well, you know how rough it is out in those lily-white suburbs. all those rich WASPS... they have to deal with their neighbor trying to borrow that lawn mower all the time! it's hard out there for a WASP ya know... not a day goes by i don't hear about a dozen different folks gunning down those spick migrants trying to steal their china or those A-rab terrorists risking their lives to get into barroom's (sorry, meant corporatewhore) linen closet cos clearly, al-queda knows with him gone nothing can stop them from world domination. thank you whore (of the corporate variety) for keeping us all safe. your testosterone makes me feel so inadequate. :rolleyes:
make love not war.
hell...if a lot more pussy was well errrr...how to say it delicately...partaken? ...i think the world would be a happier place. don't need guns for that...well not that kinda 'guns' anyway.....use your 'weapons' for good. so yea, forget the guns...but sure, the handcuffs could be fun!
make love not war.
hell...if a lot more pussy was well errrr...how to say it delicately...partaken? ...i think the world would be a happier place. don't need guns for that...well not that kinda 'guns' anyway.....use your 'weapons' for good. so yea, forget the guns...but sure, the handcuffs could be fun!
I'm adrift on a coconut shell raft, and you're in a cup in the middle of the sea.
If we ran into each other out there...handcuffs could be a drowning hazard, don't you think?
Sorry moms, it is not the quantity but the quality. I'm a dead-eye and so are all the people that go with me to the NRA range. And they're all conservative too.
Mofos like Ted Nugent got like thousands of guns. They pass 'em out to freedom-loving people like me and I get 'er done.
But yeah, I'm sure that little 9mm revolver you carry in your purse is real cute with the rubber grip and the pink trigger lock.
There ain't no bigger pussy than Ted Nugent. He's an embarassment.
I own several weapons and I sure as hell wouldn't want Ted Nugent speaking for me. Or being identified with responsible gun owners.
One more thing, I've also found that many yippie-yia-yoh, over the top, boistrous, loud-mouth, gun-waving, gun-loving fools- are often a bunch of pussies who start trouble and then resort to waving their weapons around; when someone challenges them to a fist fight. They won't fight fair or fight without their guns and knives. Pussies.
There ain't no bigger pussy than Ted Nugent. He's an embarassment.
I own several weapons and I sure as hell wouldn't want Ted Nugent speaking for me. Or being identified with responsible gun owners.
One more thing, I've also found that many yippie-yia-yoh, over the top, boistrous, loud-mouth, gun-waving, gun-loving fools- are often a bunch of pussies who start trouble and then resort to waving their weapons around; when someone challenges them to a fist fight. They won't fight fair or fight without their guns and knives. Pussies.
Yeah but he can kill a deer with a machine gun!
That must count for something......(deep in those back woods)
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
make love not war.
hell...if a lot more pussy was well errrr...how to say it delicately...partaken? ...i think the world would be a happier place. don't need guns for that...well not that kinda 'guns' anyway.....use your 'weapons' for good. so yea, forget the guns...but sure, the handcuffs could be fun!
First you have to distinguish a liberal from a conservative and adequately define the terms.
I think by doing this you will find that what the terms literally describe is an individual who has a tendency to either conservatism (maintaining existing views) or liberalism (progression; challenging of existing views). There are not liberal or conservative political parties. All parties consist of people tending towards liberalism and conservatism on different issues. In-fact, it would be quite a tedious task to isolate a pure "liberal" or an individual who challenges a culturally historic view on all issues. The difference between conservative-thought and liberal-thought is literally open-mindedness.
In this regard, conservatism is more closely related with "pussies" since conservatism dares not challenge existing views. Rather, it subdues rationality and reason to a pre-existing doctrine of belief. This is a most favorable stance to individuals who don't have the balls to challenge their peers.
I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
First you have to distinguish a liberal from a conservative and adequately define the terms.
