6 'Death Squad' Members Caught in Iraq

PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
edited July 2006 in A Moving Train
http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/w-me/2006/jul/25/072500534.html


Every little bit helps. Good thing we arent as inhumane as they are, or these dipshits would have been publicly beheaded already.

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) -

U.S. and Iraqi soldiers captured six members of an alleged "death squad" in Baghdad on Tuesday, hoping to quell the rampant sectarian violence dividing the capital, while attacks elsewhere in Iraq left at least 26 people dead.

In Washington, President Bush met Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki at the White House to discuss the deteriorating security situation. Bush said a U.S. military program to bolster Iraqi security forces in Baghdad will better address the violence there as he pledged to stand by Iraq's new democratic government.

"He believes and I believe that there needs to be more forces inside Baghdad who are willing to hold people to account," Bush said during a joint news conference.

Al-Maliki said the most important element of a new security program "is to curb the religious violence."

Representatives of Iraq's ethnic and sectarian groups met in Cairo, Egypt, to discuss ways to reconcile. Some 30 delegates representing Shiites, Sunnis, Kurds and other smaller minorities participated in discussions sponsored by the Cairo-based Arab League.

The talks are intended to prepare for a national reconciliation conference in Baghdad next month. U.S. officials believe control of Baghdad - the political, cultural, transport and economic hub of the country - will determine the future of Iraq.

"This is a duty for Iraqis to find out ways for ending this dilemma," said Arab League Undersecretary-General Ahmed Ben Heli, whose group sponsored the conference.

The six suspects, including a cell leader, were detained during a pre-dawn raid on four buildings in Baghdad, a U.S. military statement said. It was not clear if those detained Tuesday were Sunnis or Shiites.

Later in the day, gunmen attacked a police checkpoint in Dujail, about 50 miles north of Baghdad, and ambushed a sport utility vehicle belonging to a private security company in north Baghdad, killing eight people.

The killings gripping the capital accelerated after the Feb. 22 bombing of a Shiite shrine in Samarra and have steadily increased despite the establishment of al-Maliki's national unity government in May.

"We are determined to defeat terrorism and the security plan for Baghdad has entered the second phase, and it's achieving its objectives in hunting the terrorists and networks, and eliminating it," al-Maliki said in Washington.

Many of the death squads are believed to be associated with either Sunni or Shiite armed groups, targeting rival sect members as part of a struggle for power between the country's two major religious communities.

U.S. officials have avoided identifying death squads and militias by sect, preferring instead to refer to them as criminals and thugs. Iraq's army and police, which are heavily Shiite, have had trouble winning the trust of residents of majority Sunni neighborhoods.

As a result, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, Gen. George W. Casey Jr., has said more American troops will take to the streets to bolster Iraqi forces, especially in Sunni areas such as Dora, Amariya and Ghazaliyah.

In other violence Tuesday, the head of Saddam Hussein's tribe was killed when gunmen attacked a meeting in the office of a prominent sheik in Tikrit.

Mahmoud Ali Hussein al-Nida, head of the Baijat tribe, died following the attack at about 7:30 p.m. Monday. The gunmen also killed a lawyer and wounded sheik Mizahim al-Mustafa, police Lt. Ahmed Asaad said. Two other civilians caught in the crossfire also were killed, Asaad said.

The Baijat tribe includes several clans, including Saddam's Albu-Nassir clan. Al-Nida was not directly related to Saddam.

In northeastern Baghdad, a suicide car bomber attacked a joint Iraqi-U.S. checkpoint, killing three.

At least 11 bullet-riddled bodies were found dumped in two Baghdad neighborhoods, police said.

U.S. military commanders have struggled to quell the violence and have only recently intensified their efforts to disrupt groups of Sunni gunmen and Shiite militias responsible for much of the violence. Last week, U.S. and Iraqi forces conducted 19 operations specifically targeting death squads. All but two were in Baghdad.

"Clearly Baghdad is the center that everybody is fighting for," Maj. Gen. William Caldwell, spokesman for the U.S. military in Baghdad, said this week. "We will do whatever it takes to bring security to Baghdad."

