the science of creation
catefrances
Posts: 29,003
whilst we're on such a religious kick, here's a question to ponder.
does science contradict the Genesis account of creation?
does science contradict the Genesis account of creation?
hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
-
Absolutely.I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire0
-
...there was darkness.
And then came light.
And then came waters and lands and plants and animals.Feels Good Inc.0 -
Bu2 wrote:...there was darkness.
And then came light.
And then came waters and lands and plants and animals.
I'm more inclined to believe there was no begining. But I will not make assumptions about the origins of reality.I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire0 -
catefrances wrote:whilst we're on such a religious kick, here's a question to ponder.
does science contradict the Genesis account of creation?
Yes."My Cadillac's sittin in the back, it isn't me, I'm going home in my Galaxy"
S. Hoon
"My body's nobody's body but mine. You run your own body, let me run mine" Chicago '95
Franken '080 -
Darkness, then light.
But what the fuck do I know? I'm only human.
*shrugs*Feels Good Inc.0 -
Bu2 wrote:Darkness, then light.
But what the fuck do I know? I'm only human.
*shrugs*
I know but Big Bang was never concluded to be the 'begining' even if it is true. That's something Creationists have done.I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire0 -
is your beginning (or non-beginning, as it were)?
And where in the hell is the link to gabbly???????Feels Good Inc.0 -
no comment.for poetry through the ceiling. ISBN: 1 4241 8840 7
"Hear me, my chiefs!
I am tired; my heart is
sick and sad. From where
the sun stands I will fight
no more forever."
Chief Joseph - Nez Perce0 -
Bu2 wrote:is your beginning (or non-beginning, as it were)?
And where in the hell is the link to gabbly???????
I don't have an answer for that. I actually consider it to be irrelevant.I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire0 -
so when day is mentioned in the bible it is automatically assumed to be of the 24 hour variety?hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say0 -
Whats a Day to a Timeless god? So No not at all.That's two things we've got, Tape and Time.0
-
sicnevol wrote:Whats a Day to a Timeless god? So No not at all.
so if we do not assume a day in creation is 24 earth hours long. that means that God did not create the world in the 6 earth days as we see it. if this is so then it could be said that here we have science not acting in contradiction to the creation theory. because as we all know science disbelieves the 6 day theory. we simply do not know how long a day is.
and if this is so, then how are we to view 'in the beginning'? and do we also assume that the 6 days of creation are consequential to 'the beginning'? and when exactly is this 'beginning'?hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say0 -
Are you asking me?catefrances wrote:so if we do not assume a day in creation is 24 earth hours long. that means that God did not create the world in the 6 earth days as we see it. if this is so then it could be said that here we have science not acting in contradiction to the creation theory. because as we all know science disbelieves the 6 day theory. we simply do not know how long a day is.
and if this is so, then how are we to view 'in the beginning'? and do we also assume that the 6 days of creation are consequential to 'the beginning'? and when exactly is this 'beginning'?
Well, if god is timeless and always was, there is no beginning. For something that is eternal there is no time. six "days" to a god, could be 600 Billion years to us. There is a theory called the clock maker theory....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clockmaker_hypothesis
thats my thought on relgion. If there is a god, he doesn;t really care to much.That's two things we've got, Tape and Time.0 -
sicnevol wrote:Are you asking me?
Well, if god is timeless and always was, there is no beginning. For something that is eternal there is no time. six "days" to a god, could be 600 Billion years to us. There is a theory called the clock maker theory....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clockmaker_hypothesis
thats my thought on relgion. If there is a god, he doesn;t really care to much.
nope. not specifically. anyone with a brain and a thought will suffice.
yep i'm familiar with the clockmaker theory. though quite honestly, if you made something as wonderous as the earth and all the rest, why oh why would you step aside and leave the children in charge? everyone knows what kids are like home alone without supervision.
hear my name
take a good look
this could be the day
hold my hand
lie beside me
i just need to say0 -
If you change the day length then maybe genisis does not contradict the age of the universe. However there are plenty of other parts of creation that contradict science, such as the order things arrived...
Flying organisms appearing at the same time as marine organisms? The fossil record contradicts this.
The formation of the sun and moon after the formation of the earth also contradicts the current model of how the solar system (and galaxies) formed.
And there are plenty of others... So yes, the biblical account of creation is contradicted by scientific observation.0 -
What a contradiction to have a faith in science, yet use that faith to denounce faith in a God. You people are humorous....but I feel sorry for you...The only people we should try to get even with...
...are those who've helped us.
Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.0 -
know1 wrote:What a contradiction to have a faith in science, yet use that faith to denounce faith in a God. You people are humorous....but I feel sorry for you...
There's a difference in having faith in science and having faith in god, imo.THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!
naděje umírá poslední0 -
Collin wrote:There's a difference in having faith in science and having faith in god, imo.
It's not much, if any, in my opinion. If you do not understand a scientific principle completely, then you have to have faith to believe it.The only people we should try to get even with...
...are those who've helped us.
Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.0 -
catefrances wrote:
does science contradict the Genesis account of creation?
Not in my opinion. I was taught not to take Genesis literally. As is the whole Bible. That is one of the differences between Fundamentalism and Catholicism.0 -
catefrances wrote:so when day is mentioned in the bible it is automatically assumed to be of the 24 hour variety?
That's what a Fundamentalist would say.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 149K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 278 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help




