Question for all

melodious

anything 4 u, god

Commy

you want to censor ccRyderzz?


why?

brandon10

Commy wrote:

you want to censor ccRyderzz?


why?

I had no problem with the posts. I actually found them somewhat entertaining. I love trying to figure out the thought process.

Commy

brandon10 wrote:

I had no problem with the posts. I actually found them somewhat entertaining. I love trying to figure out the thought process.

yeah, some are hilarious.

dunkman

Commy wrote:

you want to censor ccRyderzz?


why?

Male primates, carnivores and rodents sometimes kill infants that they did not sire. Infanticide by males is a relatively common phenomenon in these groups, but tends to be rare in any given species. Is this behavior pathological or accidental, or does it reflect a conditional reproductive strategy for males in certain circumstances? In this book, case studies and reviews confirm the adaptive nature of infanticide in males in primates, and help to predict which species should be vulnerable to it. Much of the book is devoted to exploring the evolutionary consequences of the threat of infanticide by males for social and reproductive behavior and physiology. Written for graduate students and researchers in animal behavior, behavioral ecology, biological anthropology and social psychology, this book shows that social systems are shaped not only by ecological pressures, but also social pressures such as infanticide risk.

• First to explore systematically the consequences of infanticide for social and sexual behaviour in primates • Explicitly comparative perspective in examining social consequences of infanticide • Settles the debate between the pathology and adaptation schools by demonstrating the adaptive significance of infanticide by males
Contents

Foreword Sarah Blaffer Hrdy; Preface Carel P. van Schaik and Charles Janson; Part I. Introduction: 1. The holy wars against infanticide: which side are you on and why? Volker Sommer; 2. Infanticide by male primates: the sexual selection hypothesis revisited Carel P. van Schaik; 3. Vulnerability to infanticide by males: patterns among mammals Carel P. van Schaik; Part II. Infanticide by Males: Case Studies: 4. Infanticide in Red Howlers: female group size, male composition and a possible link to folivory Carolyn M. Crockett and Charles H. Janson; 5. Infanticide in Hanuman Langurs: social organization, male migration and weaning age Carola Borries and Andreas Koenig; 6. Male infanticide and defense of infants in Chacma baboons Ryne A. Palombit, Dorothy L. Cheney, Julia Fischer, Sara Johnson, Drew Rendall, Robert M. Seyfarth and Joan B. Silk; 7. Infanticide by males and female choice in wild Thomas’s Langurs Romy Steenbeek; 8. The evolution of infanticide in rodents: a comparative analysis Daniel T. Blumstein; 9. Infanticide by male birds José P. Viega; Part III. Behavioural Consequences of Infanticide by Males: 10. Prevention of infanticide: the perspective of infant primates Adrian Treves; 11. Infanticide and the evolution of male-female bonds in animals Ryne A. Palombit; 12. The other side of the coin: infanticide and the evolution of affiliative male-infant interactions in Old World primates Andreas Paul, Signe Preuschoft and Carel P. van Schaik; 13. Female dispersal and infanticide avoidance in primates Elisabeth H. M. Sterck and Amanda H. Korstjens; 14. Reproductive patterns in eutherian mammals: adaptations against infanticide Maria A. van Noordwijk and Carel P. van Schaik; 15. Paternity confusion and the ovarian cycles of female primates Carel P. van Schaik, J. Keith Hodges and Charles L. Nunn; 16. Social evolution in primates: the relative roles of ecology and intersexual conflict Charles L. Nunn and Carel P. van Schaik; Part IV. Infanticide by Females: 17. Infanticide by female mammals: implications for the evolution of social systems Leslie Digby; 18. ‘The hate that love generated’ - sexually selected neglect of one’s own offspring in humans Eckart Voland and Peter Stephan; Part V. Conclusion: 19. The behavioral ecology of infanticide Charles H. Janson and Carel P. van Schaik; References, Index.



see? fucking annoying isnt it.



also, i know 2 people on here who have been banned for 'topic integrity or derailing a thread' so i dont think he should be censored, but he should at least be applying the post in keeping with the topic...