In other violence, a parked car bomb near a police checkpoint in southern Baghdad's Rissala neighborhood in Baghdad's Abu Ghraib suburb exploded at 4:45 p.m., injuring five civilians, police said.

Five bodies were found in the streets of Muqdadiyah, about 60 miles north of Baghdad, in Diyala province.
Why go home

www.myspace.com/jensvad
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    I think "Kill all military age males" is a pretty inhumane order.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • Jammin909Jammin909 Posts: 888
    http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/w-me/2006/jul/25/072500534.html

    Every little bit helps. Good thing we arent as inhumane as they are, or these dipshits would have been publicly beheaded already.

    We have killed over 45,000 Iraqis since the start of the war. 2000 US Soldiers have been killed and a lot of other coalition troops.

    This would have have happened, nor would there be any "death squad" if Saddam was still in power. We could have also saved $300 billion.
    The less you know, the more you believe.
  • PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    And I think "israel must be wiped off the map" is pretty much in the same category, no? Oh yea, he's just venting, since he's the underdog, its okay. ;)
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    Jammin909 wrote:
    We have killed over 45,000 Iraqis since the start of the war. 2000 US Soldiers have been killed and a lot of other coalition troops.

    This would have have happened, nor would there be any "death squad" if Saddam was still in power. We could have also saved $300 billion.

    "th...th...those weapons were there!" hahahah

    I heard someone say this on Alex Jones' Terrorstorm.

    What a laugh, people still believe he had WMDs.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    Ahnimus wrote:
    "th...th...those weapons were there!" hahahah

    I heard someone say this on Alex Jones' Terrorstorm.

    What a laugh, people still believe he had WMDs.

    And I think it funny that people completely rule out the very real possibility that there were. What with all the warnings and media coverage of inspections/invasions. No fuckin way they had time to move them eh? The very fact that none of you are willing to give that possibility and credence, tells me its most likely the correct one.
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • RockinInCanadaRockinInCanada Posts: 2,016
    And I think it funny that people completely rule out the very real possibility that there were. What with all the warnings and media coverage of inspections/invasions. No fuckin way they had time to move them eh? The very fact that none of you are willing to give that possibility and credence, tells me its most likely the correct one.


    I think that lack of any evidence proves there were no weapons...before hand maybe...currently no.....if there is no evidence very hard to prove someone guilty regardless IF they ever had them....
  • PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    I think that lack of any evidence proves there were no weapons...before hand maybe...currently no.....if there is no evidence very hard to prove someone guilty regardless IF they ever had them....


    Noones disputing if they are currently there. ???????????????????

    Very hard to prove, indeed.

    A big stretch to believe?? Not when you think with your head and not your heart.
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • RockinInCanadaRockinInCanada Posts: 2,016
    Noones disputing if they are currently there. ???????????????????

    Very hard to prove, indeed.

    A big stretch to believe?? Not when you think with your head and not your heart.


    I 100% believe they never had nukes.....
  • PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    I 100% believe they never had nukes.....


    Neither do I. They couldnt develop one on their own thats for sure. But Nukes are not the only WMD out there. Unfortunately, there are many many many weapons of Terrible destruction out there, all for the highest bidder.
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • RockinInCanadaRockinInCanada Posts: 2,016
    Nukes are not the only WMD out there. Unfortunately, there are many many many weapons of Terrible destruction out there, all for the highest bidder.

