Okla. tea parties and lawmakers envision militia

gimmesometruth27
gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 25,078
edited April 2010 in A Moving Train
i can't agree that arming angry people against the federal government is a smart thing to do, but if oklahoma wants to regress 100 years go ahead...just don't call in the fbi, fema, or any other government authority if the shit hits the fan....
sounds like a major case of paranoia, fear, and a little sour grapes to me....

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100412/ap_ ... ty_militia


By SEAN MURPHY and TIM TALLEY, Associated Press Writers Sean Murphy And Tim Talley, Associated Press Writers – 1 hr 55 mins ago
OKLAHOMA CITY – Frustrated by recent political setbacks, tea party leaders and some conservative members of the Oklahoma Legislature say they would like to create a new volunteer militia to help defend against what they believe are improper federal infringements on state sovereignty.

Tea party movement leaders say they've discussed the idea with several supportive lawmakers and hope to get legislation next year to recognize a new volunteer force. They say the unit would not resemble militia groups that have been raided for allegedly plotting attacks on law enforcement officers.

"Is it scary? It sure is," said tea party leader Al Gerhart of Oklahoma City, who heads an umbrella group of tea party factions called the Oklahoma Constitutional Alliance. "But when do the states stop rolling over for the federal government?"

Thus far, the discussions have been exploratory. Even the proponents say they don't know how an armed force would be organized nor how a state-based militia could block federal mandates. Critics also asserted that the force could inflame extremism, and that the National Guard already provides for the state's military needs.

"Have they heard of the Oklahoma City bombing?" said Joseph Thai, a constitutional law professor at the University of Oklahoma. The state observes the 15th anniversary of the anti-government attack on Monday. Such actions could "throw fuel in the fire of radicals," he said.

But the militia talks reflect the frustration of some grass roots groups seeking new ways of fighting recent federal initiatives, such as the health reform plan, which requires all citizens to have health insurance. Over the last year, tea party groups across the country have staged rallies and pressured politicians to protest big government and demand reduced public spending.

In strongly conservative states like Oklahoma, some legislators have also discussed further action to fight federal policies, such as state legislation and lawsuits.

State Sen. Randy Brogdon, R-Owasso, a Republican candidate for governor who has appealed for tea party support, said supporters of a state militia have talked to him, and that he believes the citizen unit would be authorized under the Second Amendment to the Constitution.

The founding fathers "were not referring to a turkey shoot or a quail hunt. They really weren't even talking about us having the ability to protect ourselves against each other," Brogdon said. "The Second Amendment deals directly with the right of an individual to keep and bear arms to protect themselves from an overreaching federal government."

Another lawmaker, state Rep. Charles Key, R-Oklahoma City, said he believes there's a good chance of introducing legislation for a state-authorized militia next year.

Tea party leader J.W. Berry of the Tulsa-based OKforTea began soliciting interest in a state militia through his newsletter under the subject "Buy more guns, more bullets."

"It's not a far-right crazy plan or anything like that," Berry said. "This would be done with the full cooperation of the state Legislature."

State militias clearly are constitutionally authorized, but have not been used in recent times, said Glenn Reynolds, a law professor at the University of Tennessee and an expert on the Second Amendment. "Whether someone should get a militia to go toe-to-toe with the federal government ... now, that strikes me as kind of silly," he said.

Some conservative legislators in Oklahoma say talk of a militia, which would be privately recruited, armed and trained, goes too far.

"If the intent is to create a militia for disaster relief, we have the National Guard," said Sen. Steve Russell, R-Oklahoma City, a retired Army lieutenant colonel. "Anything beyond that purpose should be viewed with great concern and caution."

Democratic Gov. Brad Henry's communications director Paul Sund also discounted the militia discussion, saying the National Guard handles state emergencies and security.

Federal authorities say that radical militia groups have not emerged in Oklahoma, unlike many other states, in part because of the legacy of the Oklahoma City bombing. On April 19, 1995, an anti-government conspiracy led by Army veteran Tim McVeigh exploded a truckbomb outside the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, killing 168 people.

