Why no talk about John Edwards?

Options
unsung
unsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
edited August 2008 in A Moving Train
Why no talk about Edwards cheating on his cancer-stricken wife?
Post edited by Unknown User on
«134

Comments

  • Its Evolution Baby
    Its Evolution Baby Posts: 849
    unsung wrote:
    Why no talk about Edwards cheating on his cancer-stricken wife?

    It's pretty scummy. He should have consulted Bill about how to cheat without impregnating the bitch. :p
    10/31/2000 (****)
    6/7/2003 (***1/2)
    7/9/2006 (****1/2)
    7/13/2006 (**** )
    4/10/2008 EV Solo (****1/2)
    6/25/2008 MSG II (*****)
    10/1/2009 LA II (****)
    10/6/2009 LA III (***** Cornell!!!)
  • kcherub
    kcherub Posts: 961
    it's probably not true. The last thing I can find on it is from last year, and I would think that the baby in question was already born. I would also think that if there was any truth to it, the paternity of the baby would have already been determined.

    I should also note that the first thing that popped up was from the National Enquirer. Go figure.

    Take care,
    I still want you all to "take care"--I am just damn tired of typing it.

    http://www.youtube.com/user/kcherub#p/a/u/0/N-UQprRqSwo
  • my2hands
    my2hands Posts: 17,117
    unsung wrote:
    Why no talk about Edwards cheating on his cancer-stricken wife?

    give it up dude, its lame :rolleyes:
  • ledvedderman
    ledvedderman Posts: 7,762
    Because the picture from the National Enquire of "Edwards" with his "baby" looks nothing like John Edwards???
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • Its Evolution Baby
    Its Evolution Baby Posts: 849
    ledvedderman wrote:
    Because the picture from the National Enquire of "Edwards" with his "baby" looks nothing like John Edwards???

    Wait the Enquirer got it wrong!!!

    I'm shocked really...
    10/31/2000 (****)
    6/7/2003 (***1/2)
    7/9/2006 (****1/2)
    7/13/2006 (**** )
    4/10/2008 EV Solo (****1/2)
    6/25/2008 MSG II (*****)
    10/1/2009 LA II (****)
    10/6/2009 LA III (***** Cornell!!!)
  • DixieN
    DixieN Posts: 351
    I don't know about a lot of Americans. You read something, and some of you appear to just believe it. Guys...you're supposed to read something and question it. You should have smoked less dope in school and paid more attention to the media literacy class. And when you read something in a publication that exists to prove the yeti lives, you just laugh.
  • Commy
    Commy Posts: 4,984
    DixieN wrote:
    I don't know about a lot of Americans. You read something, and some of you appear to just believe it. Guys...you're supposed to read something and question it. You should have smoked less dope in school and paid more attention to the media literacy class. And when you read something in a publication that exists to prove the yeti lives, you just laugh.
    less dope or more dope?
  • LikeAnOpeningBandForTheSun
    LikeAnOpeningBandForTheSun Posts: 6,097
    who gives a shit about John Edwards?
  • acutejam
    acutejam Posts: 1,433
    Keep dreaming, it's the liberal press protecting one of their own, powerful liberals circling the wagons ... he's gonna be a no show at convention, no cabinet or VP nod for him. He's done.

    Unless it's not true.

    If this was Romney or -- aw heck there's no real equivalant in the GOP -- but it'd be front page NYT!
    [sic] happens
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    $400 dollar haircuts....

    I can only hazard a guess on what what he's spent on street meat...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • in_hiding79
    in_hiding79 Posts: 4,315
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    $400 dollar haircuts....

    I can only hazard a guess on what what he's spent on street meat...


    :D

    heheehehe
    And so the lion fell in love with the lamb...,"
    "What a stupid lamb."
    "What a sick, masochistic lion."
  • LONGRD
    LONGRD Posts: 6,036
    MrSmith wrote:
    who gives a shit about John Edwards?
    John Edwards does. ;)
    PJ- 04/29/2003.06/24,25,27,28,30/2008.10/27,28,30,31/2009
    EV- 08/09,10/2008.06/08,09/2009
  • cincybearcat
    cincybearcat Posts: 16,810
    RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:
    $400 dollar haircuts....

