Gay sex is hazardous to your health

RushlimboRushlimbo Posts: 832
edited June 2007 in A Moving Train
Some nice nuggets from the surgeon general nominee, another winner from this brilliant administration --->

http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1915
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
Post edited by Unknown User on
«134

Comments

  • cornnifercornnifer Posts: 2,130
    i'm not taking sides one way or the other in this, and this is not an endorsement of the SG nominee as i know very little about the person, but, there really is no debating the biological and physiological complementarity of the sexes. No arguing it at all.
    "When all your friends and sedatives mean well but make it worse... better find yourself a place to level out."
  • callencallen Posts: 6,388
    cornnifer wrote:
    there really is no debating the biological and physiological complementarity of the sexes. No arguing it at all.

    Please explain...
    10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG
  • cornnifercornnifer Posts: 2,130
    callen wrote:
    Please explain...

    look, i'm not gonna fight with ya. Its quite obvious what i mean. If you REALLY don't understand, i suggest porno. i don't really endorse porn, but, in extreme educational circumstances such as this, i'll allow an exception.
    "When all your friends and sedatives mean well but make it worse... better find yourself a place to level out."
  • Alex_CoeAlex_Coe Posts: 762
    Gay sex is a health hazard because the intruder can get poopie on his penis. Duh.
  • PJ_SalukiPJ_Saluki Posts: 1,006
    Gay sex is now bad for me? Fuck! What's left? I can't smoke. I shouldn't drink. I had to cancel my hand grenade juggling act just days before I was supposed to perform at a grade school. Life is just no fun anymore. I guess it's back to vagina. I'm sure that's not bad for me, is it?
    "Almost all those politicians took money from Enron, and there they are holding hearings. That's like O.J. Simpson getting in the Rae Carruth jury pool." -- Charles Barkley
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    Take it from sue johansen
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=sf2S4lF4y8s

    Basically, the anus is very thin and tears easily, you can get shit in there and it can cause problems. The vagina is more durable, almost like it was designed to get pounded.

    That's the only health issues as far as I know. I don't care what people do though. I just like pussy myself.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • callencallen Posts: 6,388
    cornnifer wrote:
    look, i'm not gonna fight with ya. Its quite obvious what i mean. If you REALLY don't understand, i suggest porno. i don't really endorse porn, but, in extreme educational circumstances such as this, i'll allow an exception.

    ....lots of dangers and nastiness from hetro sex as well.......and since one can't choose to whom your attracted, it is what it is.....so sing with me "does it really matter"??
    10-18-2000 Houston, 04-06-2003 Houston, 6-25-2003 Toronto, 10-8-2004 Kissimmee, 9-4-2005 Calgary, 12-3-05 Sao Paulo, 7-2-2006 Denver, 7-22-06 Gorge, 7-23-2006 Gorge, 9-13-2006 Bern, 6-22-2008 DC, 6-24-2008 MSG, 6-25-2008 MSG
  • SharonCSharonC Posts: 105
    Ahnimus wrote:
    Take it from sue johansen
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=sf2S4lF4y8s

    Basically, the anus is very thin and tears easily, you can get shit in there and it can cause problems. The vagina is more durable, almost like it was designed to get pounded.

    That's the only health issues as far as I know. I don't care what people do though. I just like pussy myself.

    I'm not endorsing this view, but if they're going to make that argument, then they should be saying that anal sex (not gay sex) can be dangerous. Lot's of heterosexual people have anal sex, and lots of gay people engage in other sexual activities besides anal sex (in fact, it's not the most common sexual act among gay men). The point is that he's calling "gay sex" dangerous because he has a moral agenda, couched in the pretense of a medical one.

    Vaginas tear during birth. Does that mean we should stop having kids because it could be dangerous?

    And guys, if this complementarity is so biologically obvious, why are there so many cases of homosexual behavior in nature?
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    Sorry, I was just commenting on the potential health side-effects of anal sex. Which is common amongst gay men, but also heterosexual couples.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • prismprism Posts: 2,440
    SharonC wrote:
    I'm not endorsing this view, but if they're going to make that argument, then they should be saying that anal sex (not gay sex) can be dangerous. Lot's of heterosexual people have anal sex, and lots of gay people engage in other sexual activities besides anal sex (in fact, it's not the most common sexual act among gay men). The point is that he's calling "gay sex" dangerous because he has a moral agenda, couched in the pretense of a medical one.

    Vaginas tear during birth. Does that mean we should stop having kids because it could be dangerous?

    And guys, if this complementarity is so biologically obvious, why are there so many cases of homosexual behavior in nature?

    what she said

    I'd also point out that vaginas can tear (owie) during straight sex....and I'm not talking about virgin vaginas either.
    *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
    angels share laughter
    *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    prism wrote:
    what she said

    I'd also point out that vaginas can tear (owie) during straight sex....and I'm not talking about virgin vaginas either.

    Do you extrude feces through your vagina though?

