Mitt wins NH

Godfather.
Godfather. Posts: 12,504
edited January 2012 in A Moving Train
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/20 ... win-means/

well at this point anybody but Obama pleeeaaasse !
think I may vote for Santorum at this point, I like Paul but I feel like his votes will only add to the Obama wagon if he does not win.....aughhhhhhhh !!!

Godfather.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13

Comments

  • Nevermind90
    Nevermind90 Posts: 722
    I think its sick people tactical voting...

    vote for what you believe in damn it!
    ~ Enjoy The Struggle
  • Godfather.
    Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    Nevermind90 wrote:
    I think its sick people tactical voting...

    vote for what you believe in damn it!

    sick people tactical ? please explain.

    Godfather.
  • Nevermind90
    Nevermind90 Posts: 722
    voting tactical and not voting for what you believe in what is there to explain?
    ~ Enjoy The Struggle
  • CH156378
    CH156378 Posts: 1,539
    looks like

    Barry VS. Willard 2012!
  • Godfather.
    Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    Nevermind90 wrote:
    voting tactical and not voting for what you believe in what is there to explain?

    well then I'll vote for myself...you may vote for me also on the write in. ;)


    Godfather.
  • JonnyPistachio
    JonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,218
    Godfather. wrote:
    think I may vote for Santorum at this point,

    Why exactly?
    Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
  • polaris_x
    polaris_x Posts: 13,559
    Godfather. wrote:
    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/what-mitts-win-means/

    well at this point anybody but Obama pleeeaaasse !
    think I may vote for Santorum at this point, I like Paul but I feel like his votes will only add to the Obama wagon if he does not win.....aughhhhhhhh !!!

    Godfather.

    ron paul would crush obama in a federal election ... you can pretty much guarantee every republican would vote for him plus now all the dems that a) are dissatisfied with obama and b) are opposed to US foreign policy
  • pandora
    pandora Posts: 21,855
    Watched his speech ...
    so many promises, it made it too fake for me, not trusting this guy

    none of the family could look the camera in the eye ...
    gave me a funny feeling and not in a good way

    I was thinking about SNL too and Mitt's facial expressions,
    he's gonna be an easy, annoying one to do

    there was a PJ fan in the crowd I think though ;)
    sounded just like me hootin' and hollerin' at a concert

    oh and a wasted vote ... Ron Paul? How about him be a running mate that might be a smart
    move for the party... yes no? maybe so?
  • polaris_x
    polaris_x Posts: 13,559
    pandora wrote:
    oh and a wasted vote ... Ron Paul? How about him be a running mate that might be a smart
    move for the party... yes no? maybe so?

    not a chance ... paul is the anti-establishment vote ... the republicans don't want him anywhere near the white house ...
  • JonnyPistachio
    JonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,218
    polaris_x wrote:
    Godfather. wrote:
    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/what-mitts-win-means/

    well at this point anybody but Obama pleeeaaasse !
    think I may vote for Santorum at this point, I like Paul but I feel like his votes will only add to the Obama wagon if he does not win.....aughhhhhhhh !!!

    Godfather.

    ron paul would crush obama in a federal election ... you can pretty much guarantee every republican would vote for him plus now all the dems that a) are dissatisfied with obama and b) are opposed to US foreign policy

    That's exactly why I was thinking Ron Paul might be the only one with a really good chance.
    Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
  • Jeanwah
    Jeanwah Posts: 6,361
    polaris_x wrote:
    Godfather. wrote:
    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/what-mitts-win-means/

    well at this point anybody but Obama pleeeaaasse !
    think I may vote for Santorum at this point, I like Paul but I feel like his votes will only add to the Obama wagon if he does not win.....aughhhhhhhh !!!

    Godfather.

    ron paul would crush obama in a federal election ... you can pretty much guarantee every republican would vote for him plus now all the dems that a) are dissatisfied with obama and b) are opposed to US foreign policy

    I don't think Paul would crush Obama. Remember that only the older population are shoe-ins for actually voting, with exception of the last presidential vote. Not enough young people are on board with him, let alone the idea of supporting a "Republican"...
  • Godfather.
    Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    JonnyPistachio wrote:
    Godfather. wrote:
    think I may vote for Santorum at this point,

    Why exactly?
    well I'm still learning but I was reading about a Canadian oil line into the US that Obama blocked and honestly I think that oil line could play a huge part of getting this country headed back in the right direction
    and Santorum is behind that idea...but still looking into him for more info.

    Godfather.
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 25,077
    let's not forget about all of the seniors on medicare and social security who would be cutting their own throats if they voted for paul. and it is seniors who always vote...
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • JonnyPistachio
    JonnyPistachio Florida Posts: 10,218
    Godfather. wrote:
    JonnyPistachio wrote:
    Godfather. wrote:
    think I may vote for Santorum at this point,

    Why exactly?
    well I'm still learning but I was reading about a Canadian oil line into the US that Obama blocked and honestly I think that oil line could play a huge part of getting this country headed back in the right direction
    and Santorum is behind that idea...but still looking into him for more info.

