Uh......breast feeding at 8? yuck
Spinbrett
Posts: 251
Ok, can I barf now?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxv6R9fUO74&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxv6R9fUO74&feature=related
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
.....then I saw the vid. That is so disturbing.
How disappointing.
all breast fed..........
weaned by two.........
no need to feed on me after that......
I will nuture.........
hug,
kiss,
smile,
rub their head and talk to them......
but that is way fucked up I think that is too old to breastfeed.........
Together we will float like angels.........
In the moment that you left the room, the album started skipping, goodbye to beauty shared with the ones that you love.........
I just LOVE it when people decide for themselves what is best for them...it's sooooo rare these days.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
-Oscar Wilde
Nuclear fission
I almost threw up...that is fucking nasty!! :eek:
YUCK!!!
"What a stupid lamb."
"What a sick, masochistic lion."
Nuclear fission
How does one just come across something like that?
But these children had far too much of an attachment to it. The mother seemed to deny it, but it was obvious. I would think that is it unhealthy for them, mentally, to be so. Especially when they have names for the breasts and draw lots of picture of them, and mom can't even get dressed in the morning, the girls have to be touching them or seeing them all the time. And who's to say mom isn't addicted to that attachment.
but rock n roll will live forever! - ray davies
the mom even admitted as much....."they sag, they have stretchmarks, but they dont see any of that....."
Yeesh.
Nuclear fission
The natural urge of my niece the other day was to run as fast as she could down the steps... that doesn't mean that her parents were wrong in stopping her.
I just can't see how this woman doesn't have some psychological issues...
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
Besides....Obama breast fed until 9 right?
and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
over specific principles, goals, and policies.
http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg
(\__/)
( o.O)
(")_(")
i would rather have breast milk, than a million melons.
hahhahhahaa. wow that was a weird video
Remember, Spinbrett lives in some sort of time warp, and gets news a bit delayed.
was like a picture
of a sunny day
“We can complain because rose bushes have thorns, or rejoice because thorn bushes have roses.”
― Abraham Lincoln
I just find it extremely unusual and I don't see any reason for it to be necessary at 8 years of age
6/12/08 - Tampa, FL
8/23/09 - Chicago, IL
9/28/09 - Salt Lake City, UT (11 years too long!!!)
9/03/11 - East Troy, WI - PJ20 - Night 1
9/04/11 - East Troy, WI - PJ20 - Night 2
children that are properly breastfed have higher IQs, are more sociable (feel greater attachment to their parents and others), and have greater resistance to disease. actually, i shouldn't put it that way. i should say: children who are not breastfed, or who are weened off too early, are being mentally, socially and physically harmed.
mothers need to be home with their young children. i understand that the way things are these days, two incomes are usually needed, and so our way of life can often make breastfeeding impossible beyond the few months that women are allowed to take off. but that has to change. sweden mandates that mothers get a year off.
Im over 30.....would it be weird for me to have a meal courtesy of mom?
if not, when is the appropriate age? 25?
20?
15?
Personally, I think anything more than a few months is pushing it, but that being said, I think roughly when they begin to talk is when the bar should be closed.
Nuclear fission
well, the mother had another baby 3 years after the fact. it's not unnatural for a mother to be producing milk 5 years later, otherwise it wouldn't have happened.
maybe i came across a little too extreme in last post, but the fact is, EVERY professional agrees that breastfeeding is the way to go. there are varying degrees to how much better off a child will be if breastfed, but children who are not breastfed are at higher risk for diabetes, celiac disease, diarrhea (which can be fatal for babies), tissue death in the digestive system, obesity, ear infections, respiratory infections, and urinary tract infections. breastmilk has antibodies that you can't get from formula.
could it be any more black and white?
8 is abnormal, but nature generally dictates the normal age.
human beings came onto the earth 150,000 years ago. by your logic, all of your ancestors who lived before the 20th century got the whole breastfeeding thing wrong.
Im also not worshipping a sun god, drinking river water, sleeping in caves and hunting buffalo.
Youre right though, nature dictates the normal age.
And in typical circles, usually anything over the age of 2 is abnormal as well.
If you want the child to get the breast milk, put it in a bottle and sprinkle it on their lucky charms.
An 8 year old sucking a teet is not normal, and in this day and age, it will become a problem down the road for the children.
I am ALL for breastfeeding, but thats just wrong.
My logic? My logic is that its wrong to breastfeed a child at age 8. And probably after the age of two.....that has nothing to do with my ancestors.
Nuclear fission
this is a burden on our healthcare system too.
I agree about the junkfood thing.
Its terrible the way many parents feed their children.
Nuclear fission
religion, sanitation, habitation and agriculture are not related to our evolution. yes, it's all good and fine to improve our ways of life, but we shouldn't deny our natural instincts, especially when we can back them up with science.
99.9% of mothers don't want to breastfeed until age 8, or past age 3 or 4. in this particular case, it doesn't seem to affect this girl in any negative way. they seem like a very nice family.
Thanks for posting that.
On the psychological front.....the damage will show itself later.
Nuclear fission
i totally agree. there's no need to breastfeed a child at that age, but as far as I know, there's no harm in it.
btw, my daughter was breastfed until she was 3. she just stopped wanting it.