patriots are a bunch of CHEATERS !!!

nfanel wrote:

and having the answers to the test wouldn't make you do a better job at executing? lol.
sure, i understand they still have to execute...but that doesn't detract from the fact it's still cheating no matter which way you look at it.

Maybe that's the way things were at school in Syracuse. All Big East schools can't be as good as Nova.

I agree it's cheating, but I like debating my2hands.

I just don't think it's more than a slight advantage. It's no different to me than when a catcher is telling a batter that a fastball is coming. You still have to hit the ball. And I know with all the trash talk between CBs and Wrs going on, that you have to be silly to think that Chad Johnson, TO, or Moss or any of the other prima donnas has never told a CB that I'm running a fly pattern here or running a post and daring the D to stop them.

blackredyellow wrote:

Steelers assistant coaches say privately that New England coach Bill Belichick has illegally used cameras to spy on opposing coaches flashing signals from the sideline for years, even when he was coach of the Cleveland Browns.

and yet the browns consistently sucked.

Taft wrote:

I know this is the point where Pats fans have to be all mancho and say that the penalty was weak and won't matter, but if you think losing one of your top picks is no "big whoop"....then why even watch football? You clearly know nothing about it.

Take a look at the Pats 1st and 2nd round picks over the last 6 years and then remove one of those players from the roster, its a significant loss. Not to mention scouts.com calls the 2008 draft one of the best in recent memory.

you clearly are assuming too much

i meant big whoop in that the money was not even a penalty and we only lost 1 pick compared to what people were saying .. multiples, bb suspension, etc

I'm aware that the Patriots draft very well and make 1st rounders count

but we also draft well enough that we will be ok...

say this didn't happen... and we picked some guy who pulls an Oden and will never play... same thing

shit happens... you deal with it and move on

so big whoop in that it was "only" 1 pick and not multiples... i'll try to be clearer for you next time

Taft wrote:

If they gained the pick because of the trade, then that means they came up on the short end of the trade. Its all equal, and the power of a 1st round pick (no matter how many a team has) is significant.

eventually 1 team comes up on the short end of a trade

draft picks don't always work out ... yes even when you're as brilliant as scott pioli and belichick

yes it's significant.. i will agree

but it's not a HUGE penalty

dg1979us wrote:

You may say its just being a crybaby, but its perfectly justified. Whether you like it or not, the Pats superbowls have been tarnished.

no.. i call him a cry baby because i've seen him actually cry multiple times

i think it was when he lost to the pats

and when jerome bettis stubbed his toe or something

Steve Dunne wrote:

I can't believe this thread is 21 pages long.

i can't believe you haven't figured out how to get more posts on a page

click User CP

then click Edit Options

scroll down to Number of Posts to Show Per Page

change it to 40

then it's only 9-10 pages of crap

Solat13 wrote:

Maybe that's the way things were at school in Syracuse. All Big East schools can't be as good as Nova.

Amen to that!

Go Huskies!!

(btw - is it me or is there nothing sexier than listening to Nic talk football? I mean really, how cool is she!!!)

JSBE wrote:

the pats losing the first round pick in 2008 sucks, but not as much since they will have the 49ers first rounder which will be much higher.

this is the first time in the history of the nfl that a 1st round pick would ever be taken away from a team. and the 500k that belichick was fined is the max that they can fine someone, so i'm not sure how the punishment is soft.

i agree though that suspending belichick for X number of games (2 or 3) would have been a much harsher punishment.

you can't please everyone. there will also be people that think the commish was too harsh and those that think he was too soft. and then you have those that just hate just to hate rather than rationally think.

the money doesn't mean anything... especially to the fans... think about it

those fucks charge me $40 to park in the middle of nowhere... i'm sure they'll just bump it to $50 or something

blackredyellow wrote:

They were 11-5 and beat the Patriots in a wild card game in '94 under Belichick.

i knew we should of won that game

fuckin cheater browns!!!!

bostonlou wrote:

he probably did when playing the steelers... they're too stupid to figure it out

Ya... they couldn't possibly figure out the Colts...

From the USA Today recap of the 2006 playoff game:
"The evidence was widespread. Quarterback Peyton Manning, harassed by blitzes and sacked five times, couldn't get into a consistent rhythm. His protection faltered and accuracy sputtered. The Colts had a 96-yard drive in the second quarter but got just three points from it. In the final frantic minutes, the Colts' usually prolific offense had possession twice with the chance to pull out a comeback win.

In both cases, they failed."

bostonlou wrote:

the money doesn't mean anything... especially to the fans... think about it

those fucks charge me $40 to park in the middle of nowhere... i'm sure they'll just bump it to $50 or something






i knew we should of won that game

fuckin cheater browns!!!!

The comedy continues, that's a good one.

Peace

How quickly we forget that just last week, NY PJ1 was practically begging Lou to have gay sex with him.

Ahhh, how quickly we rise from the ashes.

You people are ruining Friday sex talk for us;)