John McCain Is The Sacrificial Lamb Of The Republican Party

Steve DunneSteve Dunne Posts: 4,965
edited July 2008 in A Moving Train
8 years of the Bush Oil Company...who else could they possibly put up on the ticket knowing they will be absolutely trounced on election day? Yes he's an incredibly respectable man who's done more for his country than all of us on this board put together, but he's going to lose. Big. For all he's done for the country, I actually feel bad for this guy.
I love to turn you on
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,507
    You're right...set up for failure.

    He's the Republican version of Walter Mondale. ;) Going through the motions...awaiting your beating.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • blackredyellowblackredyellow Posts: 5,889
    8 years of the Bush Oil Company...who else could they possibly put up on the ticket knowing they will be absolutely trounced on election day? Yes he's an incredibly respectable man who's done more for his country than all of us on this board put together, but he's going to lose. Big. For all he's done for the country, I actually feel bad for this guy.

    I feel bad for him too... I don't agree with him on a whole lot, but when he was a decent candidate in 2000 he got screwed by Bush/Rove's dirty politics, and now he is set up for failure in 2008.
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    it would seem that way but he won't get trounced - it just doesn't work that way ... it will still come to the swing states ... no matter how bad bush was - states like texas and utah will always vote republican ...
  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    I really wouldn't doubt McCain winning the election. Don't get your hopes up too much.
  • polaris wrote:
    it would seem that way but he won't get trounced - it just doesn't work that way ... it will still come to the swing states ... no matter how bad bush was - states like texas and utah will always vote republican ...


    It's going to be a lot closer than people think...imo
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    It's going to be a lot closer than people think...imo

    if you can "vote" for bush a second time - you can easily vote for mccain
  • know1know1 Posts: 6,794
    Since McCain has no ties to oil, I'm going to vote for him so that we can go back to lower gas prices.
    The only people we should try to get even with...
    ...are those who've helped us.

    Right 'round the corner could be bigger than ourselves.
  • mca47mca47 Posts: 13,301
    Throwing him out there to lose is ridiculous. Unless there were tens of thousands of people...average citizens, around the country who all thought "Hmm...I'm going to go vote today for the guy we want to lose in the general election". That would be some incredible organization!

    I think Obama will win, but I do think it will be close.
  • FiveB247xFiveB247x Posts: 2,330
    I think McCain will win. The Dems are terrible at planning and running campaigns. I think over the next year a lot of people will recognize (through public relations and media) that Obama isn't really a candidate of "change" and many of his policies aren't particularly new, different or that off the mainstream, which most are used too. His whole notion of going to White House to clean things up and shake up the bureaucracy is farse and pipe dream. McCain is one the right side of the political spectrum spewing his bs and Obama is on the left side of the spectrum spewing his bs. What a wonderful system we have.
    CONservative governMENt

    Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. - Louis Brandeis
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    well, if McCain is elected...I hope he cleans up the Pakistan/Iraq Border...
  • Steve DunneSteve Dunne Posts: 4,965
    haha nice work fanch! :)
    I love to turn you on
  • puremagicpuremagic Posts: 1,907
    Can someone turn the volume down on the violin? McCain is and has been a supporter Bush Oil Company. http://www.americanprogressaction.org/issues/2008/mccain_gw_record.html

    As for making McCain the sacrificial lamb, McCain wasn't the only republican running in the republican primary, he won the republican primary remember. What happen to McCain snob nosing the republican way? What happen to McCain being McCain? What happen to McCain doing it his way? Its called RNC strategy. Now that its backfiring, why not place the blame on the RNC for McCain's shortcomings. I guess it is also the RNC's fault that McCain can't get his act together when he speaks. Nice spin for the sympathy vote, sacrificial lamb, what a joke.
    SIN EATERS--We take the moral excrement we find in this equation and we bury it down deep inside of us so that the rest of our case can stay pure. That is the job. We are morally indefensible and absolutely necessary.
  • Uncle LeoUncle Leo Posts: 1,059
    It's funny that some view McCain as the GOP throwing in the towel, while others think he'll win.

