Canadian Health Care

lukin2006lukin2006 Posts: 9,087
edited August 2006 in A Moving Train
I am just curious to know if we in Canada are getting our moneys worth when it comes to healthcare.

I personally believe that we are paying for a cadilac and only getting a pinto.
We pay very high taxes in Canada.

Some examples why I say this.
-thousands of fellow canucks have no family doctor and can not find one
-if you have no doctor, you must use hospitals or walkin clinics ( if available - until recently none were available where I live)
-hospital wait times are usually 6-10 hours for non emergency conditions
-it can take months to get in to see an orthapedic surgeon and then many more months before the surgury is done.
-as a matter of fact most specialist take months to see.
-if its life threatening I do trust that we will be taken care of.

However I know a few people who would like thier non life threatening problems taken care, so they do not have to live in pain and it gives them peace olf mind.

This is an open debate. Also curious to hear from people from other countries about thier health care.
I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin

"Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    I live in the U.S., and am currently in a battle with my insurance carrier (Aetna) over my chemotherapy treatments. Despite peer-reviewed articles in the New England Jounal of Medicine and other journals, and a recommendation from the National Cancer Institute (dated Dec. 05) that stage III ovarian cancer patients receive the treatment I've been getting, they are saying that the treatment I've been getting is "experimental" and not covered. In essence, this means that some twit with an associate's degree in accounting from his local community college sees fit to second guess my Yale-educated oncologist regarding what is likely to keep me alive. If I'm not successful in my appeal, I'm going to have 6-figure medical bills. The only way I'll be able to pay that is to sell my house, should I be lucky enough to live so long. If I'm not that lucky, the bills would be taken from my life insurance proceeds, so I'll leave my kids with nothing.

    I know the system in Canada is far from perfect (I worked 10 years for a Canadian company), but does this happen in Canada?
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • lukin2006lukin2006 Posts: 9,087
    hippiemom wrote:
    I live in the U.S., and am currently in a battle with my insurance carrier (Aetna) over my chemotherapy treatments. Despite peer-reviewed articles in the New England Jounal of Medicine and other journals, and a recommendation from the National Cancer Institute (dated Dec. 05) that stage III ovarian cancer patients receive the treatment I've been getting, they are saying that the treatment I've been getting is "experimental" and not covered. In essence, this means that some twit with an associate's degree in accounting from his local community college sees fit to second guess my Yale-educated oncologist regarding what is likely to keep me alive. If I'm not successful in my appeal, I'm going to have 6-figure medical bills. The only way I'll be able to pay that is to sell my house, should I be lucky enough to live so long. If I'm not that lucky, the bills would be taken from my life insurance proceeds, so I'll leave my kids with nothing.

    I know the system in Canada is far from perfect (I worked 10 years for a Canadian company), but does this happen in Canada?

    Thanks for your reply.

    First off I would like to say, I really hope you defeat your illness, and my thoughts and prayers are with you.

    I believe it is considered experimental, you need approval from the (Ontario Health Insurance Plan), I could be wrong, maybe someone knows for sure.
    I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin

    "Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
  • spongersponger Posts: 3,159
    hippiemom wrote:
    In essence, this means that some twit with an associate's degree in accounting from his local community college sees fit to second guess my Yale-educated oncologist regarding what is likely to keep me alive.

    You are Yale educated and you really think that a Provider would let someone with an AA make those kinds of decisions? Whoever is screwing you is probably very well educated, but that in no way means to imply that he/she is honest. Their aim is to profit regardless of what common sense may dictate. I'm sorry to hear about your situation. But, I just thought you might like to know that they are screwing you on purpose, not because they are ill-informed.
  • hippiemomhippiemom Posts: 3,326
    sponger wrote:
    You are Yale educated and you really think that a Provider would let someone with an AA make those kinds of decisions? Whoever is screwing you is probably very well educated, but that in no way means to imply that he/she is honest. Their aim is to profit regardless of what common sense may dictate. I'm sorry to hear about your situation. But, I just thought you might like to know that they are screwing you on purpose, not because they are ill-informed.
    I am not Yale-educated, my oncologist is. I don't know for certain, but I'm guessing that the insurance adjuster from Aetna does not have a Ph.D. from Yale in any field, much less oncology. Speaking as someone with cancer, I am much more interested in the opinions of oncoligists than accountants.

