Bu$h Got something Correct!!
Comments
-
jlew24asu wrote:haha I dont love Bush. I think he had good intentions to protect us after 9/11 (at that time he had a 85% approval rating so I wasnt the only one). but the whole Iraq mess (lies about WMD) he lost my respect.
no country can fuck us up. 1 country? 1 missile? so Iran will shoot a missle at us? is that it. we have a missile defense system. no army will ever reach our shores.
sorry for calling you out on your bullshit comment.
Sorry you feel it was a bullshit comment. But I felt it was pretty relavent. I also beleive his intentions were good at first but he had no plan, no nothing. Before 911 I bet alot of people said "oh no one could ever hijack our airplanes and fly them into a tower killing thousands of people" open you mind and your eyes.I'll be back0 -
Nothingman54 wrote:Like I said it only takes 1 country and 1 missile to fuck us up. I dont know which country he's going to pick a fight with? Im not him, hell today its Iran, tomorrow its Greenland??
greenland. lol0 -
I guess George Bush, Sr. is concerned that Jr. isn't doing anything about the negative press he's been getting and that public opinion is at it's all time low.
I saw a bit of news the other day, it was an interview tidbit of a reporter asking GW Bush what he thought of his own father saying this to him. His reply was along the lines of "I asked him, what are you watching the news for...don't pay attention to that, everything's going just fine, and I don't need to know what the public thinks...that doesn't concern me..."0 -
jlew24asu wrote:fuck canada. they wont do shit.
The government? No. One crazy citizen? Probably.
There is some hatred for America up here and I'd hate to see someone take that overboard. But I'm not denying it's a possibility.I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire0 -
jlew24asu wrote:syria? what the fuck is the piss poor weak country gonna do?
n. korea? what about them?
russia? the fastest declining nation on the planet?
you people have no idea. no nation is a direct threat to the US.Ron: I just don't feel like going out tonight
Sammi: Wanna just break up?0 -
Nothingman54 wrote:Sorry you feel it was a bullshit comment. But I felt it was pretty relavent. I also beleive his intentions were good at first but he had no plan, no nothing. Before 911 I bet alot of people said "oh no one could ever hijack our airplanes and fly them into a tower killing thousands of people" open you mind and your eyes.
ok mr.nothing. I agree bush is pissing off countries. but no nation can fuck us up, like you say. individuals who do not represent anyone expect maybe allah have the ability to inflict harm on us. but not a nation.0 -
Ahnimus wrote:Yea, I think it's important to remember that many of the allies, are only allies by their own interest. Question is, if Bush ran into Russia in Iraq, would he press the button and start the nuclear end?Ron: I just don't feel like going out tonight
Sammi: Wanna just break up?0 -
metsfan531941 wrote:all 3 of those countries have nukes and if ya dont believe that theres something wrong. ok there right so no nation is a threat to us, keep dreaming
guess what we have alot of nukes too. none of those nations would use a nuke against us, let alone being able to get one here.0 -
jlew24asu wrote:ok mr.nothing. I agree bush is pissing off countries. but no nation can fuck us up, like you say. individuals who do not represent anyone expect maybe allah have the ability to inflict harm on us. but not a nation.
Look! All im saying is other countries dont like us and its very possible for another country to bomb us, it may not be likley but it could very well happen. Yeah we may have a defense system but it only takes 1. Thats all im saying.I'll be back0 -
jlew24asu wrote:guess what we have alot of nukes too. none of those nations would use a nuke against us, let alone being able to get one here.Ron: I just don't feel like going out tonight
Sammi: Wanna just break up?0 -
Ahnimus wrote:The government? No. One crazy citizen? Probably.
There is some hatred for America up here and I'd hate to see someone take that overboard. But I'm not denying it's a possibility.
well thats the trade off. does america want a tough president like bush who will do whatever takes to protect this country. or someone on the far left who will sacrifice security by getting rid of the patriot act. or not staying on the offesive against el queda.
if there is some wacko in cananda who is hell bent on suicide bombing a chemical plant. good luck. he probably wont make it too far.0 -
jlew24asu wrote:well thats the trade off. does america want a tough president like bush who will do whatever takes to protect this country. or someone on the far left who will sacrifice security by getting rid of the patriot act. or not staying on the offesive against el queda.
if there is some wacko in cananda who is hell bent on suicide bombing a chemical plant. good luck. he probably wont make it too far.
I think it would be better to trade off security for good foreign relations.
Actually, not that I intend to do it, but I have spent some time thinking about it, and it really wouldn't be that hard to pull off. Anyone can order explosives on e-bay.I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire0 -
Ahnimus wrote:I think it would be better to trade off security for good foreign relations.Ahnimus wrote:Actually, not that I intend to do it, but I have spent some time thinking about it, and it really wouldn't be that hard to pull off. Anyone can order explosives on e-bay.
i'm sorry what did you say?0 -
jlew24asu wrote:well thats the trade off. does america want a tough president like bush who will do whatever takes to protect this country. or someone on the far left who will sacrifice security by getting rid of the patriot act. or not staying on the offesive against el queda.
if there is some wacko in cananda who is hell bent on suicide bombing a chemical plant. good luck. he probably wont make it too far.