    I personally have no doubt that he will win. He's going to kill Obama with the military history and the experience factor. The Obama/Osama shit may help as well. I don't know whether race will hurt Obama, but it can't help him.

    And for all the right wing bellyaching about how much more the media is talking about Obama, that can only hurt him. As mentioned above, the average American Idol fan is soon to recognize that Obama is saying as little as possible and that the only "change" that is probably coming is not being Bush (something McCain also has going for him).

    Part of me thinks that it's going to be a McCain landslide--that Obama will win Illinois, a few big states and a couple others...maybe 7 or 8 total plus DC. But the last two elections have me thinking it may be closer.

    I say McCain wins, but by a Bush/Kerry margin.

    Viewed alone, McCain looks like a throwaway. But compared to the major 2-party candidates, he looks to have a pretty good shot.
    I cannot come up with a new sig till I get this egg off my face.
  • slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,762
    Uncle Leo wrote:
    It's funny that some view McCain as the GOP throwing in the towel, while others think he'll win.

    I personally have no doubt that he will win. He's going to kill Obama with the military history and the experience factor. The Obama/Osama shit may help as well. I don't know whether race will hurt Obama, but it can't help him.

    And for all the right wing bellyaching about how much more the media is talking about Obama, that can only hurt him. As mentioned above, the average American Idol fan is soon to recognize that Obama is saying as little as possible and that the only "change" that is probably coming is not being Bush (something McCain also has going for him).

    Part of me thinks that it's going to be a McCain landslide--that Obama will win Illinois, a few big states and a couple others...maybe 7 or 8 total plus DC. But the last two elections have me thinking it may be closer.

    I say McCain wins, but by a Bush/Kerry margin.

    Viewed alone, McCain looks like a throwaway. But compared to the major 2-party candidates, he looks to have a pretty good shot.

    I think Obama will win ... but I don't think it will be a landslide. The way the electoral college works, in order for it to be a landslide, Obama will have to win a big southern state or a bunch of smaller southern states, neither of which I see happening.

    But Obama, the way things are looking today, Obama will win -- I think by the Bush/Kerry margin you were talking about, or maybe one state more.

    In politics, image matters a lot. I just think you put Obama on stage next to old man McCain ... it's like JFK next to Nixon, or Clinton next to Bush the First. It will be very easy for Obama to paint McCain as old and out of touch.

    And if the economy is the No. 1 issue heading into November, it's over. No incumbent party holds on to the White House when the economy is in the crapper.

    What would save McCain -- and maybe make him a virtual lock -- is if there were some kind of event that would push terrorism/the war to the front lines again. That's where I think McCain has a big advantage over Obama, and if something forces people to remember, "Oh yeah, we're at war," I think it would serve McCain well.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • inmytreeinmytree Posts: 4,741
    Uncle Leo wrote:
    It's funny that some view McCain as the GOP throwing in the towel, while others think he'll win.

    I personally have no doubt that he will win. He's going to kill Obama with the military history and the experience factor. The Obama/Osama shit may help as well. I don't know whether race will hurt Obama, but it can't help him.

    And for all the right wing bellyaching about how much more the media is talking about Obama, that can only hurt him. As mentioned above, the average American Idol fan is soon to recognize that Obama is saying as little as possible and that the only "change" that is probably coming is not being Bush (something McCain also has going for him).

    Part of me thinks that it's going to be a McCain landslide--that Obama will win Illinois, a few big states and a couple others...maybe 7 or 8 total plus DC. But the last two elections have me thinking it may be closer.

    I say McCain wins, but by a Bush/Kerry margin.

    Viewed alone, McCain looks like a throwaway. But compared to the major 2-party candidates, he looks to have a pretty good shot.

    foreign policy...? McCain doesn't know the difference between a sunni and shiites, and thinks Pakistan borders Iraq...

