WTF james hetfield...

13»

Comments

  • Skitch Patterson
    Skitch Patterson Posts: 642
    I actually thought that was pretty good. When i clicked it, i thought train wreck, but as far as AIC songs go, Would is probably the one he probably fits the best... the end was shaky, but at least he didnt add in the UH's and WOO's and such that he has fallen in love with the past 10 years or so.

    I liked it.
  • PearlJamaholic
    PearlJamaholic Posts: 2,019
    MLC2006 wrote:
    why do you think bands tour and put out albums, for kicks and giggles? what's he done that makes you feel "its all about the money"? hey, it's not like he's selling copies of all live shows and releasing other other live DVDs, and photo album books, and "special edition" concert posters for every show and headlining Corporatesponsorpalooza. getting my drift?? I love PJ, but if you can honestly call Cantrell a money grubber without putting 10 times more blame on PJ for grubbing for MORE money, then you're a hyppocrit.

    these bands are there to make money. and if there's still good music left in them, I don't see the problem with them trying to make money. they can tour as "Alice in Chains" or they tour as "The Juicy Fruits", and they'll sell 10 times more albums and concert tickets just for being "Alice In Chains", so I say more power to them.

    I don't even know what you're accusing Cantrell of doing? he went on tour, that's about it, right? if you saw his show on MTV Cribs, he's not living like a rockstar in a big mansions with a fleet of Bentleys and Mercedes. he seems to be pretty damn down to earth, so I don't think he's doing it only for the money because I think he's probably got enough money. I think he's doing it because he left unfinished business and there's more AIC songs to be made.

    i have a great deal of respect for cantrell. i just dont like the idea that he is calling this 'new' band aic. and i think the only reason he is doing this is for money. cause he could do a tribute tour and use another name. it just wouldnt get the same ticket sales. but i did read that if they record any new music that it wont be called aic. so i dont know. i just dont like the idea of calling it aic with out layne. and i blame jerry for this more than the other two.

    also i get the whole pj thing. and as i saw someone else post in the att thread, i think it was. the vedder of 94 would so total rip into the vedder today. for what its worth when eddie played 'i only play for money' that song today would be a poke at pj today.

    dont get me wrong i like pearl jam and cantrell. sometimes i have to wonder about the bands i like thats all.
    http://db.etree.org/PearlJamaholic
  • Beck..
    Beck.. Posts: 535
    suns rival wrote:
    ...you just murdered one of the best AIC's songs.
    if only layne cound wake up from his grave, he'll kill you.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_cZ60v9YdM
    I didnt think it was too bad.

Categories