Putin and Iran send us a message

13»

Comments

  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    jlew24asu wrote:
    if I walk up to you and punch you in the face, i'm sure you would demand a (factual) reason why I did that.

    no, i'd just beat the shit outta you!

    see the smile face...
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    As of the August 21, 2007 agreement between Iran and the IAEA it has been reported that Iran has only produced Low-Enriched uranium, the actual percentage is 3.5% using 100 centerfuges. Weapons grade uranium need to be enriched to at least 90%. Once the facts are presented it is pretty clear to see that Iran is not weaponizing their uranium but the continued insistance by the US government that Iran is a nuclear threat is nothing more than fear-mongering in order to support our continued military presense in the region.

    Here is an article hiliting this administrations fear-mongering at it's best.

    http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=071017154505.rci3xjja&show_article=1
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    mammasan wrote:
    As of the August 21, 2007 agreement between Iran and the IAEA it has been reported that Iran has only produced Low-Enriched uranium, the actual percentage is 3.5% using 100 centerfuges. Weapons grade uranium need to be enriched to at least 90%. Once the facts are presented it is pretty clear to see that Iran is not weaponizing their uranium but the continued insistance by the US government that Iran is a nuclear threat is nothing more than fear-mongering in order to support our continued military presense in the region.

    Here is an article hiliting this administrations fear-mongering at it's best.

    http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=071017154505.rci3xjja&show_article=1


    looks like the rhetoric changed a little bit...

    preventing them from having the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon...bush said

    still, fear-mongering at its best. leave those fuckers alone, lets solve the Israel problem, and we can all be a little happier.
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    jlew24asu wrote:
    looks like the rhetoric changed a little bit...

    preventing them from having the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon...bush said

    still, fear-mongering at its best. leave those fuckers alone, lets solve the Israel problem, and we can all be a little happier.

    I like how he invoked World War III. It is so blatantly obvious that this administration has it out for Iran regardless of what the Iranian government does. This is why I believe that it has absolutely nothing to do with their nuclear program and everything to do with oil. Iran sits on one of the largest oil reserves in the world and our government is uneasy with the fact that the Iranian government has such close ties with Russia and China. I feel like it's fucking deja vu and we are going to repeat the same fucking dumb ass mistake we made in the 1950's when we meddled in Iranian affairs.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • macgyver06 wrote:
    can someone explain why a war with iran would do any good??

    they clearly dont want to attack us...and until they do...why worry about them being an enemy...it doesnt make sense for them to attack us.


    why is everyone creating them to be our worst enemy..


    what is the logic here...must the U.S. have an enemy at all times?


    For the same real reason we invaded Iraq. That's why. It's all about location, location, location. Once we leave there will be no one left to prevent Iran from effectively controlling the world's oil supplies. Until we get rid of our addiction to oil I am afraid that this may be a fight that happens whether it be now or in the future.
  • 810wmb wrote:
    give me a break...i disagree with all that you listed...

    give me proof they aren't
    It's impossible to prove a negative without proving a positive.
    (note I don't believe in these conspiracy's im going to list)
    Give me proof Oswald DIDN'T act alone.
    Give me proof 9/11 was not an inside job.
    Give me proof evolution did not happen. (ok, I believe in evolution)
    Give me proof the 2000 election wasn't fixed.

    YOU CANNOT PROOVE A NEGATIVE WITHOUT PROOVING A POSITIVE!!!!!

    There isn't solid evidence that Iran is producing WMDs, and the US would never go to war without solid evidence...

    Oh.. wait...

    And I agree with jlew, why the hell are we the world police?
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • I still wonder how all that concrete got pulverized on 9/11. I can see a lot of it, but all of it? and so finely? not gravel, or largechunks, but dust....poof...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    It's impossible to prove a negative without proving a positive.
    (note I don't believe in these conspiracy's im going to list)
    Give me proof Oswald DIDN'T act alone.
    Give me proof 9/11 was not an inside job.
    Give me proof evolution did not happen. (ok, I believe in evolution)
    Give me proof the 2000 election wasn't fixed.

    YOU CANNOT PROOVE A NEGATIVE WITHOUT PROOVING A POSITIVE!!!!!

    There isn't solid evidence that Iran is producing WMDs, and the US would never go to war without solid evidence...

    Oh.. wait...

    And I agree with jlew, why the hell are we the world police?


    holy smokes...rolling the eyeballs here
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    I still wonder how all that concrete got pulverized on 9/11. I can see a lot of it, but all of it? and so finely? not gravel, or largechunks, but dust....poof...


    it's new york, you know the mob uses cheap crap when they build something
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • 810wmb wrote:
    holy smokes...rolling the eyeballs here
    You still avoided answering the question.
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    macgyver06 wrote:
    can someone explain why a war with iran would do any good??

    they clearly dont want to attack us...and until they do...why worry about them being an enemy...it doesnt make sense for them to attack us.


    why is everyone creating them to be our worst enemy..


    what is the logic here...must the U.S. have an enemy at all times?
    er yes. Its how the military industrial complex works.
  • 810wmb810wmb Posts: 849
    You still avoided answering the question.

    i think you are crazy, for real
    i'm the meat, yer not...signed Capt Asshat
  • 810wmb wrote:
    it's new york, you know the mob uses cheap crap when they build something

    Shame about those pesky industrial standards tossing that notion right out the window.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • 810wmb wrote:
    i think you are crazy, for real
    I said I didn't believe in that shit. I'm just saying it's impossible to prove a negative without proving a positive. It's a basic concept.
    Believe me, when I was growin up, I thought the worst thing you could turn out to be was normal, So I say freaks in the most complementary way. Here's a song by a fellow freak - E.V
Sign In or Register to comment.