Home› A Moving Train

John Mccain..What do you people see in this dude?

satansbedbugssatansbedbugs On Tour Posts: 2,412
edited June 2008 in A Moving Train
Discuss. I dont believe a word this man utters, the democrats are taking America back for the people, and John Mccain has a lockjaw. What the deal with this dude? I dont think its going to be close. Obama may take 48 / 50 states.
*Marker in the Sand Fanclub * HNIC

Philly- 2005, 2013, 2016, 2024
Camden 2000, 2003, 2006, 2008, 2022, 2023
Philly Spectrum 2009 x4 - We closed that MFER Down Proper
Baltimore- 2024
DC- 2006, 2008
New York- 2008, 2010
Boston - Fenway 2016 (night 2) , 2024 (night1)
East Rutherford, New Jersey- 2006
Chicago - Lollapalooza 2007
Seattle- Gorge 2005
EV Solo- DC x2, Baltimore x2 , Newark NJ x2,  Tower Theater x2 

- Given To Fly
Post edited by Unknown User on
«134

Comments

  • NYbenbenNYbenben Posts: 1,020
    i think he brings nothing to the table... i cant imagine this guy as our next president.
    4/12/92, 8/11/92, 9/28/96, 9/11/98, 8/23/00, 8/24/00, 7/9/03, 4/30/03, 10/1/04, 10/3/05, 12/9/05, 5/12/06, 5/17/06, 5/28/06, 6/3/06, 12/9/06, EV LA 4/12-4/13/08, 6/12/08, 6,19,08, 6,20,08, 6/24/08, 6/25/08, 7/1/08

    and still jonesing for another show....
    "the waiting drove me mad..."
  • satansbedbugssatansbedbugs On Tour Posts: 2,412
    NYbenben wrote:
    i think he brings nothing to the table... i cant imagine this guy as our next president.

    Did you see the pizza delivery ploy? He walked a pizza from his limo to the front door of an orphanage, what a douche. Please , America, Do not vote for this man.
    *Marker in the Sand Fanclub * HNIC

    Philly- 2005, 2013, 2016, 2024
    Camden 2000, 2003, 2006, 2008, 2022, 2023
    Philly Spectrum 2009 x4 - We closed that MFER Down Proper
    Baltimore- 2024
    DC- 2006, 2008
    New York- 2008, 2010
    Boston - Fenway 2016 (night 2) , 2024 (night1)
    East Rutherford, New Jersey- 2006
    Chicago - Lollapalooza 2007
    Seattle- Gorge 2005
    EV Solo- DC x2, Baltimore x2 , Newark NJ x2,  Tower Theater x2 

    - Given To Fly
  • NYbenbenNYbenben Posts: 1,020
    he did the same thing at a fire house in NYC... maybe he should apply for a job at Domino's and leave the Presidency for someone who can really do the job right...
    4/12/92, 8/11/92, 9/28/96, 9/11/98, 8/23/00, 8/24/00, 7/9/03, 4/30/03, 10/1/04, 10/3/05, 12/9/05, 5/12/06, 5/17/06, 5/28/06, 6/3/06, 12/9/06, EV LA 4/12-4/13/08, 6/12/08, 6,19,08, 6,20,08, 6/24/08, 6/25/08, 7/1/08

    and still jonesing for another show....
    "the waiting drove me mad..."
  • satansbedbugssatansbedbugs On Tour Posts: 2,412
    NYbenben wrote:
    he did the same thing at a fire house in NYC... maybe he should apply for a job at Domino's and leave the Presidency for someone who can really do the job right...

    Amen to that!! Its a good thing the republicans shot themselves in the foot over the past 8 years, I think the demos are going to run away with this election. Mccain could care less about that orphanage. The pizza box was probably empty anyways.
    *Marker in the Sand Fanclub * HNIC

    Philly- 2005, 2013, 2016, 2024
    Camden 2000, 2003, 2006, 2008, 2022, 2023
    Philly Spectrum 2009 x4 - We closed that MFER Down Proper
    Baltimore- 2024
    DC- 2006, 2008
    New York- 2008, 2010
    Boston - Fenway 2016 (night 2) , 2024 (night1)
    East Rutherford, New Jersey- 2006
    Chicago - Lollapalooza 2007
    Seattle- Gorge 2005
    EV Solo- DC x2, Baltimore x2 , Newark NJ x2,  Tower Theater x2 

    - Given To Fly
  • LikeAnOpeningBandForTheSunLikeAnOpeningBandForTheSun Posts: 6,097
    i think he's a future scapegoat for why the republicans lost the election.
  • satansbedbugssatansbedbugs On Tour Posts: 2,412
    MrSmith wrote:
    i think he's a future scapegoat for why the republicans lost the election.