    I wonder if folks will be interested in the following question:

    Do you think if Barack Obama had left his seriously ill wife after having had multiple affairs, had been a member of the “Keating Five,” had had a relationship with a much younger lobbyist that his staff felt the need to try and block, had intervened on behalf of the client of said young lobbyist with a federal agency, had denounced then embraced Jerry Falwell, had denounced then embraced the Bush tax cuts, had confused Shiite with Sunni, had confused Al Qaeda in Iraq with the Mahdi Army, had actively sought the endorsement and appeared on stage with a man who denounced the Catholic Church as a whore, and stated that he knew next to nothing about economics — do you think it’s possible that Obama would have been treated differently by the media than John McCain has been? Possible?

    And — this is fun to contemplate — if Michelle Obama had been an adulteress, drug addict thief with a penchant for plagiarism — do you think that she would be subject to slightly different treatment from the media than Cindypills McCain has been? Anyone?
  • fanch75fanch75 Posts: 3,734
    inmytree wrote:
    foreign policy...? McCain doesn't know the difference between a sunni and shiites, and thinks Pakistan borders Iraq...

    I wonder if folks will be interested in the following question:

    Do you think if Barack Obama had left his seriously ill wife after having had multiple affairs, had been a member of the “Keating Five,” had had a relationship with a much younger lobbyist that his staff felt the need to try and block, had intervened on behalf of the client of said young lobbyist with a federal agency, had denounced then embraced Jerry Falwell, had denounced then embraced the Bush tax cuts, had confused Shiite with Sunni, had confused Al Qaeda in Iraq with the Mahdi Army, had actively sought the endorsement and appeared on stage with a man who denounced the Catholic Church as a whore, and stated that he knew next to nothing about economics — do you think it’s possible that Obama would have been treated differently by the media than John McCain has been? Possible?

    And — this is fun to contemplate — if Michelle Obama had been an adulteress, drug addict thief with a penchant for plagiarism — do you think that she would be subject to slightly different treatment from the media than Cindypills McCain has been? Anyone?

    Wow. That's a pretty solid post you have there.
    Do you remember Rock & Roll Radio?
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    inmytree wrote:
    foreign policy...? McCain doesn't know the difference between a sunni and shiites, and thinks Pakistan borders Iraq...

    I wonder if folks will be interested in the following question:

    Do you think if Barack Obama had left his seriously ill wife after having had multiple affairs, had been a member of the “Keating Five,” had had a relationship with a much younger lobbyist that his staff felt the need to try and block, had intervened on behalf of the client of said young lobbyist with a federal agency, had denounced then embraced Jerry Falwell, had denounced then embraced the Bush tax cuts, had confused Shiite with Sunni, had confused Al Qaeda in Iraq with the Mahdi Army, had actively sought the endorsement and appeared on stage with a man who denounced the Catholic Church as a whore, and stated that he knew next to nothing about economics — do you think it’s possible that Obama would have been treated differently by the media than John McCain has been? Possible?

    And — this is fun to contemplate — if Michelle Obama had been an adulteress, drug addict thief with a penchant for plagiarism — do you think that she would be subject to slightly different treatment from the media than Cindypills McCain has been? Anyone?

    uhh ... george bush?? ... if a country can elect george bush twice - they can elect anyone ... arnold shwarzenegger is a governor for crying out loud - experience and knowledge matter little ...
  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    Don't underestimate this country's racism.
  • slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,762
    _outlaw wrote:
    Don't underestimate this country's racism.

    I think it will all come out in the wash.

    Some white people won't vote for Obama because he is black.

    And some will vote for him BECAUSE he's black. It absolves their guilt over slavery or something. "Look at me! I'm progressive!"
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • fanch75fanch75 Posts: 3,734
    And some will vote for him BECAUSE he's black. It absolves their guilt over slavery or something. "Look at me! I'm progressive!"

    http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.com/2008/01/19/8-barack-obama/

    Stuff White People Like
    #8 Barack Obama
    January 19, 2008 by clander

    Because white people are afraid that if they don’t like him that they will be called racist.
    Do you remember Rock & Roll Radio?
  • fuckfuck Posts: 4,069
    I think it will all come out in the wash.

    Some white people won't vote for Obama because he is black.