    And I'm quite aware of the myriad ways in which Americans get screwed, believe me.
    "Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." ~ MLK, 1963
  • hippiemom wrote:

    I know the system in Canada is far from perfect (I worked 10 years for a Canadian company), but does this happen in Canada?


    yes it happens all the time. if its not approaved its not approaved. There was just a big todo about a guy with cancer. my numvers are likely off, but the jiff of it was that he was fighting for treatment. he has like 6 months to live, and there is treatment that would extend that 3-4 years, but they wont pay because it is not a cure / wont cause remission.

    essencially they said "yes, we know that this money will extend your life, but it just dont seem worth it"

    shitttttyy deal
    The only thing I enjoy is having no feelings....being numb rocks!

    And I won't make the same mistakes
    (Because I know)
    Because I know how much time that wastes
    (And function)
    Function is the key
  • sponger wrote:
    You are Yale educated and you really think that a Provider would let someone with an AA make those kinds of decisions? Whoever is screwing you is probably very well educated, but that in no way means to imply that he/she is honest. Their aim is to profit regardless of what common sense may dictate. I'm sorry to hear about your situation. But, I just thought you might like to know that they are screwing you on purpose, not because they are ill-informed.

    no, they would be an insurace adjuster.
    The only thing I enjoy is having no feelings....being numb rocks!

    And I won't make the same mistakes
    (Because I know)
    Because I know how much time that wastes
    (And function)
    Function is the key
  • spongersponger Posts: 3,159
    no, they would be an insurace adjuster.

    That is incorrect. An adjuster definitely does not determine what procedures should or shouldn't be covered. Company policy dictates that. For example, an adjuster would look at the claim and compare it to company policy to determine whether or not it is covered per the policy.

    Here's an example of adjuster work in other industries:
    Adjusters may consult with other professionals, such as accountants, architects, construction workers, engineers, lawyers, and physicians, who can offer a more expert evaluation of a claim.

    http://stats.bls.gov/oco/ocos125.htm

    Common sense would dictate that determining whether or not a medical procedure is "experimental" is definitely something that would require the opinion of "other professionals" such as doctors..etc.

    Adjusters are just the messengers.

    In the case of medical insurance providers, the doctors who are acting as consultants are employees of the insurance company. I'm sure you can figure out how things work out from there.
  • sponger wrote:

    In the case of medical insurance providers, the doctors who are acting as consultants are employees of the insurance company. I'm sure you can figure out how things work out from there.


    yes, but also, the drugs MUST pass regulatory boards to be on any insurance company's policy coverage (ie fda). well, I suppose they could cover electives, but why would they, but they cant afford that becase A- experimental drugs are costly, B- opens the door to too many loopholes within contracts.
    The only thing I enjoy is having no feelings....being numb rocks!

    And I won't make the same mistakes
    (Because I know)
    Because I know how much time that wastes
    (And function)
    Function is the key
  • chopitdownchopitdown Posts: 2,222
    hippiemom wrote:
    I am not Yale-educated, my oncologist is. I don't know for certain, but I'm guessing that the insurance adjuster from Aetna does not have a Ph.D. from Yale in any field, much less oncology. Speaking as someone with cancer, I am much more interested in the opinions of oncoligists than accountants.

    And I'm quite aware of the myriad ways in which Americans get screwed, believe me.

    most of the companies do have a doc at some level making a call...granted those physicians prob get bonuses for keeping costs down so it's not surprising that they deny stuff right away. They do it all the time. I'm sure this is pissing off your doctor too; esp since there is evidence based, peer-reviewed literature to back up the treatment you guys chose.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • When it comes to buying something, actual choice is usually a prerequisite for me. But hey, maybe I'm nuts.
  • lukin2006lukin2006 Posts: 9,087
    There are tons of examples where the health care sysyem is failing people in Canada.

