began shortly before 6 a.m. when officials from the mayor’s office, the city archives, and volunteers from the New England Museum Association and workers from Polygon, a Georgetown company that helps preserve artifacts, began collecting anything of potential value.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."
  • JimmyV
    JimmyV Boston's MetroWest Posts: 19,598
    From Boston.com:

    BREAKING NEWS: State and federal indictments to be announced against alleged Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar A. Tsarnaev.
    ___________________________________________

    "...I changed by not changing at all..."

Categories