Pearl jam is better than the beetles and rolling stone.

1356710

Comments

  • -Buru-
    -Buru- Santa Barbara, CA Posts: 1,292
    Hinn wrote:
    One is a kind of insect.

    The other is a pop culture magazine.

    The comparison is stupid.

    :lol::lol::lol:

    Oh Hinny...
    I am just a dreamer, but you are just a dream...
    If I knew where it was I would take you there.

  • DewieCox
    DewieCox Posts: 11,432
    In my book there's a few bands/artists that are virtually untouchable just from their impact on other artists alone....Beatles, Zeppelin, Stones, The Who, Pink Floyd, Dylan, Hendrix and Black Sabbath. Take the influence card out and you're still lookin at some monumental bodies of work that stretched the boundaries of what people thought were possible with rock music.

    I regard PJ at what some would say is a foolishly high level, but it's a pretty hard argument to put them above or even among the very best.
  • DewieCox wrote:
    In my book there's a few bands/artists that are virtually untouchable just from their impact on other artists alone....Beatles, Zeppelin, Stones, The Who, Pink Floyd, Dylan, Hendrix and Black Sabbath. Take the influence card out and you're still lookin at some monumental bodies of work that stretched the boundaries of what people thought were possible with rock music.

    I regard PJ at what some would say is a foolishly high level, but it's a pretty hard argument to put them above or even among the very best.

    I agree with this- although I place Dylan, Hendrix, and Sabbath on the next tier below the first five bands listed.

    Obviously some will place their favourite band(s) above these types on sentimentality and personal value... and this is good. OP... fair enough- however as much as I love Pearl Jam and have frequently called them the 'Rolling Stones of our era'... it's a bit of a stretch for me to place them above the Beatles, Stones, Zeppelin, the Who, and my all time favourites- Pink Floyd.

    Look at the recent Wall tour by Roger Waters and the massive turnouts and multiple shows throughout the planet. Waters is even doing a rerun (I'm seeing it again in Vancouver). PJ will never be able to pull off such an event at the magnitude we have witnessed Waters do this at. The reason... universal appreciation and love of an absolute epic album from one of history's most unique and outstanding bands. Timeless music.
    "My brain's a good brain!"
  • Katyz
    Katyz Posts: 838
    Point of view can always be debated in friendly fashion and opinions should always be honored. Knowing what you are talking about helps.....beetles do not play the best music (in my opinion) :lol: The Beatles, on the other hand, were fantastic!!!
  • marcos
    marcos Posts: 2,112
    Well the Beatles & Stones were influenced by Elvis, the King of Rock & Roll.
  • TheGossman
    TheGossman Posts: 1,120
    Pearl Jam is the greatest band of my generation, the Beatles are the best rock and roll band of all time, no doubt.
    9/4/98, 8/4/00, 12/8/02, 12/9/02, 4/15/03, 4/16/03, 4/19/03, 4/25/03, 4/26/03, 4/28/03, 4/29/03, 4/30/03, 7/8/03, 7/9/03, 9/28/04, 9/29/04, 10/6/04, 9/1/05, 9/2/05, 5/16/06, 5/17/06, 5/27/06, 5/28/06, 5/30/06, 6/1/06, 6/3/06, 8/5/07, 6/11/08, 6/12/08, 6/14/08, 6/16/08, 6/24/08, 6/25/08
  • GAH. :shock:

    BeAtles. it's spelled with an 'a', folks.

    Really. If you don't even know how to spell their name, you have no business judging their music...because clearly you have not spent enough time learning even the slightest thing about them, or their place in rock history.

    As to the topic...PJ is my favorite band...but The Beatles changed the universe. Gotta give 'em forever props for that.
  • CAVSTARR313
    CAVSTARR313 Posts: 8,756
    Art isn't a contest.. every artist isn't playing by a set of rules.. Like sports

    Every artist is playing there own sport

    It is like asking "Who is better, Steve Yzerman or Barry Sanders?"

    While they are both great, it is impossible to compare the two, because they are playing different sports..
    None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe that they are free.
    Abrn Hlls '98 - Clarkston 2 '03 - Grd Rpds '06 - Abrn Hlls '06 - Clvd '10 - PJ20 - Berlin 1+2 '12 - Wrigley '13 - Pitt '13- buff '13- Philly 1+2 '13 - Seattle '13
  • The Rolling Stones are now heading towards their 50th year.
    I love it when a band comes along who are very middle of the road e.g. Boy And Bear from Australia. Critics rave about them & they can do know wrong. Lets see where they are in 5 tears time?
    Bands like The Rolling Stones, Pearl Jam have stood the test of time & not had to reinvent themselves.
  • gndcd402
    gndcd402 Posts: 2,576
    :lol: PJ can only dream about being 1/10th as good and influential as The Beatles. I know this is a PJ forum but come on...its the freaking Beatles. Harrison, Lennon, and McCartney are three of the best singer/songwriter ever.