    The first misconception is that its free, thats just not true, we pay extremely high taxes and in some provinces we pay a health care premium and employers pay a health care tax. In the province I'm from (Ontario) the current government introduced a health care premium early in thier mandate.

    They claimed this would reduce wait. What a joke, thousands still have no doctor. If you are in pain, needing orthopedic prcedures done you can wait a year or more. Most common procedure's done by a surgeon can take months just to see the surgeon.

    Many Canadians now opt to go to the States and pay for it themselves, just so they do not have to live in pain.
    I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin

    "Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
  • chopitdownchopitdown Posts: 2,222
    beemster wrote:
    There are tons of examples where the health care sysyem is failing people in Canada.

    The first misconception is that its free, thats just not true, we pay extremely high taxes and in some provinces we pay a health care premium and employers pay a health care tax. In the province I'm from (Ontario) the current government introduced a health care premium early in thier mandate.

    They claimed this would reduce wait. What a joke, thousands still have no doctor. If you are in pain, needing orthopedic prcedures done you can wait a year or more. Most common procedure's done by a surgeon can take months just to see the surgeon.

    Many Canadians now opt to go to the States and pay for it themselves, just so they do not have to live in pain.


    The waiting times in the states are sometimes a concern as well, although if you have a referral you get in much quicker. If I wanted to see one of the big docs in a big city it would take 6 mos sometimes, if you just called w/o a referral from another MD. If you have someone else make the appt, the wait time is MUCH less and the time to Surgery is usually much less also. The down side is the insurance company and having to play that game. Sometimes it works fine but as soon as teh costs get high, it's a whole lot harder to have the insurance company follow through.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • Everyone is covered and that's the main pro-argument, our system must be corrected and reformed, but not looking down south to do it, we must look at some europeans country who have achieved a great healthcare social system.

    In Canada, waiting list are getting shorter, it's a matter of working on them and erasing the names that should not be on the list anymore, the waiting list in Quebec have been reduced just by doing that, it's stupid but so simple. Doctors must be more available for practicing (erase the stupid quotas), immigrants doctors must be recognized, chirurgical room must be made available (build hospitals, clinics) and we should open more spaces in schools for nurses, doctors and all these guys... just my two cents...
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • chopitdownchopitdown Posts: 2,222
    Everyone is covered and that's the main pro-argument, our system must be corrected and reformed, but not looking down south to do it, we must look at some europeans country who have achieved a great healthcare social system.

    In Canada, waiting list are getting shorter, it's a matter of working on them and erasing the names that should not be on the list anymore, the waiting list in Quebec have been reduced just by doing that, it's stupid but so simple. Doctors must be more available for practicing (erase the stupid quotas), immigrants doctors must be recognized, chirurgical room must be made available (build hospitals, clinics) and we should open more spaces in schools for nurses, doctors and all these guys... just my two cents...

    I'm somewhat familiar with the quota system and doctors. I'm sure doctors would be more willing to work if they got paid for seeing the patients they do...correct me if i'm wrong, but they just have to treat a certain number to get their paycheck and any number of patients over that is in essence work done for free. No one truly likes to work for free esp if you can meet the quota in 6 or 7 mos. Docs in the US do a lot of pro bono work but I'm willing to bet it isn't 5 or 6 mos worth of free labor.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • Heatherj43Heatherj43 Posts: 1,254
    hippiemom wrote:
    I live in the U.S., and am currently in a battle with my insurance carrier (Aetna) over my chemotherapy treatments. Despite peer-reviewed articles in the New England Jounal of Medicine and other journals, and a recommendation from the National Cancer Institute (dated Dec. 05) that stage III ovarian cancer patients receive the treatment I've been getting, they are saying that the treatment I've been getting is "experimental" and not covered. In essence, this means that some twit with an associate's degree in accounting from his local community college sees fit to second guess my Yale-educated oncologist regarding what is likely to keep me alive. If I'm not successful in my appeal, I'm going to have 6-figure medical bills. The only way I'll be able to pay that is to sell my house, should I be lucky enough to live so long. If I'm not that lucky, the bills would be taken from my life insurance proceeds, so I'll leave my kids with nothing.

