Home› A Moving Train

List Good things the current President has done while he is in office here.

macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
edited October 2006 in A Moving Train
You must provide analysis.

I am blank so someone start this thread off.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«134

Comments

  • AbuskedtiAbuskedti Posts: 1,917
    Demonstrated how the United States government is in very serious need of reform.
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    WE HAVE A WINNER!!!!! :) Wake Me up when this lame duck is gone.
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    Abuskedti wrote:
    Demonstrated how the United States government is in very serious need of reform.
    Now that's damn funny. And true. Shit!
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    Our country has not been attacked since Sept 11th. would you argue Bush had NOTHING to do with that fact?
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    jlew24asu wrote:
    Our country has not been attacked since Sept 11th. would you argue Bush had NOTHING to do with that fact?

    would you be OK with placing full blame on bush for the attacks on 9/11....?
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    jlew24asu wrote:
    Our country has not been attacked since Sept 11th. would you argue Bush had NOTHING to do with that fact?

    Nothing happened on our soil by a foreign terrorist on US soil after the March 1993 attack on the WTC (3 months after Clinton took office). Would you argue that Clinton had nothing to do with that? That shows what the War on Terror is really, a piece of propaganda. Clinton didn't start saying things like "we need to fight them overseas instead of on American soil". Bush does say that, and he has gone 5 years since an attack. I believe these people will attack no matter if there is a war on terror or not.
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • Boom The CatBoom The Cat Posts: 482
    Saved some small children from sharks.
    no matter where you go,
    there you are.

    - brain of c
  • Boom The CatBoom The Cat Posts: 482
    Boom The Cat wrote:
    Saved some small children from sharks.

    No, wait. That was Aquaman.
    no matter where you go,
    there you are.

    - brain of c
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    inmytree wrote:
    would you be OK with placing full blame on bush for the attacks on 9/11....?


    I dont understand this question.
  • SweetHarmonicsSweetHarmonics Posts: 290
    He consistantly delivers highly comical expressions, of both the verbal and physical nature. Whoever is the next president will have a hard time measuring up in that aspect. Highly doubtful that we'll ever see a more comedic commander-in-chief.
    hate was just a legend
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    This was a really good thing.

    Unfortunately, it's the only one I could come up with.
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    ledvedderman wrote:
    Nothing happened on our soil by a foreign terrorist on US soil after the March 1993 attack on the WTC (3 months after Clinton took office). Would you argue that Clinton had nothing to do with that? That shows what the War on Terror is really, a piece of propaganda. Clinton didn't start saying things like "we need to fight them overseas instead of on American soil". Bush does say that, and he has gone 5 years since an attack. I believe these people will attack no matter if there is a war on terror or not.


    no I wouldnt. I believe Clinton did care about security after the 93 attack. el queda took many years to plan the attacks of 9/11.

    clinton didnt say those things because there didnt seem to be an urgency to fight them overseas. maybe now there should have been. if he invaded afgahistan then and killed osama maybe 9/11 wouldnt have happened. I dont know. I believe he tried to get him and failed, much like bush.

    of course those people will try to attack no matter if there is a war on terror or not. thats why we need to be on the offensive against them so we kill them before they kill us.

    and please no need for references to the war in Iraq. I dont feel Iraq has much to do with the war of terror, although at one point it did. once we killed zarkawi (not sure how to spell it) el queda in iraq seemed to be crippled. now its time to help how we can and get out.
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    jlew24asu wrote:
    Our country has not been attacked since Sept 11th. would you argue Bush had NOTHING to do with that fact?

    here's a little secret.... shh no one really knows who the terrorists are until they strike... shhh
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    Dow Jones Industrial Average reached an all time high yesterday and continued to make new records today. Economy is very strong right now and has been for several years.


    does that have anything to do with Bush?


    If the economy was in a major recession right now, who would you blame that on?
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    ALSO!! just in....

    a terrorist struck a few days ago... the milk man who killed the amish people..

    by definition is a terrorist.
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    macgyver06 wrote:
    here's a little secret.... shh no one really knows who the terrorists are until they strike... shhh


    I have a good idea who the terrorists are. you dont?
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    jlew24asu wrote:
    Dow Jones Industrial Average reached an all time high yesterday and continued to make new records today. Economy is very strong right now and has been for several years.


    does that have anything to do with Bush?