    I can only hazard a guess on what what he's spent on street meat...


    Nice. :)
    hippiemom = goodness
  • RainDog
    RainDog Posts: 1,824
    acutejam wrote:
    Keep dreaming, it's the liberal press protecting one of their own, powerful liberals circling the wagons ... he's gonna be a no show at convention, no cabinet or VP nod for him. He's done.

    Unless it's not true.

    If this was Romney or -- aw heck there's no real equivalant in the GOP -- but it'd be front page NYT!
    ????
    If the "liberal press" is protecting their own, how did you hear about it? Or is the National Enquirer an example of the "conservative press?" Now that I think about it, though, that does make sense.

    There are a few things you should think about before getting all paranoid and shaking your hands around your head and stuff. Namely, it's the National Enquirer, so there's that - but, also, John Edwards doesn't currently hold a public office, isn't seeking a public office at the moment, and is largely out of the public eye these days. Oh, and that picture? Yeah, o.k. When there's more proof, I'm sure you'll hear the much maligned MSM (or Lame Stream Media, as they call it in your neck of the woods) beat it to death like so many other useless distractions they blabber on about all day long.
  • puremagic
    puremagic Posts: 1,907
    acutejam wrote:
    Keep dreaming, it's the liberal press protecting one of their own, powerful liberals circling the wagons ... he's gonna be a no show at convention, no cabinet or VP nod for him. He's done.

    Unless it's not true.

    If this was Romney or -- aw heck there's no real equivalant in the GOP -- but it'd be front page NYT!


    Well I guess we can applaud McCain for offering the biker veterans a shot at his wife, only fitting since McCain voted against current military and veteran pay raises, increased health care benefits, educational benefits and housing benefits. Now that McCain doesn't even bother to show up for his Senate duties any more he is not even in a position to understand what the veterans need, nor does he care when his vote could make a difference. The military of today needs more than McCain showing up at a biker rally. The veterans of the past, present and future requires more than a pat on the back and varicose veins.

    If McCain can't do right by the military as a Senator, how can he do right by the military as Commander-In-Chief?
    SIN EATERS--We take the moral excrement we find in this equation and we bury it down deep inside of us so that the rest of our case can stay pure. That is the job. We are morally indefensible and absolutely necessary.
  • kcherub
    kcherub Posts: 961
    although I questioned the origin of the "affair" issue, it seems that he has now admitted that he "lied about the affair", but insists he is not the father of the child. It was the top ticker on CNN when I just went over there...

    Maybe JE is a PJ fan, read this thread, and decided it was time to come clean. ;)

    Shame--I really liked him (personally) and have the utmost respect for his wife. She's a fighter.

    Take care,
    I still want you all to "take care"--I am just damn tired of typing it.

    http://www.youtube.com/user/kcherub#p/a/u/0/N-UQprRqSwo
  • robbie
    robbie Posts: 883
    class act edwards. cheat on your dying wife, what a turd. I bet Obama is glad he did not pick him for VP.
  • robbie
    robbie Posts: 883
    what kind of scum fuck would do this to his sick wife?

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1024927/The-wife-John-McCain-callously-left-behind.html
  • VictoryGin
    VictoryGin Posts: 1,207
    robbie wrote:
    what kind of scum fuck would do this to his sick wife?

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1024927/The-wife-John-McCain-callously-left-behind.html

    you beat me to it. it's funny how people will say john edwards shouldn't have run or would have/should have lost because of this but check out john mccain. class act!

    my local news just broke in with this story though. kinda weird it was so important to break in to a program for.
    if you wanna be a friend of mine
    cross the river to the eastside
  • mca47
    mca47 Posts: 13,334
    Well, I think it's clear that had Edwards gotten the nomination, the dems chance at the White House would be over.

    The republican would eat that up just like they did with ol' Slick Willy and Monica.

Categories