    I know the system in Canada is far from perfect (I worked 10 years for a Canadian company), but does this happen in Canada?
    This reminds me of the many threads about insurances and getting sick wiping people out. Do you remember them? FFG was in a lot of them and the talk went something like....an illness doesn't have to wipe you out, all you have to do is buy the right insurance, etc.?
    I kept saying that insurances don't pay. He kept saying they HAVE to. I kept saying they only HAVE to pay what the contract says...and THEY are the ones who decide if you really are sick, and what treatment they will pay.
    I had paid into, through my work, long term disability, and when I got sick, they didn't pay. He said they have to. I tried to explain that some person at their company makes the decisions and will override what a doctor says and they come up with things so they don't have to pay.
    I had a niece who died back in '92. Her disability was denied, and she died!!! It was okayed after her death...so my sister did get to pay those bills, but geez...she was denied as not being sick...she fricking died!!!! How sick did they want!
    People think they are secure financially and if they get sick they find out they really weren't as secure as they thought.
    I so tried to explain this in many threads.

    I wish you luck!!! Its bad enough to be sick and dealing with that, then to have to deal with those fricking insurance people is just wrong!!!
    I remember asking the adjuster what medical degree he had, he tells me that some lady at the company made the decision, so I ask what kind of doctor she is...she was an LPN!!!!
    They overrode a few doctors that had diagnosed me and made up their own diagnosis. They never did pay. I did have to sell my house and all that. It was 2 years before any government disability began.
    I was so pissed, and sick at the same time...and trying to pay the bills, while fighting with that fricking guy in some office in Florida.
    I am so sorry you have to deal with this end of this... *aggravated sound..argh*.
    Save room for dessert!
  • lukin2006lukin2006 Posts: 9,087
    chopitdown wrote:
    The waiting times in the states are sometimes a concern as well, although if you have a referral you get in much quicker. If I wanted to see one of the big docs in a big city it would take 6 mos sometimes, if you just called w/o a referral from another MD. If you have someone else make the appt, the wait time is MUCH less and the time to Surgery is usually much less also. The down side is the insurance company and having to play that game. Sometimes it works fine but as soon as teh costs get high, it's a whole lot harder to have the insurance company follow through.

    If we don't have a referal, a specialist will not see you at all.

    Another problem are Docs that don't like to refer you to specialist if they feel it minor. My question is, how do they know? Let the specialist decide.

    I am having an ankle problem, and all the Doc said was the x ray was normal, and that a surgeon wil not help you. Mind you, I went three times
    before it was even x ray, so the OHIP got billed three times for the same problem, and pobably a fourth because I will likely need to seek medical attention elsewhere.

    This system of ours is very frustrating. There needs to be changes, but no government has the intestinal fortitude to make the changes.

    The first change that needs to be made is to pay the health care providers closer to what the US health care providers make. this will allow us to retain
    healthcare workers and recruit health care workers.
    I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin

    "Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
  • chopitdownchopitdown Posts: 2,222
    beemster wrote:
    If we don't have a referal, a specialist will not see you at all.

    Another problem are Docs that don't like to refer you to specialist if they feel it minor. My question is, how do they know? Let the specialist decide.

    I am having an ankle problem, and all the Doc said was the x ray was normal, and that a surgeon wil not help you. Mind you, I went three times
    before it was even x ray, so the OHIP got billed three times for the same problem, and pobably a fourth because I will likely need to seek medical attention elsewhere.

    This system of ours is very frustrating. There needs to be changes, but no government has the intestinal fortitude to make the changes.

    The first change that needs to be made is to pay the health care providers closer to what the US health care providers make. this will allow us to retain
    healthcare workers and recruit health care workers.

    That would be frustrating. A lot of Gen med docs do have the knowledge to make decisions but you're abosolutely right b/c people do specialize b/c it's impossible to know everything and be competent about everything.

    On a side note, can you get a referral to a physical therapist for the ankle (the lower extremity and the shoulder are 2 things i've done a decent amount of work with)...just b/c it's not fx doesn't mean it's not a host of other things. Your doc is right, a surgeon won't cut most likely, but will be much better versed in ortho issues...hell, even a non operative sports med guy would be good.