    Oh and FYI, I'm 24 and The Beatles are my #1 band.
  • luke. wrote:
    I'm sick of everybody mentioning these two bands when it comes to 'greatest band ever' arguments. I get it, the beetles wrote let it be and shit- so what, pearl jam wrote black, yellow Ledbetter and even flow- boom that just happened. Fuck off losers, pearl win based on the fact that they have more talent. The end

    Congratulations on your first pubic hair!
  • From their ERA's Id say they all were the greatest.
    PJ in the 90's
    beatles and stones 60's -70's
    groundbreaking in their own ways
    AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE
  • erocshifty
    erocshifty Posts: 1,170
    even mick jagger said that nobody played over an hour until zeppelin started doing 2-3 1/2 hours. i love all the classic stuff. you should listen to i've got a feeling. pj paid tribute to the beatles on their first release ever....also sheck out you've got to hide your love away by ed, little sister by pj & robert plant. or more recently, mother. i'm sure i am forgetting some, but give respect where it is due. without the past we wouldn't have what we do now...
    "It's best to live in grace before you're forced to." EV- 10/09/2014 
  • I remember when I had my first beer.
  • frazba
    frazba Posts: 601
    I'm not even going to attempt to explain why I think Lukes comments are misguided, I don't think anything we say will change his mind, and that he's as entitled to his opinion as we are to ours. I would ask him to check out any of The Stones albums between '69 and '73 though ( esp 'Exile On Main St' and 'Sticky Fingers') and The Beatles White Album.

    I'd also like to sat that it's nice to see someone who is passionate about their music, although I feel he should check out the history behind it.
  • erocshifty
    erocshifty Posts: 1,170
    frazba wrote:
    I'm not even going to attempt to explain why I think Lukes comments are misguided, I don't think anything we say will change his mind, and that he's as entitled to his opinion as we are to ours. I would ask him to check out any of The Stones albums between '69 and '73 though ( esp 'Exile On Main St' and 'Sticky Fingers') and The Beatles White Album.

    I'd also like to sat that it's nice to see someone who is passionate about their music, although I feel he should check out the history behind it.
    4 of the best records ever..
    1.beggars banquet
    2.let it bleed
    3.sticky fingers
    4.exile on main st.
    the stones were damn near untouchable during this era..i got the white album when no code came out. similar records, somewhat. both bands were in huge transition periods of their career. pj was stepping back & becoming more introspectrive & the beatles were literally fracturing. the emotional kalidescope on both bands albums were enormous. i was going through a pretty tough time and i grew with help from both. dear prudence, won't you come out to play....
    "It's best to live in grace before you're forced to." EV- 10/09/2014 
  • Thoughts_Arrive
    Thoughts_Arrive Melbourne, Australia Posts: 15,165
    What a lame-ass remark!
    George Harrison is a poor man's Stone Gossard.

    to all that believe PJ is better then the beatles or the rollingstones; we'll see how far eddies' smoking and wine can carry him/them.

    Plus dont forget about pink floyd and the kinks, that which PJ could never top in creativity.

    I was taking the piss (joking). :roll:
    Fuck some people get sucked in easily.
    Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/2014
  • Thoughts_Arrive
    Thoughts_Arrive Melbourne, Australia Posts: 15,165
    Hinn wrote:
    One is a kind of insect.

    The other is a pop culture magazine.

    The comparison is stupid.

    :lol:
    Adelaide 17/11/2009, Melbourne 20/11/2009, Sydney 22/11/2009, Melbourne (Big Day Out Festival) 24/01/2014
  • Newch91
    Newch91 Posts: 17,560
    gndcd402 wrote:
    :lol: PJ can only dream about being 1/10th as good and influential as The Beatles. I know this is a PJ forum but come on...its the freaking Beatles. Harrison, Lennon, and McCartney are three of the best singer/songwriter ever.

    Oh and FYI, I'm 24 and The Beatles are my #1 band.
    :lol: I have you beat, I'm 20. :P
    Shows: 6.27.08 Hartford, CT/5.15.10 Hartford, CT/6.18.2011 Hartford, CT (EV Solo)/10.19.13 Brooklyn/10.25.13 Hartford
    "Becoming a Bruce fan is like hitting puberty as a musical fan. It's inevitable." - dcfaithful
  • southernmanfan
    southernmanfan Johannesburg, South Africa Posts: 1,029
    I love the Beatles, I like the Stones....but Pearl Jam is my life! ;)
    rustedsigns