whos about tired with this Bush SHit?

24

Comments

  • onelongsong
    onelongsong Posts: 3,517
    macgyver06 wrote:
    was this guy really elected 2 times....i come on this board to debate issues...but than i think..wait...at least half the people on here must have voted for this guy....and than rage against the machine starts playing in my head and i thinkk...

    are you all fucking nuts...or brain dead? and what exactly do you consider when voting for a non-consrvative war monger into office.

    well before the next election...maybe we could inform these people what the presidents jobs are and what he has the power to do in office. :)

    this could be very educational!

    not everyone should just be handed the presidency like George Bush

    everyone looks at the bad. iraq and afganistan had to happen sooner or later. better it be sooner. bush will probably go down in history for solving the worlds energy problems. why don't people talk about that?
  • eMMI
    eMMI Posts: 6,262
    macgyver06 wrote:
    ya you are right...it's not our fault our language is one of the most complicated...

    it's not complicated. :o

    ok, some words are almost impossible to pronounce/spell.. but if you learn it properly, it's easy. ;):D


    ok, carry on.
    "Don't be faint-hearted, I have a solution! We shall go and commandeer some small craft, then drift at leisure until we happen upon another ideal place for our waterside supper with riparian entertainments."
  • jlew24asu
    jlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    do we need another thread like this? this place is getting old
  • macgyver06
    macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    dunkman wrote:
    its not your language though... its called English... you're just borrowing it :p;)


    edit: yeah, somewhat like a hardworking pornstar from the 70's i am indeed tired of Bush... just to keep thread integrity :)

    it has been tirelessly stolen from every language on the planet into a super language.... we are like the white power ranger :)

    that wasnt supposed to be racist...
  • macgyver06
    macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    onelongsong wrote:
    everyone looks at the bad. iraq and afganistan had to happen sooner or later. better it be sooner. bush will probably go down in history for solving the worlds energy problems. why don't people talk about that?

    solving the worlds energy problems... im confused..

    we were discussing George Bush. Not An Autotrophic Bush who can produce its own food and energy.
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    onelongsong wrote:
    everyone looks at the bad. iraq and afganistan had to happen sooner or later. better it be sooner. bush will probably go down in history for solving the worlds energy problems. why don't people talk about that?

    Because he hasn't solved the world's energy problem. Yes people tend to focus on the negative aspects of his presidency but there have been so many negative aspects.

    I'm not going to argue over Afghanistan because that was a necessity. We needed to displace Al Qaida and it's support network, the Taliban, from there. The problem is we didn't finish the job. We did it on the quick so we could move on to Iraq. Iraq was a completely unnecessary war. There is and was no reason for us to invade Iraq. Even if want to believe that we did have a reason to go in there the war is self was so horrorably mismanaged. If Bush was the CEO of a corporation he would have lost his job a long time ago because of bad management. Then there is No Child Left Behind, the Medicare Prescription Plan all of which are horrible policies that will be a part of his legacy.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • macgyver06
    macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    the taliban still runs afghanistan for the record.
  • onelongsong
    onelongsong Posts: 3,517
    mammasan wrote:
    Because he hasn't solved the world's energy problem. Yes people tend to focus on the negative aspects of his presidency but there have been so many negative aspects.

    I'm not going to argue over Afghanistan because that was a necessity. We needed to displace Al Qaida and it's support network, the Taliban, from there. The problem is we didn't finish the job. We did it on the quick so we could move on to Iraq. Iraq was a completely unnecessary war. There is and was no reason for us to invade Iraq. Even if want to believe that we did have a reason to go in there the war is self was so horrorably mismanaged. If Bush was the CEO of a corporation he would have lost his job a long time ago because of bad management. Then there is No Child Left Behind, the Medicare Prescription Plan all of which are horrible policies that will be a part of his legacy.

    the worlds energy problem has been solved. it's just a matter of bringing the helium3 here. he's got that in the works and by next year; robots will be deployed to gather information and start the process of mining.

    iraq had WMDs because WE GAVE THEM TO HIM. he used biologicals to kill villages and when he paid the families of the hijackers he drew the line in the sand. wasn't he convicted of genocide? and what about not complying with nato rules and blocking inspections?
    hilary wants to surrender but we need to finish the job.
  • macgyver06
    macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    i believe onelongsong..has woken up in a stars wars movie.

    you can go back to sleep for 10 more minutes
  • onelongsong
    onelongsong Posts: 3,517
    macgyver06 wrote:
    i believe onelongsong..has woken up in a stars wars movie.

    you can go back to sleep for 10 more minutes


    and what don't you understand? i'll explain it.
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Isn't it a bit unusual that...