    I think you're right in terms of the pay, you have to be able to recruit and keep top notch docs if you want top notch care. And if docs can travel south to make much more money, most will.
    make sure the fortune that you seek...is the fortune that you need
  • Okay here I go......

    1st thing first to address....hippiemom, my mothers chemo was covered in Canada and there were no hassles at all, and it was cutting edge. I went up to the cancer wards precription window gave them the paper and an hour later I left with my mothers medicine, nothing to it.

    2nd thing Healthcare reform in Canada:

    - Our current systen is flawed but is far from broke. The system in the USA is no better beemster, where we pay high taxes they pay some insane health care premiums and some of the time you are given a list of doctors from the insurance company on who you must see if you want to be re-imburesed. Plus the USA system is flawed that access to healthcare is essentially only for the people with money to spend. In Canada we allow everyone equal care but we need to adjust methods of delivery, where in the USA if you are poor (and I am not talking a free loading poor...but a person who still works three days a week while taking care of a child) you are going to be screwed from anything from a broken leg to at worse cancer. In Canada no matter the the issue you will receive treatment.

    - I agree we do need to make changes. One I suggest is allowing doctors to practise in the private sector only after completing a minumum of 35 hours a week. One can go on to say that will not allow much time for the doctor to practice privately, my arguement that I honestly believe is that the time alloted for private use (assuming 75% do go smei-private) will be directly proportional to those Canadian citizens that will actually use the private system. I for one will refrain from any use of this system, but that is my choice.

    - Private clinics can offer specilists, MRI's, X-Rays, and consultation. This right here will decrease the public list for these needed applications. Surgeries such as joint replacement, and minor non-life threatening injuries should also be available to the private side to decrease the public waiting list. I call on you to research the Alberta study where a three month trial was completed to see the effect of allowing people to pay for hip/joint replacement and how that would decrease the public list. It is estiamated that the public list went down approx. (do not quote this as gospel) as 25%. Which is a large number and proves further study IMHO.

    - All life threatening injuries will be covered only through the public sector, no person regardless of their income should have their life prioritized over someone who simply makes less money, that is the soul and essence of our system and we cannot take that away. Some will say I am by proposing some pay services I go against this ideology, but the point is there that there is no lives at stake and the paying will drastically decrease the wait for the public side...win win situation. We have to give a little somewhere to improve the system as a whole. This inlcudes all forms of transplants, cancer therapy, heart surgeries, etc. You know what I am getting at.

    - Sorry but taxes remain the same...to try to quantitate someone's use or non-use of the public/private system would create a bureacratic nightmare similar to that of the gun registry. So much time would be spent arguing the logistics of everything it would be horrible one can only imagine. If you have a better plan for this please let me know. Therefore the public system, which is and always will be the primary system, is still taken care of.

    - Foreign doctors should go through rigourous testing to verify their education, this can be done quite easily and will give access to those that right now are shot down completly.

    In a nutshell I think reforms are necessary, however we must not look south that system is deplorable and once you take into account health care premiums and restricted access things are not as rosy. We must look at the European systems, which happen to consistently rank in the top groups for healthcare provider.
  • Plus I may add beemster that the reason that the government does not making sweeping changes is the fact that healthcare in our country is something that most Canadians feel passionaltly about the most. It would be political suicide to mess around with things too much...our system will never be like the south, thank God at that. But it does need changes realize though that there is a very line to walk on and in the end voters will matter most to these people....
  • lukin2006lukin2006 Posts: 9,087
    Everyone is covered and that's the main pro-argument, our system must be corrected and reformed, but not looking down south to do it, we must look at some europeans country who have achieved a great healthcare social system.

