Limbaugh uses phrase "Obama the Magic Negro"
Options

Rushlimbo
Posts: 832
Limbaugh uses phrase "Obama the Magic Negro" -- the world is shocked and outraged. More to come as the week progresses (probably Thursday).
==========================================================
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: There's a fascinating story in the LA Times today. Get this headline. Who wrote this? David Ehrenstein is his name. He's LA-based, and "writes about Hollywood and politics." The headline of his column: "Obama, the 'Magic Negro.'"
I kid you not!
"As every carbon-based life form on this planet surely knows, Barack Obama, the junior Democratic senator from Illinois, is running for president. Since making his announcement, there has been no end of commentary about him in all quarters -- musing over his charisma and the prospect he offers of being the first African American to be elected to the White House. But it's clear that Obama also is running for an equally important unelected office, in the province of the popular imagination -- the 'Magic Negro.' The Magic Negro is a figure of postmodern folk culture, coined by snarky 20th century sociologists, to explain a cultural figure who emerged in the wake of Brown vs. Board of Education. 'He has no past, he simply appears one day to help the white protagonist,' reads the description on Wikipedia. … He's there to assuage white 'guilt' (i.e., the minimal discomfort they feel) over the role of slavery and racial segregation in American history, while replacing stereotypes of a dangerous, highly sexualized black man with a benign figure for whom interracial sexual congress holds no interest."
The problem, Ehrenstein says, is he's not real. Al Sharpton's real, Snoop Dogg is real, but Barack Obama is not real. He's just there to assuage white guilt. In other words, the only reason Obama is anywhere is because whites are willing to support him because they feel so guilty over slavery. Now, before you reject this, Shelby Steele has written a great book about the whole concept of "White Guilt" and how it is allowing our society to become more and more passive about any number of transgressions that the country has made from its inception. Here's the close: "Like a comic-book superhero, Obama is there to help, out of the sheer goodness of a heart we need not know or understand. For as with all Magic Negroes, the less real he seems, the more desirable he becomes. If he were real, white America couldn't project all its fantasies of curative black benevolence on him."
So, those of you white people out there who are supporting Barack Obama, you are racists. That is the point that David Ehrenstein is making. You're attempting to assuage all of your white guilt by supporting Obama, is worthless, because you're just exhibiting racism because you know he's not a "real black." As Biden said, he's "clean," and "articulate." What else did he say? Good-looking, articulate, one of the first. But he's not real. This is more of the drivel and the bilge that we get from the Drive-By Media. In order to be a real black, you gotta be a Sharpton or you've gotta be a Snoop Dogg. You gotta be a Ludacris or something like that. Obama can't possibly fill this role because nobody knows anything about him and we don't want to know anything about him. The only thing that matters is he's black and he sounds good and it allows you white racists to assuage your guilt. There is white racism out there, much of it is on the left where the plantation mentality still resides.
"Now, let me ask you a question. The term "magic negro" has been thrown into the political presidential race and the mix for 2008, and the term magic negro, as applied to Barack Obama, has been done by an LA Times columnist David Ehrenstein. Do you think, if I keep referring to Obama as "the magic negro" from this day on, I will eventually get the credit and/or heat for this? Magic negro. It is a term, and it's exactly as described here. Its purpose is to allow whites the guilt-free support. But in Barack's case, it's only because he isn't a "real black." The LA Times, by the way, is not first with these types of columns. The LA Times has two or three columns like this: "Is Barack Obama Black Enough?" And so forth. So there's a racist component out there on the editorial page of the LA Times that's obsessed with the race of Barack Obama -- and as with all leftists, while they are obsessed with race, they're accusing everybody else of being racists.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
So, those of you white people out there who are supporting Barack Obama, you are racists. That is the point that David Ehrenstein is making. You're attempting to assuage all of your white guilt by supporting Obama, is worthless, because you're just exhibiting racism because you know he's not a "real black." As Biden said, he's "clean," and "articulate." What else did he say? Good-looking, articulate, one of the first. But he's not real. This is more of the drivel and the bilge that we get from the Drive-By Media. In order to be a real black, you gotta be a Sharpton or you've gotta be a Snoop Dogg. You gotta be a Ludacris or something like that. Obama can't possibly fill this role because nobody knows anything about him and we don't want to know anything about him. The only thing that matters is he's black and he sounds good and it allows you white racists to assuage your guilt. There is white racism out there, much of it is on the left where the plantation mentality still resides.
