My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
"All references to Popular Mechanics have been withdrawn"
They call it the boob tube for a reason.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Thanks, the contact us link at the bottom of their page leads to some useless faq.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Anatomy and Physiology: Drug Abuse leads to Brain Damage
Drain Bramage?
I'm not think as you stoned i am.
"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot". Mark Twain
"I would rather die on my feet than to live on my knees."
Emiliano Zapata
"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot". Mark Twain
"I would rather die on my feet than to live on my knees."
Emiliano Zapata
yo jlew i was wondering,you're from Chi-town.are you a Jordan fan?
"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot". Mark Twain
"I would rather die on my feet than to live on my knees."
Emiliano Zapata
a pop up window should appear. it has a comment/question box where u can type whatever want
No that I already did. I'm just saying you have to dig for it to find what you found, not just be able to click the link at the bottom of their page like any normal scenario.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
No that I already did. I'm just saying you have to dig for it to find what you found, not just be able to click the link at the bottom of their page like any normal scenario.
Did a search right? Me, I like links. If something says "contact us", that's exactly what it should be. It's diversionary otherwise. You know how they say...false advertising. Bait and switch. Expect one thing...get another.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Did a search right? Me, I like links. If something says "contact us", that's exactly what it should be. It's diversionary otherwise. You know how they say...false advertising. Bait and switch. Expect one thing...get another.
a search? no. I clicked on FAQ/Contact US at the bottom.
then they ask what I am asking a question about. I choose a category and then an answer appears. contact us is clearly (linked) right on the page.
was actually rather easy and fast to find. maybe I'm just having a good day, I dont know, or you're having a slow one?
a search? no. I clicked on FAQ/Contact US at the bottom.
then they ask what I am asking a question about. I choose a category and then an answer appears. contact us is clearly (linked) right on the page.
was actually rather easy and fast to find. maybe I'm just having a good day, I dont know, or you're having a slow one?
lol...you bothered (or had time) to play with the gay 20 questions faq thing?
eeks...so much for simplicity...
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
It's a bad TV show because it takes some people 30 seconds to find a way to contact them with an e-mail that some intern is going to skim through (if comments are really read at all)?
Haven't you posted many times before about the dumbing down of the american public, but now complain that you can't figure out how to contact a website?
My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
It's a bad TV show because it takes some people 30 seconds to find a way to contact them with an e-mail that some intern is going to skim through (if comments are really read at all)?
Haven't you posted many times before about the dumbing down of the american public, but now complain that you can't figure out how to contact a website?
I found this odd too. first he complained that you couldnt contact them at all. then I showed him how to do it, and it was "too hard" for him to figure out.
yea, 3 clicks took a long time. what can I say, its a slow day at work.
Lol....you're actually defending it? omg... read, click once and communicate...
v.s. scroll around...click...read and scroll around more....click...read and scroll some more...click....and hope...
right....yeap...
you guys are hilarious...no really...
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
It's a bad TV show because it takes some people 30 seconds to find a way to contact them with an e-mail that some intern is going to skim through (if comments are really read at all)?
Haven't you posted many times before about the dumbing down of the american public, but now complain that you can't figure out how to contact a website?
Bad show? where did I say that...oh wait...no, you said that.
I said their contact method is shit..and elusive.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
dude, it literally took me seconds to find it and send them a comment. seconds. we cant help that you are, well stupid and lazy.
should I tell you what's really funny? I'm sure you can figure it out....
then again, you probably cant. jokes on you
Your logic is as backwards as your thinking...
kinda reminds me of watching a septic tank empty...but somehow it has an ego
Oh isn' this fun now....
not exactly...but you love it. You feed off it for some reason.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
"...it's another bought out mouthpiece TV show" Sorry, I thought that meant that you thought it was "bad" - I guess that means "good".
My whole life
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
I guess I took it as you thinking it was a bad show from this post:
"...it's another bought out mouthpiece TV show" Sorry, I thought that meant that you thought it was "bad" - I guess that means "good".
I stand corrected, I'm bouncing back and forth between two of my clients servers right now. This place isn't isn't exactly paying out the big bucks, so whatever...
Well see after tonights show how much of an unbiased entity the history channel has become, but their contact us feature is still ultra shit!!