    In Canada, waiting list are getting shorter, it's a matter of working on them and erasing the names that should not be on the list anymore, the waiting list in Quebec have been reduced just by doing that, it's stupid but so simple. Doctors must be more available for practicing (erase the stupid quotas), immigrants doctors must be recognized, chirurgical room must be made available (build hospitals, clinics) and we should open more spaces in schools for nurses, doctors and all these guys... just my two cents...
    I agree, all your point are valid,
    I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin

    "Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
  • lukin2006lukin2006 Posts: 9,087
    Plus I may add beemster that the reason that the government does not making sweeping changes is the fact that healthcare in our country is something that most Canadians feel passionaltly about the most. It would be political suicide to mess around with things too much...our system will never be like the south, thank God at that. But it does need changes realize though that there is a very line to walk on and in the end voters will matter most to these people....
    Your living in a dream world if you do not think our system is broken. Its more than flawed. I never said to incorporate a system like the states, we need to look to europe where they have some very good examples of health care that runs far better than ours. France and Sweden apparantly have excellent health care.

    Secondly, if its experimental treatment OHIP, may or may not cover it.
    I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin

    "Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
  • lukin2006lukin2006 Posts: 9,087
    This was done in 2000, there might be a more current list.

    Where 30 just a few spots ahead of the US. But we should strive to be where France is, or at least in the top 10. Like I say we are paying for BMW and getting Pinto of a health care system.

    The World Health Organization's ranking
    of the world's health systems.
    Source: WHO World Health Report - See also Spreadsheet Details (731kb)

    Rank CountryView this list in alphabetic order View this list in alphabetic order View this list in alphabetic order

    1 France
    2 Italy
    3 San Marino
    4 Andorra
    5 Malta
    6 Singapore
    7 Spain
    8 Oman
    9 Austria
    10 Japan
    11 Norway
    12 Portugal
    13 Monaco
    14 Greece
    15 Iceland
    16 Luxembourg
    17 Netherlands
    18 United Kingdom
    19 Ireland
    20 Switzerland
    21 Belgium
    22 Colombia
    23 Sweden
    24 Cyprus
    25 Germany
    26 Saudi Arabia
    27 United Arab Emirates
    28 Israel
    29 Morocco
    30 Canada
    31 Finland
    32 Australia
    33 Chile
    34 Denmark
    35 Dominica
    36 Costa Rica
    37 United States of America
    38 Slovenia
    39 Cuba
    40 Brunei
    41 New Zealand
    42 Bahrain
    43 Croatia
    44 Qatar
    45 Kuwait
    46 Barbados
    47 Thailand
    48 Czech Republic
    49 Malaysia
    50 Poland
    51 Dominican Republic
    52 Tunisia
    53 Jamaica
    54 Venezuela
    55 Albania
    56 Seychelles
    57 Paraguay
    58 South Korea
    59 Senegal
    60 Philippines
    61 Mexico
    62 Slovakia
    63 Egypt
    64 Kazakhstan
    65 Uruguay
    66 Hungary
    67 Trinidad and Tobago
    68 Saint Lucia
    69 Belize
    70 Turkey
    71 Nicaragua
    72 Belarus
    73 Lithuania
    74 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
    75 Argentina
    76 Sri Lanka
    77 Estonia
    78 Guatemala
    79 Ukraine
    80 Solomon Islands
    81 Algeria
    82 Palau
    83 Jordan
    84 Mauritius
    85 Grenada
    86 Antigua and Barbuda
    87 Libya
    88 Bangladesh
    89 Macedonia
    90 Bosnia-Herzegovina
    91 Lebanon
    92 Indonesia
    93 Iran
    94 Bahamas
    95 Panama
    96 Fiji
    97 Benin
    98 Nauru
    99 Romania
    100 Saint Kitts and Nevis
    101 Moldova
    102 Bulgaria
    103 Iraq
    104 Armenia
    105 Latvia
    106 Yugoslavia
    107 Cook Islands
    108 Syria
    109 Azerbaijan
    110 Suriname
    111 Ecuador
    112 India
    113 Cape Verde
    114 Georgia
    115 El Salvador
    116 Tonga
    117 Uzbekistan
    118 Comoros
    119 Samoa
    120 Yemen
    121 Niue
    122 Pakistan
    123 Micronesia
    124 Bhutan
    125 Brazil
    126 Bolivia
    127 Vanuatu
    128 Guyana
    129 Peru
    130 Russia
    131 Honduras
    132 Burkina Faso
    133 Sao Tome and Principe
    134 Sudan
    135 Ghana
    136 Tuvalu
    137 Ivory Coast
    138 Haiti
    139 Gabon
    140 Kenya
    141 Marshall Islands
    142 Kiribati
    143 Burundi
    144 China
    145 Mongolia
    146 Gambia
    147 Maldives
    148 Papua New Guinea
    149 Uganda
    150 Nepal
    151 Kyrgystan
    152 Togo
    153 Turkmenistan
    154 Tajikistan
    155 Zimbabwe
    156 Tanzania
    157 Djibouti
    158 Eritrea
    159 Madagascar
    160 Vietnam
    161 Guinea
    162 Mauritania
    163 Mali
    164 Cameroon
    165 Laos
    166 Congo
    167 North Korea
    168 Namibia
    169 Botswana
    170 Niger
    171 Equatorial Guinea
    172 Rwanda
    173 Afghanistan
    174 Cambodia
    175 South Africa
    176 Guinea-Bissau
    177 Swaziland
    178 Chad
    179 Somalia
    180 Ethiopia
    181 Angola
    182 Zambia
    183 Lesotho
    184 Mozambique
    185 Malawi
    186 Liberia
    187 Nigeria
    188 Democratic Republic of the Congo
    189 Central African Republic
    190 Myanmar
    I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin

    "Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
  • beemster wrote:
    Your living in a dream world if you do not think our system is broken. Its more than flawed. I never said to incorporate a system like the states, we need to look to europe where they have some very good examples of health care that runs far better than ours. France and Sweden apparantly have excellent health care.

    Secondly, if its experimental treatment OHIP, may or may not cover it.

    You think our taxes our high...look at Swedens.....I will bet higher than ours....
  • beemster wrote:
    Your living in a dream world if you do not think our system is broken. Its more than flawed. I never said to incorporate a system like the states, we need to look to europe where they have some very good examples of health care that runs far better than ours. France and Sweden apparantly have excellent health care.

    Secondly, if its experimental treatment OHIP, may or may not cover it.

    My system presented would help with the flaws...I fail to see the system as broke....but that is my opinion....
  • lukin2006lukin2006 Posts: 9,087
    You think our taxes our high...look at Swedens.....I will bet higher than ours....

    I am sure there are other countries that are taxed higher than Canada, that probably include Sweden, France and other countries throughout the world. Taxes are also hard to interpret because most countries have different tax rates depending on income.

    That still doesn't solve the problem that your living in a dream world if you do not think our system is broken and needs major work. The first step pay our health care proffesionals like the US health care proffesionals or thier will continue to be a shortage of workers in health care. Listen we pay our Police, Firefighters, ambulance workers, and most other government employees at levels the same or higher as thier US counterparts, so why not health care workers, especially Doctors. Common sense dictates that if I can make more money down south, then I'll go, and many Doctors and other proffesionals have gone.

    As far as the politicians not wanting to fix it, like I said, they do not heve the intestinal fortitude to do the job. But most politicians just talk about fixing, I want one who will reform. I am one person who is not afraid of change.
    I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin

    "Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
  • surferdudesurferdude Posts: 2,057
    My system presented would help with the flaws...I fail to see the system as broke....but that is my opinion....
    There are some fundamental serious flaws in our system.

    One, sourcing of doctors. We don't pay North American market rates. We will always have a doctor shortage which will get worse over the next 50 years as our population ages.

    Two, nursing shortage and the fact we allow them to unionize. Much the same problem as with doctors but compounded by the unionization. When you and I are federally mandated to have no choice then the employee should have no choice to unionize. Unionization of a monopoly service is a recipe for disaster.

    Three, unionization of other healthcare industry jobs. Same issue as with the nurses.