Commy

dunkman wrote:

Male primates, carnivores and rodents sometimes kill infants that they did not sire. Infanticide by males is a relatively common phenomenon in these groups, but tends to be rare in any given species. Is this behavior pathological or accidental, or does it reflect a conditional reproductive strategy for males in certain circumstances? In this book, case studies and reviews confirm the adaptive nature of infanticide in males in primates, and help to predict which species should be vulnerable to it. Much of the book is devoted to exploring the evolutionary consequences of the threat of infanticide by males for social and reproductive behavior and physiology. Written for graduate students and researchers in animal behavior, behavioral ecology, biological anthropology and social psychology, this book shows that social systems are shaped not only by ecological pressures, but also social pressures such as infanticide risk.

• First to explore systematically the consequences of infanticide for social and sexual behaviour in primates • Explicitly comparative perspective in examining social consequences of infanticide • Settles the debate between the pathology and adaptation schools by demonstrating the adaptive significance of infanticide by males
Contents

Foreword Sarah Blaffer Hrdy; Preface Carel P. van Schaik and Charles Janson; Part I. Introduction: 1. The holy wars against infanticide: which side are you on and why? Volker Sommer; 2. Infanticide by male primates: the sexual selection hypothesis revisited Carel P. van Schaik; 3. Vulnerability to infanticide by males: patterns among mammals Carel P. van Schaik; Part II. Infanticide by Males: Case Studies: 4. Infanticide in Red Howlers: female group size, male composition and a possible link to folivory Carolyn M. Crockett and Charles H. Janson; 5. Infanticide in Hanuman Langurs: social organization, male migration and weaning age Carola Borries and Andreas Koenig; 6. Male infanticide and defense of infants in Chacma baboons Ryne A. Palombit, Dorothy L. Cheney, Julia Fischer, Sara Johnson, Drew Rendall, Robert M. Seyfarth and Joan B. Silk; 7. Infanticide by males and female choice in wild Thomas’s Langurs Romy Steenbeek; 8. The evolution of infanticide in rodents: a comparative analysis Daniel T. Blumstein; 9. Infanticide by male birds José P. Viega; Part III. Behavioural Consequences of Infanticide by Males: 10. Prevention of infanticide: the perspective of infant primates Adrian Treves; 11. Infanticide and the evolution of male-female bonds in animals Ryne A. Palombit; 12. The other side of the coin: infanticide and the evolution of affiliative male-infant interactions in Old World primates Andreas Paul, Signe Preuschoft and Carel P. van Schaik; 13. Female dispersal and infanticide avoidance in primates Elisabeth H. M. Sterck and Amanda H. Korstjens; 14. Reproductive patterns in eutherian mammals: adaptations against infanticide Maria A. van Noordwijk and Carel P. van Schaik; 15. Paternity confusion and the ovarian cycles of female primates Carel P. van Schaik, J. Keith Hodges and Charles L. Nunn; 16. Social evolution in primates: the relative roles of ecology and intersexual conflict Charles L. Nunn and Carel P. van Schaik; Part IV. Infanticide by Females: 17. Infanticide by female mammals: implications for the evolution of social systems Leslie Digby; 18. ‘The hate that love generated’ - sexually selected neglect of one’s own offspring in humans Eckart Voland and Peter Stephan; Part V. Conclusion: 19. The behavioral ecology of infanticide Charles H. Janson and Carel P. van Schaik; References, Index.



see? fucking annoying isnt it.



also, i know 2 people on here who have been banned for 'topic integrity or derailing a thread' so i dont think he should be censored, but he should at least be applying the post in keeping with the topic...

I had no idea about infanticide that's some crazy shit. thing is, and yeah that was kind of annoying, but his posts are entertaining, and he has a unique thought process.

he should not be banned becasue a few people can't find the ignore button.

Anon

Hi Commy, i also didn't mind his posts and had fun trying to figure them out. I think what may have annoyed a few people, was that yesterday, instead of his/her few random posts, he posted in every single thread. Mostly it was the same rant. When i signed in, the whole right hand side of the forum, where it says last poster was his name (apart from the forum rules which is locked). Then i saw he was doing the same thing in the music forum. I guess that would've annoyed a few people. Especially as it was the same thing over and over.