Only an idiot would argue it wasn't.. that or a piss poor web designer.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
its ok to be embarrassed that you let everybody see how difficult it was for you to find a contact us section on a website. really its ok.
but somehow I'm illogical?
thanks for playin roland. you need anymore help navigating the world wide web, you let me know.
get over yourself...it's really pretty sad, and transparent.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
I guess I took it as you thinking it was a bad show from this post:
i actually gave a damn good reason why it was a bad show, but as typical around here you sheeples would rather debate bullshit and ignore real indicators of invalidity ... i posted a link to Infowars Explaining SERIOUS BIAS in the promotion of this show and all i got back was personal attack saying Alex Jones has rotted my brain or some such garbage
(which i have come ONLY to expect from the like of Jlew and his ilk ... people who will NEVER get drawn in to REAL discussion but only FLING INSULTS and insinuate that you are crazy, or must be stupid because you misspell one in a hundred words - hey i could post a half dozen stupid misspelling from him too, but i choose to stick to the point)
ANYHOW,
if anyone took the time to read that link,
you'd see that what was original advertised was:
An Internet search for "9/11 conspiracy theories" yields nearly two million hits. Were the attacks on 9/11 perpetrated by the Bush Administration to advance its own interests? Could a government missile have hit the Pentagon? As outrageous as these ideas may sound, many people believe them. Why do these theories arise in the first place? [sounds like you are saying they arise because of crazy people, huh?] An interview with James Meigs, Editor-in-Chief of Popular Mechanics, who refutes many of these theories. Watch as experts in the fields of aeronautics, engineering and the military put these theories to the test. [you mean debunk them? cause thats what you say down below]
but then they changed it, removing the reference to The Pop Mech EIC (gee, i wonder why?) and basicaly making it sound more bening, all though still being VERY BLUNT about it being a show ABOUT DISPROVING 911 "CT":
Examines the various conspiracy theories espoused on the Internet, in articles and in public forums that attempt to explain the 9/11 attacks. It includes theories that the World Trade Center was brought down by a controlled demolition; that a missile, not a commercial airliner, hit the Pentagon; and that members of the U.S. government orchestrated the attacks in hopes of creating a war in the Middle East. Each conspiracy argument is countered by a variety of experts in the fields of engineering, intelligence and the military. The program also delves into the anatomy of such conspiracies and how they grow on the Internet.
So ...
IT IS A BAD SHOW,
because just like the 911 Omissions Report it DOES NO INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING on the matter, it simply picks a conclussion from the get-go and goes about explaining why said conclusion must be right.
Sounds like a real bullshit piece if you ask me.
Of course you sheeple will swallow it like ice cream on a hot day.
:(
We wont even discuss here the many simpler inconsistencies and coincidences that point to fishy shit going on. Why were most of the hijackers Saudi if this was about either Bin Laden\Afghanistan or Iraq? Why was Mahmoud Ahmad (the man who wired the money To Mohammed Atta) having lunch with the chairman of the Senate Intelligene Committee on 911? Why did Bush just fucking sit there after TWO planes had hit, and it was OBVIOUS we were under the most serious terror attack ever? Why was the Patriot Act (has anyone seen how goddamn long and complex it is?) just ready to go ... like it was drafted and just waiting to be "sprung" ... what about all the fucking motive to go in to Iraq & Afghanistan that was evident from PNAC and long before ... why wouldn't bush and cheney go under oath ... and then what i see as THE MOST PROBLEMATIC CONTRADICTION ...
EVERY SINGLE US OFFICIAL CLAIMS THEY HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF TERRORISTS INTENDING TO USE PLANES TO DESTROY TARGETS IN THE USE AND YET, ON 911 THEY WERE CONDUCTING MULTIPLE LIVE EXCERCISES THAT INVOLVED JUST THAT ... and not ONLY just that but excercises involving PLANES FLYING IN TO THE PENTAGON AND THE WORLD TRADE CENTERS ...
now go look at the london bombings in 2005, and ask yourself the probability that TWO SEPERATE GOVERNMENTS at two seperate times would both conduct LIVE TRAINING DRILLS with military\police both AT THE EXACT SAME TIME IN THE SAME GODDAMN PLACE(same target) AT THE EXACT SAME TIME THAT IT ACTUALLY HAPPENED ... and FYI those drills on 911 were done anually in JUNE (i believe) and were pushed back to 911 ... WHY !??!
the fucking list of problems with the official story is so massive you folks would refuse to read it all ... shit, you have refused to read it before, i doubt your reading this now. (and if you have, you'll just post some shit response that attempts to laugh me off as crazy)
If I was to smile and I held out my hand
If I opened it now would you not understand?
