Waterboarding - Torture or Not?
Ridin The Wave
Posts: 552
I haven't seen any threads on this, so I figured I'd post this link to get some thoughts.
http://current.com/items/86417301_kaj_larsen_goes_waterboarding
http://current.com/items/86417301_kaj_larsen_goes_waterboarding
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
Long time reader, third or forth time poster.
For some reason this post (or more specifically the accompaning video) really disturbed me. Anyone group that uses this "interrigation technique" is both a sick fucking organisation, and a stupid one (I'd admit anything under waterboarding because I'm terribly scared of pain/discomfort). I can't imagine the thought process that the average american citizen goes through every day in regards to the war on terror, but I pray, even as an atheist, that people are smart enough to realise that this can only lead to disinformation and hatred which is counteractive to the worthy cause all people of reasonable mind are fighting.
As apolitically as possible, I hope most everybody on the board will agree. Despite the bottle or 2 of wine I've had. : )
Cheers,
Steve
edit: Ooops signed in under the wrong name.
Also, this is hardly doing to west's reputation any good. Let's not pretend that we're the only side that know.
Cheers
Steve
There isn't even a debate here, this is the bush administration not giving a shit about law.
It can't.
http://www.wishlistfoundation.org
Oh my, they dropped the leash.
Morgan Freeman/Clint Eastwood 08' for President!
"Make our day"
maybe not so great a plan..
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
I bet if you were waterboarded you'd admit to killing Lincoln if it meant they'd quit TORTURING you.
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
maybe, maybe not
doesn't change the FACT that it has worked
But that's not a fact, is it?
it just means someone has said something that stops others from putting them through unbearable suffering.
All this really proves is that the pain is so unbearable than they'll give the other side (in this case the US and the western allies) any information the they want, whether true or not.
Torture and the results it gathers are useless and destructive.
but the info WAS TRUE so it did work
yr right - they just cut our heads off, drag our dead bodies through the street naked, ect.
we are soooooooooooo inhumane
http://www.wishlistfoundation.org
Oh my, they dropped the leash.
Morgan Freeman/Clint Eastwood 08' for President!
"Make our day"
HUH? Maybe its the hangover I'm suffering with today but ya' lost me here sailor.
It's NOT a fact....
here are the facts:
1) At one point during days of interrogation he was water-boarded
2) After a long interrogation he admitted to involvement in 9/11, and about 147 other things.
What we don't know, is if any of his admissions were true, or if it was water boarding or other questions, techniques or whatever that made him talk.
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
so, are you saying that you believe that he wasn't involved?
Pretty sure if you read it yourself you can see that's not what he's saying.
http://www.reverbnation.com/brianzilm
i did read it, why do you think i asked the question?
No, I'm not saying that. I actually do think that he was involved. But just because someone confesses to something after a long interrogation where torture was involved, doesn't make it true.
Besides the fact with him, he was never going to be released anyway, so why not take the blame for everything to boost his own image or to just take some heat off of other terrorists who are still free.
I guarantee that if any of us were subjected to what he was put through, that we would admit to just about anything.
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
I totally agree with this statement.
But, even if the above wasn't/isn't the case, the man from 9/11 was subjected to many different techniques, as was already stated - there is no way to show which one was successful.
And even if what he said was true and it was 100% because of the waterboarding, that does not a) make it right and b) mean it will work everytime!
Ok it worked for this one individual, but for the most part information obtain through torture is highly unreliable. Second even if it was reliable it is still wrong. We are supposed to be this great democracy. Protectors of justice and liberty. We are supposed to lead by example and the example we are senting is jusr plain wrong. We are going against every principle this country was founded apon and once we have destroyed those principles what is there really left to defend. By comminting these acts we are lowering ourselves to the terrorists standards and at that point we are no better then they are and they basically won.
if you don't believe it, why don't you volunteer to lie down on a board and let me pour water down your throat until you nearly drown.
any takers??
i didn't think so.
"Well, you tell him that I don't talk to suckas."
You basically condone and stamp their acts with your approval when you accept that acting the same way as they do is the norm.
Hail, Hail!!!
I think to get the bad guys any means should be used if it saves lives. I know innocents will get it from time to time, but that is something we have to risk to prevent more 9/11's.
This isn't about us being better than them morally, they will cut your fucking head off in a heart beat so fuck sympathy for these bastards. If it saves one life torturing one of these fuckers I am all for it. LLets not play the spin game either and say if it was your loved one tortured etc either, get a better argument.
think of it this way, if you had a child or relative or friend,and this dude had info that will or could lead to their death but won't spill the beans you can't seriously tell me you wouldn't do ANYTHING to get the info. I'd find that hard to believe. You would allow the chance of that person dying for moral athority.....We(the US/"coalition") are fighting a mindset that does not care about dying, would not hesitate to torture/mainme/murder you...I say fuck moral high ground and do whatever we need to to save our citizens' lives. If that makes us now somehow no better than them you are IMHO way off.
If they are a citizen of the country interrogating them they should however have all the right afforded to them. If not a citezen all betts are off.
Guess again. Those were not 'Terrorists' who did that. It was the 'Poor oppressed Iraqis that we want to liberate and spread democracy all over'.
Hail, Hail!!!