Gay sex is hazardous to your health

Ahnimus · June 2007

pickupyourwill wrote:

sorry for pickin' on ya Ahnimus, but I couldn't help but notice that if you take "him" out of your name your left with just an "anus". just making on observation is all. continue on with the poopshoot talk.

Here are a couple for you pickupyourwill

i kill up cry ow
i ill up cry wok
i icy work pull
i icky pull row
i lurk cow ply

Or if I remove a bunch of letters and rearrange them I get PRiCK.

Lol, so much fun

RolandTD20Kdrummer · June 2007

I just had to...

http://wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=pickupyourwill

from:
http://wordsmith.org/anagram/

Funny...they omit Santa from Satan
http://wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=satan
.

catefrances · June 2007

oh for fucks sake people. if youre gonna engage in anal sex show some common sense and wrap that sucker in rubber. just like for vaginal sex

SharonC · June 2007

RolandTD20Kdrummer wrote:

You're equating anal sex with the actual presentment of a human life?

....whoa.....

I'm not equating them in totality, just pointing out that both can be considered risky behaviors for a similar reason. But in reality, childbirth is much more dangerous.

dunkman · June 2007

there are so many instances of gay anal sex in nature as obviously it must feel good... even hetero couples engage in anal sex as it feels good.. is it natural? i personally dont think it is... in so much as the anus and its accompanying tubes are built for the sole purpose of excreting shit... if it was meant to be fucked then it would be a self-lubricating stretchable entry point... its not.. its designed to let things out, not in... this is why, in nature, it can be fairly common occurence for a gay man to have a wizards cuff for an arsehole... this is due to his muscles becoming stretched and limp.. anal prolapses are common amongst older gay men... as is having a bad moustache

Jeanie · June 2007

dunkman wrote:

there are so many instances of gay anal sex in nature as obviously it must feel good... even hetero couples engage in anal sex as it feels good.. is it natural? i personally dont think it is... in so much as the anus and its accompanying tubes are built for the sole purpose of excreting shit... if it was meant to be fucked then it would be a self-lubricating stretchable entry point... its not.. its designed to let things out, not in... this is why, in nature, it can be fairly common occurence for a gay man to have a wizards cuff for an arsehole... this is due to his muscles becoming stretched and limp.. anal prolapses are common amongst older gay men... as is having a bad moustache

I'm just wondering, where is it written that the anus is an exit point only dunk? I mean who says what is natural or unatural? Not having a go, just curious. Coz I know there was no rule book or operational manual on my body presented to me!!! Not that I'm particularly interested in supporting anal sex but you're argument isn't cutting it for me.

What about uterine prolapse in women? Does that mean that women weren't designed to have too many children? Actually now that I think about it, the bad moustache thing could apply here as well.

And if the anus wasn't meant to be a pleasurable hole, how come a man's prostate, the centre of a man's pleasure, is most easily accessed by the anus?

Just thinking out loud.

RolandTD20Kdrummer · June 2007

SharonC wrote:

I'm not equating them in totality, just pointing out that both can be considered risky behaviors for a similar reason. But in reality, childbirth is much more dangerous.

More dangerous sure...but an orgasm v.s. a human life....yadda yadda..

dunkman · June 2007

Jeanie wrote:

I'm just wondering, where is it written that the anus is an exit point only dunk? I mean who says what is natural or unatural? Not having a go, just curious. Coz I know there was no rule book or operational manual on my body presented to me!!! Not that I'm particularly interested in supporting anal sex but you're argument isn't cutting it for me.

What about uterine prolapse in women? Does that mean that women weren't designed to have too many children? Actually now that I think about it, the bad moustache thing could apply here as well.

And if the anus wasn't meant to be a pleasurable hole, how come a man's prostate, the centre of a man's pleasure, is most easily accessed by the anus?

