LETS GO RED WINGS!!!!!

Jason P

lukin2006 wrote:

Rule 24 - Penalty Shot

http://www.nhl.com/ice/page.htm?id=26308

If all the rules are followed to the T, it would be constant 4 on 4 with 10 penalty shots every single game.

Bad judgement by the refs.

jlaustin

lukin2006 wrote:

I never thought this series would get to game 7 after Detroit was up 3-1.

Wonder why with less than 2 minutes to go was there so many empty seats at the joe? Did they not see game 7 Boston and Toronto? Bandwagon fans

Wonder why you have such vitriol for Detroit and its fans? Nearly every post I have read from you is anti-Detroit, so I wonder why you post so much in the Let's Go Red Wings thread. Apparently you do have a dog in the fight - anyone that is not Detroit.

polaris_x

jlaustin wrote:

Wonder why you have such vitriol for Detroit and its fans? Nearly every post I have read from you is anti-Detroit, so I wonder why you post so much in the Let's Go Red Wings thread. Apparently you do have a dog in the fight - anyone that is not Detroit.

he is an angry person in general ...

i'm not a fan of the call on the penalty shot myself but i hate the whole notion of what should or shouldn't be a call in the playoffs vs. the regular season ... if the rules say that should have been a penalty shot ... he's gotta call it ...

Jason P

jlaustin wrote:

lukin2006 wrote:

I never thought this series would get to game 7 after Detroit was up 3-1.

Wonder why with less than 2 minutes to go was there so many empty seats at the joe? Did they not see game 7 Boston and Toronto? Bandwagon fans

Wonder why you have such vitriol for Detroit and its fans? Nearly every post I have read from you is anti-Detroit, so I wonder why you post so much in the Let's Go Red Wings thread. Apparently you do have a dog in the fight - anyone that is not Detroit.

He is pinch hitting for Songburst.

Take joy in the fact that the Wings have been making his life hell for that last two decades. And the fires look to shine bright for the next decade as well.

:twisted: :twisted:

Jason P

lukin2006 wrote:

Rule 24 - Penalty Shot

http://www.nhl.com/ice/page.htm?id=26308

I would hate to ever play golf with you. I'll bet you are the guy that carries the USAG rules book with you during a charity scramble.

lukin2006

jlaustin wrote:

lukin2006 wrote:

I never thought this series would get to game 7 after Detroit was up 3-1.

Wonder why with less than 2 minutes to go was there so many empty seats at the joe? Did they not see game 7 Boston and Toronto? Bandwagon fans

Wonder why you have such vitriol for Detroit and its fans? Nearly every post I have read from you is anti-Detroit, so I wonder why you post so much in the Let's Go Red Wings thread. Apparently you do have a dog in the fight - anyone that is not Detroit.

because i can ...

lukin2006

Jason P wrote:

jlaustin wrote:

lukin2006 wrote:

I never thought this series would get to game 7 after Detroit was up 3-1.

Wonder why with less than 2 minutes to go was there so many empty seats at the joe? Did they not see game 7 Boston and Toronto? Bandwagon fans

Wonder why you have such vitriol for Detroit and its fans? Nearly every post I have read from you is anti-Detroit, so I wonder why you post so much in the Let's Go Red Wings thread. Apparently you do have a dog in the fight - anyone that is not Detroit.

He is pinch hitting for Songburst.

Take joy in the fact that the Wings have been making his life hell for that last two decades. And the fires look to shine bright for the next decade as well.


:twisted: :twisted:

nope haven't been making my life all that bad ... since 1990 you've only one 1 more cup that Pittsburgh or NJ it's not like you're Montreal of the 50's,60' or 70's or NYI and Edmonton of the 80's ... it's just good fun trash talking ... I guess I didn't realize how sensitive Detroit fans are ...

lukin2006

polaris_x wrote:

jlaustin wrote:

Wonder why you have such vitriol for Detroit and its fans? Nearly every post I have read from you is anti-Detroit, so I wonder why you post so much in the Let's Go Red Wings thread. Apparently you do have a dog in the fight - anyone that is not Detroit.

he is an angry person in general ...

i'm not a fan of the call on the penalty shot myself but i hate the whole notion of what should or shouldn't be a call in the playoffs vs. the regular season ... if the rules say that should have been a penalty shot ... he's gotta call it ...

not that angry ... don't have a dog in the fight ...

The penalty shot is a judgement call ... a lot of penalties are judgement calls, it no secret that the NHL is the worst officiated sport ... IMO ... there is a t=on of interference that goes uncalled, I'd love to see that called every time until the players learn that if they interfere it'll be a penalty ... it may take a year or even 2 but eventual that'll open up the ice and the play would improve the entertainment.

rival.

lukin2006 wrote:

All the CBC broadcasters said it was the correct call.

According to them the criteria is:

Clear cut breakaway
Taking away a scoring chance
No shot on goal

i agree with this and i do not have a dog in this fight either.

two handed slash prevented the shot. no different than hooking the guy down to the ice in my opinion.

one of those damned if you do, damned if you don't calls for the ref. tough situation for a game 6...

jlaustin

lukin2006 wrote:

polaris_x wrote:

jlaustin wrote:

Wonder why you have such vitriol for Detroit and its fans? Nearly every post I have read from you is anti-Detroit, so I wonder why you post so much in the Let's Go Red Wings thread. Apparently you do have a dog in the fight - anyone that is not Detroit.

he is an angry person in general ...

i'm not a fan of the call on the penalty shot myself but i hate the whole notion of what should or shouldn't be a call in the playoffs vs. the regular season ... if the rules say that should have been a penalty shot ... he's gotta call it ...

not that angry ... don't have a dog in the fight ...