    I just said nukes....as for biological I dont know for sure.....but as for now if this was a case in a court of law they would be innocent.....like I said with no proof its really difficult to prove something happened.....
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    And I think it funny that people completely rule out the very real possibility that there were. What with all the warnings and media coverage of inspections/invasions. No fuckin way they had time to move them eh? The very fact that none of you are willing to give that possibility and credence, tells me its most likely the correct one.
    ...
    If you really believe that the Iraqi military was able to transport tons of weapons, hundreds of miles through open desert... then you MUST believe that either the Iraqi military had the most brilliant people in the world... or the U.S. military and Intelligence agencies are inept and useless. You have to believe that our F-15 and F-16 pilots patrolling the highways since 1991 are really, really stupid.
    I DON'T believe that. I don't believe that the inept, piece of shit Iraqi military are smarter than our fighter pilots and air surveillence crews. One AE-6 Prowler is cabable of tracking every vehicle travelling between Los Angeles and Santa Barbara... we had the big trackers over Iraq.
    You must believe that our military people are completely blind or stupid NOT to notice that traffic.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    Cosmo wrote:
    ...
    If you really believe that the Iraqi military was able to transport tons of weapons, hundreds of miles through open desert... then you MUST believe that either the Iraqi military had the most brilliant people in the world... or the U.S. military and Intelligence agencies are inept and useless. You have to believe that our F-15 and F-16 pilots patrolling the highways since 1991 are really, really stupid.
    I DON'T believe that. I don't believe that the inept, piece of shit Iraqi military are smarter than our fighter pilots and air surveillence crews. One AE-6 Prowler is cabable of tracking every vehicle travelling between Los Angeles and Santa Barbara... we had the big trackers over Iraq.
    You must believe that our military people are completely blind or stupid NOT to notice that traffic.

    How big of a container of Chemical weapons does it take to kill 100,000 people? How many containers can you break that down into? Countless im sure. I dont know what I believe. I know that I dont believe in absolutes tho. And to think that theres absolutely no way there were any kind of WMD is foolish too.
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • mtildenmtilden Posts: 62
    Neither do I. They couldnt develop one on their own thats for sure. But Nukes are not the only WMD out there. Unfortunately, there are many many many weapons of Terrible destruction out there, all for the highest bidder.

    Autocrats who are considered infidels by Muslim terrorists groups aren't having live weapons auctions for said terrorist groups.
    "Go fuck yourself"
    -Dick Cheney

    "Are you taking over or are you taking orders"
    -Joe Strummer 1952-2002

    "All the war-propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are not fighting."
    -George Orwell
  • PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    mtilden wrote:
    Autocrats who are considered infidels by Muslim terrorists groups aren't having live weapons auctions for said terrorist groups.

    Thats good to know?? <----insert emoticon scratching head.

    Enlighten me with your in depth knowledge of the illegal weapons black market trade.
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    How big of a container of Chemical weapons does it take to kill 100,000 people? How many containers can you break that down into? Countless im sure. I dont know what I believe. I know that I dont believe in absolutes tho. And to think that theres absolutely no way there were any kind of WMD is foolish too.
    ...
    I know they HAD chemical weapons... in 1984. WE sold them to Iraq. We wanted Iraq (Saddam Hussein) to use them in the 8 year stalemate with Iran. We hated Iran more than Iraq (just like the hated the Soviets more than the Mujahadin (Bin Laden and his crew).
    But, guess what? Hussein used them on Iran. He used them against the Kurds after we convinced them to rebel and we'd back them up... which we didn't. AND the 1991 Gulf War destroyed all of their assets... development, manufacturing, storage and distribution. AND the swarm of weapons inspection immediately following the 1991 Gulf War discovered and destroyed tons of them.
    ...
    So... how much remained? And you don't just keep the stuff in your garage. Ask a military guy how he has to handle and store munitions... especially chemical/biological munitions. If they did have some left over from 1989 to 1991... how effective would they be in 2003 with inadequate storage facilities. About as effective as that can of gasoline in your garage that is about 12 years old.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • mtildenmtilden Posts: 62
    Thats good to know?? <----insert emoticon scratching head.

    Enlighten me with your in depth knowledge of the illegal weapons black market trade.

    Let me put it this way, since one of Osama Bin Laden's goals was to overthrow Saddam Hussein, Saddam was not going to sell weapons to him.
    "Go fuck yourself"
    -Dick Cheney

    "Are you taking over or are you taking orders"
    -Joe Strummer 1952-2002

    "All the war-propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are not fighting."
    -George Orwell
  • PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    mtilden wrote:
    Let me put it this way, since one of Osama Bin Laden's goals was to overthrow Saddam Hussein, Saddam was not going to sell weapons to him.