    Godfather.

    Ah, I hadnt heard of that. Interesting. I'll have to look into that.
    I have only heard potential extremist religious social policies, and that he seems to like the idea of war with Iran. :shock:
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    let's not forget about all of the seniors on medicare and social security who would be cutting their own throats if they voted for paul. and it is seniors who always vote...
    True.
    Pick up my debut novel here on amazon: Jonny Bails Floatin (in paperback) (also available on Kindle for $2.99)
  • mikepegg44
    mikepegg44 Posts: 3,353
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    let's not forget about all of the seniors on medicare and social security who would be cutting their own throats if they voted for paul. and it is seniors who always vote...



    :lol::D:) :roll: :( :shock: :evil:

    you have got to be kidding me

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qojv1bR ... r_embedded

    start listening at about 245

    transition =/= the "cutting of ones throat"
    that’s right! Can’t we all just get together and focus on our real enemies: monogamous gays and stem cells… - Ned Flanders
    It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
    - Joe Rogan
  • mikepegg44
    mikepegg44 Posts: 3,353
    pandora wrote:
    Watched his speech ...
    so many promises, it made it too fake for me, not trusting this guy

    none of the family could look the camera in the eye ...
    gave me a funny feeling and not in a good way

    I was thinking about SNL too and Mitt's facial expressions,
    he's gonna be an easy, annoying one to do

    there was a PJ fan in the crowd I think though ;)
    sounded just like me hootin' and hollerin' at a concert

    oh and a wasted vote ... Ron Paul? How about him be a running mate that might be a smart
    move for the party... yes no? maybe so?


    the only wasted vote is the one that votes against someone else.
    that’s right! Can’t we all just get together and focus on our real enemies: monogamous gays and stem cells… - Ned Flanders
    It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
    - Joe Rogan
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    polaris_x wrote:
    Godfather. wrote:
    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/what-mitts-win-means/

    well at this point anybody but Obama pleeeaaasse !
    think I may vote for Santorum at this point, I like Paul but I feel like his votes will only add to the Obama wagon if he does not win.....aughhhhhhhh !!!

    Godfather.

    ron paul would crush obama in a federal election ... you can pretty much guarantee every republican would vote for him plus now all the dems that a) are dissatisfied with obama and b) are opposed to US foreign policy

    I'm not a betting man, but if I were I would take this bet in a heartbeat. "Ron Paul would crush Obama"...seriously? Ron Paul would have zero chance against the President. Zero. I'm not even sure where the political logic is coming from that would lead one to believe that Ron Paul's policies would go over well in Michigan, Florida, and Pennsylvania. It's beyond absurd.
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 25,077
    mikepegg44 wrote:
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    let's not forget about all of the seniors on medicare and social security who would be cutting their own throats if they voted for paul. and it is seniors who always vote...



    :lol::D:) :roll: :( :shock: :evil:

    you have got to be kidding me

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qojv1bR ... r_embedded

    start listening at about 245

    transition =/= the "cutting of ones throat"
    i can't watch the video at work...

    BUT

    if the man supports the paul ryan budget, he supports gutting medicare, medicaid, and social security. especially for future generations, thus cutting their throat financially and insurance-wise...how can people on those programs now support themselves if they have no savings and are too old to go out and find a way to make some income? what if people can not make enough money to have enough savings to live on, especailly as people are living much longer now?

    the libertarian ideals look good on paper, but would be a tragedy if ever implemented.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • mikepegg44
    mikepegg44 Posts: 3,353
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    mikepegg44 wrote:
    gimmesometruth27 wrote:
    let's not forget about all of the seniors on medicare and social security who would be cutting their own throats if they voted for paul. and it is seniors who always vote...



    :lol::D:) :roll: :( :shock: :evil:

    you have got to be kidding me

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qojv1bR ... r_embedded

    start listening at about 245

    transition =/= the "cutting of ones throat"
    i can't watch the video at work...

    BUT

    if the man supports the paul ryan budget, he supports gutting medicare, medicaid, and social security. especially for future generations, thus cutting their throat financially and insurance-wise...how can people on those programs now support themselves if they have no savings and are too old to go out and find a way to make some income? what if people can not make enough money to have enough savings to live on, especailly as people are living much longer now?

    the libertarian ideals look good on paper, but would be a tragedy if ever implemented.

    watch it when you get home it answers your questions

    by the way, Ron Paul voted against the Paul Ryan plan
    that’s right! Can’t we all just get together and focus on our real enemies: monogamous gays and stem cells… - Ned Flanders
    It is terrifying when you are too stupid to know who is dumb
    - Joe Rogan
  • CH156378
    CH156378 Posts: 1,539
    the speech was great last night. alot of redmeat republican talking points. i heard he used a teleprompter for the first time since iowa. :lol: i guess an advisor must have told mitt that being himself wasn't working.

Categories