The penalty shot is a judgement call ... a lot of penalties are judgement calls, it no secret that the NHL is the worst officiated sport ... IMO ... there is a t=on of interference that goes uncalled, I'd love to see that called every time until the players learn that if they interfere it'll be a penalty ... it may take a year or even 2 but eventual that'll open up the ice and the play would improve the entertainment.

I wan't referring to the penalty shot... I was talking about your snide comments about the fans of Detroit - which you felt the need to edit your post to add. Sorry if we don't meet up to your lofty standards. We lost the game. The penalty shot was not the reason, but it certainly didn't help. Maybe you can start a Fuck the Red Wings and their fans suck thread.

lukin2006

rival. wrote:

lukin2006 wrote:

All the CBC broadcasters said it was the correct call.

According to them the criteria is:

Clear cut breakaway
Taking away a scoring chance
No shot on goal

i agree with this and i do not have a dog in this fight either.

two handed slash prevented the shot. no different than hooking the guy down to the ice in my opinion.

one of those damned if you do, damned if you don't calls for the ref. tough situation for a game 6...

and if Howard makes the save you have to figure that would have flipped all the momentum toward the Wings, but by the way he acted after the shot went in my guess is his he was upset about the call and clearly was thinking about the call. Game 7 should be good.

lukin2006

jlaustin wrote:

lukin2006 wrote:

polaris_x wrote:

he is an angry person in general ...

i'm not a fan of the call on the penalty shot myself but i hate the whole notion of what should or shouldn't be a call in the playoffs vs. the regular season ... if the rules say that should have been a penalty shot ... he's gotta call it ...

not that angry ... don't have a dog in the fight ...

The penalty shot is a judgement call ... a lot of penalties are judgement calls, it no secret that the NHL is the worst officiated sport ... IMO ... there is a t=on of interference that goes uncalled, I'd love to see that called every time until the players learn that if they interfere it'll be a penalty ... it may take a year or even 2 but eventual that'll open up the ice and the play would improve the entertainment.

I wan't referring to the penalty shot... I was talking about your snide comments about the fans of Detroit - which you felt the need to edit your post to add. Sorry if we don't meet up to your lofty standards. We lost the game. The penalty shot was not the reason, but it certainly didn't help. Maybe you can start a Fuck the Red Wings and their fans suck thread.

were you at the game? then my comments weren't directed at you. If you market yourselves as hockey town then maybe the fans at the arena might want to stick out the last 2 minutes, scoring 2 goals in the last 2 minutes is not unheard of ...

jlaustin

Not sure any fans in attendance or at home are responsible for marketing the team, the slogan, etc. Love to get in on that revenue stream myself.

Here's to a terrific game 7 - Go Wings!

Nami

Dr. Delight wrote:

#2 needs to take a seat on the bench. two bad plays by him on both Hawks goals in the 3rd.

hes been like that all the playoffs....

polaris_x

lukin2006 wrote:

it no secret that the NHL is the worst officiated sport ... IMO ...

mlb by a landslide ...

Nami

Imo the 3rd goal was the issue not the 4th. Toews was offside all the way and the line judge didnt catch it.

When i saw it unfold I was like "F", reminds me of the philly goal over the penguins,(Briere I believe) that i saw off TSN's 10 most controversial goals early that week.

I may have jinxed the wings

My hate for whinny Toews and showboat Kane are steadily growing. and damn you Bollard and Bickell.

polaris_x

Nami wrote:

Imo the 3rd goal was the issue not the 4th. Toews was offside all the way and the line judge didnt catch it.

When i saw it unfold I was like "F", reminds me of the philly goal over the penguins,(Briere I believe) that i saw off TSN's 10 most controversial goals early that week.

I may have jinxed the wings

My hate for whinny Toews and showboat Kane are steadily growing. and damn you Bollard and Bickell.

he wasn't offside because detroit brought the puck back into the zone

Nami

polaris_x wrote:

Nami wrote:

Imo the 3rd goal was the issue not the 4th. Toews was offside all the way and the line judge didnt catch it.

When i saw it unfold I was like "F", reminds me of the philly goal over the penguins,(Briere I believe) that i saw off TSN's 10 most controversial goals early that week.

I may have jinxed the wings

My hate for whinny Toews and showboat Kane are steadily growing. and damn you Bollard and Bickell.

he wasn't offside because detroit brought the puck back into the zone

thought they showed that Frazen didnt touch the puck.

polaris_x

Nami wrote:

thought they showed that Frazen didnt touch the puck.

you got some video? ... from the replays i see - it sure looks like he knocked it into the zone

Nami

polaris_x wrote:

Nami wrote:

thought they showed that Frazen didnt touch the puck.

you got some video? ... from the replays i see - it sure looks like he knocked it into the zone[/quote

all i can find is from the corner on ...on nhl.com. what you got?