    Let me put it this way, since Osama Bin Laden isnt the only terrorist out there, I dont get your point.
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • mtildenmtilden Posts: 62
    Let me put it this way, since Osama Bin Laden isnt the only terrorist out there, I dont get your point.

    My point is that someone so power hungry is not going to be passing out his weapons to potential threats.
    "Go fuck yourself"
    -Dick Cheney

    "Are you taking over or are you taking orders"
    -Joe Strummer 1952-2002

    "All the war-propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are not fighting."
    -George Orwell
  • PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    mtilden wrote:
    My point is that someone so power hungry is not going to be passing out his weapons to potential threats.

    Glad you think so. I feel safe knowing our security is in your hands.



    The enemy of my enemy, is my friend.


    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    Cosmo wrote:
    ...
    I know they HAD chemical weapons... in 1984. WE sold them to Iraq. We wanted Iraq (Saddam Hussein) to use them in the 8 year stalemate with Iran. We hated Iran more than Iraq (just like the hated the Soviets more than the Mujahadin (Bin Laden and his crew).
    But, guess what? Hussein used them on Iran. He used them against the Kurds after we convinced them to rebel and we'd back them up... which we didn't. AND the 1991 Gulf War destroyed all of their assets... development, manufacturing, storage and distribution. AND the swarm of weapons inspection immediately following the 1991 Gulf War discovered and destroyed tons of them.
    ...
    So... how much remained? And you don't just keep the stuff in your garage. Ask a military guy how he has to handle and store munitions... especially chemical/biological munitions. If they did have some left over from 1989 to 1991... how effective would they be in 2003 with inadequate storage facilities. About as effective as that can of gasoline in your garage that is about 12 years old.

    Cool, since they are harmless, maybe you can store them all at your place. ;)
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    The enemy of my enemy, is my friend.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    ...
    The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Usama bin Laden was the enemy of my enemy, the Soviet Union. Saddam Hussein was the enemy of my enemy, the fundamentalist Shi'ite state of Iran.
    Therefore, Usama bin laden and Saddam Hussein are my friends.
    ...
    That makes sense.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    Cosmo wrote:
    ...
    The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Usama bin Laden was the enemy of my enemy, the Soviet Union. Saddam Hussein was the enemy of my enemy, the fundamentalist Shi'ite state of Iran.
    Therefore, Usama bin laden and Saddam Hussein are my friends.
    ...
    That makes sense.

    The enemy of my friends enemy, is an enemy of my enemies friends.........................................................................................................................


    im lost. :p
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • mtildenmtilden Posts: 62
    Glad you think so. I feel safe knowing our security is in your hands.

    Well, if you want to dive under your desk for every petty thug that comes along that's your business.
    "Go fuck yourself"
    -Dick Cheney

    "Are you taking over or are you taking orders"
    -Joe Strummer 1952-2002

    "All the war-propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are not fighting."
    -George Orwell
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    Cool, since they are harmless, maybe you can store them all at your place. ;)
    ...
    Why should I? They are useless.
    ...
    Besides, you are the one that feared Iraq, not me. I knew they were a piece of shit military that would toss up the white flag as soon as someone pointed a gun at them. I remember the 1991 Gulf War... I remember their military strategy. Hell, they were stalemated by fucking Iran. Iran, whose army rides horses and use swords.
    There is no fucking way they were able to pull it off under the noses of our fighter pilots and air crews and intelligence agents. To believe that would onlty mean that I place more credibility to the Iraqis, than our military. and I do not believe that one bit.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    The enemy of my friends enemy, is an enemy of my enemies friends.........................................................................................................................