There is middle ground also!! A President can defend this country by fighting the right people. 9/11 happens and he attacks Iraq telling us about Weapons of Mass Destruction. Why didn't we attack the people who caused 9/11? Iraq wasn't involved it was a cover to draw our attention from the fact he had no idea where to find Osama. Osama still is out there and over 1,000 US Soldiers are dead helping a country that had nothing to do with it.
Bu$h is the worst president we have had in most of our lifetime. He is killing our youth to protect his Oil Money!!0 -
jlew24asu wrote:ready for this. I agree
i'm sorry what did you say?
The issue of border security between Canada and the USA has been hot for a while. That got me thinking about it. Y'all really need to protect yourselves from your numerous enemies, so I examined some of the flaws in the security and I agree, you either need to make more friends or tighten up our border.I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire0 -
Nothingman54 wrote:He is a very dangerous man. He needs to stop trying to play the role of GOD. Other countrys dont like us and I can understand why. GB is a threat to everybody and he will pick on the wrong country and they will fuck us up.
Because Bush is the only leader in the world who makes decisions based off of money? Newsflash: Every leader does it. I wonder if Russia would put their financial interests aside, as well as China, and focused on the Iranian and North Korean threats, how quick it would be get real change in those countries? Probably pretty quick. But, THEY DON'T. Which is why the US has to go it alone.
You all want to live in the past and talk about Halliburton or Iran-Contra. Well, think to the future. Iran is a growing threat that we don't want to go to war with. If we had Russia and more of the EU's support, we could bring about change much faster. But we don't have their support.
Edit: Cool, I'm a 'faithfull' now.
Anyway, go back to living in the past and making jokes about Halliburton. If you really don't want to go to war with Iran, put the blame where it belongs (Europe and Asia), because we are the only ones trying do anything about them.0 -
Lizardking wrote:There is middle ground also!! A President can defend this country by fighting the right people. 9/11 happens and he attacks Iraq telling us about Weapons of Mass Destruction.
yup, turns out not to be true. although saddam did use them. I dont feel he was a threat to america or had a link to el quedaLizardking wrote:Why didn't we attack the people who caused 9/11?Lizardking wrote:Iraq wasn't involved it was a cover to draw our attention from the fact he had no idea where to find Osama. Osama still is out there and over 1,000 US Soldiers are dead helping a country that had nothing to do with it.
Bu$h is the worst president we have had in most of our lifetime. He is killing our youth to protect his Oil Money!!0 -
Ahnimus wrote:The issue of border security between Canada and the USA has been hot for a while. That got me thinking about it. Y'all really need to protect yourselves from your numerous enemies, so I examined some of the flaws in the security and I agree, you either need to make more friends or tighten up our border.
I wish we would do both0 -
jlew24asu wrote:have you lost your fucking mind. what country in this world can come close to fucking us up?
I believe it is our divisiveness that will lead to our downfall. Divided, we will never be able to solve our problems, let alone the problems of other nations.
I can imagine that there will be continued fingerpointing beyond 2008 regarding Iraq, for example. If the future president leaves and the place goes to Hell... which it will... then, there will be arguements that the Bush plan was the right plan and we should have stayed. If the future President decides to stay, then he will be blamed for staying. Either way... it's a losing proposition. Iraq is going to be fucked up whether we stay or we leave. I believe it's time we realized this.
I think the only way we can accel is recognizing that the person on the other side of the aisle is NOT the enemy. The enemy is the guy, sitting in an apartment in Rihad or Berlin, plotting to detonate a box filled with Anthrax in the Mall of America on Thanksgiving weekend.Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
Hail, Hail!!!0 -
Ahnimus wrote:Canada!
I bet you one dude from Canada could take out major faciliities of the U.S. infrustructure. But first he/she would need a reason and the determination to actually do it. Which isn't likely to happen. Like, plant a bomb at one of your chemical research facilities there and let the anthrax fly.
not to mention the lack of security at a lot of these sites...they were targeted by homeland security as a major threat and what does this administration do? they let the industry create it's own security guidelines then let the parts be VOLUNTARY!!!!!standin above the crowd
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way0
Categories
- All Categories
- 148.9K Pearl Jam's Music and Activism
- 110.1K The Porch
- 275 Vitalogy
- 35.1K Given To Fly (live)
- 3.5K Words and Music...Communication
- 39.2K Flea Market
- 39.2K Lost Dogs
- 58.7K Not Pearl Jam's Music
- 10.6K Musicians and Gearheads
- 29.1K Other Music
- 17.8K Poetry, Prose, Music & Art
- 1.1K The Art Wall
- 56.8K Non-Pearl Jam Discussion
- 22.2K A Moving Train
- 31.7K All Encompassing Trip
- 2.9K Technical Stuff and Help