Last month, FBI agents conducted a raid on the Hutaree militia group in southern Michigan and accused members of plotting to kill law enforcement officers.
"You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1345

Comments

  • keeponrockin
    keeponrockin Posts: 7,446
    How the fuck is an armed militia going to help anything? Can someone explain that to me logically.
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • FiveB247x
    FiveB247x Posts: 2,330
    The answer is obvious... some nuts have guns and don't like what the government is doing... so obviously they can improve things by forming a militia.... duh. :lol:

    And people wonder why our nation is a cluster-f'... our national IQ and common sense level is about that of a 13yr old, functional retard.
    How the fuck is an armed militia going to help anything? Can someone explain that to me logically.
    CONservative governMENt

    Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. - Louis Brandeis
  • RB112589
    RB112589 Posts: 98
    You know, violence is being portrayed as a first act, rather than the purpose in which it was layed out by our forefathers. This story is being taken a little out of context by a synical thought process. I love the comments that degrade this idea by calling them idiots and "Tim McViegh", or however you spell his name, lovers. Why, because you don't agree with them and it makes you feel better about yourselves calling them idiots or hicks. I applaud the idea of a people demanding accountablility and realizing that if they do not stand up for themselves, than who will? Health Care is just the rouse to all of this, an excuse for the article if you will. Extreme leftest have long loved the idea of the abolition of the second ammendmant; so all of those who continue to bow down to the almighty word without "thinking" about what you are reading, well, I guess here comes another smug comment hiding behind a bunch of deceptive press making those feel good about themselves. When another contraversial story comes out, and you hear more about pissed off people who are not being represented like they had voted, and some other backdoor story meant to be about one thing that is really about an agenda comes out, I hope you at least think about it a little longer before you jump on the band wagon and just start spewing hate from an idea that has been lost by our "security" of an artificial concept of peace.
    So do you opose voting? What about free speach? You want change, but you don't want anyone to speak up when they are pissed? We vote people who we believe to be the most qualified for the job, they tell us things, and they just continue to do the same thing? Talk about a backwards society. This is an action by people, not the government, which makes me listen with a refreshed sence of hope. Violence should not be the answer and am in no way advocating it (needed to bring this out because I know some would love to just continue to spew hate, this time at me).
    Question: How come people's rights are of the utmost importance, that is till you talk about our country.
    Go first ammendment! And remember, there are crazy people on all sides!
  • FiveB247x
    FiveB247x Posts: 2,330
    RB112589 perhaps you can answer this simple question?
    How the fuck is an armed militia going to help anything? Can someone explain that to me logically.
    CONservative governMENt

    Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. - Louis Brandeis
  • Starfall
    Starfall Posts: 548
    RB112589 wrote:
    Extreme leftest have long loved the idea of the abolition of the second ammendmant; so all of those who continue to bow down to the almighty word without "thinking" about what you are reading, well, I guess here comes another smug comment hiding behind a bunch of deceptive press making those feel good about themselves.

    "Extreme leftest (sic)"? Really? Like who?
    Go first ammendment! And remember, there are crazy people on all sides!

    I don't see people on the left advocating killing police officers, government employees, or opposition politicians.
    "It's not hard to own something. Or everything. You just have to know that it's yours, and then be willing to let it go." - Neil Gaiman, "Stardust"
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 25,078
    RB112589 wrote:
    You know, violence is being portrayed as a first act, rather than the purpose in which it was layed out by our forefathers. This story is being taken a little out of context by a synical thought process. I love the comments that degrade this idea by calling them idiots and "Tim McViegh", or however you spell his name, lovers. Why, because you don't agree with them and it makes you feel better about yourselves calling them idiots or hicks. I applaud the idea of a people demanding accountablility and realizing that if they do not stand up for themselves, than who will? Health Care is just the rouse to all of this, an excuse for the article if you will. Extreme leftest have long loved the idea of the abolition of the second ammendmant; so all of those who continue to bow down to the almighty word without "thinking" about what you are reading, well, I guess here comes another smug comment hiding behind a bunch of deceptive press making those feel good about themselves. When another contraversial story comes out, and you hear more about pissed off people who are not being represented like they had voted, and some other backdoor story meant to be about one thing that is really about an agenda comes out, I hope you at least think about it a little longer before you jump on the band wagon and just start spewing hate from an idea that has been lost by our "security" of an artificial concept of peace.
    So do you opose voting? What about free speach? You want change, but you don't want anyone to speak up when they are pissed? We vote people who we believe to be the most qualified for the job, they tell us things, and they just continue to do the same thing? Talk about a backwards society. This is an action by people, not the government, which makes me listen with a refreshed sence of hope. Violence should not be the answer and am in no way advocating it (needed to bring this out because I know some would love to just continue to spew hate, this time at me).
    Question: How come people's rights are of the utmost importance, that is till you talk about our country.
    Go first ammendment! And remember, there are crazy people on all sides!
    what are you even talking about? seriously, your rambling post makes no sense and goes off in about 15 different directions. and from what i can surmise, it has nothing to do with the article i posted, only more paranoia about getting guns taken away, which by the way, obama has never ever once said he was going to do...he has never said he was going to repeal the second ammendment.....next false accusation please...

