Alright, I've been summoned again for Jury Duty!!!

2»

Comments

  • know1
    know1 Posts: 6,801
    I just got off of my 3rd term in 5 years. I think it's interesting, but the part I don't like is seeing government bureaucracy at work (going down to the courthouse, etc.)
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • I just did a while ago and chose to postpone.....turns out I picked the week my wife is due to have our child....I wonder if you can postone again?

    Last time I went in New Britain, we watched movies all day, I told them how much I despise frivolous lawsuits and I was out.
    If a man speaks in a forest and there is no woman around to hear him, is he still wrong?
  • I've only been called once, got picked for a trial and loved it!
    I even got a free lunch the last day!
  • Jeremy1012
    Jeremy1012 Posts: 7,170
    I think I'd refuse to sit. I wouldn't feel comfortable having that kind of power without any kind of expertise. Who the hell am I to decide that a person is guilty or innocent based on the SKILL of a lawyer and how they presented the case to me? That's not proof of anything.

    A jury might be the only "fair" way but it's not something I'd be comfortable with at all.
    "I remember one night at Muzdalifa with nothing but the sky overhead, I lay awake amid sleeping Muslim brothers and I learned that pilgrims from every land — every colour, and class, and rank; high officials and the beggar alike — all snored in the same language"
  • _outlaw wrote:
    Remember: Innocent till proven guilty. If the evidence is not overwhelmingly clear that the defendant is guilty, then you can't vote him guilty.

    HAHAHA! The fact that this is coming from an outlaw is the best!!
    GoiMTvP.gif
  • Collin
    Collin Posts: 4,931
    Jeremy1012 wrote:
    I think I'd refuse to sit. I wouldn't feel comfortable having that kind of power without any kind of expertise. Who the hell am I to decide that a person is guilty or innocent based on the SKILL of a lawyer and how they presented the case to me? That's not proof of anything.

    A jury might be the only "fair" way but it's not something I'd be comfortable with at all.

    An 18 year old boy killed two people here. The lawsuit was on the news for weeks. Two experts gave their opinion about the boy's mental condition. They had different opinions, of course. The jury had to decide which one was right. What the hell?
    THANK YOU, LOSTDAWG!


    naděje umírá poslední
  • eyedclaar
    eyedclaar Posts: 6,980
    Jeremy1012 wrote:
    I think I'd refuse to sit. I wouldn't feel comfortable having that kind of power without any kind of expertise. Who the hell am I to decide that a person is guilty or innocent based on the SKILL of a lawyer and how they presented the case to me? That's not proof of anything.

    A jury might be the only "fair" way but it's not something I'd be comfortable with at all.


    I hear you. Except I'd probably be thinking, "Shit, if they want this guy locked up, they'd want me executed."
    Idaho's Premier Outdoor Writer

    Please Support My Writing Habit By Purchasing A Book:

    https://www.createspace.com/3437020

    http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000663025696

    http://earthtremors.blogspot.com/
  • fuck
    fuck Posts: 4,069
    HAHAHA! The fact that this is coming from an outlaw is the best!!
    :D
  • aNiMaL
    aNiMaL Posts: 7,117
    peacegirl wrote:
    I've only been called once, got picked for a trial and loved it!
    I even got a free lunch the last day!
    Yeah, the judge bought us lunch on our last day too during deliberations. I think that was mainly so we would continue to deliberate white we ate.

    If nothing else, I hope to get some good reading time in.