    I didn't think so...
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • brain of cbrain of c Posts: 5,213
    gay sex is happy sex.
  • SharonCSharonC Posts: 105
    Ahnimus wrote:
    Sorry, I was just commenting on the potential health side-effects of anal sex. Which is common amongst gay men, but also heterosexual couples.

    Yeah, I didn't necessarily think you were supporting his position. I just wanted to use what you said to point out his bias.
  • prismprism Posts: 2,440
    Ahnimus wrote:
    Do you extrude feces through your vagina though?

    I didn't think so...


    no

    I mentioned it because a girl that I used to work with got sepsis that nearly killed her as the result of a vaginal tear from straight sex. it had nothing to do with shit. do most vaginal tears result in sepsis? no, they heal fine on their own. one getting infected and progressing to sepsis is actually rare however it can happen and it's extemely dangerous
    *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
    angels share laughter
    *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
  • Smellyman2Smellyman2 Posts: 689
    Ahnimus wrote:
    Do you extrude feces through your vagina though?

    I didn't think so...

    depends if anal sex was first.


    icky
  • I never did like playing with other peoples poo...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    SharonC wrote:
    I'm not endorsing this view, but if they're going to make that argument, then they should be saying that anal sex (not gay sex) can be dangerous. Lot's of heterosexual people have anal sex, and lots of gay people engage in other sexual activities besides anal sex (in fact, it's not the most common sexual act among gay men). The point is that he's calling "gay sex" dangerous because he has a moral agenda, couched in the pretense of a medical one.

    Vaginas tear during birth. Does that mean we should stop having kids because it could be dangerous?

    And guys, if this complementarity is so biologically obvious, why are there so many cases of homosexual behavior in nature?


    WELL said, covers all the angles. nothing else to add b/c yea.....says it all.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • pickupyourwillpickupyourwill Posts: 3,135
    Ahnimus wrote:
    Sorry, I was just commenting on the potential health side-effects of anal sex. Which is common amongst gay men, but also heterosexual couples.

    sorry for pickin' on ya Ahnimus, but I couldn't help but notice that if you take "him" out of your name your left with just an "anus". :p just making on observation is all. continue on with the poopshoot talk.
  • SharonC wrote:

    Vaginas tear during birth. Does that mean we should stop having kids because it could be dangerous?

    You're equating anal sex with the actual presentment of a human life?

    ....whoa.....
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • cornnifercornnifer Posts: 2,130
    callen wrote:
    ....lots of dangers and nastiness from hetro sex as well.......and since one can't choose to whom your attracted, it is what it is.....so sing with me "does it really matter"??

    Absolutely. i didn't even comment on health risks as i totally understand and agree that there are plenty of health risks associated with straight sex. And, personally, no it doesn't really matter. i could care less what others choose to do in their bedroom. i only commemted on the biological and physiological complementarity of the sexes. it is undisputable.
    "When all your friends and sedatives mean well but make it worse... better find yourself a place to level out."
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    sorry for pickin' on ya Ahnimus, but I couldn't help but notice that if you take "him" out of your name your left with just an "anus". :p just making on observation is all. continue on with the poopshoot talk.

    Here are a couple for you pickupyourwill

    i kill up cry ow
    i ill up cry wok
    i icy work pull
    i icky pull row
    i lurk cow ply

    Or if I remove a bunch of letters and rearrange them I get PRiCK.

    Lol, so much fun ;)
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • catefrancescatefrances Posts: 29,003
    oh for fucks sake people. if youre gonna engage in anal sex show some common sense and wrap that sucker in rubber. just like for vaginal sex :)
    hear my name
    take a good look
    this could be the day
    hold my hand
    lie beside me
    i just need to say
  • SharonCSharonC Posts: 105
    You're equating anal sex with the actual presentment of a human life?

    ....whoa.....

    I'm not equating them in totality, just pointing out that both can be considered risky behaviors for a similar reason. But in reality, childbirth is much more dangerous. ;)
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    there are so many instances of gay anal sex in nature as obviously it must feel good... even hetero couples engage in anal sex as it feels good.. is it natural? i personally dont think it is... in so much as the anus and its accompanying tubes are built for the sole purpose of excreting shit... if it was meant to be fucked then it would be a self-lubricating stretchable entry point... its not.. its designed to let things out, not in... this is why, in nature, it can be fairly common occurence for a gay man to have a wizards cuff for an arsehole... this is due to his muscles becoming stretched and limp.. anal prolapses are common amongst older gay men... as is having a bad moustache
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • JeanieJeanie Posts: 9,446
    dunkman wrote:
    there are so many instances of gay anal sex in nature as obviously it must feel good... even hetero couples engage in anal sex as it feels good.. is it natural? i personally dont think it is... in so much as the anus and its accompanying tubes are built for the sole purpose of excreting shit... if it was meant to be fucked then it would be a self-lubricating stretchable entry point... its not.. its designed to let things out, not in... this is why, in nature, it can be fairly common occurence for a gay man to have a wizards cuff for an arsehole... this is due to his muscles becoming stretched and limp.. anal prolapses are common amongst older gay men... as is having a bad moustache


    I'm just wondering, where is it written that the anus is an exit point only dunk? I mean who says what is natural or unatural? Not having a go, just curious. Coz I know there was no rule book or operational manual on my body presented to me!!! Not that I'm particularly interested in supporting anal sex but you're argument isn't cutting it for me.