    And some will vote for him BECAUSE he's black. It absolves their guilt over slavery or something. "Look at me! I'm progressive!"
    It won't cancel eachother out though. I think there are more older white people who'll vote against him for him being black, then there is younger, "progressive" people who'd vote for him because he's black.
  • puremagicpuremagic Posts: 1,907

    And some will vote for him BECAUSE he's black. It absolves their guilt over slavery or something. "Look at me! I'm progressive!"

    Really! So it couldn't be that the man actually hits on topics that even white people can identify with?

    -- Its not as if white people are paying less at the gas pumps than blacks.

    -- Its not as if white people aren't losing their homes just like blacks.

    -- Its not as if white people aren't losing their jobs just like blacks.

    -- Its not as if white people aren't without health care just like blacks.

    -- Its not as if white men and women military personnel aren't being killed and maimed just like blacks.

    Of course not, its all about white people feeling bad over slavery, bravo!
    SIN EATERS--We take the moral excrement we find in this equation and we bury it down deep inside of us so that the rest of our case can stay pure. That is the job. We are morally indefensible and absolutely necessary.
  • puremagic wrote:
    Really! So it couldn't be that the man actually hits on topics that even white people can identify with?

    -- Its not as if white people are paying less at the gas pumps than blacks.

    -- Its not as if white people aren't losing their homes just like blacks.

    -- Its not as if white people aren't losing their jobs just like blacks.

    -- Its not as if white people aren't without health care just like blacks.

    -- Its not as if white men and women military personnel aren't being killed and maimed just like blacks.

    Of course not, its all about white people feeling bad over slavery, bravo!
    He very clearly said "some".
    Smokey Robinson constantly looks like he's trying to act natural after being accused of farting.
  • cincybearcatcincybearcat Posts: 16,507
    puremagic wrote:
    Really! So it couldn't be that the man actually hits on topics that even white people can identify with?

    -- Its not as if white people are paying less at the gas pumps than blacks.

    -- Its not as if white people aren't losing their homes just like blacks.

    -- Its not as if white people aren't losing their jobs just like blacks.

    -- Its not as if white people aren't without health care just like blacks.

    -- Its not as if white men and women military personnel aren't being killed and maimed just like blacks.

    Of course not, its all about white people feeling bad over slavery, bravo!

    I think all that is true.

    But I also think that:

    Some whites won't vote for him because he's black.
    Some blacks will vote for him only because he's black.
    some whites will vote for him because he is black, as stated.
    Some blacks won't vote for him because he isn't black enough.
    hippiemom = goodness
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    puremagic wrote:
    .

    Of course not, its all about white people feeling bad over slavery, bravo!

    You missed his point. One poster said people will NOT vote for Obama because of racism. His point is that some will vote for him ONLY because he's black - the whole white guilt thing. Some people will vote for him because the media tells them to. Some people will vote for him because he is the Democrat candidate. Some people will vote for him because they've weighed the issues and agree with his positions.
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • Uncle LeoUncle Leo Posts: 1,059
    inmytree wrote:
    foreign policy...? McCain doesn't know the difference between a sunni and shiites, and thinks Pakistan borders Iraq...

    I never said he was strong in that area. In fact, I never said "foreign policy." However, the "experience" thing could help McCain alot. And I agree with slightofjeff, that it will be of particular importance if war/terrorism ends up as a key issue over the economy.
    inmytree wrote:
    I wonder if folks will be interested in the following question:

    Do you think if Barack Obama had left his seriously ill wife after having had multiple affairs, had been a member of the “Keating Five,” had had a relationship with a much younger lobbyist that his staff felt the need to try and block, had intervened on behalf of the client of said young lobbyist with a federal agency, had denounced then embraced Jerry Falwell, had denounced then embraced the Bush tax cuts, had confused Shiite with Sunni, had confused Al Qaeda in Iraq with the Mahdi Army, had actively sought the endorsement and appeared on stage with a man who denounced the Catholic Church as a whore, and stated that he knew next to nothing about economics — do you think it’s possible that Obama would have been treated differently by the media than John McCain has been? Possible?

    And — this is fun to contemplate — if Michelle Obama had been an adulteress, drug addict thief with a penchant for plagiarism — do you think that she would be subject to slightly different treatment from the media than Cindypills McCain has been? Anyone?

