do you have any concept of debating something? that is the purpose of this board ya know.
Properly debating something means having a concept of what is actually taking place in reality. My original post in this thread might serve as some kind of indication
in case you needed direction on which way is up
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Under "definition of torture" the document lists U.S. interrogation techniques such as forced nudity, isolation, sleep deprivation and blindfolding prisoners.
thats toture?
"The United States does not permit, tolerate, or condone torture under any circumstances," said a spokeswoman for the U.S. embassy in Ottawa.
A spokesman for Foreign Minister Maxime Bernier tried to distance Ottawa from the document.
"The training manual is not a policy document and does not reflect the views or policies of this government," he said.
Other countries on the watch list include Syria, China, Iran, Afghanistan, Mexico and Saudi Arabia. theres a shocker. I wonder if their techniques are worse then nudity?
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
The AR 15-6 found no evidence of torture or inhumane treatment at JTF-GTMO.
not only do you drink it...you serve it...
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
But you hold it above all other evidence in spite of, or am I mistaken about that?
Of course they're going to proclaim themselves innocent in an internal investigation. Who wouldn't? What would you expect the outcome to be?
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Comments
do you have any concept of debating something? that is the purpose of this board ya know.
Properly debating something means having a concept of what is actually taking place in reality. My original post in this thread might serve as some kind of indication
in case you needed direction on which way is up
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Under "definition of torture" the document lists U.S. interrogation techniques such as forced nudity, isolation, sleep deprivation and blindfolding prisoners.
thats toture?
"The United States does not permit, tolerate, or condone torture under any circumstances," said a spokeswoman for the U.S. embassy in Ottawa.
A spokesman for Foreign Minister Maxime Bernier tried to distance Ottawa from the document.
"The training manual is not a policy document and does not reflect the views or policies of this government," he said.
Other countries on the watch list include Syria, China, Iran, Afghanistan, Mexico and Saudi Arabia. theres a shocker. I wonder if their techniques are worse then nudity?
It may not be acceptable but, it has been proven.
Declassed docs:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jul2005/d20050714report.pdf
Related news:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/torture/
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2004/05/10/040510fa_fact
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/04/27/60II/main614063.shtml
Everyone must have imagined it...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
really?
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jul2...0714report.pdf
The AR 15-6 found no evidence of torture or inhumane treatment at JTF-GTMO.
not only do you drink it...you serve it...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
I didnt post the article genius.
But you hold it above all other evidence in spite of, or am I mistaken about that?
Of course they're going to proclaim themselves innocent in an internal investigation. Who wouldn't? What would you expect the outcome to be?
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")