was 9/11 an inside job?

Options
12345679»

Comments

  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    9/11....aint no ting but a chicken wing...

    I'm waiting for 9/11 part II...coming soon to a city (New York) near you.

    The movie of course :rolleyes: otherwise that would make me one of "dem terrrrerists" or something.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • spiral out
    spiral out Posts: 1,052
    jlew24asu wrote:
    guess what dude. you dont know shit about me. and guess what..

    whatreallyhappened.com is rubbish. but nice try.

    so like stu was saying....since I dismiss the bullshit you post means I dont know anything about history? wow. stu nailed your ass.


    You have some heavy obsession with whatreallyhappened.com

    I might have to check it out sometime so i know what your talking about.
    Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!

    The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
  • MakingWaves
    MakingWaves Posts: 1,294
    DriftingByTheStorm wrote:
    how about #'s 9 & 12 to start.

    Just a note, i never made it through college and i compiled that "colorful-pile of shit" ... with a brain your size, you should be able to READ IT just fine.

    Get the fuck over it and learn to read. Bold letters and the color red aren't the hardest things in the world to understand. It's TWO COLORS, and some bold. You are either illiterate or just lazy as hell.
    If you people are too lazy to even read what is potentialy truth, then how the fuck will you ever be free!?!

    I hate myself for getting back in this crap but let me see if this will make sense to you as to why 9 & 12 are lame arguements.

    What you won’t see pointed out very often is that bin Ladin isn’t the only known person in the videos. Leading Al Qaeda figures Suleiman Abu Ghaith and Ayman al-Zawahiri are claimed to make make brief appearances, too. Presumably we’re supposed to believe they are also being impersonated?

    Beyond the analyses, we think the idea of the tape being faked raises other questions, for which there are a distinct lack of answers.

    Many of the same sites who tell us this tape is a fake, for instance, also point out that bin Ladin denied being involved with 9/11 soon after the attacks. If this is true then it suggests bin Ladin is a real, live person, out there somewhere, not doing the bidding of the US Government. In which case why has he, or some other al Qaeda spokesman, not pointed out that this tape is a fake?

    And if you also look at the rest of this tape there are points of it where it looks exactly like bin Laden.
    Seeing visions of falling up somehow.

    Pensacola '94
    New Orleans '95
    Birmingham '98
    New Orleans '00
    New Orleans '03
    Tampa '08
    New Orleans '10 - Jazzfest
    New Orleans '16 - Jazzfest
    Fenway Park '18
    St. Louis '22
  • John Budge
    John Budge Posts: 259
    Byrnzie wrote:
    And Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gunman that shot Kennedy, right?
    Affirmative
  • John Budge
    John Budge Posts: 259
    DriftingByTheStorm wrote:
    ...If you people are too lazy to even read what is potentialy truth, then how the fuck will you ever be free!?!
    "potentialy(sic) truth" -- Fucking classic!
  • stu gee
    stu gee Posts: 1,174
    DriftingByTheStorm wrote:
    how about #'s 9 & 12 to start.

    Just a note, i never made it through college and i compiled that "colorful-pile of shit" ... with a brain your size, you should be able to READ IT just fine.

    Get the fuck over it and learn to read. Bold letters and the color red aren't the hardest things in the world to understand. It's TWO COLORS, and some bold. You are either illiterate or just lazy as hell.
    If you people are too lazy to even read what is potentialy truth, then how the fuck will you ever be free!?!

    I have read a lot of what is 'potentially' the truth and i still think its less than convincing.
    People say im paranoid. Well, they dont say it, but i know that's what they are thinking.
  • DriftingByTheStorm
    DriftingByTheStorm Posts: 8,684
    John Budge wrote:
    "potentialy(sic) truth" -- Fucking classic!

    you know, call outs on grammar make REALY(sic) effective arguments ... thanks ... i sure wish we could see POLITICS degrade to this level ... fuck issues and intelligent debate, lets just call people out on grammar, and be petty.

    let me go back and proof read every post you've ever made, god knows you never slipped.
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • RolandTD20Kdrummer
    RolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    Just like Bush is potentially right to bomb the snot out of countries that aren't even linked to 9/11, but played up hard in the media so the sheeple dine on it like a fine organic hay. Mmmmm organic...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")

Categories