    Lets hope!! If John Mccain wins the presidency, Im moving !!
    *Marker in the Sand Fanclub * HNIC

    Philly- 2005, 2013, 2016, 2024
    Camden 2000, 2003, 2006, 2008, 2022, 2023
    Philly Spectrum 2009 x4 - We closed that MFER Down Proper
    Baltimore- 2024
    DC- 2006, 2008
    New York- 2008, 2010
    Boston - Fenway 2016 (night 2) , 2024 (night1)
    East Rutherford, New Jersey- 2006
    Chicago - Lollapalooza 2007
    Seattle- Gorge 2005
    EV Solo- DC x2, Baltimore x2 , Newark NJ x2,  Tower Theater x2 

    - Given To Fly
  • unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    It is sad these three clowns are all that there is.
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    satansbedbugs wrote:
    Discuss. I dont believe a word this man utters, the democrats are taking America back for the people, and John Mccain has a lockjaw. What the deal with this dude? I dont think its going to be close. Obama may take 48 / 50 states.

    I'm not voting for any of the 3 asshats running, but you're completely delusional if you think Obama wins 48 states. Seriously, that is some wicked crack. Obama has shown an amazing inability to win the big states. He may be able to beat McCain, but it will be a very close race.

    And Dems will not be taking America back (whatever that means). They've had a couple of years now to show us a plan, and we've seen nothing but status quo. They are interested in increasing both taxes and spending. Big fucking deal. Same old shit no matter which party you elect.
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • statisticsstatistics Posts: 26
    i wouldn't trust anyone over sixty in a position of power. they have less energy and they're not able to get around to as much. he shouldn't have even been a candidate. if i was wanting to choose someone to govern even a small country, i'd choose someone between forty and sixty. experience and energy.
  • unsungunsung I stopped by on March 7 2024. First time in many years, had to update payment info. Hope all is well. Politicians suck. Bye. Posts: 9,487
    statistics wrote:
    i wouldn't trust anyone over sixty in a position of power. they have less energy and they're not able to get around to as much. he shouldn't have even been a candidate. if i was wanting to choose someone to govern even a small country, i'd choose someone between forty and sixty. experience and energy.



    Yeah those guys like Thomas Jefferson, FDR, and Reagan were all delusional when they were in higher offices. :rolleyes:
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    " John Mccain..What do you people see in this dude? "

    A very old, very full of shit puppet for the status quo.




    " Barack Obama..What do you people see in this dude? "


    A very young, very full of shit puppet for the status quo.



    " Hillary Clinton..What do you people see in this dudette? "


    A not so young, but not so old puppet for the status quo.



    " Dennis Kucinich ..What do you people see in this dude? "

    A guy with more balls and integrity then all of the Congress, Supreme Court and White House.......put together. The guy who should be our next president.


    " Ralph Nadar ..What do you people see in this dude? "

    He's not Dennis Kucinich, but he's a reasonable option to Kucinich. Better than the Three Amigos currently getting all the press; in the this twisted and ridiculous campaign-Game Show known as " Who Wants To Be President Of The United States Of America ".

    Take us to a commercial break, Regis.
  • ThecureThecure Posts: 814
    satansbedbugs wrote:
    Did you see the pizza delivery ploy? He walked a pizza from his limo to the front door of an orphanage, what a douche. Please , America, Do not vote for this man.

    did you see obama bowling ploy or how abotu Hillary drinking shots ploy. give it up, all the people running for office do the same thing. i say vote for no-one. there is this great book called seeing and what happens is that people of a country are so fustrated that they decide to vote for no-one. they just stay home.
    People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid."
    - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)

    If you haven't got anything nice to say about anybody, come sit next to me."
    - Alice Roosevelt Longworth (1884-1980)
  • slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,762
    What do I see in this dude?