    What about uterine prolapse in women? Does that mean that women weren't designed to have too many children? Actually now that I think about it, the bad moustache thing could apply here as well. :D

    And if the anus wasn't meant to be a pleasurable hole, how come a man's prostate, the centre of a man's pleasure, is most easily accessed by the anus?

    Just thinking out loud. :)
    NOPE!!!

    *~You're IT Bert!~*

    Hold on to the thread
    The currents will shift
  • SharonC wrote:
    I'm not equating them in totality, just pointing out that both can be considered risky behaviors for a similar reason. But in reality, childbirth is much more dangerous. ;)

    More dangerous sure...but an orgasm v.s. a human life....yadda yadda..
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • dunkmandunkman Posts: 19,646
    Jeanie wrote:
    I'm just wondering, where is it written that the anus is an exit point only dunk? I mean who says what is natural or unatural? Not having a go, just curious. Coz I know there was no rule book or operational manual on my body presented to me!!! Not that I'm particularly interested in supporting anal sex but you're argument isn't cutting it for me.

    What about uterine prolapse in women? Does that mean that women weren't designed to have too many children? Actually now that I think about it, the bad moustache thing could apply here as well. :D

    And if the anus wasn't meant to be a pleasurable hole, how come a man's prostate, the centre of a man's pleasure, is most easily accessed by the anus?

    Just thinking out loud. :)

    you asked where it was written that its an exit point only... check it out Jeanie, the muscles are designed to push things out, not in... you can find this out on wikipedia or other medical sites... or alternatively try doing a poo and then sucking it all the way back up... you wont be able to

    Vaginal lubrication is the naturally produced lubricating fluid that reduces friction during sexual intercourse. The anus/sphincter does not produce a natural lubricating fluid... thats why it isnt 'natural' to stick a willy in there... it doesnt mean it isnt fun or doesnt feel great... but its not what i would deem a 'natural' place to shove my willy, just as humping a warm bag of liver isnt natural but probably feels nice... iwouldnt know though *whistles*

    the sole purpose/design/mechanics of sex is to reproduce... anal sex wont let us do that.. again this is why i think its not 'natural'

    if anal sex were a natural thing then KY Jelly would go bust.. and anal prolapses wouldnt be a gay mans concern
    oh scary... 40000 morbidly obese christians wearing fanny packs invading europe is probably the least scariest thing since I watched an edited version of The Care Bears movie in an extremely brightly lit cinema.
  • mmm ecoli... say ahhh...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • JeanieJeanie Posts: 9,446
    dunkman wrote:
    you asked where it was written that its an exit point only... check it out Jeanie, the muscles are designed to push things out, not in... you can find this out on wikipedia or other medical sites... or alternatively try doing a poo and then sucking it all the way back up... you wont be able to

    Vaginal lubrication is the naturally produced lubricating fluid that reduces friction during sexual intercourse. The anus/sphincter does not produce a natural lubricating fluid... thats why it isnt 'natural' to stick a willy in there... it doesnt mean it isnt fun or doesnt feel great... but its not what i would deem a 'natural' place to shove my willy, just as humping a warm bag of liver isnt natural but probably feels nice... iwouldnt know though *whistles*

    the sole purpose/design/mechanics of sex is to reproduce... anal sex wont let us do that.. again this is why i think its not 'natural'

    if anal sex were a natural thing then KY Jelly would go bust.. and anal prolapses wouldnt be a gay mans concern


    If the sole purpose of sex is reproduction, then explain the clitoris to me?
    And why then is a man's prostate, ALL MENS PROSTATES located up their ass? If the sole purpose of sex is reproduction then there was no need for nature to make sex pleasurable.
    And not all women produce vaginal lubricant, so I don't think that counts as a valid argument.

    If the anus is not somewhere you feel is natural to stick your willy, fine and good. Your personal preference, your choice. And if you don't want to subject your anus to being an entrance point, male or female, fine and good, your choice.
    But I still haven't seen any argument that would convince me that anal sex is "wrong" or not "proper" or that our bodies weren't "designed" for it.
    I'm quite sure anal sex has been around as long as vaginal sex.
    It probably hasn't had the same "sanctity" applied to it and has suffered "bad press" over the millenia but I doubt very much, that anal sex was even first performed by a "homosexual". I'm more than convinced, boys being the way they are about their dick and holes, that the first anal sex was probably instigated by a male on a female. Anyway, it's all neither here nor there.
    For those that wish to partake of anal sex that's their business. I'm quite sure that like with hetrosexual couples, homosexuals find penetrative sex only a small part of a loving relationship. I shall leave you to your warm bag of liver dunky! ;):D
    NOPE!!!

    *~You're IT Bert!~*

    Hold on to the thread
    The currents will shift
Sign In or Register to comment.