    Lack of guidelines and principles to deal with extremely expensive medicines and procedures that provide no hope of cure.
    “One good thing about music,
    when it hits you, you feel to pain.
    So brutalize me with music.”
    ~ Bob Marley
  • A little off topic I am engineer within the petroleum world and I want to unionize (and there are hundreds along the same), we get treated like crap and with piss-poor wage (well its not too bad actually :) but I view us as major contributors to the industry) compared to the amount of money we bring in to the company....Im talking major benefit cuts when record profits occur, expectations to work o/t with no monetary gain. As i get older I am seriously looking at leading an unionization movement...anyhow WAY OFF Topic...lol

    Yeah I agree that we need to pay doctors more...but you guys make it sound like we live in a 3rd world country and you say I am the one dreaming...sorry for being optimistic but I have NEVER had a problem...6-10 hrs in the hospital never for me...I know experiences will vary but at the end of day I will take my system over 95% of the worlds....it is not broke.....I would agree to a tax INCREASE to pay doctors a better wage if it would lead to more hospitals
  • lukin2006lukin2006 Posts: 9,087
    surferdude wrote:
    There are some fundamental serious flaws in our system.

    One, sourcing of doctors. We don't pay North American market rates. We will always have a doctor shortage which will get worse over the next 50 years as our population ages.

    Two, nursing shortage and the fact we allow them to unionize. Much the same problem as with doctors but compounded by the unionization. When you and I are federally mandated to have no choice then the employee should have no choice to unionize. Unionization of a monopoly service is a recipe for disaster.

    Three, unionization of other healthcare industry jobs. Same issue as with the nurses.



    Lack of guidelines and principles to deal with extremely expensive medicines and procedures that provide no hope of cure.

    My point, if we are serious about health care we need to pay the Doctors market rates.

    As far as nurses, I have a relative who worked both sides of the border, she liked the southern side better.
    I have certain rules I live by ... My First Rule ... I don't believe anything the government tells me ... George Carlin

    "Life Is What Happens To You When Your Busy Making Other Plans" John Lennon
  • surferdudesurferdude Posts: 2,057
    A little off topic I am engineer within the petroleum world and I want to unionize (and there are hundreds along the same), we get treated like crap and with piss-poor wage (well its not too bad actually :) but I view us as major contributors to the industry) compared to the amount of money we bring in to the company....Im talking major benefit cuts when record profits occur, expectations to work o/t with no monetary gain. As i get older I am seriously looking at leading an unionization movement...anyhow WAY OFF Topic...lol
    I can't understand how anyone who is good at their job and takes pride in their work would ever want to unionize. I think of engineers as professionals, professionals do not unionize in my books. If you don't like how your current employer treats you find a new employer.

    In general I'm against unions, except in dangerous occupations. Unions unfairly force a company to keep employees while not placing this same demand on an employee to stay with a company. The fact that employees can take another job during a strike but a company cannot hire replacement workers is so one-sided it's ridiculous.

    Yeah I agree that we need to pay doctors more...but you guys make it sound like we live in a 3rd world country and you say I am the one dreaming...sorry for being optimistic but I have NEVER had a problem...6-10 hrs in the hospital never for me...I know experiences will vary but at the end of day I will take my system over 95% of the worlds....it is not broke.....I would agree to a tax INCREASE to pay doctors a better wage if it would lead to more hospitals
    I accept our system for what it is. It works if you are seriously ill. It does not work that well when you are not.
    “One good thing about music,
    when it hits you, you feel to pain.
    So brutalize me with music.”
    ~ Bob Marley
  • surferdude wrote:
    I can't understand how anyone who is good at their job and takes pride in their work would ever want to unionize. I think of engineers as professionals, professionals do not unionize in my books. If you don't like how your current employer treats you find a new employer.

    In general I'm against unions, except in dangerous occupations. Unions unfairly force a company to keep employees while not placing this same demand on an employee to stay with a company. The fact that employees can take another job during a strike but a company cannot hire replacement workers is so one-sided it's ridiculous.


    I accept our system for what it is. It works if you are seriously ill. It does not work that well when you are not.


    LOL....Im just a frusrated employee and I do LOVE my job and i am very very good at it....however your right it is a company thing....I still think it it a travesty some people expect people to work for free ( I will always be against working FREE hours for the man...hell it doesn't even need to paid...give me the hours as paid time off at regular wage at least)....I actually would not go through with all that I said...however this working o/t conception is widely held in industry and is a complete farce IMHO....you know just a bad day with management today....we all go through that every once and again as you would understand....
Sign In or Register to comment.