Question for all

Dirtie_Frank

What is ccRyderzz talking about in all of his posts? Is it just me or does it have nothingt o do with anything the subject is about?

godpt3

unstable mental patient with delusions of conspiracy. Just ignore 'im.

Dirtie_Frank

godpt3 wrote:

unstable mental patient with delusions of conspiracy. Just ignore 'im.

It's hard when he is every post. When I looked at who replied last to the posts on page his name was on them all.

godpt3

Dirtie_Frank wrote:

It's hard when he is every post. When I looked at who replied last to the posts on page his name was on them all.

try reporting him to the mods. Maybe if enough people complain, he'll be 86'ed.

JaneNY

He went on my ignore list a couple hours ago. I think he's just spamming the board.

vduboise

JaneNY wrote:

He went on my ignore list a couple hours ago. I think he's just spamming the board.

he is spamming the board. Hard to ignore when he is on every thread spreading...what?

Make some sense ccRyderzz, and maybe we can understand

norm

kids...meth kills

godpt3

vduboise wrote:

he is spamming the board. Hard to ignore when he is on every thread spreading...what?

I reported about a half dozen posts to the mods. We'll see what happens come morning

Dirtie_Frank

I am glad that it is no just me. I thought I was just dumb or something thinking I could not read his post and understand them.

norm

Dirtie_Frank wrote:

I am glad that it is no just me. I thought I was just dumb or something thinking I could not read his post and understand them.

seems like he comes by every few months or so....make your own assumptions as to why

godpt3

cutback wrote:

seems like he comes by every few months or so....make your own assumptions as to why

probably because that's about how long it takes for the ban to expire

vduboise

maybe the ban has happened. Have not seen a thread with him in it for a while.

godpt3

vduboise wrote:

maybe the ban has happened. Have not seen a thread with him in it for a while.

I think so. His post count seems to be going down as we speak.

dignin

i like him, he...or her, brings a sense of levity here i was checking some of his earlier posts and...oh man...holy shit

melodious

we must be grateful for anyone who gives time is giving their love...

look for that sunshine....

godpt3

melodious wrote:

we must be grateful for anyone who gives time is giving their love...

look for that sunshine....

so, was ccRyderzz your alias, or something???

melodious

when someone asks me a question such as you pose, i tend to question intention...

usually what we ask of others is based on an inner heart beat rhythm...

it's very nice to meet you...

godpt3

melodious wrote:

when someone asks me a question such as you pose, i tend to question intention...

usually what we ask of others is based on an inner heart beat rhythm...

it's very nice to meet you...

Your honor... the prosecution rests.

melodious

you are part of me, and i am part of you...

but i think ccRiderz is from Detroit, if I am not mistaken...

who was it....oh, let me think...

oh yeah, Mitch Rider and the Detroit Demoliton...

they sang a song, Devil with the Blue Dress On...

it's very nice to meet you, godpt3, yet another beautiful manifestation of loving

off to work we go... + =

_

Dirtie_Frank wrote:

What is ccRyderzz talking about in all of his posts? Is it just me or does it have nothingt o do with anything the subject is about?

Thank God someone brought this up! I was starting to think I was losing my mind or something. Hopefully something will be done about it.

godpt3

melodious wrote:

oh yeah, Mitch Rider and the Detroit Demoliton...

it was mitch ryder and the detroit wheels. If you're gonna do Motown, at least get it right.

melodious

anything 4 u, god

Commy

you want to censor ccRyderzz?


why?

brandon10

Commy wrote:

you want to censor ccRyderzz?


why?

I had no problem with the posts. I actually found them somewhat entertaining. I love trying to figure out the thought process.

Commy

brandon10 wrote:

I had no problem with the posts. I actually found them somewhat entertaining. I love trying to figure out the thought process.

yeah, some are hilarious.

dunkman

Commy wrote:

you want to censor ccRyderzz?


why?

Male primates, carnivores and rodents sometimes kill infants that they did not sire. Infanticide by males is a relatively common phenomenon in these groups, but tends to be rare in any given species. Is this behavior pathological or accidental, or does it reflect a conditional reproductive strategy for males in certain circumstances? In this book, case studies and reviews confirm the adaptive nature of infanticide in males in primates, and help to predict which species should be vulnerable to it. Much of the book is devoted to exploring the evolutionary consequences of the threat of infanticide by males for social and reproductive behavior and physiology. Written for graduate students and researchers in animal behavior, behavioral ecology, biological anthropology and social psychology, this book shows that social systems are shaped not only by ecological pressures, but also social pressures such as infanticide risk.