    i just do not think it is a good idea to arm angry people. and stupid, redneck, playing army in the backwoods people at that....and if oklahoma is going to consider doing so, then they deserve whatever the repercussions are.
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • aerial
    aerial Posts: 2,319
    RB112589 wrote:
    You know, violence is being portrayed as a first act, rather than the purpose in which it was layed out by our forefathers. This story is being taken a little out of context by a synical thought process. I love the comments that degrade this idea by calling them idiots and "Tim McViegh", or however you spell his name, lovers. Why, because you don't agree with them and it makes you feel better about yourselves calling them idiots or hicks. I applaud the idea of a people demanding accountablility and realizing that if they do not stand up for themselves, than who will? Health Care is just the rouse to all of this, an excuse for the article if you will. Extreme leftest have long loved the idea of the abolition of the second ammendmant; so all of those who continue to bow down to the almighty word without "thinking" about what you are reading, well, I guess here comes another smug comment hiding behind a bunch of deceptive press making those feel good about themselves. When another contraversial story comes out, and you hear more about pissed off people who are not being represented like they had voted, and some other backdoor story meant to be about one thing that is really about an agenda comes out, I hope you at least think about it a little longer before you jump on the band wagon and just start spewing hate from an idea that has been lost by our "security" of an artificial concept of peace.
    So do you opose voting? What about free speach? You want change, but you don't want anyone to speak up when they are pissed? We vote people who we believe to be the most qualified for the job, they tell us things, and they just continue to do the same thing? Talk about a backwards society. This is an action by people, not the government, which makes me listen with a refreshed sence of hope. Violence should not be the answer and am in no way advocating it (needed to bring this out because I know some would love to just continue to spew hate, this time at me).
    Question: How come people's rights are of the utmost importance, that is till you talk about our country.
    Go first ammendment! And remember, there are crazy people on all sides!
    what are you even talking about? seriously, your rambling post makes no sense and goes off in about 15 different directions. and from what i can surmise, it has nothing to do with the article i posted, only more paranoia about getting guns taken away, which by the way, obama has never ever once said he was going to do...he has never said he was going to repeal the second ammendment.....next false accusation please...

    i just do not think it is a good idea to arm angry people. and stupid, redneck, playing army in the backwoods people at that....and if oklahoma is going to consider doing so, then they deserve whatever the repercussions are.
    Do you even live in the USA?
    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
  • OutOfBreath
    OutOfBreath Posts: 1,802
    It must be said that historically, what happens when political parties form militias.... well, it's pretty ugly. Their only use is as threat of force or actual use of force. The first is damn undemocratic, and the second is civil war.

    And I fail to see what that would really accomplish anyway. You have a national guard, dont you?

    Peace
    Dan
    "YOU [humans] NEED TO BELIEVE IN THINGS THAT AREN'T TRUE. HOW ELSE CAN THEY BECOME?" - Death

