Pearl jam is better than the beetles and rolling stone.

1246710

Comments

  • AfghanTwilight
    AfghanTwilight Rochester, NY Posts: 869
    Yet Pearl Jam are the ones who've paid tribute to The Beatles myriad times. But they very well are better than whoever the "Beetles" are.

    Pearl Jam are basically generation X's Rolling Stones. Anyway, all the bands you mention are great. Why does it matter who sits atop the discussion?
  • danny
    danny Posts: 2,283
    i agree!
    danny d
  • I grew up in the sixties, listening to the Beatles, the Stones, the Who, the Kinks, the Animals, etc. I loved this music, and I still do. However, no band has ever touched me emotionally the way Pearl Jam do. I am so grateful I discovered them, even if it had to happen so recently. As I have stated before, I may have missed the first 20 years, but I'm happy to be along to see what the next 20 years will bring!!! :D
    "A beacon on dry land"
  • BinFrog
    BinFrog MA Posts: 7,314
    Yes, Pearl Jam is better than:

    The Beetles. I mean, I've never even HEARD of them. Were they part of the Russian Invasion?

    Rolling Stone. Well duh. Of course they are better than that sh*trag of music "journalism".
    Bright eyed kid: "Wow Typo Man, you're the best!"
    Typo Man: "Thanks kidz, but remembir, stay in skool!"
  • Thoughts_Arrive
    Thoughts_Arrive Melbourne, Australia Posts: 15,165
    I grew up in the sixties, listening to the Beatles, the Stones, the Who, the Kinks, the Animals, etc. I loved this music, and I still do. However, no band has ever touched me emotionally the way Pearl Jam do. I am so grateful I discovered them, even if it had to happen so recently. As I have stated before, I may have missed the first 20 years, but I'm happy to be along to see what the next 20 years will bring!!! :D

    Yep, no band comes close to PJ in terms of touching me emotionally.
    Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/2014
  • IgotshitID
    IgotshitID St.john's Newfoundland Posts: 895
    I agree with this, I dont get why the beatles are so huge. I do think the stones are awsome though
    St.John's 9/24/2005
    St.John's 9/25/2005
    Toronto 9/11/2011
    Toronto 9/12/2011
    Quebec City 5/5/2016
    Ottawa 5/8/2016
  • EmBleve
    EmBleve Posts: 3,019
    I haven't read through this thread, but the title makes me :lol: . I don't really know if it's a fair comparison as in better/worse...PJ and the beetles and rolling stone are all righteous. :mrgreen:
  • ComeToTX
    ComeToTX Austin Posts: 8,064
    I'm not a huge Stones fan but The Beatles and PJ are my two favorite bands of all time. Of course I could give two shits about what anybody else thinks about any band I like.
    This show, another show, a show here and a show there.
  • Pearl Jam is definitely my favorite band ever, but the assertion made in this thread's original post is simply absurd.
  • rollings
    rollings unknown Posts: 7,127
    beetles = bugs that look like beetles. CHECK
    rolling stone = magazine that used to be big and newspapery, now is glossy covered. CHECK

    You're RIGHT! Pearl Jam IS better than the beetles and rolling stone! :P
  • I grew up in the sixties, listening to the Beatles, the Stones, the Who, the Kinks, the Animals, etc. I loved this music, and I still do. However, no band has ever touched me emotionally the way Pearl Jam do. I am so grateful I discovered them, even if it had to happen so recently. As I have stated before, I may have missed the first 20 years, but I'm happy to be along to see what the next 20 years will bring!!! :D

    This is so cool to read.

    I think that a lot of people get permanently 'stuck' during a certain era, and never seem to move past it, in terms of really trying new things and giving them a chance. I'm about the same age as the guys in PJ, and have been on this particular train since Ten hit the airwaves...but a lot of my contemporaries are sort of 'stuck' in the late 80's-early 90's. Which is fine, I guess...but personally, I have had a lot of fun with some of the music from the 2000's. Sure...some of it is crap (just like some of it was crap in the late 80's-early 90's - we've just forgotten about that era's crap! :lol: )...but I have also found some really great bands by keeping my ears open, and not closing down to new stuff.

    Sure, PJ and some other bands who were popular in the 80's and 90's still populate 4 of the top 5 spots my 'favorite bands of all time list'...but hey...it was worth listening to all the new stuff, just to discover the 1...and a lot of other bands who I've enjoyed a lot in recent years.

    Good on you for keeping your ears open - sounds like it's paid off just as handsomely for you with the discovery of one awesome band! :)
  • Rollings wrote:
    beetles = bugs that look like beetles. CHECK
    rolling stone = magazine that used to be big and newspapery, now is glossy covered. CHECK

    You're RIGHT! Pearl Jam IS better than the beetles and rolling stone! :P

    :lol:

    Well, if you put it that way....yeah! :thumbup:

    Been so long since I thought Rolling Stone relevant that I didn't even know they'd changed their format. But then, all the 'gloss' (in more ways than one) is probably why they are no longer relevant.
  • erocshifty
    erocshifty Posts: 1,170
    PKTrekGirl wrote:
    I grew up in the sixties, listening to the Beatles, the Stones, the Who, the Kinks, the Animals, etc. I loved this music, and I still do. However, no band has ever touched me emotionally the way Pearl Jam do. I am so grateful I discovered them, even if it had to happen so recently. As I have stated before, I may have missed the first 20 years, but I'm happy to be along to see what the next 20 years will bring!!! :D

    This is so cool to read.