Simple...they see a rosy picture of honest politicians and generous corporations that all have our best interests at heart. They think all people have to be honest if we vote for them.
When they get a bag of chips that is 50% air and marked up 100% they think it's just swell, and that's the way it's always been. Yes....Ahhh...
There's a word for it...actually a few words...I leave it up to the imagination...
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
Comments
English 101: Context
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
Anatomy and Physiology: Drug Abuse leads to Brain Damage
—Dorothy Parker
http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/6902/conspiracytheoriesxt6qt8.jpg
"All references to Popular Mechanics have been withdrawn"
They call it the boob tube for a reason.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
http://boards.historychannel.com/thread.jspa?threadID=600021437&messageID=700082766
Don't believe me? Try contacting them...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
http://www.history.com/global/feedback/faq.jsp?NetwCode=THC&level_1=nodes_38&level_2=nodes_71&level_3=nodes_281&x=47&y=15#
click on contact us
Thanks, the contact us link at the bottom of their page leads to some useless faq.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Drain Bramage?
I'm not think as you stoned i am.
"I would rather die on my feet than to live on my knees."
Emiliano Zapata
that's enough of a description.
"I would rather die on my feet than to live on my knees."
Emiliano Zapata
a pop up window should appear. it has a comment/question box where u can type whatever want
"I would rather die on my feet than to live on my knees."
Emiliano Zapata
Jordan as in Michael Jordan? um yea, he did win 6 championships during the 90s and probably the best basketball player of all time. why?
No that I already did. I'm just saying you have to dig for it to find what you found, not just be able to click the link at the bottom of their page like any normal scenario.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
took me all of 6 seconds
Did a search right? Me, I like links. If something says "contact us", that's exactly what it should be. It's diversionary otherwise. You know how they say...false advertising. Bait and switch. Expect one thing...get another.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
a search? no. I clicked on FAQ/Contact US at the bottom.
then they ask what I am asking a question about. I choose a category and then an answer appears. contact us is clearly (linked) right on the page.
was actually rather easy and fast to find. maybe I'm just having a good day, I dont know, or you're having a slow one?
lol...you bothered (or had time) to play with the gay 20 questions faq thing?
eeks...so much for simplicity...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
yea, 3 clicks took a long time. what can I say, its a slow day at work.
It's a bad TV show because it takes some people 30 seconds to find a way to contact them with an e-mail that some intern is going to skim through (if comments are really read at all)?
Haven't you posted many times before about the dumbing down of the american public, but now complain that you can't figure out how to contact a website?
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
I found this odd too. first he complained that you couldnt contact them at all. then I showed him how to do it, and it was "too hard" for him to figure out.
yea, us americans is so stupid sometimes.
Lol....you're actually defending it? omg... read, click once and communicate...
v.s. scroll around...click...read and scroll around more....click...read and scroll some more...click....and hope...
right....yeap...
you guys are hilarious...no really...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
Bad show? where did I say that...oh wait...no, you said that.
I said their contact method is shit..and elusive.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
dude, it literally took me seconds to find it and send them a comment. seconds. we cant help that you are, well stupid and lazy.
should I tell you what's really funny? I'm sure you can figure it out....
then again, you probably cant. jokes on you
Your logic is as backwards as your thinking...
kinda reminds me of watching a septic tank empty...but somehow it has an ego
Oh isn' this fun now....
not exactly...but you love it. You feed off it for some reason.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
its ok to be embarrassed that you let everybody see how difficult it was for you to find a contact us section on a website. really its ok.
but somehow I'm illogical?
thanks for playin roland. you need anymore help navigating the world wide web, you let me know.
damn... you'll argue about anything....
I guess I took it as you thinking it was a bad show from this post:
"...it's another bought out mouthpiece TV show" Sorry, I thought that meant that you thought it was "bad" - I guess that means "good".
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
I stand corrected, I'm bouncing back and forth between two of my clients servers right now. This place isn't isn't exactly paying out the big bucks, so whatever...
