Intellectually and morally confused

2»

Comments

  • Taft wrote:
    That is my point you cannot define "good" and "evil", but if you watch Bush's speech today, that is how he tries to simplify the state of the world right now, good v. evil. And those who vote[d] for him fall for it because they are either too lazy or too dumb to actually do research.

    How is something that you cannot define "elementary"?

    Anyway, the state of the world is good v. evil. But infighting should always be expected from evil.
  • TaftTaft Posts: 454
    How is something that you cannot define "elementary"?

    Anyway, the state of the world is good v. evil. But infighting should always be expected from evil.

    Bush et al, are "dumbing down" their entire foreign policy to a good v. evil argument (read the transcript of his speech today, it is unreal), hoping to continue to ride the uninformed voters at the polls in November.
  • Taft wrote:
    Bush et al, are "dumbing down" their entire foreign policy to a good v. evil argument (read the transcript of his speech today, it is unreal), hoping to continue to ride the uninformed voters at the polls in November.

    Yes they are. But that doesn't mean they're alone.

    The far-left has also "dumbed down" their entire foreign policy to a "power vs victimization" argument that is equally as foolish.

    What you're left with is one side of political spectrum that doesn't understand morality and another side that pretends morality doesn't exist.
Sign In or Register to comment.