I never attacked major networks and papers....I am the usually the one getting attacked for agreeing with them on issues like 9/11. the only site I have a major problem with is the 911research bullshit.
you said:
"so the wall street jounal said it, it must be true."
funny thing is that was said TODAY after this post i'm replying to!
sorry, but while i don't believe something just b/c it's published i tend to think a paper like the wall street journal has a bit more credability than some members.tripod site
standin above the crowd
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
you said:
"so the wall street jounal said it, it must be true."
funny thing is that was said TODAY after this post i'm replying to!
sorry, but while i don't believe something just b/c it's published i tend to think a paper like the wall street journal has a bit more credability than some members.tripod site
I wasnt attacking the paper, I just wanted some proof. and you showed what I was asking for. I happen to like the WSJ
Comments
http://forums.pearljam.com/showpost.php?p=3778396&postcount=196
you said:
"so the wall street jounal said it, it must be true."
funny thing is that was said TODAY after this post i'm replying to!
sorry, but while i don't believe something just b/c it's published i tend to think a paper like the wall street journal has a bit more credability than some members.tripod site
he had a voice that was strong and loud and
i swallowed his facade cos i'm so
eager to identify with
someone above the crowd
someone who seemed to feel the same
someone prepared to lead the way
I wasnt attacking the paper, I just wanted some proof. and you showed what I was asking for. I happen to like the WSJ