That one event was kind of a big deal. But I guess you don't mind being lied to.
It was a big deal to you. And I do mind if I'm being lied to. An apology from the reporter would have been nice. But since I didn't see it so I can't really comment on it.
And that's one report that I KNOW of, because it happened to me. How many other times has this shit gone on and nobody's the wiser?
Who knows.
And what does six years ago have to do with it? Within those six years, the BBC could have spun and bullshitted thousands of stories.
It was a big deal to you. And I do mind if I'm being lied to. An apology from the reporter would have been nice. But since I didn't see it so I can't really comment on it.
Who knows.
Do you still watch the BBC?
You don't think it's a big deal, yet you DO mind being lied to?
Yes or no, do you think that what the BBC did in my example was an excellent example of media spin and bullshit found ever so often in the US media?
I have a pair of bunny ears on top of my TV, so I don't see anything cable, but, I catch the BBC radio once every week at work.
I'm not trying to say our media is better here in the US. What I'm trying to say is, that your's is just as bad.
I'm talking with somebody whose only seen 10-15 US news reports!
That's why I don't comment on US tv news.
What the fuck are you wasting my time for?
Don't read my posts if your time is so precious.
If you think that my experience with the BBC was an "honest" mistake, re-read my original post and dig your head out of the sand.
Even if it wasn't, it could have been a one time thing. Most likely isn't, though. And I didn't say honest.
It's like arguing with a child.
Likewise.
You have absolutely no knowledge with media biasedness cause you've never really watched multiple media outlets!
Because I haven't watched US media I have absolutely no knowledge of the media and you suddenly assume I never really watched multiple media outlets?
I watch the Belgian news, the Dutch news, BBC, Czech news, sometimes German and French new reports, I read Time magazine and daily check a number of news source on the internet, including many American ones and I read the Belgian paper.
There isn't a single unbiased news source out there and if there is please inform because that would be very welcome.
And you're asking me whether or not and how much of the BBC I've seen.
Well it's a lot more than 10-15 for christs sakes.
How many times in those 6 years? Once a week, months, 6 months...?
Comments
It was a big deal to you. And I do mind if I'm being lied to. An apology from the reporter would have been nice. But since I didn't see it so I can't really comment on it.
Who knows.
Do you still watch the BBC?
naděje umírá poslední
You don't think it's a big deal, yet you DO mind being lied to?
Yes or no, do you think that what the BBC did in my example was an excellent example of media spin and bullshit found ever so often in the US media?
I have a pair of bunny ears on top of my TV, so I don't see anything cable, but, I catch the BBC radio once every week at work.
I'm not trying to say our media is better here in the US. What I'm trying to say is, that your's is just as bad.
That story was a big deal to you, not to me.
I never said anything about the US media.
So you haven't watched the BBC is 6 years?
It's not "mine".
naděje umírá poslední
So the BBC lies, but you don't like being lied to?
I was just asking a question, don't get defensive and not answer it, I even put it in yes or no format for ya.
When did I say I haven't watched the BBC in six years?
You make no sense my friend and I have to make a playlist for my show. I'll catch ya later.
How do you know they lie? Maybe it was a one time mistake.
I'm not getting defensive, how can I answer that question, I've only seen 10 maybe 15 US news reports.
How many times do you watch it?
Why do you say that?
naděje umírá poslední
"What I lack in decorum, I make up for with an absence of tact."
Camden 5-28-06
Washington, D.C. 6-22-08
I'm talking with somebody whose only seen 10-15 US news reports!
What the fuck are you wasting my time for?
If you think that my experience with the BBC was an "honest" mistake, re-read my original post and dig your head out of the sand.
It's like arguing with a child. You have absolutely no knowledge with media biasedness cause you've never really watched multiple media outlets!
And you're asking me whether or not and how much of the BBC I've seen.
Well it's a lot more than 10-15 for christs sakes.
That's why I don't comment on US tv news.
Don't read my posts if your time is so precious.
Even if it wasn't, it could have been a one time thing. Most likely isn't, though. And I didn't say honest.
Likewise.
Because I haven't watched US media I have absolutely no knowledge of the media and you suddenly assume I never really watched multiple media outlets?
I watch the Belgian news, the Dutch news, BBC, Czech news, sometimes German and French new reports, I read Time magazine and daily check a number of news source on the internet, including many American ones and I read the Belgian paper.
There isn't a single unbiased news source out there and if there is please inform because that would be very welcome.
How many times in those 6 years? Once a week, months, 6 months...?
naděje umírá poslední
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6292143.stm
naděje umírá poslední