    The approach is "See....look at all the terrorists there are!!"

    not "See...look at all the terrorists we've created over the decades!!"

    Pledge allegiance and bow unconditionally, or suffer our mighty boomstick...

    ...sounds wonderfully delusional...

    foreign policy all-stars...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    onelongsong wrote:
    the worlds energy problem has been solved. it's just a matter of bringing the helium3 here. he's got that in the works and by next year; robots will be deployed to gather information and start the process of mining.

    iraq had WMDs because WE GAVE THEM TO HIM. he used biologicals to kill villages and when he paid the families of the hijackers he drew the line in the sand. wasn't he convicted of genocide? and what about not complying with nato rules and blocking inspections?
    hilary wants to surrender but we need to finish the job.

    Iraq HAD WMDs. That is the key word there. I don't know if you remember this little war back in the early 90's where we invaded Iraq and destroyed the majority of their militray and weapons programs and delivery systems. Then that was followed by years of inspection where we continued to destroy their supply of biological and chemical weapons and dismatled their weapons programs. I'm sure it just a case of selective memory.


    As for this Helium3 and robot miners, it the first I've heard of it and I'm pretty sure that if this administration had anything to do with it they would have been tauting it left and right.

    Lastly who gives fuck about Hillary. I blame her just as much as the current administration for being in Iraq. Last I remembered she voted to yes to authorize this war. I guess she suffers from selective memory as well.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • onelongsong
    onelongsong Posts: 3,517
    mammasan wrote:
    Iraq HAD WMDs. That is the key word there. I don't know if you remember this little war back in the early 90's where we invaded Iraq and destroyed the majority of their militray and weapons programs and delivery systems. Then that was followed by years of inspection where we continued to destroy their supply of biological and chemical weapons and dismatled their weapons programs. I'm sure it just a case of selective memory.


    As for this Helium3 and robot miners, it the first I've heard of it and I'm pretty sure that if this administration had anything to do with it they would have been tauting it left and right.

    Lastly who gives fuck about Hillary. I blame her just as much as the current administration for being in Iraq. Last I remembered she voted to yes to authorize this war. I guess she suffers from selective memory as well.

    he did a good job of rebuilding. as for inspections; how many secret underground labs do we have? if we wanted to hide WMDs we could do it easily.

    bush made a big speach about the helium3 a couple years ago and the national geographic channel shows a documentary about how helium3 can provide the world with clean power and hows there's enough to power the entire world for 1000 years. so if you haven't heard about this program it's not because it hasn't had enough media coverage.

    hopefully nobody cares about hilary.
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    onelongsong wrote:
    he did a good job of rebuilding. as for inspections; how many secret underground labs do we have? if we wanted to hide WMDs we could do it easily.

    bush made a big speach about the helium3 a couple years ago and the national geographic channel shows a documentary about how helium3 can provide the world with clean power and hows there's enough to power the entire world for 1000 years. so if you haven't heard about this program it's not because it hasn't had enough media coverage.

    hopefully nobody cares about hilary.

    He didn't rebuild his programs. Don't you think if possessed WMDs he would have used them against us when we attacked. Don't you think the Baathist insurgents wouldn't be using them as we speak. let's face reality here, he didn't have stores of WMDs.

    I did a quick read on helium 3. While it does look extremely promising we still need to device a mining and transportation system which could take decades. Secondly this is not Bush's idea. He had no hand in the discovery, creation, or mining of helium 3 hense he can take no credit for it. So no Bush did not solve our word's energy problem. He just happens to be the presidnet at the time when this discovery was made.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • macgyver06
    macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    mammasan wrote:
    He didn't rebuild his programs. Don't you think if possessed WMDs he would have used them against us when we attacked. Don't you think the Baathist insurgents wouldn't be using them as we speak. let's face reality here, he didn't have stores of WMDs.

