REBELLIOUS TRUTHS non partisan "cutting edge" ideology
Comments
-
saw the videos which were interesting. however i asked myself where did their numbers come from? there didn't seem to be any hard data.
I think it would be better if they showed where they got their numbers from.0 -
Hugh Freaking Dillon wrote:fear4freedom wrote:I believe that Mitt Romney would have ran this country off a cliff at 50 mph! !
so WHY did you start about 76 threads preaching your undying love and support for him? if you believed that, shouldn't you have voted Gary Johnson?
Cmon HUGHEY! You know why! Because in the next line it says I believe Obama will drive this country off a cliff at 100 mph! Thats whY! Context matters!Theres no time like the present
A man that stands for nothing....will fall for anything!
All people need to do more on every level!0 -
Please define "drive this country off a cliff at 100 miles per hour." It might help us all understand what you think might happen in the next 4 years. Also, please explain how it would have been different if Willard Mitt Romney, "drove it off a cliff at 50 miles per hour." Enquiring minds want to know.
Peace.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Halifax2TheMax wrote:Please define "drive this country off a cliff at 100 miles per hour." It might help us all understand what you think might happen in the next 4 years. Also, please explain how it would have been different if Willard Mitt Romney, "drove it off a cliff at 50 miles per hour." Enquiring minds want to know.
Peace.
Its an expression, in terms of I dont believe either candidate will stop the spending, which is our number one biggest problem! Mitt will spend half of Obama and be considered a meany for it! Anytime we cut spending for anything, the left paints the right as being "anti". There is no way out now.....the left will use this method with our youth from here on out and probably sound better to the youth! Its easy to print money, raise revenues and direct that money to areas of interests and lobbyists to basically purchase their support for future elections and future voting blocks! Its never fun to go to Vegas with a conservative, but if we wish to save our country, we need to cut spending big time! Bottom line!Theres no time like the present
A man that stands for nothing....will fall for anything!
All people need to do more on every level!0 -
fear4freedom wrote:Prince Of Dorkness wrote:it's going to be for ALL of your threads.
You are the type arent you? I know you all too well there bud! You are a sabatoger! Well, you will expose yourself for sure....for the world to see! Good luck bud
i believe the word youre looking for is saboteur.
hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say0 -
fear4freedom wrote:Halifax2TheMax wrote:Please define "drive this country off a cliff at 100 miles per hour." It might help us all understand what you think might happen in the next 4 years. Also, please explain how it would have been different if Willard Mitt Romney, "drove it off a cliff at 50 miles per hour." Enquiring minds want to know.
Peace.
Its an expression, in terms of I dont believe either candidate will stop the spending, which is our number one biggest problem! Mitt will spend half of Obama and be considered a meany for it! Anytime we cut spending for anything, the left paints the right as being "anti". There is no way out now.....the left will use this method with our youth from here on out and probably sound better to the youth! Its easy to print money, raise revenues and direct that money to areas of interests and lobbyists to basically purchase their support for future elections and future voting blocks! Its never fun to go to Vegas with a conservative, but if we wish to save our country, we need to cut spending big time! Bottom line!
So, do you mean stop the spending as in completely stop the spending? Like no more? Or should the government freeze spending at current levels or should they cut the deficit? Or should spending go back to 1980 levels? You do realize that Obama is proposing $4.1 trillion in cuts and revenue increases over the next 10 years right? Is that enough? Should it be $8 trillion? $16 trillion? And you realize that non-defense discretionary spending, exclusive of social security and medicare, is about 14% or 15% of the budget right? Would you welcome a 10% decrease in the defense budget? Why or why not? So, where does the money to pay for the $16 trillion national debt come from? I would like to hear your proposed solutions. How much is "big time?" What is the "bottom line?"
