Dem Senator Completely Schooled on ObamaCare

2»

Comments

  • cajunkiwicajunkiwi Posts: 984
    prfctlefts wrote:


    sorry man I thought you were a chick :oops:
    as Obama would say "Let me be clear " Im not a real big fan of her either.
    as far as her quiting through her term didn't it have to do something with all those ethics violations she was being charged with. Im not condoning what she did,but maybe it was best for the state of Alaska and it's citizens. You do have to take into consideration that she was a govenor and she had something like a 60% approval rating.. Just sayin

    as far as the better looking comment goes I was just being stupid. With that being said most Of the women on Fox If Im not mistaken happen to be attorneys. So it's not just looks.
    and no I have never seen Olivia Wilde..

    You've never seen Olivia Wilde? Dude... at the risk of derailing this thread, Google her or watch an episode of House.

    But back to the topic at hand - you can add those ethics violations to the list of reasons people don't like her. Approval ratings don't last forever either - Bush had an astronomical rating immediately after 9/11, and he ended statistically the most unpopular president in U.S. history (based on approval ratings). Obama's rating seems to be falling daily, though it's still higher than the rating of any of the potential Republican candidates, whose own ratings are also falling steadily.
    And I listen for the voice inside my head... nothing. I'll do this one myself.
  • __ Posts: 6,651
    prfctlefts wrote:


    Gimmie Im not sticking up for the repubeicans by any means. I wish there was a law that said they had to read all bills before voting on it. Most of them need to get thier asses voted out also. I don't think any R's voted for it but I could be wrong.

    Right, but they're equally as responsible for reading something they vote against as they would be had they voted for it.
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,341
    scb wrote:
    [
    Right, but they're equally as responsible for reading something they vote against as they would be had they voted for it.

    true, true...
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • cajunkiwicajunkiwi Posts: 984

    true, true...

    We had a problem here in Louisiana a few months ago where a bill was passed by the lawmakers, and neither side read it first - they essentially voted yay/nay based on the title of the bill. Then, after it was passed, one of them read it and objected to it, so they went back and reversed the vote. If you're not reading what you're voting on, then you shouldn't be allowed to vote.
    And I listen for the voice inside my head... nothing. I'll do this one myself.
  • __ Posts: 6,651
    cajunkiwi wrote:

    We had a problem here in Louisiana a few months ago where a bill was passed by the lawmakers, and neither side read it first - they essentially voted yay/nay based on the title of the bill. Then, after it was passed, one of them read it and objected to it, so they went back and reversed the vote. If you're not reading what you're voting on, then you shouldn't be allowed to vote.

    Welcome to the United States. All you need is a catchphrase. :( I just read this story on NPR, which I think is related: http://www.npr.org/blogs/watchingwashin ... 129319446/
  • cajunkiwi wrote:
    You've never seen Olivia Wilde? Dude... at the risk of derailing this thread, Google her or watch an episode of House.


    you weren't joking.. :D
Sign In or Register to comment.