South of Seattle

Pj_Gurl wrote:

Hi Commy, i also didn't mind his posts and had fun trying to figure them out. I think what may have annoyed a few people, was that yesterday, instead of his/her few random posts, he posted in every single thread. Mostly it was the same rant. When i signed in, the whole right hand side of the forum, where it says last poster was his name (apart from the forum rules which is locked). Then i saw he was doing the same thing in the music forum. I guess that would've annoyed a few people. Especially as it was the same thing over and over.

Also putting my name in the topic of threads? Why? Because I'm from the same state?

It's all Acid influenced gibberish to me.

chopitdown

Commy wrote:

you want to censor ccRyderzz?


why?

plagarism and not referencing any sources.

Dirtie_Frank

Pj_Gurl wrote:

Hi Commy, i also didn't mind his posts and had fun trying to figure them out. I think what may have annoyed a few people, was that yesterday, instead of his/her few random posts, he posted in every single thread. Mostly it was the same rant. When i signed in, the whole right hand side of the forum, where it says last poster was his name (apart from the forum rules which is locked). Then i saw he was doing the same thing in the music forum. I guess that would've annoyed a few people. Especially as it was the same thing over and over.

We have a BINGO! really I would not mind if it was relavant or once and a while but every post was the same thing.

Commy

Dirtie_Frank wrote:

We have a BINGO! really I would not mind if it was relavant or once and a while but every post was the same thing.

so you're trying to get a pj fan banned from the message board? good luck. good cause.

godpt3

Commy wrote:

so you're trying to get a pj fan banned from the message board? good luck. good cause.

trying to weed out the blithering idiots from an intelligent discussion is always a worthy cause. Quite frankly, it needs to happen more often.

Strangest Tribe

Ive actually understood some of his posts, I've just never figured out an appropriate response.

Harmless and entertaining usually gets you banned around here for whatever reason...I'm thinking of Cory, Speedy, and bostonlou when I say this...

I have never understood some of the bannings, for everyone that has been banned for whatever reason it seems I can find someone else guilty of the same or worse....

Dirtie_Frank

Commy wrote:

so you're trying to get a pj fan banned from the message board? good luck. good cause.

No I am not trying to gethim banned, trying to get him to make sense. I never reported him or anything. It just gets annoying when he posts the same nonsense in all of the forums

Collin

Strangest Tribe wrote:

Ive actually understood some of his posts, I've just never figured out an appropriate response.

Harmless and entertaining usually gets you banned around here for whatever reason...I'm thinking of Cory, Speedy, and bostonlou when I say this...

I have never understood some of the bannings, for everyone that has been banned for whatever reason it seems I can find someone else guilty of the same or worse....

I liked his/her posts, but yesterday he posted the same thing in several threads. Anyway, I like reading it... but not in every thread the same thing.

mammasan

godpt3 wrote:

try reporting him to the mods. Maybe if enough people complain, he'll be 86'ed.

Why would you want him banned? Yes his posts are all over the place and hard to decipher but he has every right to continue to post on here. He hasn't offended or attacked anyone to my knowledge. If you don't like his posts just put him on ignore and go about your business here. No need to censor someone simply because you don't like, or in his case, can't understand what they are saying.

melodious

godpt3 wrote:

trying to weed out the blithering idiots from an intelligent discussion is always a worthy cause. Quite frankly, it needs to happen more often.

lowers voice to a deep whisper: reallly???


you have to look from the reverse...ie, leaving the left, veering towards the right....

even so, could cc be such a type that reveals truthfulness???

peace.

dunkman

melodious wrote:

you have to look from the reverse...ie, leaving the left, veering towards the right....

even so, could cc be such a type that reveals truthfulness???

peace.

wtf does that mean?


you have to poke distressed pigs from a distance, going to close will highlight ineptitude.

melodious

your sig says it all....

dunkman

melodious wrote:

your sig says it all....

my signature betrays the open portal to Jerry Garcia's thorax, come in and have a look, good times can happen if the soul is reversed but not until I think its in gear.