Rolling Stone Magazine = Worst Magazine Ever

Byrnzie

mammasan wrote:

I really don't look to Rolling Stone for political insight or commentary, or music reviews.

Which leaves.....the photos?

mammasan

Byrnzie wrote:

Which leaves.....the photos?

That's pretty much all Rolling Stone is good for, that and bird cage lining.

rebornFixer

mammasan wrote:

That's pretty much all Rolling Stone is good for, that and bird cage lining.

Also worthy of consideration if you like your TP stiff and glossy ...

mammasan

reborncareerist wrote:

Also worthy of consideration if you like your TP stiff and glossy ...

I'll pass on the Rolling Stone TP, but I guess if the situation arises it can also be used as TP.

not4u

"big man, pig man, haha charade you are"

world

Wow, im getting a lot of people agreeing with me. I didnt know this many people disliked Rolling Stone as much as I do.

lol@"I live in England and am fortunate that the shop near to where I work in London sells Rolling Stone. It is partisan, but that's fine by me. As the previous poster says, it's o.k to be partisan when you're right."
Talk about drinking the Kool-Aid. As much as the American stereotype is fat, dumb, lazy, and rich. The European stereotype is "belive every left-wing thing we read," dont most Europeans belive Bush planned 9/11? Who acts more like sheeple, the Republican base or the we-hate-Bush crowd?

I will read the occasional Rolling Stone political article. Along with Air American and Rush Limbaugh. I enjoy hearing all sides of politics. But I get frustrated at crap articles like this.

rebornFixer

world wrote:

Wow, im getting a lot of people agreeing with me. I didnt know this many people disliked Rolling Stone as much as I do.

lol@"I live in England and am fortunate that the shop near to where I work in London sells Rolling Stone. It is partisan, but that's fine by me. As the previous poster says, it's o.k to be partisan when you're right."
Talk about drinking the Kool-Aid. As much as the American stereotype is fat, dumb, lazy, and rich. The European stereotype is "belive every left-wing thing we read," dont most Europeans belive Bush planned 9/11? Who acts more like sheeple, the Republican base or the we-hate-Bush crowd?

I will read the occasional Rolling Stone political article. Along with Air American and Rush Limbaugh. I enjoy hearing all sides of politics. But I get frustrated at crap articles like this.

The Europeans are just as myopic and reactionary as the Americans are ... They just happen to be on the right end of the political spectrum for this message board, so they catch less crap from people here.

Byrnzie

world wrote:

Wow, im getting a lot of people agreeing with me. I didnt know this many people disliked Rolling Stone as much as I do.

lol@"I live in England and am fortunate that the shop near to where I work in London sells Rolling Stone. It is partisan, but that's fine by me. As the previous poster says, it's o.k to be partisan when you're right."
Talk about drinking the Kool-Aid. As much as the American stereotype is fat, dumb, lazy, and rich. The European stereotype is "belive every left-wing thing we read," dont most Europeans belive Bush planned 9/11? Who acts more like sheeple, the Republican base or the we-hate-Bush crowd?

I will read the occasional Rolling Stone political article. Along with Air American and Rush Limbaugh. I enjoy hearing all sides of politics. But I get frustrated at crap articles like this.

No, Europeans don't believe Bush planned 9/11. However, a lot of people believe that he 'allowed' it to happen. The evidence is there for all to see.

evenkat

world wrote:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/12055360/cover_story_time_to_go_inside_the_worst_congress_ever/1

Rolling Stone might be one of the worst magazines ive ever seen. I think Bush is a retard, I think 90% of the Republicans in Congress are retarded. But, when I see the this cover story, it makes me wonder if the Democrats are ever going to win. Didnt the Democrats and their friends in the media(Rolling Stone & others) learn that just bashing the other side wont win?

Repubicans have a HUGE base, I think in the last 37 years only 2 Democrats have won the White House. This "Republicans suck" campaign only energizes Republicans and get them out to vote. As much as I would love the Republicans to lose, I have absolutly no interest in reading a magazine that says "Worst Congress Ever". Its like a contest of who can be more one-sided, Rush Limbaugh or Rolling Stone. At least Rush can be funny.

Republicans suck, but they kick ass when it comes to winning elections. They even got Bush to win a 2nd term! Democrats are just plain stupid and are failing more and more every election season.

Looks like ill be voting all Libertarian again.

First, the Republicans are in control of this country as they control ALL branches of government, which has led to abuse in power and corruption. It's been like this for the past 6 years. Since they are the ones in control they are on the chopping block. So you're mad at democrats for bashing the Republicans...that's exactly how the Republicans won the past elections from bashing the Democrats, lol.

The question is, are you happy with the way the Republicans are running the country? Most importantly are your representatives representing how you want this country run? Have they been honest and trust worthy? Have they made the right decisions? If not it's time to replace them no matter what party they are in. Now I plan on voting for the democrats because I am very unhappy with the way the Republicans have run the country. Now am I positive that the democrats will do a better job? No, but I know for a fact that the Republicans have done the worst job in running this country in my entire lifetime so it's time for a change. There is one democrat that I will not be voting for and that's the NY State Comptroller, he has abused his power as he has taken money from taxpayers so his wife could be driven around. He claims that many NYS politicians do the same but his number one job is to make sure that the state government does not do things like this. He has failed so he has to go too.

I think the most important thing in this election is there needs to be a balance in power so one party can't run the country into the ground and divide the country like this again.

Dino283

I know hat ya mean. I use to love RS, and still do as far as music is concernd. But politically its jus way to one sided.

miller8966

evenkat wrote:

First, the Republicans are in control of this country as they control ALL branches of government, which has led to abuse in power and corruption. It's been like this for the past 6 years. Since they are the ones in control they are on the chopping block. So you're mad at democrats for bashing the Republicans...that's exactly how the Republicans won the past elections from bashing the Democrats, lol.

The question is, are you happy with the way the Republicans are running the country? Most importantly are your representatives representing how you want this country run? Have they been honest and trust worthy? Have they made the right decisions? If not it's time to replace them no matter what party they are in. Now I plan on voting for the democrats because I am very unhappy with the way the Republicans have run the country. Now am I positive that the democrats will do a better job? No, but I know for a fact that the Republicans have done the worst job in running this country in my entire lifetime so it's time for a change. There is one democrat that I will not be voting for and that's the NY State Comptroller, he has abused his power as he has taken money from taxpayers so his wife could be driven around. He claims that many NYS politicians do the same but his number one job is to make sure that the state government does not do things like this. He has failed so he has to go too.

I think the most important thing in this election is there needs to be a balance in power so one party can't run the country into the ground and divide the country like this again.

A. What does your post have to do with the thread?

B. When i read rollingstone magazine i want to read about musicians. If their political thats fine..you can talk about ed and his views cause it coincides with the music. but i dont want some fluff propaganda piece on the bush administration.

evenkat

miller8966 wrote:

A. What does your post have to do with the thread?

B. When i read rollingstone magazine i want to read about musicians. If their political thats fine..you can talk about ed and his views cause it coincides with the music. but i dont want some fluff propaganda piece on the bush administration.

First, I was responding to a post in this thread by the author. Second, the Rolling Stone Magazine has a VERY long history regarding political issues and politicians so it's not like they started with Bush and his asinine policies. If you only wish to read about musicians and music then buy some lame magazine like Circus Magazine or something like that. My guess is you probably only want to look at pictures anyways.