    "Every judgment teeters on the brink of error. To claim absolute knowledge is to become monstrous. Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty." - Frank Herbert, Dune, 1965
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 25,078
    aerial wrote:
    RB112589 wrote:
    You know, violence is being portrayed as a first act, rather than the purpose in which it was layed out by our forefathers. This story is being taken a little out of context by a synical thought process. I love the comments that degrade this idea by calling them idiots and "Tim McViegh", or however you spell his name, lovers. Why, because you don't agree with them and it makes you feel better about yourselves calling them idiots or hicks. I applaud the idea of a people demanding accountablility and realizing that if they do not stand up for themselves, than who will? Health Care is just the rouse to all of this, an excuse for the article if you will. Extreme leftest have long loved the idea of the abolition of the second ammendmant; so all of those who continue to bow down to the almighty word without "thinking" about what you are reading, well, I guess here comes another smug comment hiding behind a bunch of deceptive press making those feel good about themselves. When another contraversial story comes out, and you hear more about pissed off people who are not being represented like they had voted, and some other backdoor story meant to be about one thing that is really about an agenda comes out, I hope you at least think about it a little longer before you jump on the band wagon and just start spewing hate from an idea that has been lost by our "security" of an artificial concept of peace.
    So do you opose voting? What about free speach? You want change, but you don't want anyone to speak up when they are pissed? We vote people who we believe to be the most qualified for the job, they tell us things, and they just continue to do the same thing? Talk about a backwards society. This is an action by people, not the government, which makes me listen with a refreshed sence of hope. Violence should not be the answer and am in no way advocating it (needed to bring this out because I know some would love to just continue to spew hate, this time at me).
    Question: How come people's rights are of the utmost importance, that is till you talk about our country.
    Go first ammendment! And remember, there are crazy people on all sides!
    what are you even talking about? seriously, your rambling post makes no sense and goes off in about 15 different directions. and from what i can surmise, it has nothing to do with the article i posted, only more paranoia about getting guns taken away, which by the way, obama has never ever once said he was going to do...he has never said he was going to repeal the second ammendment.....next false accusation please...

    i just do not think it is a good idea to arm angry people. and stupid, redneck, playing army in the backwoods people at that....and if oklahoma is going to consider doing so, then they deserve whatever the repercussions are.
    Do you even live in the USA?
    no i don't live in the usa.... :roll: :roll:

    actually i do, and i do not see what my location has to do with anything in this thread, so what are you talking about? care to contribute to the discussion or just post random irrelevent questions??
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • polaris_x
    polaris_x Posts: 13,559
    RB112589 wrote:
    You know, violence is being portrayed as a first act, rather than the purpose in which it was layed out by our forefathers. This story is being taken a little out of context by a synical thought process. I love the comments that degrade this idea by calling them idiots and "Tim McViegh", or however you spell his name, lovers. Why, because you don't agree with them and it makes you feel better about yourselves calling them idiots or hicks. I applaud the idea of a people demanding accountablility and realizing that if they do not stand up for themselves, than who will? Health Care is just the rouse to all of this, an excuse for the article if you will. Extreme leftest have long loved the idea of the abolition of the second ammendmant; so all of those who continue to bow down to the almighty word without "thinking" about what you are reading, well, I guess here comes another smug comment hiding behind a bunch of deceptive press making those feel good about themselves. When another contraversial story comes out, and you hear more about pissed off people who are not being represented like they had voted, and some other backdoor story meant to be about one thing that is really about an agenda comes out, I hope you at least think about it a little longer before you jump on the band wagon and just start spewing hate from an idea that has been lost by our "security" of an artificial concept of peace.
    So do you opose voting? What about free speach? You want change, but you don't want anyone to speak up when they are pissed? We vote people who we believe to be the most qualified for the job, they tell us things, and they just continue to do the same thing? Talk about a backwards society. This is an action by people, not the government, which makes me listen with a refreshed sence of hope. Violence should not be the answer and am in no way advocating it (needed to bring this out because I know some would love to just continue to spew hate, this time at me).
    Question: How come people's rights are of the utmost importance, that is till you talk about our country.
    Go first ammendment! And remember, there are crazy people on all sides!

    i will go out on a limb ... like waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay out ... hahaha and say for the most part - i agree with everything you say ...

    many people want to dismiss this party for a multitude of reasons some reasonable some not so reasonable however, the crux of the issue is still the same ... the current makeover of gov't is the same as previous ones whereby they no longer work to serve the people but rather large corporations ...

    people SHOULD be holding gov't accountable and be pissed ... to expect change simply through some conventional manner is simply not going to do anything ... although i by no means favour an armed or violent response - i do believe a revolution of sorts has to happen ... at the very least - these tea partiers are active ... they may not be well-informed on many issues but they are doing something about it ...

    i believe there are many here who voted for obama hoping he would fix everything ... he can't ... only the people can ...
  • blackredyellow
    blackredyellow Posts: 5,888
    It must be said that historically, what happens when political parties form militias.... well, it's pretty ugly. Their only use is as threat of force or actual use of force. The first is damn undemocratic, and the second is civil war.