Now, let me ask you a question. The term "magic negro" has been thrown into the political presidential race and the mix for 2008, and the term magic negro, as applied to Barack Obama, has been done by an LA Times columnist David Ehrenstein. Do you think, if I keep referring to Obama as "the magic negro" from this day on, I will eventually get the credit and/or heat for this? Magic negro. It is a term, and it's exactly as described here. Its purpose is to allow whites the guilt-free support. But in Barack's case, it's only because he isn't a "real black." The LA Times, by the way, is not first with these types of columns. The LA Times has two or three columns like this: "Is Barack Obama Black Enough?" And so forth. So there's a racist component out there on the editorial page of the LA Times that's obsessed with the race of Barack Obama -- and as with all leftists, while they are obsessed with race, they're accusing everybody else of being racists.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: This piece by David Ehrenstein in the LA Times today, "Obama the 'Magic Negro,'" it's just infuriating. It is the left that continues to besmirch these people. It's the left that continues to question their so-called authenticity. These people are all human beings. I don't care if it's Sharpton or if it's Reverend Jackson, these people are all human beings. Some of them are in the race business, I understand that. But look at who it is that keeps focusing on whether they're authentic enough, authenticity based on skin color. Who is it doing this? It's the left. I got a suggestion for of those at the LA Times. Let's cut to the chase. Go get an old-fashioned auction block and put it in the town square, put it somewhere where it looks like it's real, and just bring all these black people up there and auction them off and find out who it is that sells for the highest price.
That's essentially what you're doing with all of these nonsensical categorizations: Obama is not black enough. Obama is not down for the struggle. Obama doesn't have a legitimate civil rights background. Obama's ears don't look like a black person's ears. They're too big. Obama doesn't sound like a black person. He's clean and articulate. It's the left saying all these things. Now he's the "magic negro," which is just a convenient trick for the LA Times to blame a bunch of white people for being racists. Okay, just get an auction block and grab as many blacks as you want to put 'em up there and let's start the sales, LA Times, and let's see who it is that fetches the highest price. Isn't that essentially the way they're approaching this? These human beings are simply commodities, and they are there for some purpose other than their own human existence. If you doubt the racism and the groupthink and the superiority of the leftists in this country, you'd be making a grave error.
END TRANSCRIPT
==========================================================
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: There's a fascinating story in the LA Times today. Get this headline. Who wrote this? David Ehrenstein is his name. He's LA-based, and "writes about Hollywood and politics." The headline of his column: "Obama, the 'Magic Negro.'"
I kid you not!
"As every carbon-based life form on this planet surely knows, Barack Obama, the junior Democratic senator from Illinois, is running for president. Since making his announcement, there has been no end of commentary about him in all quarters -- musing over his charisma and the prospect he offers of being the first African American to be elected to the White House. But it's clear that Obama also is running for an equally important unelected office, in the province of the popular imagination -- the 'Magic Negro.' The Magic Negro is a figure of postmodern folk culture, coined by snarky 20th century sociologists, to explain a cultural figure who emerged in the wake of Brown vs. Board of Education. 'He has no past, he simply appears one day to help the white protagonist,' reads the description on Wikipedia. … He's there to assuage white 'guilt' (i.e., the minimal discomfort they feel) over the role of slavery and racial segregation in American history, while replacing stereotypes of a dangerous, highly sexualized black man with a benign figure for whom interracial sexual congress holds no interest."
The problem, Ehrenstein says, is he's not real. Al Sharpton's real, Snoop Dogg is real, but Barack Obama is not real. He's just there to assuage white guilt. In other words, the only reason Obama is anywhere is because whites are willing to support him because they feel so guilty over slavery. Now, before you reject this, Shelby Steele has written a great book about the whole concept of "White Guilt" and how it is allowing our society to become more and more passive about any number of transgressions that the country has made from its inception. Here's the close: "Like a comic-book superhero, Obama is there to help, out of the sheer goodness of a heart we need not know or understand. For as with all Magic Negroes, the less real he seems, the more desirable he becomes. If he were real, white America couldn't project all its fantasies of curative black benevolence on him."
So, those of you white people out there who are supporting Barack Obama, you are racists. That is the point that David Ehrenstein is making. You're attempting to assuage all of your white guilt by supporting Obama, is worthless, because you're just exhibiting racism because you know he's not a "real black." As Biden said, he's "clean," and "articulate." What else did he say? Good-looking, articulate, one of the first. But he's not real. This is more of the drivel and the bilge that we get from the Drive-By Media. In order to be a real black, you gotta be a Sharpton or you've gotta be a Snoop Dogg. You gotta be a Ludacris or something like that. Obama can't possibly fill this role because nobody knows anything about him and we don't want to know anything about him. The only thing that matters is he's black and he sounds good and it allows you white racists to assuage your guilt. There is white racism out there, much of it is on the left where the plantation mentality still resides.