• First to explore systematically the consequences of infanticide for social and sexual behaviour in primates • Explicitly comparative perspective in examining social consequences of infanticide • Settles the debate between the pathology and adaptation schools by demonstrating the adaptive significance of infanticide by males
Contents

Foreword Sarah Blaffer Hrdy; Preface Carel P. van Schaik and Charles Janson; Part I. Introduction: 1. The holy wars against infanticide: which side are you on and why? Volker Sommer; 2. Infanticide by male primates: the sexual selection hypothesis revisited Carel P. van Schaik; 3. Vulnerability to infanticide by males: patterns among mammals Carel P. van Schaik; Part II. Infanticide by Males: Case Studies: 4. Infanticide in Red Howlers: female group size, male composition and a possible link to folivory Carolyn M. Crockett and Charles H. Janson; 5. Infanticide in Hanuman Langurs: social organization, male migration and weaning age Carola Borries and Andreas Koenig; 6. Male infanticide and defense of infants in Chacma baboons Ryne A. Palombit, Dorothy L. Cheney, Julia Fischer, Sara Johnson, Drew Rendall, Robert M. Seyfarth and Joan B. Silk; 7. Infanticide by males and female choice in wild Thomas’s Langurs Romy Steenbeek; 8. The evolution of infanticide in rodents: a comparative analysis Daniel T. Blumstein; 9. Infanticide by male birds José P. Viega; Part III. Behavioural Consequences of Infanticide by Males: 10. Prevention of infanticide: the perspective of infant primates Adrian Treves; 11. Infanticide and the evolution of male-female bonds in animals Ryne A. Palombit; 12. The other side of the coin: infanticide and the evolution of affiliative male-infant interactions in Old World primates Andreas Paul, Signe Preuschoft and Carel P. van Schaik; 13. Female dispersal and infanticide avoidance in primates Elisabeth H. M. Sterck and Amanda H. Korstjens; 14. Reproductive patterns in eutherian mammals: adaptations against infanticide Maria A. van Noordwijk and Carel P. van Schaik; 15. Paternity confusion and the ovarian cycles of female primates Carel P. van Schaik, J. Keith Hodges and Charles L. Nunn; 16. Social evolution in primates: the relative roles of ecology and intersexual conflict Charles L. Nunn and Carel P. van Schaik; Part IV. Infanticide by Females: 17. Infanticide by female mammals: implications for the evolution of social systems Leslie Digby; 18. ‘The hate that love generated’ - sexually selected neglect of one’s own offspring in humans Eckart Voland and Peter Stephan; Part V. Conclusion: 19. The behavioral ecology of infanticide Charles H. Janson and Carel P. van Schaik; References, Index.



see? fucking annoying isnt it.



also, i know 2 people on here who have been banned for 'topic integrity or derailing a thread' so i dont think he should be censored, but he should at least be applying the post in keeping with the topic...

Commy

dunkman wrote:

Male primates, carnivores and rodents sometimes kill infants that they did not sire. Infanticide by males is a relatively common phenomenon in these groups, but tends to be rare in any given species. Is this behavior pathological or accidental, or does it reflect a conditional reproductive strategy for males in certain circumstances? In this book, case studies and reviews confirm the adaptive nature of infanticide in males in primates, and help to predict which species should be vulnerable to it. Much of the book is devoted to exploring the evolutionary consequences of the threat of infanticide by males for social and reproductive behavior and physiology. Written for graduate students and researchers in animal behavior, behavioral ecology, biological anthropology and social psychology, this book shows that social systems are shaped not only by ecological pressures, but also social pressures such as infanticide risk.