Just thinking out loud.

you asked where it was written that its an exit point only... check it out Jeanie, the muscles are designed to push things out, not in... you can find this out on wikipedia or other medical sites... or alternatively try doing a poo and then sucking it all the way back up... you wont be able to

Vaginal lubrication is the naturally produced lubricating fluid that reduces friction during sexual intercourse. The anus/sphincter does not produce a natural lubricating fluid... thats why it isnt 'natural' to stick a willy in there... it doesnt mean it isnt fun or doesnt feel great... but its not what i would deem a 'natural' place to shove my willy, just as humping a warm bag of liver isnt natural but probably feels nice... iwouldnt know though *whistles*

the sole purpose/design/mechanics of sex is to reproduce... anal sex wont let us do that.. again this is why i think its not 'natural'

if anal sex were a natural thing then KY Jelly would go bust.. and anal prolapses wouldnt be a gay mans concern

RolandTD20Kdrummer · June 2007

mmm ecoli... say ahhh...

Jeanie · June 2007

dunkman wrote:

you asked where it was written that its an exit point only... check it out Jeanie, the muscles are designed to push things out, not in... you can find this out on wikipedia or other medical sites... or alternatively try doing a poo and then sucking it all the way back up... you wont be able to

Vaginal lubrication is the naturally produced lubricating fluid that reduces friction during sexual intercourse. The anus/sphincter does not produce a natural lubricating fluid... thats why it isnt 'natural' to stick a willy in there... it doesnt mean it isnt fun or doesnt feel great... but its not what i would deem a 'natural' place to shove my willy, just as humping a warm bag of liver isnt natural but probably feels nice... iwouldnt know though *whistles*

the sole purpose/design/mechanics of sex is to reproduce... anal sex wont let us do that.. again this is why i think its not 'natural'

if anal sex were a natural thing then KY Jelly would go bust.. and anal prolapses wouldnt be a gay mans concern

If the sole purpose of sex is reproduction, then explain the clitoris to me?
And why then is a man's prostate, ALL MENS PROSTATES located up their ass? If the sole purpose of sex is reproduction then there was no need for nature to make sex pleasurable.
And not all women produce vaginal lubricant, so I don't think that counts as a valid argument.

If the anus is not somewhere you feel is natural to stick your willy, fine and good. Your personal preference, your choice. And if you don't want to subject your anus to being an entrance point, male or female, fine and good, your choice.
But I still haven't seen any argument that would convince me that anal sex is "wrong" or not "proper" or that our bodies weren't "designed" for it.
I'm quite sure anal sex has been around as long as vaginal sex.
It probably hasn't had the same "sanctity" applied to it and has suffered "bad press" over the millenia but I doubt very much, that anal sex was even first performed by a "homosexual". I'm more than convinced, boys being the way they are about their dick and holes, that the first anal sex was probably instigated by a male on a female. Anyway, it's all neither here nor there.
For those that wish to partake of anal sex that's their business. I'm quite sure that like with hetrosexual couples, homosexuals find penetrative sex only a small part of a loving relationship. I shall leave you to your warm bag of liver dunky!

dunkman · June 2007

Jeanie wrote:

If the sole purpose of sex is reproduction, then explain the clitoris to me?

sure thing... its a mini penis... its only there after your cells have decided if your going to be a woman or a man.. same with my nipples.

and the clitoris isnt necessary for reproduction..

ask the thousands of poor women in Middle Eastern countries who have had theirs lopped off.. they still have children

And why then is a man's prostate, ALL MENS PROSTATES located up their ass? If the sole purpose of sex is reproduction then there was no need for nature to make sex pleasurable.

because it isnt located up the ass... it is very close to it but its like saying my tonsils are located in my brain.. the gland itself isnt up the ass.. it can be stimulated throught the bum, the prostate isnt there to be stimulated.. its primary function is to produce seminal fluid and other stuff liek that... it just so happens (urban myth?) that it apparently produces instant ejaculation or can produce heavier loads... again very unsubstantiated that. Sex is pleasureable because it just is... but we are designed to have sex as a means for reproduction... saying otherwise is just kiding yourself.

