SIN EATERS--We take the moral excrement we find in this equation and we bury it down deep inside of us so that the rest of our case can stay pure. That is the job. We are morally indefensible and absolutely necessary.
again, you are diverting the point. Slick Willie was accused of sexual harrassment, newt wasn't.
he lied under oath about an affair, in a sexual harrassment trial. i know the drive by media has probably brainwashed the public into thinking clinton was impeached b/c of an affair, but no...it's because he was accused of sexual harrassment, and lied about an affair under oath. that is important b/c perverts like der schlichmeister exhibit such behavior. it's not about...of course, everyone would lie about sex. again, he was accused of a crime...unlike scooter libby.
any real feminist would recognize this, but a liberal wouldn't, the latter would make all kinds of excuses...which further shines the light on the leftist agenda. they don't give a damned about women's rights.
i believe he was acquitted on perjury charges. like it or not, he played the legal system and did not technically break the law. if newt aplogizes publicly for his hypocritical witchunt, i will let it go and listen to what he has to say. but until then, newt talking about personal lives not being an issue makes about as much sense as al sharpton saying race shouldn't be an issue in his campaign.
again, you are diverting the point. Slick Willie was accused of sexual harrassment, newt wasn't.
Bill Clinton was accused of sexual harrassment, but wasn't found guilty. However, during the course of the investigation, he was asked a question about his affair with Monica Lewinsky - something that wasn't a crime - and he lied about it. Hence, the perjury charge.
again, he was accused of a crime...unlike scooter libby.
Scooter was accused of a crime - perjury. There was an investigation into who leaked the name of a covert CIA agent - a crime - and Scoots was called in to testify. During his testimony, he lied. Let's say if you were called in as a witness to someone else's trial, and you lied while under oath, you too would be charged with a crime. Or should it be O.K. for witnesses to lie? Would that help our justice system?
Comments
Neither has Gore, but the lines have been drawn.
i believe he was acquitted on perjury charges. like it or not, he played the legal system and did not technically break the law. if newt aplogizes publicly for his hypocritical witchunt, i will let it go and listen to what he has to say. but until then, newt talking about personal lives not being an issue makes about as much sense as al sharpton saying race shouldn't be an issue in his campaign.