Peace.09/15/1998 & 09/16/1998, Mansfield, MA; 08/29/00 08/30/00, Mansfield, MA; 07/02/03, 07/03/03, Mansfield, MA; 09/28/04, 09/29/04, Boston, MA; 09/22/05, Halifax, NS; 05/24/06, 05/25/06, Boston, MA; 07/22/06, 07/23/06, Gorge, WA; 06/27/2008, Hartford; 06/28/08, 06/30/08, Mansfield; 08/18/2009, O2, London, UK; 10/30/09, 10/31/09, Philadelphia, PA; 05/15/10, Hartford, CT; 05/17/10, Boston, MA; 05/20/10, 05/21/10, NY, NY; 06/22/10, Dublin, IRE; 06/23/10, Northern Ireland; 09/03/11, 09/04/11, Alpine Valley, WI; 09/11/11, 09/12/11, Toronto, Ont; 09/14/11, Ottawa, Ont; 09/15/11, Hamilton, Ont; 07/02/2012, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/04/2012 & 07/05/2012, Berlin, Germany; 07/07/2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 09/30/2012, Missoula, MT; 07/16/2013, London, Ont; 07/19/2013, Chicago, IL; 10/15/2013 & 10/16/2013, Worcester, MA; 10/21/2013 & 10/22/2013, Philadelphia, PA; 10/25/2013, Hartford, CT; 11/29/2013, Portland, OR; 11/30/2013, Spokane, WA; 12/04/2013, Vancouver, BC; 12/06/2013, Seattle, WA; 10/03/2014, St. Louis. MO; 10/22/2014, Denver, CO; 10/26/2015, New York, NY; 04/23/2016, New Orleans, LA; 04/28/2016 & 04/29/2016, Philadelphia, PA; 05/01/2016 & 05/02/2016, New York, NY; 05/08/2016, Ottawa, Ont.; 05/10/2016 & 05/12/2016, Toronto, Ont.; 08/05/2016 & 08/07/2016, Boston, MA; 08/20/2016 & 08/22/2016, Chicago, IL; 07/01/2018, Prague, Czech Republic; 07/03/2018, Krakow, Poland; 07/05/2018, Berlin, Germany; 09/02/2018 & 09/04/2018, Boston, MA; 09/08/2022, Toronto, Ont; 09/11/2022, New York, NY; 09/14/2022, Camden, NJ; 09/02/2023, St. Paul, MN; 05/04/2024 & 05/06/2024, Vancouver, BC; 05/10/2024, Portland, OR;
Libtardaplorable©. And proud of it.
Brilliantati©0 -
Halifax2TheMax wrote:fear4freedom wrote:Halifax2TheMax wrote:Please define "drive this country off a cliff at 100 miles per hour." It might help us all understand what you think might happen in the next 4 years. Also, please explain how it would have been different if Willard Mitt Romney, "drove it off a cliff at 50 miles per hour." Enquiring minds want to know.
Peace.
Its an expression, in terms of I dont believe either candidate will stop the spending, which is our number one biggest problem! Mitt will spend half of Obama and be considered a meany for it! Anytime we cut spending for anything, the left paints the right as being "anti". There is no way out now.....the left will use this method with our youth from here on out and probably sound better to the youth! Its easy to print money, raise revenues and direct that money to areas of interests and lobbyists to basically purchase their support for future elections and future voting blocks! Its never fun to go to Vegas with a conservative, but if we wish to save our country, we need to cut spending big time! Bottom line!
So, do you mean stop the spending as in completely stop the spending? Like no more? Or should the government freeze spending at current levels or should they cut the deficit? Or should spending go back to 1980 levels? You do realize that Obama is proposing $4.1 trillion in cuts and revenue increases over the next 10 years right? Is that enough? Should it be $8 trillion? $16 trillion? And you realize that non-defense discretionary spending, exclusive of social security and medicare, is about 14% or 15% of the budget right? Would you welcome a 10% decrease in the defense budget? Why or why not? So, where does the money to pay for the $16 trillion national debt come from? I would like to hear your proposed solutions. How much is "big time?" What is the "bottom line?"
Peace.
I believe bold action would be to balance the annual budget within a few to five years! I also believe in cutting all areas totalling about 8 trillion over the next 10 years. I also believe that keeping the taxes low for businesses would increase jobs and incentives and therefore raise revenues. There is alot of waste that can be cut....this is where whoever is doing the cutting proposals will be called out by the left as being "anti"
I would pursue waste and fraud at a much better rate than a current admin. who is beholden to all of it! Obama owes many groups, lobbyists, unions, etc. for both of his elections and some of them even say he does! I would limit the federal govt. and enhance the private sector. I would cut Fema by $1 less than Obamas Sequestration just to say that Obama was going to cut it more than me! LOL
A created job is not just a position paid for by taking money from one area and putting it in another, a true job created is creating an atmosphere of want, need and desire to hire the position! That is a true job that needs to be created.....thats what we need, positions that are created from nothing! Wealth that is created from nothing by using our unique opportunities and combining them with our great people and their money.Theres no time like the present
A man that stands for nothing....will fall for anything!