    Well its the liberal media, so I guess they'd be ignoring it even more.

    I wonder whether the term "Keating 5" will ever come up. The liberal media is only talking about Obama. I've been waiting for them to talk about McCain.
    I cannot come up with a new sig till I get this egg off my face.
  • blackredyellowblackredyellow Posts: 5,889
    Uncle Leo wrote:
    It's funny that some view McCain as the GOP throwing in the towel, while others think he'll win.

    I personally have no doubt that he will win. He's going to kill Obama with the military history and the experience factor. The Obama/Osama shit may help as well. I don't know whether race will hurt Obama, but it can't help him.

    And for all the right wing bellyaching about how much more the media is talking about Obama, that can only hurt him. As mentioned above, the average American Idol fan is soon to recognize that Obama is saying as little as possible and that the only "change" that is probably coming is not being Bush (something McCain also has going for him).

    I think it's funny that you bring up the average american idol fan, and then expect them to dig deep into the issues.

    I think the "change" from the Bush administration is probably the only change that he will need, and I honestly think that if McCain keeps trumpeting the war without ever saying what victory actually is, more and more people will jump ship from his military bandwagon.
    My whole life
    was like a picture
    of a sunny day
    “We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
    ― Abraham Lincoln
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    You're right...set up for failure.

    He's the Republican version of Walter Mondale. ;) Going through the motions...awaiting your beating.



    sad for him, but good for us...i hope.

    i don't like being over-confident, i've been burned by that in the past, as have we all.

    jeffbr wrote:
    You missed his point. One poster said people will NOT vote for Obama because of racism. His point is that some will vote for him ONLY because he's black - the whole white guilt thing. Some people will vote for him because the media tells them to. Some people will vote for him because he is the Democrat candidate. Some people will vote for him because they've weighed the issues and agree with his positions.



    and they only thing 'new' in there is the fact that people can actually vote purely on race if they so desire to, otherwise...isn't that pretty much every election?


    and...

    _outlaw wrote:
    It won't cancel eachother out though. I think there are more older white people who'll vote against him for him being black, then there is younger, "progressive" people who'd vote for him because he's black.



    i certainly wouldn't label ANYone 'progressive' if they voted for a candidate based SOLEY on their race. altho i am going to guess that's also why you used quotes as well. :p personally, i think his race will have very little to do with why people vote for him or not. just my opinion of course.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • Solat13Solat13 Posts: 6,996
    It's going to be a close election when all is said and done. I mean look at how close the daily polling has been:

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/general_election_match_up_history

    It's going to come down to battleground states and whether the country wants to try something new or stay on the same course. Another big thing to consider is that some leaners may tend to vote for McCain when all is said and done. There is a certain segment of people who do not like one party having total control of Congress and the White House which would be the case if Obama wins.
    - Busted down the pretext
    - 8/28/98
    - 9/2/00
    - 4/28/03, 5/3/03, 7/3/03, 7/5/03, 7/6/03, 7/9/03, 7/11/03, 7/12/03, 7/14/03
    - 9/28/04, 9/29/04, 10/1/04, 10/2/04
    - 9/11/05, 9/12/05, 9/13/05, 9/30/05, 10/1/05, 10/3/05
    - 5/12/06, 5/13/06, 5/27/06, 5/28/06, 5/30/06, 6/1/06, 6/3/06, 6/23/06, 7/22/06, 7/23/06, 12/2/06, 12/9/06
    - 8/2/07, 8/5/07
    - 6/19/08, 6/20/08, 6/22/08, 6/24/08, 6/25/08, 6/27/08, 6/28/08, 6/30/08, 7/1/08
    - 8/23/09, 8/24/09, 9/21/09, 9/22/09, 10/27/09, 10/28/09, 10/30/09, 10/31/09
    - 5/15/10, 5/17/10, 5/18/10, 5/20/10, 5/21/10, 10/23/10, 10/24/10
    - 9/11/11, 9/12/11
    - 10/18/13, 10/21/13, 10/22/13, 11/30/13, 12/4/13
Sign In or Register to comment.