so what did you think of the Bush speech today

jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
edited September 2006 in A Moving Train
trying to spread the message for freedom seems like a good thing to me.

"to fight radicalism and terror with justice and dignity, to achieve a true peace, founded on human freedom."



http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/09/20040921-3.html
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • brain of cbrain of c Posts: 5,213
    i think every time he speaks, an angel's wings fall off.
  • zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • brain of c wrote:
    i think every time he speaks, an angel's wings fall off.


    that's awesome

    i only watched a few minutes but i got nothing new from it
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    I wonder where you got that idea from........
  • "to fight radicalism – read: muslims

    and terror – read: and anyone who’s against us

    with justice – read: using gitmo and secret prisons worldwide to contain people who have not been charged with any crime.

    and dignity – read: and pissing on, beating, stripping and humiliating said prisoners

    to achieve a true peace – read: to achieve peace on our terms

    founded on human freedom – read: founded on illegally bombing countries into submission.

    Other than that….zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
  • jlew24asu wrote:
    I wonder where you got that idea from........

    i had to do it :) .....
    "L'homme est né libre, et partout il est dans les fers"
    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau
  • Well when Bush actually starts to live by "justice & dignity" I may actually listen to something he has to say......
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    "to fight radicalism – read: muslims

    and terror – read: and anyone who’s against us

    you mean radical muslims. and anyone who is against freedom.
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    i had to do it :) .....

    well played my friend
  • WMAWMA Posts: 175
    I'm getting sick of his fear tactics.

    Any decent leader would try to quell the peoples fears rather than heighten them in the name of politics I believe.

    Rather than prompting us to imagine how we'd feel if our families were dead he could explain that we have more of a chance of slipping in our showers and breaking our necks, getting hit by lightening, or winning the lottery then being the victim of a terror attack. "So don't live in fear"

    "vote this way or your family will die" is disgusting politics.
  • WMA wrote:
    I'm getting sick of his fear tactics.

    Any decent leader would try to quell the peoples fears rather than highten them in the name of politics I believe.

    Rather than prompting us to imagine how we'd feel if our families were dead he could explain that we have more of a chance of slipping in our showers and breaking our necks, getting hit by lightening, or winning the lottery then being the victim of a terror attack. "So don't live in fear"

    "vote this way or your family will die" is disgusting politics.

    Well it has come to the point that he will not change his fear mongering...I think it is time for people to stop buying into his BS.....
  • PickrPickr Posts: 161
    It's the same shit every time....gettin boring
    Stix and Stones may break my bones, but More than Words will never hurt me.
  • Pickr wrote:
    It's the same shit every time....gettin boring

    I still cannot believe people buy into his "fear" hype.....
  • jlew24asu wrote:
    you mean radical muslims. and anyone who is against freedom.

    Seems to me they've killed one or two non-radical muslims.

    Against freedom....ha....has it occurred to you that most of the people being bombed want nothing more than freedom from bombs, invading armies/indefinite occupation, kidnappings, puppet gov’ts and imposed culture? I highly doubt anyone is against freedom…except maybe a few extremists hoping to gain power (same as the US – but no terrorists there ).

    Glad to see you agree with the rest tho.
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    I highly doubt anyone is against freedom…except maybe a few extremists hoping to gain power (same as the US – but no terrorists there ).

    Glad to see you agree with the rest tho.


    a few extremists? lets try every dictatorship in the middle east. there is not one free country in the middle east. most of them are run by extremists who only believe in a strict interpertaion of the koran. thankfully a few mideast countries have tried new things like bush mentioned, giving some people more freedoms.

    and the US is not trying to gain power. are we raising the flag and calling it ours? no, we intend to leave.


    and I dont agree with everything else you said.
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    " with justice – read: using gitmo and secret prisons worldwide to contain people who have not been charged with any crime.

    and dignity – read: and pissing on, beating, stripping and humiliating said prisoners

    to achieve a true peace – read: to achieve peace on our terms

    founded on human freedom – read: founded on illegally bombing countries into submission.