And not all women produce vaginal lubricant, so I don't think that counts as a valid argument.

maybe they dont... but they are designed to... not all humans can walk, but we were designed to. anyway, i could fix that dryness problem if need be

If the anus is not somewhere you feel is natural to stick your willy, fine and good. Your personal preference, your choice. And if you don't want to subject your anus to being an entrance point, male or female, fine and good, your choice.
But I still haven't seen any argument that would convince me that anal sex is "wrong" or not "proper" or that our bodies weren't "designed" for it.
I'm quite sure anal sex has been around as long as vaginal sex.
It probably hasn't had the same "sanctity" applied to it and has suffered "bad press" over the millenia but I doubt very much, that anal sex was even first performed by a "homosexual". I'm more than convinced, boys being the way they are about their dick and holes, that the first anal sex was probably instigated by a male on a female. Anyway, it's all neither here nor there.
For those that wish to partake of anal sex that's their business. I'm quite sure that like with hetrosexual couples, homosexuals find penetrative sex only a small part of a loving relationship. I shall leave you to your warm bag of liver dunky!

i'm not saying its 'wrong' or 'not proper'... i'm saying that medically speaking the way the anus works and the adjoining sphincter muscles work... the body was designed to shove things out of there.. it has no self-lubricating properties and even a camels pussy gets wet... but bums dont!!!

my daughter had a rare condition when she was a baby (Hertzsprungs) and its when the muscles of the colon havent joined up properly... anyway, the surgeon who dealt with us told us that these muscles are only ever meant to push faeces out and so if she had dead tissue there she would need an operation as she might never be able to push them out... they create a rippling effect and push waste DOWN and OUT.. its the sole function of a rectum/anus/whatever... ok it might feel good being shagged in it, but then there are men/women out there who shag their dogs... it might feel nice, but i'm pretty sure its not natural!!!

Deni · June 2007

dunkman wrote:

sure thing... its a mini penis... its only there after your cells have decided if your going to be a woman or a man.. same with my nipples.

and the clitoris isnt necessary for reproduction.. ask the thousands of poor women in Middle Eastern countries who have had theirs lopped off.. they still have children

You have been deceived! The clitoris is NOT a tiny penis! The clitoris has it's own completely unique biological function! Orgasm is not just pleasurable for a woman it is a biological imperative. Not only does a woman's orgasm help push semen up into her uterus which helps in conception, but woman (historically speaking--and I'm not talking about the Victorian era) used orgasm to judge their mates by. Besides, all fetuses start out physically female. A penis develops from the clitoral complex! (That's the sex nub thingy.) So if anything a clitoris is not a tiny penis, but a penis is a big disgusting overgrown clitoris! SO THERE! This is why we call it genital MUTILATION when women in those countries are forced to slice off their clitori. And worse, they are SOWN UP! They may still have children, but it rips them in half and many of them DIE!

Kann · June 2007

Jeanie wrote:

If the sole purpose of sex is reproduction, then explain the clitoris to me?
And why then is a man's prostate, ALL MENS PROSTATES located up their ass? If the sole purpose of sex is reproduction then there was no need for nature to make sex pleasurable.

Well, it's up for interpretation, but it's possible to argue that if sex wasn't pleasurable then not as many people would bother to have sex in the first place (it can be tiring, akward, boring, lame etc.) and lead to the extinction of the species. So having pleasurable sex may very well be what saved us from extinction.

And not all women produce vaginal lubricant, so I don't think that counts as a valid argument.

On other side not all prostates, when touched, give pleasure.

But I still haven't seen any argument that would convince me that anal sex is "wrong" or not "proper" or that our bodies weren't "designed" for it.

Maybe we think that what is natural and proper is an act that has biological consequences : i.e. vaginal sex ensures the survival of the species. That would mean oral sex is unnatural and not proper either.

pickupyourwill · June 2007

Ahnimus wrote:

Here are a couple for you pickupyourwill

i kill up cry ow
i ill up cry wok
i icy work pull
i icky pull row
i lurk cow ply

Or if I remove a bunch of letters and rearrange them I get PRiCK.

Lol, so much fun

fair enough anus--oop, I mean Ahnimus--fair enough

dunkman · June 2007

Deni wrote:

You have been deceived! The clitoris is NOT a tiny penis! The clitoris has it's own completely unique biological function! Orgasm is not just pleasurable for a woman it is a biological imperative. Not only does a woman's orgasm help push semen up into her uterus which helps in conception,

it only HELPS in conception... its not a necessity for a woman to orgasm via the clitoris to have a baby... and its a vaginal orgasm that can aid the dipping of the cervix just as much as a clitoral orgasm...