    I did a quick read on helium 3. While it does look extremely promising we still need to device a mining and transportation system which could take decades. Secondly this is not Bush's idea. He had no hand in the discovery, creation, or mining of helium 3 hense he can take no credit for it. So no Bush did not solve our word's energy problem. He just happens to be the presidnet at the time when this discovery was made.

    Iraq didn't even have an airforce.
    He couldn't build a military when you are paying for past wars and trading oil for food and cars. (1970 Terror vans with the little doors on the top) very popular in Iraq :)
  • onelongsong
    onelongsong Posts: 3,517
    mammasan wrote:
    He didn't rebuild his programs. Don't you think if possessed WMDs he would have used them against us when we attacked. Don't you think the Baathist insurgents wouldn't be using them as we speak. let's face reality here, he didn't have stores of WMDs.

    I did a quick read on helium 3. While it does look extremely promising we still need to device a mining and transportation system which could take decades. Secondly this is not Bush's idea. He had no hand in the discovery, creation, or mining of helium 3 hense he can take no credit for it. So no Bush did not solve our word's energy problem. He just happens to be the presidnet at the time when this discovery was made.

    he happens to be the one to authorize and fund the exploration. he did basically what kennedy did in the 60's. he saw the potential while others ignored it. we knew where the helium3 was in the early 70's and we do have the technology to use it. when used in reactors; it releases only a fraction of neutrons other fuels use and therefore are not "worn down" and in need of replacement every 5 years.

    saddam wouldn't use WMDs against us because the entire world would be all over him. he felt he could hide out and ride it out. every now and then we find stores of weapons hid underground in the desert. it's just a matter of time until we find them.
  • Collin
    Collin Posts: 4,931
    macgyver06 wrote:
    it has been tirelessly stolen from every language on the planet into a super language.... we are like the white power ranger :)

    that wasnt supposed to be racist...

    :D
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    onelongsong wrote:
    he happens to be the one to authorize and fund the exploration. he did basically what kennedy did in the 60's. he saw the potential while others ignored it. we knew where the helium3 was in the early 70's and we do have the technology to use it. when used in reactors; it releases only a fraction of neutrons other fuels use and therefore are not "worn down" and in need of replacement every 5 years.

    saddam wouldn't use WMDs against us because the entire world would be all over him. he felt he could hide out and ride it out. every now and then we find stores of weapons hid underground in the desert. it's just a matter of time until we find them.

    A matter of time. We have occupied that country for 4 years we found a single man hiding in a whole in the dessert, but have been unable to find thousands of tons of biological and chemical weapons. Even the president has admitted that they where wrong about the WMDs. yet you seem to believe that you know better than them. Saddam used them on his own people what makes you think he would think twice about using them on us. He knew he was done. There was no way of hiding and riding this one out. His sons where dead, his rule overthrown and his government toppled. The people who he oppressed for decades where going to come into power. He knew that his days where numbered. A desperate man like him would have used those weapons from day one and what ever was left the Sunni insurgents would have or still be using today.

    As for helium 3 yes we have already have the means to use it. We just lack the means to harvest it.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • onelongsong
    onelongsong Posts: 3,517
    mammasan wrote:
    A matter of time. We have occupied that country for 4 years we found a single man hiding in a whole in the dessert, but have been unable to find thousands of tons of biological and chemical weapons. Even the president has admitted that they where wrong about the WMDs. yet you seem to believe that you know better than them. Saddam used them on his own people what makes you think he would think twice about using them on us. He knew he was done. There was no way of hiding and riding this one out. His sons where dead, his rule overthrown and his government toppled. The people who he oppressed for decades where going to come into power. He knew that his days where numbered. A desperate man like him would have used those weapons from day one and what ever was left the Sunni insurgents would have or still be using today.

    As for helium 3 yes we have already have the means to use it. We just lack the means to harvest it.

    he said that for pr reasons.

    we have the means to harvest. watch moon for sale on national geographic. men are being trained already in the space stations assembled on earth for training. orbitors and landers are made.
  • mammasan
    mammasan Posts: 5,656
    onelongsong wrote:
    he said that for pr reasons.

    What ever helps you sleep at night.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul

Categories