"Now, let me ask you a question. The term "magic negro" has been thrown into the political presidential race and the mix for 2008, and the term magic negro, as applied to Barack Obama, has been done by an LA Times columnist David Ehrenstein. Do you think, if I keep referring to Obama as "the magic negro" from this day on, I will eventually get the credit and/or heat for this? Magic negro. It is a term, and it's exactly as described here. Its purpose is to allow whites the guilt-free support. But in Barack's case, it's only because he isn't a "real black." The LA Times, by the way, is not first with these types of columns. The LA Times has two or three columns like this: "Is Barack Obama Black Enough?" And so forth. So there's a racist component out there on the editorial page of the LA Times that's obsessed with the race of Barack Obama -- and as with all leftists, while they are obsessed with race, they're accusing everybody else of being racists.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
So, those of you white people out there who are supporting Barack Obama, you are racists. That is the point that David Ehrenstein is making. You're attempting to assuage all of your white guilt by supporting Obama, is worthless, because you're just exhibiting racism because you know he's not a "real black." As Biden said, he's "clean," and "articulate." What else did he say? Good-looking, articulate, one of the first. But he's not real. This is more of the drivel and the bilge that we get from the Drive-By Media. In order to be a real black, you gotta be a Sharpton or you've gotta be a Snoop Dogg. You gotta be a Ludacris or something like that. Obama can't possibly fill this role because nobody knows anything about him and we don't want to know anything about him. The only thing that matters is he's black and he sounds good and it allows you white racists to assuage your guilt. There is white racism out there, much of it is on the left where the plantation mentality still resides.
Now, let me ask you a question. The term "magic negro" has been thrown into the political presidential race and the mix for 2008, and the term magic negro, as applied to Barack Obama, has been done by an LA Times columnist David Ehrenstein. Do you think, if I keep referring to Obama as "the magic negro" from this day on, I will eventually get the credit and/or heat for this? Magic negro. It is a term, and it's exactly as described here. Its purpose is to allow whites the guilt-free support. But in Barack's case, it's only because he isn't a "real black." The LA Times, by the way, is not first with these types of columns. The LA Times has two or three columns like this: "Is Barack Obama Black Enough?" And so forth. So there's a racist component out there on the editorial page of the LA Times that's obsessed with the race of Barack Obama -- and as with all leftists, while they are obsessed with race, they're accusing everybody else of being racists.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: This piece by David Ehrenstein in the LA Times today, "Obama the 'Magic Negro,'" it's just infuriating. It is the left that continues to besmirch these people. It's the left that continues to question their so-called authenticity. These people are all human beings. I don't care if it's Sharpton or if it's Reverend Jackson, these people are all human beings. Some of them are in the race business, I understand that. But look at who it is that keeps focusing on whether they're authentic enough, authenticity based on skin color. Who is it doing this? It's the left. I got a suggestion for of those at the LA Times. Let's cut to the chase. Go get an old-fashioned auction block and put it in the town square, put it somewhere where it looks like it's real, and just bring all these black people up there and auction them off and find out who it is that sells for the highest price.
That's essentially what you're doing with all of these nonsensical categorizations: Obama is not black enough. Obama is not down for the struggle. Obama doesn't have a legitimate civil rights background. Obama's ears don't look like a black person's ears. They're too big. Obama doesn't sound like a black person. He's clean and articulate. It's the left saying all these things. Now he's the "magic negro," which is just a convenient trick for the LA Times to blame a bunch of white people for being racists. Okay, just get an auction block and grab as many blacks as you want to put 'em up there and let's start the sales, LA Times, and let's see who it is that fetches the highest price. Isn't that essentially the way they're approaching this? These human beings are simply commodities, and they are there for some purpose other than their own human existence. If you doubt the racism and the groupthink and the superiority of the leftists in this country, you'd be making a grave error.
END TRANSCRIPT
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
-
Wow! How I'd love to ram a stick through Rush Limbaugh's ears.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
Pardon me if I sound like an idiot, but I thought Obama wasn't 'african american' at all. Wasn't one of his parents indonesian or something? I thought at one stage some black americans were rejecting him because he doesn't have any african heritage, so they didn't feel he was really representing them at all.It doesn't matter if you're male, female, or confused; black, white, brown, red, green, yellow; gay, lesbian; redneck cop, stoned; ugly; military style, doggy style; fat, rich or poor; vegetarian or cannibal; bum, hippie, virgin; famous or drunk-you're either an asshole or you're not!
-C Addison0 -
gue_barium wrote:Wow! How I'd love to ram a stick through Rush Limbaugh's ears.
All the way through. In one ear and out the other. I bet his eyeballs look funny when I do that. Maybe he'll shit his pants.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
Scubascott wrote:Pardon me if I sound like an idiot, but I thought Obama wasn't 'african american' at all. Wasn't one of his parents indonesian or something? I thought at one stage some black americans were rejecting him because he doesn't have any african heritage, so they didn't feel he was really representing them at all.