I think by doing this you will find that what the terms literally describe is an individual who has a tendency to either conservatism (maintaining existing views) or liberalism (progression; challenging of existing views). There are not liberal or conservative political parties. All parties consist of people tending towards liberalism and conservatism on different issues. In-fact, it would be quite a tedious task to isolate a pure "liberal" or an individual who challenges a culturally historic view on all issues. The difference between conservative-thought and liberal-thought is literally open-mindedness.
In this regard, conservatism is more closely related with "pussies" since conservatism dares not challenge existing views. Rather, it subdues rationality and reason to a pre-existing doctrine of belief. This is a most favorable stance to individuals who don't have the balls to challenge their peers.
Add this one to the list of countless great posts by Ahnimus.
I think we can all agree that conservatives have more guns, yes? And they also support a stronger military, yes?
What makes the libs think that if the shit were to go down and a nuke were to go off in DC or NY, that we would still remain safe without guns? There is a very real possibility that terrorists could sneak a weapon across our border, and if they did, how would you protect yourself if you didn't own a gun? Suppose the government was dissolved for a time or the police force was no longer funded and they all went home. What then?
Or perhaps, what if a home intruder just happened upon your home and decided he was going to kill your ass? Is that reason enough to own a gun?
I like how liberals oppose gun rights so much because then that means they're the only ones without guns. Makes them easier to fight
If the shit were to go down and nuke go off in DC or NY or anyfuckingwhere for that matter, you're fucked. A gun ain't gonna save yer arse. If the terrrrrrrrrists sneak a weapon of mass destruction across the boarder, what happens? That would be mass destruction. What you gonna do, SHOOT the radioactive fallout? If you're within a 100 mile radius you'll be lucky if you can stop throwing up long enough to say " shit, where's my gun!" Thats assuming you survived the initial blast and burns to your skin.
Your second point, the government dissolving or the police force all packing up and going home? You are joking aren't you?
And unless you are one of those types that sleeps with a fully loaded and unlocked gun under your pillow.....if a home intruder just happens upon your home and wants to kill your arse, well, he's gonna kill your arse. Sure, you could politely ask him to wait a sec on the killing so you can go get your gun from the locked cabinet, find the bullets that you keep in a separate locked drawer(as of course all responsible gun owners do) and load that thing up and shoot his arse first. My guess is, you're fucked.
I think we can all agree that conservatives have more guns, yes? And they also support a stronger military, yes?
What makes the libs think that if the shit were to go down and a nuke were to go off in DC or NY, that we would still remain safe without guns? There is a very real possibility that terrorists could sneak a weapon across our border, and if they did, how would you protect yourself if you didn't own a gun? Suppose the government was dissolved for a time or the police force was no longer funded and they all went home. What then?
Or perhaps, what if a home intruder just happened upon your home and decided he was going to kill your ass? Is that reason enough to own a gun?
I like how liberals oppose gun rights so much because then that means they're the only ones without guns. Makes them easier to fight
I think we can all agree that conservatives have more guns, yes? And they also support a stronger military, yes?
What makes the libs think that if the shit were to go down and a nuke were to go off in DC or NY, that we would still remain safe without guns? There is a very real possibility that terrorists could sneak a weapon across our border, and if they did, how would you protect yourself if you didn't own a gun? Suppose the government was dissolved for a time or the police force was no longer funded and they all went home. What then?
Or perhaps, what if a home intruder just happened upon your home and decided he was going to kill your ass? Is that reason enough to own a gun?
I like how liberals oppose gun rights so much because then that means they're the only ones without guns. Makes them easier to fight
but again this proves once again..that people who make posts lik this and buy guns for protection...for some reason think the boogey man and all his cronies are constantly out to get you and your precious...oh your precious children and family...
you are delusional...no one is out to get you...terrorists dont want to blow you up and nobody really wants to rob you...
when will we grow up in this world??
I think we can all agree that conservatives have more guns, yes? And they also support a stronger military, yes?
What makes the libs think that if the shit were to go down and a nuke were to go off in DC or NY, that we would still remain safe without guns? There is a very real possibility that terrorists could sneak a weapon across our border, and if they did, how would you protect yourself if you didn't own a gun? Suppose the government was dissolved for a time or the police force was no longer funded and they all went home. What then?