    Other than that….zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    with justice read: they are criminals of war on terror. they are not allowed the same freedoms as criminals of war. geneva convention rights are only given to those who fight with a uniform for a country. terrorists do not. they should be tried in military courts. and never ever ever ever under any circumstances should USA use torture.

    and dignity read: it was an admitted horrible mistake by so young soliders who have since ben sent to prison. you make it sound like its americas policy to do that.
  • jlew24asu wrote:
    a few extremists? lets try every dictatorship in the middle east. there is not one free country in the middle east. most of them are run by extremists who only believe in a strict interpertaion of the koran. thankfully a few mideast countries have tried new things like bush mentioned, giving some people more freedoms.

    and the US is not trying to gain power. are we raising the flag and calling it ours? no, we intend to leave.


    and I dont agree with everything else you said.

    I love Saudi Arabia's human rights....women is having a baby...baby is breeched coming out...what do they do...drop her and the newborn out in the middle of desert to die...true story from a medic who worked with the royal family....he also said public beheadings were common.....my point is I really wish Bush would apply his distorted logic to other countries in the region regardless if they are a "friend" or not.....to me that shows how uncredible his cause really is.....and furthers my belief in his alterior agenda
  • CosmoCosmo Posts: 12,225
    jlew24asu wrote:
    with justice read: they are criminals of war on terror. they are not allowed the same freedoms as criminals of war. geneva convention rights are only given to those who fight with a uniform for a country. terrorists do not. they should be tried in military courts. and never ever ever ever under any circumstances should USA use torture.

    and dignity read: it was an admitted horrible mistake by so young soliders who have since ben sent to prison. you make it sound like its americas policy to do that.
    ...
    If you dispise the torture and death of our soldiers captured by the enemy... then you do not prescribe to that same doctrine.
    If you accept the methods of torture to get what you wants or need in this 'War On Terror', then you are telling the other side, it is okay for them to do the same thing to our guys.
    If you believe that they will torture and kill our guys anyway, so it's okay to do the same to theirs... you are validating their tactics and methods and essentially becoming the same type of person they are.
    Allen Fieldhouse, home of the 2008 NCAA men's Basketball Champions! Go Jayhawks!
    Hail, Hail!!!
  • LBC1076LBC1076 Posts: 224
    I think that the United States is practicing in the ultimate of hypocracies, they are trying to stop radical Islamists from imposing their beliefs on others, by trying to impose their beliefs on others.


    Where is the logic in that? Just because the sytem, albeit flawed, as mostly worked in favor of the US, why does the US feel that will definitely everywhere else without fail?


    Sidenote, the Iranian president will be speaking to the UN General Assembly within the hour, Ahmadinejad's going live in primetime.
  • OpenOpen Posts: 792
    jlew24asu wrote:
    trying to spread the message for freedom seems like a good thing to me.

    "to fight radicalism and terror with justice and dignity, to achieve a true peace, founded on human freedom."



    http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/09/20040921-3.html

    Track record.
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    wake up man, it was american policy to do that, straight down from rummy.

    and we should treat all HUMANS under the geneva convention


    thanks dude, im wide awake.

    it was never american policy to piss on prisioners. a handful of young soliders made mistakes and have been punished.

    sure treat them HUMANELY. but el queda prisioners are not entitled to the rights of the geneva convention. that being said, they still should not be tortured, ever.
  • RainDogRainDog Posts: 1,824
    jlew24asu wrote:
    thanks dude, im wide awake.

    it was never american policy to piss on prisioners. a handful of young soliders made mistakes and have been punished.

    sure treat them HUMANELY. but el queda prisioners are not entitled to the rights of the geneva convention. that being said, they still should not be tortured, ever.
    If this is just some handful of young soldiers, then why is Bush trying to have the rules changed?

    Why, for example, when asked about waterboarding, did Bush say he did't want to discuss it because, get this, he didn't want to discuss tactics openly because then the enemy could adapt? Why not call it what it is - water torture? And how the hell can the enemy "adapt" to waterboarding? Grow gills?
  • brain of c wrote:
    i think every time he speaks, an angel's wings fall off.

    lol!! that's so harsh--but funny.
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    jlew24asu wrote:
    you mean radical muslims. and anyone who is against freedom.


    we all have the freedom to have our phones wiretapped w/o cause, court order or even letting anyone else know.

    the freedom to assemble and protest just as long as the politicians can't actually see or hear us

    the freedom to go to war that's just another politicians lie where they are too cheap to buy me adequate protection adn make it illegal for my parents to buy me any and then want to cut my health insurance off after 1 month of being back <if a reservist>

    the freedom to have my bank alert someone if i make a larger than usual deposit or withdrawal

    the right to be put on a watch list just for going to a protest

    hey...it seems like this administration is agaisnt freedom, to me!
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    El_Kabong wrote:
    we all have the freedom to have our phones wiretapped w/o cause, court order or even letting anyone else know.