Well see after tonights show how much of an unbiased entity the history channel has become, but their contact us feature is still ultra shit!!
Only an idiot would argue it wasn't.. that or a piss poor web designer.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
get over yourself...it's really pretty sad, and transparent.
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
i actually gave a damn good reason why it was a bad show, but as typical around here you sheeples would rather debate bullshit and ignore real indicators of invalidity ... i posted a link to Infowars Explaining SERIOUS BIAS in the promotion of this show and all i got back was personal attack saying Alex Jones has rotted my brain or some such garbage
(which i have come ONLY to expect from the like of Jlew and his ilk ... people who will NEVER get drawn in to REAL discussion but only FLING INSULTS and insinuate that you are crazy, or must be stupid because you misspell one in a hundred words - hey i could post a half dozen stupid misspelling from him too, but i choose to stick to the point)
ANYHOW,
if anyone took the time to read that link,
you'd see that what was original advertised was:
but then they changed it, removing the reference to The Pop Mech EIC (gee, i wonder why?) and basicaly making it sound more bening, all though still being VERY BLUNT about it being a show ABOUT DISPROVING 911 "CT":
So ...
IT IS A BAD SHOW,
because just like the 911 Omissions Report it DOES NO INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING on the matter, it simply picks a conclussion from the get-go and goes about explaining why said conclusion must be right.
Sounds like a real bullshit piece if you ask me.
Of course you sheeple will swallow it like ice cream on a hot day.
:(
We wont even discuss here the many simpler inconsistencies and coincidences that point to fishy shit going on. Why were most of the hijackers Saudi if this was about either Bin Laden\Afghanistan or Iraq? Why was Mahmoud Ahmad (the man who wired the money To Mohammed Atta) having lunch with the chairman of the Senate Intelligene Committee on 911? Why did Bush just fucking sit there after TWO planes had hit, and it was OBVIOUS we were under the most serious terror attack ever? Why was the Patriot Act (has anyone seen how goddamn long and complex it is?) just ready to go ... like it was drafted and just waiting to be "sprung" ... what about all the fucking motive to go in to Iraq & Afghanistan that was evident from PNAC and long before ... why wouldn't bush and cheney go under oath ... and then what i see as THE MOST PROBLEMATIC CONTRADICTION ...
EVERY SINGLE US OFFICIAL CLAIMS THEY HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF TERRORISTS INTENDING TO USE PLANES TO DESTROY TARGETS IN THE USE AND YET, ON 911 THEY WERE CONDUCTING MULTIPLE LIVE EXCERCISES THAT INVOLVED JUST THAT ... and not ONLY just that but excercises involving PLANES FLYING IN TO THE PENTAGON AND THE WORLD TRADE CENTERS ...
now go look at the london bombings in 2005, and ask yourself the probability that TWO SEPERATE GOVERNMENTS at two seperate times would both conduct LIVE TRAINING DRILLS with military\police both AT THE EXACT SAME TIME IN THE SAME GODDAMN PLACE(same target) AT THE EXACT SAME TIME THAT IT ACTUALLY HAPPENED ... and FYI those drills on 911 were done anually in JUNE (i believe) and were pushed back to 911 ... WHY !??!
LYING SACKS OF SHIT. DEFEND THIS. GO AHEAD. YEAH. THEY WERE JUST CYA, HUH? AND THE "TRAINING EXCERCISES THAT WERE GOING ON THE EXACT DAY AND THE EXACT TIME REGARDING THE EXACT SAME THING? NOT A COVER UP FOR THE REAL THING?
Vigilant Guardian, Vigilant Warrior, Northern Guardian, Northern Warrior, the list goes on. How many fucking drills were they doing on 911? Jeez. Is it getting HOT in here?
WTF???
YOU DONT SMELL FISH?
the fucking list of problems with the official story is so massive you folks would refuse to read it all ... shit, you have refused to read it before, i doubt your reading this now. (and if you have, you'll just post some shit response that attempts to laugh me off as crazy)
If I opened it now would you not understand?
When they get a bag of chips that is 50% air and marked up 100% they think it's just swell, and that's the way it's always been. Yes....Ahhh...
There's a word for it...actually a few words...I leave it up to the imagination...
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
like this?
http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/august2007/020807MIC911.jpg
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")