All people need to do more on every level!0 -
i read the US economy grew 2.2% over the previous 12 months to august 2012. is that acceptable?hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say0 -
catefrances wrote:i read the US economy grew 2.2% over the previous 12 months to august 2012. is that acceptable?
NO!Theres no time like the present
A man that stands for nothing....will fall for anything!
All people need to do more on every level!0 -
fear4freedom wrote:catefrances wrote:i read the US economy grew 2.2% over the previous 12 months to august 2012. is that acceptable?
NO!
our economy grew by 3.8% during the same time. what percentage would be acceptable and how do you think growth can be stimulated? or is it okay for it to be seen to be growing with no particular 'acceptable' minimum percentage climb in mind?hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say0 -
catefrances wrote:fear4freedom wrote:catefrances wrote:i read the US economy grew 2.2% over the previous 12 months to august 2012. is that acceptable?
NO!
our economy grew by 3.8% during the same time. what percentage would be acceptable and how do you think growth can be stimulated? or is it okay for it to be seen to be growing with no particular 'acceptable' minimum percentage climb in mind?
5-8% is ideal! If we spend 6 trillion, we better get better results!Theres no time like the present
A man that stands for nothing....will fall for anything!
All people need to do more on every level!0 -
fear4freedom wrote:catefrances wrote:our economy grew by 3.8% during the same time. what percentage would be acceptable and how do you think growth can be stimulated? or is it okay for it to be seen to be growing with no particular 'acceptable' minimum percentage climb in mind?
5-8% is ideal! If we spend 6 trillion, we better get better results!
where you gonna get 6 trillion dollars from?hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say0 -
catefrances wrote:fear4freedom wrote:catefrances wrote:our economy grew by 3.8% during the same time. what percentage would be acceptable and how do you think growth can be stimulated? or is it okay for it to be seen to be growing with no particular 'acceptable' minimum percentage climb in mind?
5-8% is ideal! If we spend 6 trillion, we better get better results!
where you gonna get 6 trillion dollars from?
what are you talking about? Obama already spent way more than 6 trillion, im talking about the rise in our deficit to 16.3 trillion with little results!Theres no time like the present
A man that stands for nothing....will fall for anything!
All people need to do more on every level!0 -
fear4freedom wrote:
I believe bold action would be to balance the annual budget within a few to five years! I also believe in cutting all areas totalling about 8 trillion over the next 10 years. I also believe that keeping the taxes low for businesses would increase jobs and incentives and therefore raise revenues. There is alot of waste that can be cut....this is where whoever is doing the cutting proposals will be called out by the left as being "anti"
I would pursue waste and fraud at a much better rate than a current admin. who is beholden to all of it! Obama owes many groups, lobbyists, unions, etc. for both of his elections and some of them even say he does! I would limit the federal govt. and enhance the private sector. I would cut Fema by $1 less than Obamas Sequestration just to say that Obama was going to cut it more than me! LOL
A created job is not just a position paid for by taking money from one area and putting it in another, a true job created is creating an atmosphere of want, need and desire to hire the position! That is a true job that needs to be created.....thats what we need, positions that are created from nothing! Wealth that is created from nothing by using our unique opportunities and combining them with our great people and their money.
would "all areas" include the military?Gimli 1993
Fargo 2003
Winnipeg 2005
Winnipeg 2011
St. Paul 20140 -
fear4freedom wrote:catefrances wrote:fear4freedom wrote:
5-8% is ideal! If we spend 6 trillion, we better get better results!
where you gonna get 6 trillion dollars from?
what are you talking about? Obama already spent way more than 6 trillion, im talking about the rise in our deficit to 16.3 trillion with little results!
aah ok i misunderstood. i read your post as if we spend 6 trillion(in the future) not as weve already done so so there better be better results than whats currently being got.hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help