    the freedom to assemble and protest just as long as the politicians can't actually see or hear us

    the freedom to go to war that's just another politicians lie where they are too cheap to buy me adequate protection adn make it illegal for my parents to buy me any and then want to cut my health insurance off after 1 month of being back <if a reservist>

    the freedom to have my bank alert someone if i make a larger than usual deposit or withdrawal

    the right to be put on a watch list just for going to a protest

    hey...it seems like this administration is agaisnt freedom, to me!

    being a tad bit picky arent we? personally I'm glad my bank alerts me if I make a larger then usual withdrawal. would suck if they didnt, and someone got away with my money.

    are we forced to watch 1 tv or radio station? Do i need to have to keep a picture of George W on my wall? Can women vote/drive/go to school/marry anyone they want? will I go to jail if I say something bad about Bush?
  • El_KabongEl_Kabong Posts: 4,141
    jlew24asu wrote:
    being a tad bit picky arent we? personally I'm glad my bank alerts me if I make a larger then usual withdrawal. would suck if they didnt, and someone got away with my money.

    are we forced to watch 1 tv or radio station? Do i need to have to keep a picture of George W on my wall? Can women vote/drive/go to school/marry anyone they want? will I go to jail if I say something bad about Bush?


    no, the bank doesn't alert YOU they alert the authorities.

    so women driving and being able to say something about bush is the pinnacle of freedom for you?

    and no, women can't marry who they want, what if they wanted to marry another girl?
    standin above the crowd
    he had a voice that was strong and loud and
    i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
    eager to identify with
    someone above the crowd
    someone who seemed to feel the same
    someone prepared to lead the way
  • jlew24asujlew24asu Posts: 10,118
    El_Kabong wrote:
    no, the bank doesn't alert YOU they alert the authorities.

    so women driving and being able to say something about bush is the pinnacle of freedom for you?

    and no, women can't marry who they want, what if they wanted to marry another girl?


    good, as long as they alert somebody. I'm glad they are looking out for me.


    a pinnacle of freedom? no. but freedom none the less.

    so now you want to turn this into a gay marriage debate? dont try and tell me women are treated well in the middle east. I think women would rather have american freedoms vs. living in pakistan and can be raped by whoever is horny at the time
  • spiral outspiral out Posts: 1,052
    jlew24asu wrote:
    good, as long as they alert somebody. I'm glad they are looking out for me.


    a pinnacle of freedom? no. but freedom none the less.

    so now you want to turn this into a gay marriage debate? dont try and tell me women are treated well in the middle east. I think women would rather have american freedoms vs. living in pakistan and can be raped by whoever is horny at the time

    It's all well and good comparing your version of freedom to a countries with less, but it does not take away the points made by El kabong, the lovely western goverments are slowly taking away our percieved freedoms too.

    The freedom you think you have is an illusion.

    You are only free as long as you live within the rules of the country, Now is that TRUE FREEDOM?
    Keep on rockin in the free world!!!!

    The economy has polarized to the point where the wealthiest 10% now own 85% of the nation’s wealth. Never before have the bottom 90% been so highly indebted, so dependent on the wealthy.
  • even flow?even flow? Posts: 8,066
    jlew24asu wrote:
    so now you want to turn this into a gay marriage debate? dont try and tell me women are treated well in the middle east. I think women would rather have american freedoms vs. living in pakistan and can be raped by whoever is horny at the time


    You are right about women in the middle east. They can't even wail at the same part of the wall with men. So much for being advanced.


    As for Bush's speach. Par for the bigot in all of us. I fail to see when Cdn soldiers are being killed in Afgan how that democratically elected head is doing a good job. Then I look into Iraq and think of the mess it was before your beloved army got there. As I said, par for the course.
    You've changed your place in this world!
  • Eva7Eva7 Posts: 226
    jlew24asu wrote:
    "to fight radicalism and terror with justice and dignity, to achieve a true peace, founded on human freedom."

    I think this is the funniest sentence ever from Bush. I am starting to enjoy his comedian talent.
Sign In or Register to comment.