Price of Oil

lazymoon13lazymoon13 Posts: 838
edited April 2008 in A Moving Train
wtf. $120?!?! how is this effecting you? are you driving less? what can possibly bring this price down? whats goes up must come down. damn this is getting out of hand.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«134

Comments

  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    lower demand ... drive less, drive more efficient (mileage, car pools), use less (plastics) ... stop illegal occupations ... stop threatening to bomb sovereign countries ...
  • lazymoon13 wrote:
    wtf. $120?!?! how is this effecting you? are you driving less? what can possibly bring this price down? whats goes up must come down. damn this is getting out of hand.

    Meh...$120 is going to look really good come August.
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    Meh...$120 is going to look really good come August.

    That's the fucking scary part. We haven't even started using the summer blend, which tends to be more expensive. Unfortunate for me I started a job about 2 months ago that requires me to drive to work, I used to work in NYC so I took public transportation.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • ledveddermanledvedderman Posts: 7,761
    I drive 110 miles a day roundtrip and it is FUCKING KILLING ME.

    I wish my small town could produce well paying jobs, but that isn't the case.
  • lazymoon13lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    Meh...$120 is going to look really good come August.

    :(
  • lazymoon13lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    I drive 110 miles a day roundtrip and it is FUCKING KILLING ME.

    I wish my small town could produce well paying jobs, but that isn't the case.

    wow man. you need to move. is that out of the question? dont mean to pry, its none of my business but damn. 110 miles A DAY!
  • lazymoon13lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    mammasan wrote:
    That's the fucking scary part. We haven't even started using the summer blend, which tends to be more expensive. Unfortunate for me I started a job about 2 months ago that requires me to drive to work, I used to work in NYC so I took public transportation.

    mccain proposed to drop the fed tax of 0.20 cents a gallon for the summer. good or bad idea?
  • There is no price tag for blood. That is what we are paying in Iraq for oil.
    Anger is a gift
  • lazymoon13lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    There is no price tag for blood. That is what we are paying in Iraq for oil.

    ok jimmy. how about the price we pay from all other countries? :rolleyes: we don't get all of our oil from Iraq ya know.
  • lazymoon13 wrote:
    mccain proposed to drop the fed tax of 0.20 cents a gallon for the summer. good or bad idea?

    Spineless, gimmicky idea. Drop it for good, remove corresponding spending from the budget (preferrably oil company subsidies).
  • lazymoon13lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    Spineless, gimmicky idea.
    yikes, spineless? how so? he's seems to be the only senator with a spine to suggest such a thing.
    Drop it for good, remove corresponding spending from the budget (preferrably oil company subsidies).
    great idea.
  • lazymoon13 wrote:
    wtf. $120?!?! how is this effecting you? are you driving less? what can possibly bring this price down? whats goes up must come down. damn this is getting out of hand.

    I'm all for it. really. in the past studies have shown that demand for gasoline is extremely price inelastic. but I hope that if it gets high enough, that will change.

    you make choices as to where you live, where you work, whether you drive a car, and what kind of car you drive. therefore, unless you are a truck driver, where the primary (singular really) input is gasoline, you shouldn't really be complaining.
  • normnorm Posts: 31,146
    Spineless, gimmicky idea. Drop it for good, remove corresponding spending from the budget (preferrably oil company subsidies).

    oil companies are being subsidized?? for what?? raping the citizenry?? :mad:
  • cutback wrote:
    oil companies are being subsidized?? for what?? raping the citizenry?? :mad:

    Oil companies are historically subsidized for exploration-related expenses, amongst other things. And yes, it is quite ridiculous.
  • polarispolaris Posts: 3,527
    cutback wrote:
    oil companies are being subsidized?? for what?? raping the citizenry?? :mad:

    yup ... if we paid the 'true' cost of energy ... we'd only be using renewables ...
  • lazymoon13 wrote:
    yikes, spineless? how so? he's seems to be the only senator with a spine to suggest such a thing.

    It does not take a spine to villify oil companies and tell America that you'll make gas cheaper over the summer. That's a silly cop-out that does nothing to address the actual problem and is the kind of populist bullshit I expect from McCain.

    Gas taxes and oil subsidies are a joke. Remove them both, permanently, and make sure you're shoring up the federal budget in anticipation of the lost revenue. That takes a spine.
  • polaris wrote:
    yup ... if we paid the 'true' cost of energy ... we'd only be using renewables ...

    Not really. You'd be using a mixture of coal, oil, nuclear, and renewables. Just at slightly different proportions than we do now.
  • lazymoon13lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    I'm all for it. really. in the past studies have shown that demand for gasoline is extremely price inelastic. but I hope that if it gets high enough, that will change.

    you make choices as to where you live, where you work, whether you drive a car, and what kind of car you drive. therefore, unless you are a truck driver, where the primary (singular really) input is gasoline, you shouldn't really be complaining.

    do you live in America? if not have you been here? the vast majority of people who live here have little to NO choice but to drive to work.
  • It does not take a spine to villify oil companies and tell America that you'll make gas cheaper over the summer. That's a silly cop-out that does nothing to address the actual problem and is the kind of populist bullshit I expect from McCain.

