Throughout history jesus was a white man

LifeWasted21
LifeWasted21 Posts: 149
edited December 2006 in A Moving Train
so the rest of you can all just go to hell.


Im kidding of course. Why is this? he has been painted, portrayed as a white man since the beginning of this crazy fairy tale.

im stilling trying to decide what i believe in but the older I get, the more i think its a big goddamn conspiracy to rule people. There I said it. Jesus would not have even been white? Am i wrong about this?

maybe i can believe in jesus as a good man and thats it.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«134567

Comments

  • redrock
    redrock Posts: 18,341
    LifeWasted21 wrote:
    so the rest of you can all just go to hell.


    Im kidding of course. Why is this? he has been painted, portrayed as a white man since the beginning of this crazy fairy tale.

    im stilling trying to decide what i believe in but the older I get, the more i think its a big goddamn conspiracy to rule people. There I said it. Jesus would not have even been white? Am i wrong about this?

    maybe i can believe in jesus as a good man and thats it.

    Well... should he have existed and coming where he came from, he would have been a bit 'tanned'.. dearie me... he might have even looked... I'm saying it.... a bit... 'arab' :eek:
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    Jesus would have looked like Sadaam Hussain when he crawled out of that hole in the ground. Except he would have been scruffier. There were no bic razor's in his day.
  • macgyver06
    macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    or perhaps like the rest of that book, he was a symbol for the ''righteous path''

    LIKE MICKEY MOUSE!
  • macgyver06
    macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    theres nothing more righteous than a Merry Mouse
  • London Calling
    London Calling Posts: 164
    isnt this why muslims dont allow pictures of their prophets to stop this inadvertant racism. I mean if Jesus was portryed as lookinh like an arab i dont think Pat Robertson would worship him.
  • macgyver06
    macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    London Calling wrote:
    isnt this why muslims dont allow pictures of their prophets to stop this inadvertant racism. I mean if Jesus was portryed as lookinh like an arab i dont think Pat Robertson would worship him.

    its so that every believer can truly have his own image of his PERSONAL
    God...( this is not that crazy )
  • macgyver06
    macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    maybe thats why they got so pissed about that cartoon...now a kid is envisioning a cartoon guy
  • Collin
    Collin Posts: 4,931
    http://archives.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/12/25/face.jesus/index.html
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • Collin
    Collin Posts: 4,931
    And and it's throughout western history Jesus was a white man.
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • LifeWasted21
    LifeWasted21 Posts: 149
    i dont care from what history viewpoint he's been a white man. The fact that a human being can be manipulated to form other peopels beliefs. If the story is true, he shouldnt be turned into someone else, but obviously has been to control others.
  • redrock
    redrock Posts: 18,341
    Collin wrote:
    http://archives.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/12/25/face.jesus/index.html

    Damn... and I thought he looked like this http://www.bestofneworleans.com/dispatch/2003-03-11/ae_feat-1.jpg
    or this http://www.sebastianbach.com/archives/jcsp1.jpg
  • Collin
    Collin Posts: 4,931
    LifeWasted21 wrote:
    i dont care from what history viewpoint he's been a white man. The fact that a human being can be manipulated to form other peopels beliefs. If the story is true, he shouldnt be turned into someone else, but obviously has been to control others.

    Jesus would indeed not have been white, he would have looked like a Middle Eastern person. But the fact is in Africa Jesus is mostly portrayed as a black man, in Latin America Jesus is often portrayed as a Hispanic.

    I think his skin colour isn't important at all, I think his message is important.
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • Collin
    Collin Posts: 4,931
    redrock wrote:
    Damn... and I thought he looked like this http://www.bestofneworleans.com/dispatch/2003-03-11/ae_feat-1.jpg
    or this http://www.sebastianbach.com/archives/jcsp1.jpg

    Talk about a shock, I thought he looked like this: Jesus
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    Collin wrote:
    http://archives.cnn.com/2002/TECH/science/12/25/face.jesus/index.html


    "Using archaeological and anatomical science rather than artistic interpretation makes this the most accurate likeness ever created," Jean Claude Gragard, producer of the BBC documentary "Son of God," told The London Times. Gragard used the same image last year in his series.


    What a joke! There is no archaeological or anatomical science with which to reconstruct Jesus because there is absolutely no historical evidence that ever existed, outside of the Bible. And the Bible isn't evidence. It was written 50 - 100 years after his supposed existence.
  • angelica
    angelica Posts: 6,038
    redrock wrote:
    Damn... and I thought he looked like this http://www.bestofneworleans.com/dispatch/2003-03-11/ae_feat-1.jpg
    or this http://www.sebastianbach.com/archives/jcsp1.jpg

    :eek: That's one scary Jesus!
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • Collin
    Collin Posts: 4,931
    Byrnzie wrote:
    "Using archaeological and anatomical science rather than artistic interpretation makes this the most accurate likeness ever created," Jean Claude Gragard, producer of the BBC documentary "Son of God," told The London Times. Gragard used the same image last year in his series.


    What a joke! There is no archaeological or anatomical science with which to reconstruct Jesus because there is absolutely no historical evidence that ever existed, outside of the Bible. And the Bible isn't evidence. It was written 50 - 100 years after his supposed existence.

    What the bloody hell are you talking about?

    Did you even read the rest?
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • redrock
    redrock Posts: 18,341
    angelica wrote:
    :eek: That's one scary Jesus!

    Yep.... I think I like Collin's better... Bach to do what he does best..... :D
  • angelica
    angelica Posts: 6,038
    redrock wrote:
    Yep.... I think I like Collin's better... Bach to do what he does best..... :D
    ;)

    Is it Collin's Southpark Jesus you prefer, or the "anatomical science" one that's got Byrnzie up in arms? ;)
    "The opposite of a fact is falsehood, but the opposite of one profound truth may very well be another profound truth." ~ Niels Bohr

    http://www.myspace.com/illuminatta

    Rhinocerous Surprise '08!!!
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    Collin wrote:
    What the bloody hell are you talking about?

    Did you even read the rest?

    Would you care to explain what your gripe is?
  • Byrnzie
    Byrnzie Posts: 21,037
    Collin wrote:
    What the bloody hell are you talking about?

    Did you even read the rest?

    So they took an Israeli face and then constructed their Jesus around what they figured a Jew looked like in that time. Anyone could have done the same. You must admit it's a bit pathetic. I'm not having a go at you. I'm having ago at these arseholes who are being paid to produce this crap.

Categories