    im lost. :p
    ...
    That's probably because you are trying to defend a position that basically says that the Iraqi military was run by brilliant strategists and tacticians and/or that Saddam Hussein was was brilliant evil genius.
    Whereas, I am stating that the Iraqi military is a piece of shit and would probably lose a war against our Special Olympics Team and that Saddam Hussein was a brutal buffoon that spewed a bunch of bullshit to keep Iran at bay.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    Cosmo wrote:
    ...
    Why should I? They are useless.
    ...
    Besides, you are the one that feared Iraq, not me. I knew they were a piece of shit military that would toss up the white flag as soon as someone pointed a gun at them. I remember the 1991 Gulf War... I remember their military strategy. Hell, they were stalemated by fucking Iran. Iran, whose army rides horses and use swords.
    There is no fucking way they were able to pull it off under the noses of our fighter pilots and air crews and intelligence agents. To believe that would onlty mean that I place more credibility to the Iraqis, than our military. and I do not believe that one bit.

    I dont nor did I fear Iraq. Because I agree with the policy of "lets fight them there, rather than here. And if they ever DO come here, they'd better think twice about stopping at my house. ;)


    Do you really think Iran's army rides horses and is limited to swords? You worded as if thats still the case.

    And I dont think the goons in charge of these ass backwards countries are capable of doing it either. They can barely even keep their own countries going. But I do think that there are some other nations working behind the scenes who are and were capapble, and have plenty of motive.
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • mtildenmtilden Posts: 62
    I dont nor did I fear Iraq. Because I agree with the policy of "lets fight them there, rather than here. And if they ever DO come here, they'd better think twice about stopping at my house. ;)

    That's the point you're missing. We never would have had to fight them over here. This whole operation was a waste of lives, time, and resources.
    "Go fuck yourself"
    -Dick Cheney

    "Are you taking over or are you taking orders"
    -Joe Strummer 1952-2002

    "All the war-propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are not fighting."
    -George Orwell
  • PaperPlatesPaperPlates Posts: 1,745
    mtilden wrote:
    That's the point you're missing. We never would have had to fight them over here. This whole operation was a waste of lives, time, and resources.

    The point you're missing is that I dont agree with your basic perception of the situation. You keep believing it. Ill keep voting and winning elections trying to ensure that we NEVER have to fight them over here.
    Why go home

    www.myspace.com/jensvad
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    I dont nor did I fear Iraq. Because I agree with the policy of "lets fight them there, rather than here. And if they ever DO come here, they'd better think twice about stopping at my house. ;)


    Do you really think Iran's army rides horses and is limited to swords? You worded as if thats still the case.

    And I dont think the goons in charge of these ass backwards countries are capable of doing it either. They can barely even keep their own countries going. But I do think that there are some other nations working behind the scenes who are and were capapble, and have plenty of motive.
    ...
    Do you remember 1985? That was around the time that the 'Human Wave' was big at our college football games.
    It was also about the same time that the 'Human Wave' in the Iran/Iraq war took place when Iranian military leaders ordered frontal assaults into Iraqi machine gun and armoured positions. These Human Wavers had machetes and fixed bayonets on empty rifles. The strategy was, "Well... they can't kill 'em all... some will get through". Guess what? They didn't get through. You cannot charge a machine gun nest on a horse and armed with a machete... even I know that. Needless to say, they got their asses kicked.
    Yet... the Iran/Iraq war ended in a tie. This is the military that can outsmart OUR military? NO FUCKING WAY.
    ...
    And that "Let's fight them there, so we don't have to fight them here" is a bunch of bulshit. It's more like, "Let's train them how to fight us there, so our kids will have to deal with all of the new fucking recruits we are creating". Brilliant fucking strategy... one that I would suppose would come from a bunch of fucking suit wearing civilian politicians with no real wartime experience.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • mtildenmtilden Posts: 62
    The point you're missing is that I dont agree with your basic perception of the situation. You keep believing it. Ill keep voting and winning elections trying to ensure that we NEVER have to fight them over here.

    If we keep going after the wrong people we will have to fight someone over here.
    "Go fuck yourself"
    -Dick Cheney

    "Are you taking over or are you taking orders"
    -Joe Strummer 1952-2002

    "All the war-propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are not fighting."
    -George Orwell
Sign In or Register to comment.