    Gas taxes and oil subsidies are a joke. Remove them both, permanently, and make sure you're shoring up the federal budget in anticipation of the lost revenue. That takes a spine.

    why WOULDN'T you want a gas tax? someone sure as hell should be paying for the f-ed up externalities they're causing when they choose to drive.
  • lazymoon13lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    It does not take a spine to villify oil companies and tell America that you'll make gas cheaper over the summer. That's a silly cop-out that does nothing to address the actual problem and is the kind of populist bullshit I expect from McCain.

    Gas taxes and oil subsidies are a joke. Remove them both, permanently, and make sure you're shoring up the federal budget in anticipation of the lost revenue. That takes a spine.

    you should run for office. have you considered it? you seem to have it all figured out. anyway, I applaud mccain for proposing cutting the tax. he's the only one to make such a suggestion. thats a start.
  • lazymoon13 wrote:
    do you live in America? if not have you been here? the vast majority of people who live here have little to NO choice but to drive to work.

    yes I live in america. and I have lived and worked lived in autocentric suburban areas, where in I rode a bike and walked when possible and when not, carpooled to work with 3 other people, one car of which was a prius- all choices, including living in an autocentric area (going to the best grad program in my field, which happens to be environmental economics, outweighed my desire to live in cities and my dislike of driving). I did not like having to drive so I *chose* to live somewhere I didn't have to later when that option was more prevalent among my preferences. It may be a *complex* choice, it may be a hugely complicated utility function, but it is still a rational, economic choice, bottom line.

    Also, may I remind people, that it is OUR CHOICES that have made the united states as autocentric as it is today. If we did not demand cars, if we did not demand huge houses, if we did not demand big box stores and shopping malls- suburban autocentric areas as we know them would not be as proliferating as they are today. That's not to say it can't change. We can all vote with our feet. We can seek out places to alternative live and work. we can demand bike paths and sidewalks. I'm not saying it could change overnight, but people are just like "eh, it's the way it is, you have to drive." When it's really not. If everyone just changed their OUTLOOK on how things are designed and stopped accepting the status quo, it would eventually change, as an economic necessity.
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    mccain proposed to drop the fed tax of 0.20 cents a gallon for the summer. good or bad idea?

    It's a nice gesture but in the end it's just that. What we need is a solution not some flimsy band aid.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • Kel VarnsenKel Varnsen Posts: 1,952
    I'm all for it. really. in the past studies have shown that demand for gasoline is extremely price inelastic. but I hope that if it gets high enough, that will change.

    you make choices as to where you live, where you work, whether you drive a car, and what kind of car you drive. therefore, unless you are a truck driver, where the primary (singular really) input is gasoline, you shouldn't really be complaining.


    That is what has always bugged me. The people who seem to complain the most about gas prices are the people where their high levels of gas uses are a result of their own choices. These are the people who have to have the 4 bedroom house in the suburbs with the double garage and the huge back yard (even though to afford that house you have to have an hour commute). These are the people who drive SUV's when a small or medium sized car would suit them just fine.
  • lazymoon13lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    yes I live in america. and I have lived and worked lived in autocentric suburban areas (where in I rode a bike and walked when possible and when not, carpooled to work with 3 other people, one car of which was a prius- all choices). I did not like having to drive so I *chose* to live somewhere I didn't have to. It may be a *complex* choice, it may be a hugely complicated utility function, but it is still a rational, economic choice, bottom line.

    you don't get it. are all americans supposed to cram into urban areas so they can ditch their cars? and guess what, carpooling still requires people to buy and use gas.
  • lazymoon13lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    mammasan wrote:
    It's a nice gesture but in the end it's just that. What we need is a solution not some flimsy band aid.

    its a start. and certainly not a spineless gimmicky move. I guess he could have done nothing? :rolleyes:
  • why WOULDN'T you want a gas tax?

    Because it's uneccessary, regressive and immoral.
    someone sure as hell should be paying for the f-ed up externalities they're causing when they choose to drive.

    Umm...so let me get this straight. Driving creates "f-ed up externalities" and therefore drivers should be punished by paying a tribute to the organizations that provided them with public roads to begin with????
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    you don't get it. are all americans supposed to cram into urban areas so they can ditch their cars? and guess what, carpooling still requires people to buy and use gas.

    No but you can start by making some wiser choices. If you have to drive far to get to work don't buy a Hummer. There are also plenty of people who can commute to work via public transportation who still drive because the train or the bus is too crowded. Having worked in NYC for the majority of my career I have met dozens of people who drive to work when they can just as easily take a train or bus. Then they would bitch about the tolls, traffic and gas prices.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • mammasanmammasan Posts: 5,656
    lazymoon13 wrote:
    its a start. and certainly not a spineless gimmicky move. I guess he could have done nothing? :rolleyes:

    No he could fight to eliminate the gas tax completely.
    "When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads." - Ron Paul
  • lazymoon13lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    mammasan wrote:
    No but you can start by making some wiser choices. If you have to drive far to get to work don't buy a Hummer. There are also plenty of people who can commute to work via public transportation who still drive because the train or the bus is too crowded. Having worked in NYC for the majority of my career I have met dozens of people who drive to work when they can just as easily take a train or bus. Then they would bitch about the tolls, traffic and gas prices.

    I have no sympathy for those people. I'm talking about the millions of americans who simply have little or no choice.
  • lazymoon13lazymoon13 Posts: 838
    mammasan wrote:
    No he could fight to eliminate the gas tax completely.
    sure he can, but like I said, this is a good start. I'll take a temp cut proposal over no proposal at all. which is what I got from the 99 other senators.
Sign In or Register to comment.