• First to explore systematically the consequences of infanticide for social and sexual behaviour in primates • Explicitly comparative perspective in examining social consequences of infanticide • Settles the debate between the pathology and adaptation schools by demonstrating the adaptive significance of infanticide by males
Contents

Foreword Sarah Blaffer Hrdy; Preface Carel P. van Schaik and Charles Janson; Part I. Introduction: 1. The holy wars against infanticide: which side are you on and why? Volker Sommer; 2. Infanticide by male primates: the sexual selection hypothesis revisited Carel P. van Schaik; 3. Vulnerability to infanticide by males: patterns among mammals Carel P. van Schaik; Part II. Infanticide by Males: Case Studies: 4. Infanticide in Red Howlers: female group size, male composition and a possible link to folivory Carolyn M. Crockett and Charles H. Janson; 5. Infanticide in Hanuman Langurs: social organization, male migration and weaning age Carola Borries and Andreas Koenig; 6. Male infanticide and defense of infants in Chacma baboons Ryne A. Palombit, Dorothy L. Cheney, Julia Fischer, Sara Johnson, Drew Rendall, Robert M. Seyfarth and Joan B. Silk; 7. Infanticide by males and female choice in wild Thomas’s Langurs Romy Steenbeek; 8. The evolution of infanticide in rodents: a comparative analysis Daniel T. Blumstein; 9. Infanticide by male birds José P. Viega; Part III. Behavioural Consequences of Infanticide by Males: 10. Prevention of infanticide: the perspective of infant primates Adrian Treves; 11. Infanticide and the evolution of male-female bonds in animals Ryne A. Palombit; 12. The other side of the coin: infanticide and the evolution of affiliative male-infant interactions in Old World primates Andreas Paul, Signe Preuschoft and Carel P. van Schaik; 13. Female dispersal and infanticide avoidance in primates Elisabeth H. M. Sterck and Amanda H. Korstjens; 14. Reproductive patterns in eutherian mammals: adaptations against infanticide Maria A. van Noordwijk and Carel P. van Schaik; 15. Paternity confusion and the ovarian cycles of female primates Carel P. van Schaik, J. Keith Hodges and Charles L. Nunn; 16. Social evolution in primates: the relative roles of ecology and intersexual conflict Charles L. Nunn and Carel P. van Schaik; Part IV. Infanticide by Females: 17. Infanticide by female mammals: implications for the evolution of social systems Leslie Digby; 18. ‘The hate that love generated’ - sexually selected neglect of one’s own offspring in humans Eckart Voland and Peter Stephan; Part V. Conclusion: 19. The behavioral ecology of infanticide Charles H. Janson and Carel P. van Schaik; References, Index.



see? fucking annoying isnt it.



also, i know 2 people on here who have been banned for 'topic integrity or derailing a thread' so i dont think he should be censored, but he should at least be applying the post in keeping with the topic...

I had no idea about infanticide that's some crazy shit. thing is, and yeah that was kind of annoying, but his posts are entertaining, and he has a unique thought process.

he should not be banned becasue a few people can't find the ignore button.

Anon

Hi Commy, i also didn't mind his posts and had fun trying to figure them out. I think what may have annoyed a few people, was that yesterday, instead of his/her few random posts, he posted in every single thread. Mostly it was the same rant. When i signed in, the whole right hand side of the forum, where it says last poster was his name (apart from the forum rules which is locked). Then i saw he was doing the same thing in the music forum. I guess that would've annoyed a few people. Especially as it was the same thing over and over.

South of Seattle

Pj_Gurl wrote:

Hi Commy, i also didn't mind his posts and had fun trying to figure them out. I think what may have annoyed a few people, was that yesterday, instead of his/her few random posts, he posted in every single thread. Mostly it was the same rant. When i signed in, the whole right hand side of the forum, where it says last poster was his name (apart from the forum rules which is locked). Then i saw he was doing the same thing in the music forum. I guess that would've annoyed a few people. Especially as it was the same thing over and over.

Also putting my name in the topic of threads? Why? Because I'm from the same state?

It's all Acid influenced gibberish to me.

chopitdown

Commy wrote:

you want to censor ccRyderzz?


why?

plagarism and not referencing any sources.

Dirtie_Frank

Pj_Gurl wrote:

Hi Commy, i also didn't mind his posts and had fun trying to figure them out. I think what may have annoyed a few people, was that yesterday, instead of his/her few random posts, he posted in every single thread. Mostly it was the same rant. When i signed in, the whole right hand side of the forum, where it says last poster was his name (apart from the forum rules which is locked). Then i saw he was doing the same thing in the music forum. I guess that would've annoyed a few people. Especially as it was the same thing over and over.

We have a BINGO! really I would not mind if it was relavant or once and a while but every post was the same thing.