    I think that a lot of people get permanently 'stuck' during a certain era, and never seem to move past it, in terms of really trying new things and giving them a chance. I'm about the same age as the guys in PJ, and have been on this particular train since Ten hit the airwaves...but a lot of my contemporaries are sort of 'stuck' in the late 80's-early 90's. Which is fine, I guess...but personally, I have had a lot of fun with some of the music from the 2000's. Sure...some of it is crap (just like some of it was crap in the late 80's-early 90's - we've just forgotten about that era's crap! :lol: )...but I have also found some really great bands by keeping my ears open, and not closing down to new stuff.

    Sure, PJ and some other bands who were popular in the 80's and 90's still populate 4 of the top 5 spots my 'favorite bands of all time list'...but hey...it was worth listening to all the new stuff, just to discover the 1...and a lot of other bands who I've enjoyed a lot in recent years.

    Good on you for keeping your ears open - sounds like it's paid off just as handsomely for you with the discovery of one awesome band! :)
    that was super cool to read-welcome to the "jamily"! newer bands that are killer- the raconteurs! hope they & the dead weather keep goin'.
    "It's best to live in grace before you're forced to." EV- 10/09/2014 
  • I heard the Monkeys were a big influence on the beatles.
  • Newch91
    Newch91 Posts: 17,560
    STIKYHANDZ wrote:
    I heard the Monkeys were a big influence on the beatles.
    :lol:
    Shows: 6.27.08 Hartford, CT/5.15.10 Hartford, CT/6.18.2011 Hartford, CT (EV Solo)/10.19.13 Brooklyn/10.25.13 Hartford
    "Becoming a Bruce fan is like hitting puberty as a musical fan. It's inevitable." - dcfaithful
  • rollings
    rollings unknown Posts: 7,127
    luke. wrote:
    I'm sick of everybody mentioning these two bands when it comes to 'greatest band ever' arguments. I get it, the beetles wrote let it be and shit- so what, pearl jam wrote black, yellow Ledbetter and even flow- boom that just happened. Fuck off losers, pearl win based on the fact that they have more talent. The end


    I love the song Shit by the beetles.

    Love it.


    It's off the brown album, right?
  • Newch91
    Newch91 Posts: 17,560
    Rollings wrote:
    luke. wrote:
    I'm sick of everybody mentioning these two bands when it comes to 'greatest band ever' arguments. I get it, the beetles wrote let it be and shit- so what, pearl jam wrote black, yellow Ledbetter and even flow- boom that just happened. Fuck off losers, pearl win based on the fact that they have more talent. The end


    I love the song Shit by the beetles.

    Love it.


    It's off the brown album, right?
    :lol:
    Shows: 6.27.08 Hartford, CT/5.15.10 Hartford, CT/6.18.2011 Hartford, CT (EV Solo)/10.19.13 Brooklyn/10.25.13 Hartford
    "Becoming a Bruce fan is like hitting puberty as a musical fan. It's inevitable." - dcfaithful
  • 12345AGNST1
    12345AGNST1 Posts: 4,906
    Hey guess what? steak burritos are better than veggie burritos because vegetarians are pussies.

    I win
    5/28/06, 6/27/08, 10/28/09, 5/18/10, 5/21/10
    8/7/08, 6/9/09
  • FrankY59
    FrankY59 Posts: 1,052
    This is going to sound VERY NAIVE of me but I will apologize in advance. I also only read the first page before posting...

    Anyway, I only know the Beatles through commercial/media/movies etc...I never actually listened to any of their albums just songs through these outlets. But when people say they are the band of the 60s in that EVERYONE listened to them...is that similar to how everyone listened to N Sync in the late 90s or Britney Spears in 2000s or some hip hop rtist that I am sure has been really big and is always played at the clubs and all over radio that I cannot even think of because I hate that kind of music?!

    I mean a band like Pearl Jam is actually talented musically and lyrically. I just wanna know if the Beatles were just the mainstream choice of their era or are they as timeless as people make them out to be?!
  • gndcd402
    gndcd402 Posts: 2,576
    FrankY59 wrote:
    I mean a band like Pearl Jam is actually talented musically and lyrically. I just wanna know if the Beatles were just the mainstream choice of their era or are they as timeless as people make them out to be?!
    Did you seriously just say that the Beatles weren't talented?! The Beatles were and still are music legends. Nsync, Gaga, etc are merely fads who die out in a few years if they're lucky. There's a reason the Beatles are my favorite band even though I was born almost 20 yrs after they're last album. It's because they're amazing :) Do yourself a favor and listen to some of their albums (my favorites are Sgt Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band, White Album, and Help!).