So with Sarah Palin, out goes the whole inexperienced talk?

2»

Comments

  • digsterdigster Posts: 1,293
    She challenged corruption in her state. You sound like you need to read a bit more about her.

    She sounds fine; although I don't agree with most of her positions, she seems like she has alot of integrity. The problem is not with her; the problem is with the weakness of McCain's 'experience' message from here on out.
  • flywallyflyflywallyfly Posts: 1,453
    cutback wrote:
    you're sportin' wood, ain't ya cw? ;):D

    Corporate Whore only sports the wood for ol' Pat Buchanan, his idol.
  • Smellyman2Smellyman2 Posts: 689
    Corporate Whore only sports the wood for ol' Pat Buchanan, his idol.

    He must love this then.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0Fru4dZLGA
  • Corporate Whore only sports the wood for ol' Pat Buchanan, his idol.

    That's supposed to be wood

    OO
    | |
    | |
    | |
    | |
    U

    .
    o
    O
    00
    All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.
    -Enoch Powell
  • TDMize15TDMize15 Posts: 166
    Nah brah, I said largest as in largest geographic size. And that involves a great deal of executive experience. Alaska isn't your basic New England shithole state - it's got foreign policy issues.

    Ol rights, territorial fishing waters, Russia to its east. Just because it has a small population doesn't mean that running that state is a simple task. Governors must always be great leaders - senators can dabble in DC outside of executive decision-making.

    The person who runs Alaska is a major executive, not a junior senator from Chicago. Obama hasn't done jack - Palin took on corrupt politicians from her own political party.


    Russia is not to Alaska's east... rent a globe :)

    And the fact that most mayors of major cities have more constituents than Sarah Palin... is a very viable point.
    All the rusted signs, we ignore throughout our lives, choosing the shiny ones instead...

    And he who forgets, will be destined to remember...
  • gimmesometruth27gimmesometruth27 St. Fuckin Louis Posts: 23,303
    Nah brah, I said largest as in largest geographic size. And that involves a great deal of executive experience. Alaska isn't your basic New England shithole state - it's got foreign policy issues.

    Ol rights, territorial fishing waters, Russia to its east. Just because it has a small population doesn't mean that running that state is a simple task. Governors must always be great leaders - senators can dabble in DC outside of executive decision-making.

    The person who runs Alaska is a major executive, not a junior senator from Chicago. Obama hasn't done jack - Palin took on corrupt politicians from her own political party.
    listen to yourself. by definition, a junior senator works in washington dc and has federal responsibilities. much more so than the the governor of a state. i am sorry CW but the gop can not argue about obamas "lack of experience" any more when if they win, the person closest to the presidency has not done a god damn thing outside of her state. you will make excuses for anyone that has an R after their name. i am waiting for you to defend larry craig now.

    edit spelling.........
    "You can tell the greatness of a man by what makes him angry."  - Lincoln

    "Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
  • digsterdigster Posts: 1,293
    listen to yourself. by definition, a junior senator works in washington dc and has federal responsibilities. much more so than the the governor of a state. i am sorry CW but the gop can not argue about obamas "lack of experience" any more when if they win, the person closest to the presidency has not done a god damn thing outside of her state. you will make excuses for anyone that has an R after their name. i am waiting for you to defend larry craig now.

    edit spelling.........

    Hell, we don't even need to say that Obama is more prepared; let's grant Republicans that Palin is as prepared for the presidency as Barack Obama. That's still not enough; McCain has said time and time again that Obama is "not fit for the presidency" and that his "dangerously inexperienced." What does it say about McCain's judgment when, although he bases his entire campaign on experience, picks someone who, by his own standard, is unfit to lead?
Sign In or Register to comment.