    If the economy was in a major recession right now, who would you blame that on?

    Bush doesnt have a good say on how the economy is. our free market and economists and the industries, and the people feeling comfortable and buying do.
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    jlew24asu wrote:
    I have a good idea who the terrorists are. you dont?

    no I dont...tell me.. who are they?

    this isnt sarcasm either
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    jlew24asu wrote:
    I have a good idea who the terrorists are. you dont?

    Is Timothy McVeigh a terrorist to you? If he is, isn't this mad milk man from the other day?
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    macgyver06 wrote:
    Bush doesnt have a good say on how the economy is. our free market and economists and the industries, and the people feeling comfortable and buying do.


    so you wouldnt be blaming bush if we were in a recession?
  • PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    macgyver06 wrote:
    Bush doesnt have a good say on how the economy is. our free market and economists and the industries, and the people feeling comfortable and buying do.

    So I'll assume you're one of the few who doesnt credit Clinton for the good economy during his turn??? ;)
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    hippiemom wrote:
    This was a really good thing.

    Unfortunately, it's the only one I could come up with.
    ...
    That was about it for me, too. I only wish that he had heard of Jacques Cousteau prior to 2006.
    But, he DID show some strength in the days after the September 11, 2001 attacks... and going after the Bin Laden crew. But, that was a no-brainer... I believe any President would have done the same.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    ledvedderman wrote:
    Is Timothy McVeigh a terrorist to you? If he is, isn't this mad milk man from the other day?


    McVeigh yes.

    the milk man? he is a mentally ill guy who had inner demons against women and who knows what. did he terrorize the amish community? um yes he did.
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    jlew24asu wrote:
    so you wouldnt be blaming bush if we were in a recession?

    i would blame him for not putting a plan into action..such as raising federal reserve limits... that is HIS JOB
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    jlew24asu wrote:
    McVeigh yes.

    the milk man? he is a mentally ill guy who had inner demons against women and who knows what. did he terrorize the amish community? um yes he did.

    Would it be fair to say that McVeigh was a "mentally ill guy who had inner demons about the way the Federal government handled the Waco situation"
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    macgyver06 wrote:
    i would blame him for not putting a plan into action..such as raising federal reserve limits... that is HIS JOB


    he did put a plan into action in early 2002 when we were in a recession. what has the market done since then? hmmmm


    so you blame or would blame him for a recession but not praise him for an effective plan.


    cant we be fair about it? im sure you thought Clinton was a genius during his time even though the ecomony soared under a stock market bubble which voilently bursts in 2000
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    ledvedderman wrote:
    Would it be fair to say that McVeigh was a "mentally ill guy who had inner demons about the way the Federal government handled the Waco situation"


    he had a much bigger beef with the government than just waco. what are you getting at?
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    jlew24asu wrote:
    he had a much bigger beef with the government than just waco. what are you getting at?

    You stated that you had a pretty good idea who the terrorists were? I could be wrong, but to me, that's implying that middle eastern men are the terrorists you were thinking of. I was trying to show that there is no way anyone can know who the terrorists are.
    E8toX.gif

    http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    ledvedderman wrote:
    You stated that you had a pretty good idea who the terrorists were? I could be wrong, but to me, that's implying that middle eastern men are the terrorists you were thinking of. I was trying to show that there is no way anyone can know who the terrorists are.


    excuse me allow me to be more clear. I was refering to islamic terrorists. they seemed to be more organized and dedicated then the Tim McVeighs of the world.

    and to keep in line with this thread. Bush has prevented them from attacking us again on our soil.
  • TheVoiceInsideTheVoiceInside Posts: 361
    jlew24asu wrote:
    excuse me allow me to be more clear. I was refering to islamic terrorists. they seemed to be more organized and dedicated then the Tim McVeighs of the world.

    and to keep in line with this thread. Bush has prevented them from attacking us again on our soil.


    What good is it to be protected inside your house if you cant even go outside.
Sign In or Register to comment.