World peace being stopped by.....
JordyWordy
Posts: 2,261
"USA biggest threat to world peace". discuss.
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
Many a profits to be had.
Peace
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
Wow, how long did it take you to do that? I'm impressed!
Peace
*MUSIC IS the expression of EMOTION.....and that POLITICS IS merely the DECOY of PERCEPTION*
.....song_Music & Politics....Michael Franti
*The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite INSANE*....Nikola Tesla(a man who shaped our world of electricity with his futuristic inventions)
Cut & paste. Took about 20 seconds!
Nah, usually the Olympics.
www.myspace.com/jensvad
glad you said usually, that little thing in munich was kinda teetering on not peaceful.
The US just happens to be the biggest, most influential country in the world right now, and with a bonehead leader, we get involved in more shit then we should. But if the US wasn't in the picture, there would be other power hungry leaders involved in the same crap.
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
this article is actually what made me post.
im not trying to rehash an argument about US policy, just wanted to see what peoples reactions were to this perception of america based on the survey of over 15,000 people worldwide....i know its only a survey but still.
just said id throw it out there cos most of the people who post here seem to be american.
Well, let's take a look at what ole Georgie boy has said today about the fact that Iran has been shown not to be developing nuclear weapons....
"Iran was dangerous, Iran is dangerous and Iran will be dangerous if they have the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon," he said.
Well, there we are then! Iran will remain dangerous if they have the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon. Therefore, we must destroy Iran until we can be sure that nobody is left alive there with the knowledge to make a nuclear weapon.
I agree. I doubt things would be any better if another country was in the US's place. But I don't think humans are the biggest threat to world peace, politics, money and religion are the biggest threats to world peace.
But a suggestion from myself, as I understand world peace, I'd say the biggest obstacle is the realpolitik going on between states that hasn't changed since feudal Europe in essence, meaning everyone tries to get away with as much as possible and screw everyone else. Our world is Machiavellian. US is the biggest, most blatant actor among the states, but they behave no different than others to "preserve their way of life". Furthermore, the imbalance between amount of people and amount of resources will always be good to disturb the peace.
Peace
Dan
"Every judgment teeters on the brink of error. To claim absolute knowledge is to become monstrous. Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty." - Frank Herbert, Dune, 1965
i disagree, the way PEOPLE value politics (power), money and religion are the biggest threats to the world. Politics, money and religion only have the power over us that we give them.
finally, world peace is the biggest joke. the reason is that everyone has a different view of what world peace would look like.
- Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
If you haven't got anything nice to say about anybody, come sit next to me."
- Alice Roosevelt Longworth (1884-1980)
Well said.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Just look at history my friend. The Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Persian, Chinese, Spanish, British, Germans, and Japanese all did what we are doing now, some in more brutal ways and to a greater extent. If the US where not the super power another country would surely fill that role. History has proven this time and time again.
That was then this is now. A lot has changed over the years. War is not considered acceptable policy anymore....the stakes are too high. Everything is connected by the second now, and it never was this way in the past.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
True but a super power has little worry about if the rest of the globe dissapproves of their actions. If Russia or China where in our shoes their behavior would be no different than ours.
I'm not entirely convinced, European culture is not as John Wayne as the America's are.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
I had no idea China was part of European culture.
You're fooling yourself if you think that world peace will automatically occur if the US cleans up its act. As has been mentioned one only needs to look at history. Your claim that we're living in different times is meaningless. Every point in history is different from a previous point. Every generation is living in a different time that the previous.
me either, i cant really see any european country becoming a superpower (not just because of their small scale, but also european values, beliefs, and overall connection of euro countries cos of EU etc) ....so i suppose the european "power" would be the EU.
it seems inherent by nature that a country who attempts to or does become a superpower will have to be antagonistic...
does it have to be the case that their will always be a country exerting its political weight outside its own jurisdiction? its a different world now than before alright, but is it THAT different?
im confused, are you saying that people do or dont learn from the past / history?
Since when has China or even Russia been a part of European culture?
Every empire in history has fallen only to be replaced by another. Someday US hegemony will fall only to be replaced by another superpower, from the looks of it probably China.
all good examples but that sounded as if it was meant as a Western standard. War does not appear to be considered acceptable in Europe in general - the response throughout europe regarding Iraq was fairly unanimous.
but yes, Russia can be distinguished from the rest of europe for the past 15 years on the basis of Chechnya, and also Serbia