    And I fail to see what that would really accomplish anyway. You have a national guard, dont you?

    Peace
    Dan

    Yeah... I can completely understand organizing people against government overreaching... protest, campaign to get people who think like you elected/other voted out, etc etc etc...

    But, armed militias? It goes back to this:
    How the fuck is an armed militia going to help anything? Can someone explain that to me logically.


    Armed militias aren't going to take on the police, FBI, ATF, Nat'l Guard, US Military, etc... the only thing they can do is to use force, or the threat of force to try to intimidate other citizens into siding with them. Talk about a worthless approach.

    For the most these people are nothing more than idiots who romanticize about play war in the woods and have seem movies like Red Dawn way too many times. I dressed up in army gear and played war with friends when I was 10 years old, but unlike these people, I grew up.
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 25,078
    polaris_x wrote:
    at the very least - these tea partiers are active ... they may not be well-informed on many issues but they are doing something about it ...

    this part reminds me of that scene in the movie Animal House...

    Otter: "This requires a really stupid and futile gesture be done on somebody's part."

    Bluto: "Yeah, and we're just the guys to do it!"
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • Godfather.
    Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    How the fuck is an armed militia going to help anything? Can someone explain that to me logically.

    who knows....some people will stand and fight and some will bow and follow, the people that stand and fight
    make and change history, then there are those that will complain but not do anything one way or another to
    help what they believe to be right.

    Godfather.
  • keeponrockin
    keeponrockin Posts: 7,446
    Godfather. wrote:
    How the fuck is an armed militia going to help anything? Can someone explain that to me logically.

    who knows....some people will stand and fight and some will bow and follow, the people that stand and fight
    make and change history, then there are those that will complain but not do anything one way or another to
    help what they believe to be right.

    Godfather.
    There are also those that don't fight yet make and change history

    aahd064_8x10rev-dr-martin-luther-king-jr-posters.jpg
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • gimmesometruth27
    gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 25,078
    There are also those that don't fight yet make and change history

    aahd064_8x10rev-dr-martin-luther-king-jr-posters.jpg
    nice post. and for better or worse, lets not forget these guys either...

    ghandi.jpg

    jesus-thumps-up1.jpg
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • keeponrockin
    keeponrockin Posts: 7,446
    How the fuck is an armed militia going to help anything? Can someone explain that to me logically.
    Furthermore, the second these militias actually take or threaten any sort of violent action, should we consider them terrorists?

    I think so. Thoughts?
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • blackredyellow
    blackredyellow Posts: 5,888
    How the fuck is an armed militia going to help anything? Can someone explain that to me logically.
    Furthermore, the second these militias actually take or threaten any sort of violent action, should we consider them terrorists?

    I think so. Thoughts?

    Insurgents is more like it...

    Even though it's changed meanings over the last decade, I still think of terrorists as people, who, well use terror and big acts, to kill people or to make their point.
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • mysticweed
    mysticweed Posts: 3,710
    The tea party folks say their militia won't be like other militias that threaten the law of the land and other necessary evils, which by definition is pretty much what are formed to do. Huh?
    Fuck 'em
    fuck 'em if they can't take a joke

    "what a long, strange trip it's been"
  • Godfather.
    Godfather. Posts: 12,504
    what would you all have called the Minuit men or the those that fought and died at the Alamo or the men that fought during the civil war ? or even the student's that died at Kent state protesting for what they thought was right, I am not siding with one or the other on this discussion just saying this country is still a new country compared to other country's and we have fought for everything we have including our freedom and some people are ready to stand and fight to keep what they have, to them their right in what they do.
    just a thought.

    Godfather.
  • inmytree
    inmytree Posts: 4,740
    I still don't understand these folks...what the hell are they so upset about...? I guess when words (or shout) don't work, frustrated fools will resort to threats of violence...

    and to compare them to the founding fathers is simply stupid...

    I think these teabaggers are blinded by hate for Obama and they hate America...

    damn, I can't wait until these out of work fuckheads find jobs...