    He's not that other dude, or that one lady.

    Seriously, not a great election year. I'm going to end up voting for someone I disagree with half the time, because he'll be running against someone I disagree with all the time.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • slightofjeffslightofjeff Posts: 7,762
    statistics wrote:
    i wouldn't trust anyone over sixty in a position of power. they have less energy and they're not able to get around to as much. he shouldn't have even been a candidate. if i was wanting to choose someone to govern even a small country, i'd choose someone between forty and sixty. experience and energy.

    age has nothing to do with it. In this day and age, I wouldn't trust anybody who has done the things you have to do to get to the point where you can run for president.
    everybody wants the most they can possibly get
    for the least they could possibly do
  • VictoryGinVictoryGin Posts: 1,207
    jeffbr wrote:
    I'm not voting for any of the 3 asshats running, but you're completely delusional if you think Obama wins 48 states. Seriously, that is some wicked crack. Obama has shown an amazing inability to win the big states. He may be able to beat McCain, but it will be a very close race.

    good god. you may not be supportive of obama but perhaps it is you who is smoking some wicked crack. i don't think he'd win 48 states either, but you can't believe that a big state like new york is going to go red in the general. and you can't be shocked that hillary won there in the primary when she is their senator. and maybe you missed the memo, but obama won texas. that's a big fucking state. i'm not saying he'd necessarily win there in the general, but you're just flat out wrong when you say he can't win big states.

    and in addition, what's pretty fucking cool about the general is that some southern states will actually be in play when they normally are not.
    if you wanna be a friend of mine
    cross the river to the eastside
  • ThecureThecure Posts: 814
    statistics wrote:
    i wouldn't trust anyone over sixty in a position of power. they have less energy and they're not able to get around to as much. he shouldn't have even been a candidate. if i was wanting to choose someone to govern even a small country, i'd choose someone between forty and sixty. experience and energy.

    i know alot of people over 60 that have more enegy than 20 years old. also, why should mcCain not be the candidate. are all 60 years odl supposed to just stay home and play bridge. or maybe they should just work at Wal_mart nothing to hard for them. and also if i am correct Keith Richards is over 60 and so is Mick Jagger and having seen them in concert i would say they have energy.
    People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid."
    - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)

    If you haven't got anything nice to say about anybody, come sit next to me."
    - Alice Roosevelt Longworth (1884-1980)
  • jeffbrjeffbr Seattle Posts: 7,177
    VictoryGin wrote:
    good god. you may not be supportive of obama but perhaps it is you who is smoking some wicked crack. i don't think he'd win 48 states either, but you can't believe that a big state like new york is going to go red in the general. and you can't be shocked that hillary won there in the primary when she is their senator. and maybe you missed the memo, but obama won texas. that's a big fucking state. i'm not saying he'd necessarily win there in the general, but you're just flat out wrong when you say he can't win big states.

    and in addition, what's pretty fucking cool about the general is that some southern states will actually be in play when they normally are not.

    He hasn't shown the ability to win the big states. Any political scientist will tell you that. He also hasn't been shown preference from the white, working class in this country. So to think he'll waltz in and win 48 states in a landslide is the crack smoking I'm talking about. Of course he'll win a few big states when up against McCain. Go back and read my post - I think it will be a very close race. That could only happen if he wins some big states. Nowhere did I say that he will not be able to win big states, just that he has thus far not demonstrated that ability. Hopefully you didn't hurt yourself with that knee jerk.
    "I'll use the magic word - let's just shut the fuck up, please." EV, 04/13/08
  • OffHeGoes29OffHeGoes29 Posts: 1,240
    I think if people started to worry more about who they put in Congress, then the White House, the outcome would be different. People think the President has more power then what he/she actually has.
    BRING BACK THE WHALE
  • OffHeGoes29OffHeGoes29 Posts: 1,240
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powers_of_the_President_of_the_United_States
    BRING BACK THE WHALE
  • NeverbeenLedbetterNeverbeenLedbetter Posts: 213
    jeffbr wrote:

    And Dems will not be taking America back (whatever that means). They've had a couple of years now to show us a plan, and we've seen nothing but status quo. They are interested in increasing both taxes and spending. Big fucking deal. Same old shit no matter which party you elect.