Probably. Obama is a nigger, that's according to Limbaugh, not me. See? If you play the race card exclusively, for or against, it is the race card. Rush gets his kicks on bouncing it off the supposed opposition. Rush is opposed to racial supremacy? Give me a fucking break. His girdle is whiter than the robes of the KKK.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
gue_barium wrote:Probably. Obama is a nigger, that's according to Limbaugh, not me. See? If you play the race card exclusively, for or against, it is the race card. Rush gets his kicks on bouncing it off the supposed opposition. Rush is opposed to racial supremacy? Give me a fucking break. His girdle is whiter than the robes of the KKK.
He is an elitist bully. I'm finding the world to be more welcoming to this type, lately, and I don't like it at all.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
So Rush quotes a title of an LA Times newspaper article and Rush is the one who needs to be punished?
For what?
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-ehrenstein19mar19,0,5335087.story?coll=la-opinion-rightrail0 -
Scubascott wrote:Pardon me if I sound like an idiot, but I thought Obama wasn't 'african american' at all. Wasn't one of his parents indonesian or something? I thought at one stage some black americans were rejecting him because he doesn't have any african heritage, so they didn't feel he was really representing them at all.DOWNLOAD THE LATEST ISSUE OF The Last Reel: http://www.mediafire.com/?jdsqazrjzdt
http://www.myspace.com/thelastreel http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=196043279650 -
I wish all the columnists would stop talking about Barak Obama's race, and about Hillary Clinton being female. Why not just discuss their policies and goals for the United States? That's when we're going to move on beyond prejudice.R.i.p. Rigoberto Alpizar.
R.i.p. My Dad - May 28, 2007
R.i.p. Black Tail (cat) - Sept. 20, 20080 -
69charger wrote:So Rush quotes a title of an LA Times newspaper article and Rush is the one who needs to be punished?
For what?
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-ehrenstein19mar19,0,5335087.story?coll=la-opinion-rightrail
That's what I was thinking. People apparently can't comprehend what they read, or they're so blinded by partisanship that they refuse to understand.
RUSH WAS QUOTING SOMEONE ELSE.The only people we should try to get even with...
...are those who've helped us.
Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.0 -
JaneNY wrote:I wish all the columnists would stop talking about Barak Obama's race, and about Hillary Clinton being female. Why not just discuss their policies and goals for the United States? That's when we're going to move on beyond prejudice.
Because that is what sells. The avergae American doesn't give a flying fuck about what our prospective president's policies are. If they like the way he/she comes across on TV they will vote for them. So the media is just giving us what we want."When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul0 -
Scubascott wrote:Pardon me if I sound like an idiot, but I thought Obama wasn't 'african american' at all. Wasn't one of his parents indonesian or something? I thought at one stage some black americans were rejecting him because he doesn't have any african heritage, so they didn't feel he was really representing them at all.0
-
JaneNY wrote:I wish all the columnists would stop talking about Barak Obama's race, and about Hillary Clinton being female. Why not just discuss their policies and goals for the United States? That's when we're going to move on beyond prejudice.0
-
Did you guys read the article? He quoteD a guy who called Obama that. He didn't personally call Obama anything. I'm in no way a fan of Rush at all, but it's clear this was someone elses words. I'm as big of an Obama man as anyone else, but the anger should be directed towards the columnist from LA.0
-
jlew24asu wrote:lets all point and laugh at limbo. WELL DONE!!
i was kinda hoping he was cracking a joke in light of purple hawk's other thread about it. but now im not quite so sure.0 -
soulsinging wrote:i was kinda hoping he was cracking a joke in light of purple hawk's other thread about it. but now im not quite so sure.
I kind of thought that too... he didn't reply at all in the thread, so I am still thinking he did it for fun and is just watching everyone's reaction... or so I hope.My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln0 -
We should start a new thread titled: Rushlimbo uses phrase "Obama the Magic Negro"..........Since it would really be no different than what he posted about Rush Limbaugh (not that i'm sticking up for Rush Limbaugh... I just don't see why people try so hard to make him look like a jack-ass when he's doing such a great job at it himself).0
-
soulsinging wrote:i was kinda hoping he was cracking a joke in light of purple hawk's other thread about it. but now im not quite so sure.
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.0 -
gue_barium wrote:All the way through. In one ear and out the other. I bet his eyeballs look funny when I do that. Maybe he'll shit his pants.
One can dream.one foot in the door
the other foot in the gutter
sweet smell that they adore
I think I'd rather smother
-The Replacements-0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.8K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110K The Porch
- 274 Vitalogy
- 35K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.1K Flea Market
- 39.1K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.7K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help