however, it is a necessity for a woman to receive sperm in the vagina to enable reproduction... not in the anus. which is the core subject of the thread

so i have a giant clit... awesome... i'm off home to play with it

dunkman · June 2007

Deni wrote:

You have been deceived! The clitoris is NOT a tiny penis! So if anything a clitoris is not a tiny penis, but a penis is a big disgusting overgrown clitoris! SO THERE!

you are wrong regarding the clitoris penis thing.. (just as i was) we are sorta non-sexual until the 4th week of our embryonic state.. our penis or clitoris is a tubercle until its decided what sex we are to be

A genital tubercle is a body of tissue which forms in the ventral, caudal region of mammalian embryos of both sexes, and eventually develops into a phallus. In the human fetus the genital tubercle develops around week 4 of gestation, and by week 9 becomes recognizably either a clitoris or penis.

The genital tubercle is sensitive to dihydrotestosterone and rich in 5-alpha-reductase, so that the amount of fetal testosterone present after the second month is a major determinant of phallus size at birth

redrock · June 2007

dunkman wrote:

its not a necessity for a woman to orgasm via the clitoris to have a baby...

Actually it's not a necessity for the woman to orgasm at all to conceive.... one of those myths again....

dunkman wrote:

so i have a giant clit... awesome... i'm off home to play with it

Not too much.. you'll go blind.

Dunk, you are most probably right in saying that the anus was is not 'built' purposely for sex but seeing there is an abundance of nerve endings in the anal region and it's generally a nice tight fit... so pleasure all around!

As for risky? As long as one takes proper precautions and is 'reasonable....

Jeanie · June 2007

dunkman wrote:

sure thing... its a mini penis... its only there after your cells have decided if your going to be a woman or a man.. same with my nipples.

and the clitoris isnt necessary for reproduction.. ask the thousands of poor women in Middle Eastern countries who have had theirs lopped off.. they still have children

because it isnt located up the ass... it is very close to it but its like saying my tonsils are located in my brain.. the gland itself isnt up the ass.. it can be stimulated throught the bum, the prostate isnt there to be stimulated.. its primary function is to produce seminal fluid and other stuff liek that... it just so happens (urban myth?) that it apparently produces instant ejaculation or can produce heavier loads... again very unsubstantiated that. Sex is pleasureable because it just is... but we are designed to have sex as a means for reproduction... saying otherwise is just kiding yourself.

maybe they dont... but they are designed to... not all humans can walk, but we were designed to. anyway, i could fix that dryness problem if need be

i'm not saying its 'wrong' or 'not proper'... i'm saying that medically speaking the way the anus works and the adjoining sphincter muscles work... the body was designed to shove things out of there.. it has no self-lubricating properties and even a camels pussy gets wet... but bums dont!!!

my daughter had a rare condition when she was a baby (Hertzsprungs) and its when the muscles of the colon havent joined up properly... anyway, the surgeon who dealt with us told us that these muscles are only ever meant to push faeces out and so if she had dead tissue there she would need an operation as she might never be able to push them out... they create a rippling effect and push waste DOWN and OUT.. its the sole function of a rectum/anus/whatever... ok it might feel good being shagged in it, but then there are men/women out there who shag their dogs... it might feel nice, but i'm pretty sure its not natural!!!

Yeah, this could go on for hours, and we still wouldn't agree dunky. But that's cool. You've got your views and I've got mine.

I'm really sorry about your baby girl. Hope she's not suffering too much.

dunkman · June 2007

redrock wrote:

Actually it's not a necessity for the woman to orgasm at all to conceive.... one of those myths again....

i knew this, but thanks

Not too much.. you'll go blind.

IrishAL :eek:

cornnifer · June 2007

Jeanie wrote:

But I still haven't seen any argument that would convince me that anal sex is "wrong" or not "proper" or that our bodies weren't "designed" for it.

i won't say that its "wrong" or not "proper" for those that get their kicks that way. You can stick whatever you want in your ass. i don't care. It isn't my business. Good luck with that.
But in absolutely no way will i agree that our bodies were designed/evolved for that. No way. Regardless of what perspective you look at it from. It isn't a religious/spiritual issue. Whether you look at it naturalistically or theistically, anal sex is simply not what God/nature intended. Its elementary school biology for Pete's sake.

Gay sex is hazardous to your health

Comments

Categories