    The Dems in congress better be ready to work their ass off over the next 2 years getting something worthy passed if Obama or Clinton win. They have no shot of pushing their agenda with Bush ready to veto everything right now and not enough of a majority to override. That excuse goes bye bye however if they take the White House.
    Raleigh '03; Hartford '08; Mansfield II '08; Buffalo '10; Hartford '10;
    East Troy I '11; East Troy II '11; DeLuna Fest '12; Wrigley '13; Buffalo '13;
    Toronto II '16; Wrigley I '16; Wrigley II '16; Wrigley I '18; Wrigley II '18;
    Asbury Park '21; MSG '22; Camden '22
  • beachdwellerbeachdweller Posts: 1,532
    another thing McCain and Bush have in common, neither understands what the word "appeasement" means
    "Music, for me, was fucking heroin." eV (nothing Ed has said is more true for me personally than this quote)

    Stop by:
    http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=14678777351&ref=mf
  • NMyTreeNMyTree Posts: 2,374
    beachdweller wrote:
    another thing McCain and Bush have in common, neither understands what the word "appeasement" means


    Well, they sure have a grand grasp on the word when it comes to catering and pandering to Corporations, Special Interests and Israel:D:D
  • CommyCommy Posts: 4,984
    John Mccain is so goddamn average its hard to believe he's running for the president of the world.
  • MLC2006MLC2006 Posts: 861
    VictoryGin wrote:
    good god. you may not be supportive of obama but perhaps it is you who is smoking some wicked crack. i don't think he'd win 48 states either, but you can't believe that a big state like new york is going to go red in the general. and you can't be shocked that hillary won there in the primary when she is their senator. and maybe you missed the memo, but obama won texas. that's a big fucking state. i'm not saying he'd necessarily win there in the general, but you're just flat out wrong when you say he can't win big states.

    and in addition, what's pretty fucking cool about the general is that some southern states will actually be in play when they normally are not.


    NY and California will not go Republican, but I expect that most other large states will. I believe OH, PA, FL, and TX would be more than enough to cover for NY and California. I also wouldn't be too sure about southern states being in play either. while Obama won by landslides over Hillary, it's because a majority of southern Democrats are black. they still don't outnumber southern Republicans.

    like others, I'm not voting for any of these 3 because I think all 3 of them are unfit to be president. but I feel differently about how it's going to go different days. I expect it's either going to be Obama in a ballot counting nailbiter or McCain in a landslide. to predict a landslide for Obama is ludricrous imo. it's just not going to happen.
  • beachdwellerbeachdweller Posts: 1,532
    NMyTree wrote:
    Well, they sure have a grand grasp on the word when it comes to catering and pandering to Corporations, Special Interests and Israel:D:D

    that would be mutal appeasement right? :D
    "Music, for me, was fucking heroin." eV (nothing Ed has said is more true for me personally than this quote)

    Stop by:
    http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=14678777351&ref=mf
  • FinsburyParkCarrotsFinsburyParkCarrots Seattle, WA Posts: 12,223
    They see uranium as comfort food.
  • _Crazy_Mary__Crazy_Mary_ Posts: 1,299
    satansbedbugs wrote:
    Lets hope!! If John Mccain wins the presidency, Im moving !!


    I wish I could believe you... Where would you go? China?

    I don't like John McCain. He's too far to the left. I don't like any of the candidates, but if I have to vote for one (and I will) it will be McCain. :mad:
    I really screwed that up. I really Schruted it.
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    _Crazy_Mary_ wrote:
    I don't like John McCain. He's too far to the left.


    these are the people that scare the shit out of me...
  • _Crazy_Mary__Crazy_Mary_ Posts: 1,299
    my2hands wrote:
    these are the people that scare the shit out of me...
    :confused: as if you didn't just quote me? Talking about me like I'm not even here? Nice.
    McCain and Bush are in the same boat to me, only Bush is a bumbling nincompoop (sp?).
    I really screwed that up. I really Schruted it.
  • RolandTD20KdrummerRolandTD20Kdrummer Posts: 13,066
    *cough* the other left...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
Sign In or Register to comment.