Or perhaps, what if a home intruder just happened upon your home and decided he was going to kill your ass? Is that reason enough to own a gun?
I like how liberals oppose gun rights so much because then that means they're the only ones without guns. Makes them easier to fight
If you have a nuke going off in NY, that's a problem a gun won't help with.
But what makes you think we should arm all the paranoid people and have them running around with guns?
Comments
Let's just breathe...
I am myself like you somehow
good stuff!
hell...if a lot more pussy was well errrr...how to say it delicately...partaken? ...i think the world would be a happier place. don't need guns for that...well not that kinda 'guns' anyway.....use your 'weapons' for good. so yea, forget the guns...but sure, the handcuffs could be fun!
Let's just breathe...
I am myself like you somehow
I'm adrift on a coconut shell raft, and you're in a cup in the middle of the sea.
If we ran into each other out there...handcuffs could be a drowning hazard, don't you think?
all posts by ©gue_barium are protected under US copyright law and are not to be reproduced, exchanged or sold
except by express written permission of ©gue_barium, the author.
There ain't no bigger pussy than Ted Nugent. He's an embarassment.
I own several weapons and I sure as hell wouldn't want Ted Nugent speaking for me. Or being identified with responsible gun owners.
One more thing, I've also found that many yippie-yia-yoh, over the top, boistrous, loud-mouth, gun-waving, gun-loving fools- are often a bunch of pussies who start trouble and then resort to waving their weapons around; when someone challenges them to a fist fight. They won't fight fair or fight without their guns and knives. Pussies.
Yeah but he can kill a deer with a machine gun!
That must count for something......(deep in those back woods)
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Hmmm, did somebody say.....Hand Cuffs????
I think by doing this you will find that what the terms literally describe is an individual who has a tendency to either conservatism (maintaining existing views) or liberalism (progression; challenging of existing views). There are not liberal or conservative political parties. All parties consist of people tending towards liberalism and conservatism on different issues. In-fact, it would be quite a tedious task to isolate a pure "liberal" or an individual who challenges a culturally historic view on all issues. The difference between conservative-thought and liberal-thought is literally open-mindedness.
In this regard, conservatism is more closely related with "pussies" since conservatism dares not challenge existing views. Rather, it subdues rationality and reason to a pre-existing doctrine of belief. This is a most favorable stance to individuals who don't have the balls to challenge their peers.
If the shit were to go down and nuke go off in DC or NY or anyfuckingwhere for that matter, you're fucked. A gun ain't gonna save yer arse. If the terrrrrrrrrists sneak a weapon of mass destruction across the boarder, what happens? That would be mass destruction. What you gonna do, SHOOT the radioactive fallout? If you're within a 100 mile radius you'll be lucky if you can stop throwing up long enough to say " shit, where's my gun!" Thats assuming you survived the initial blast and burns to your skin.
Your second point, the government dissolving or the police force all packing up and going home? You are joking aren't you?
And unless you are one of those types that sleeps with a fully loaded and unlocked gun under your pillow.....if a home intruder just happens upon your home and wants to kill your arse, well, he's gonna kill your arse. Sure, you could politely ask him to wait a sec on the killing so you can go get your gun from the locked cabinet, find the bullets that you keep in a separate locked drawer(as of course all responsible gun owners do) and load that thing up and shoot his arse first. My guess is, you're fucked.
http://glocktalk.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=429920
They're pretty unusual though. Hence why it'd be the choice for a lib.
-Enoch Powell
i dont need a gun to break a fuckin neck
but again this proves once again..that people who make posts lik this and buy guns for protection...for some reason think the boogey man and all his cronies are constantly out to get you and your precious...oh your precious children and family...
you are delusional...no one is out to get you...terrorists dont want to blow you up and nobody really wants to rob you...
when will we grow up in this world??
MORON
If you have a nuke going off in NY, that's a problem a gun won't help with.
But what makes you think we should arm all the paranoid people and have them running around with guns?