Our Only Chance Of Bringing The Troops Home Within The Next 10 Fucking Years

2

Comments

  • bootlegger10bootlegger10 Posts: 16,054
    my2hands wrote:
    :rolleyes:

    You obviously think that Barack is going to bring the troops home. You probably also think Barack would not have supported the war in 2001 if he was in the Senate. He would have bent over and took it like he has been doing on every Iraq vote since he has been in the Senate. It makes me puke when he says he was against the war. He was a freaking nobody in a state senate when the vote occurred. I would bet my junk that he would have voted for the war like every other weak liberal. Especially since he takes every stance that could get him closer to being elected. He is a panderer, and a panderer would have voted for the war in 2001.
  • NevermindNevermind Posts: 1,006
    my2hands wrote:
    there is a major candiate speaking out against the permanent presence and bases in iraq... his name is barack obama, you might want to check him out
    How is Obama going to get rid of these bases? Someone owns them and its not Obama.
  • bah.
    nevermind.


    rofl...

    priceless...
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    Nevermind wrote:
    How is Obama going to get rid of these bases? Someone owns them and its not Obama.

    the President is Commander in Chief...


    that is 5th grade civics
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    You obviously think that Barack is going to bring the troops home. You probably also think Barack would not have supported the war in 2001 if he was in the Senate. He would have bent over and took it like he has been doing on every Iraq vote since he has been in the Senate. It makes me puke when he says he was against the war. He was a freaking nobody in a state senate when the vote occurred. I would bet my junk that he would have voted for the war like every other weak liberal. Especially since he takes every stance that could get him closer to being elected. He is a panderer, and a panderer would have voted for the war in 2001.

    so now you speculate on what he WOULD have done... newslfash, he stood up and took the unfavorable position of being against the war while he was an ELECTED OFFICIAL... that was professional suicide at that time, just ask the dixie chicks

    i believe Barack Obama will excericise the will of the american population and end the Iraq occupation...

    you poeple really cant grasp the funding thing can you? it's actually quite elementary

    now feel free to call me some more names...
  • my2hands wrote:
    now feel free to call me some more names...

    smarty pants!

    ;)
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • NevermindNevermind Posts: 1,006
    my2hands wrote:
    the President is Commander in Chief...


    that is 5th grade civics
    Obama isnt/will never be president. And if he somehow pulls it off he wont do shit. Unless he wants to get shot in the head by some CIA goons.
  • Nevermind wrote:
    Obama isnt/will never be president. And if he somehow pulls it off he wont do shit. Unless he wants to get shot in the head by some CIA goons.

    Either Obama is a great liar (maybe the best they've ever found), or he will be rendered ineffective.

    That means 1 of 3 things.

    1. They will just rig it like they've done before, and he will NOT be president.

    2. They will just use massive lobbying influence and stonewalling in congress to render him virtualy ineffective. If he tries something they don't like with the troops, they will just fuck him with the media. Play every day escalating violence in the Mid East, and have long opinion pieces on how, "Is Obama to blame for the escalating violence in the Middle East which now threatens Israel !?!"

    3. They will do something REALLY fucked up, like
    a. put hillary on the ticket as his VP
    b. have Obama offed
    c. Hillary becomes President
    d. race riots and economic uncertainty surrounding assassination gives Hillary authority for martial law
    e. bye bye america

    I can see any of those happening.

    I lean more towards 1 right now as their prefered choice, IF Mr. Obama is not on the take, but #3 sure would be some sneaky fucked up shit.
    If I was to smile and I held out my hand
    If I opened it now would you not understand?
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117

    3. They will do something REALLY fucked up, like
    a. put hillary on the ticket as his VP
    b. have Obama offed
    c. Hillary becomes President
    d. race riots and economic uncertainty surrounding assassination gives Hillary authority for martial law
    e. bye bye america

    I can see any of those happening.

    i think you need help man... seriously... you are extremely paranoid and swallow any conspiracy theory that comes your way... you seem like a good guy, but you constantly focus on doomsday scenarios and conspiracies...
  • my2hands wrote:
    i think you need help man... seriously... you are extremely paranoid and swallow any conspiracy theory that comes your way... you seem like a good guy, but you constantly focus on doomsday scenarios and conspiracies...

    Control of the world is not by chance. It is very calculated by some very powerful people keeping their best interests in mind above all else.

    Never forget that.
    Progress is not made by everyone joining some new fad,
    and reveling in it's loyalty. It's made by forming coalitions
    over specific principles, goals, and policies.

    http://i36.tinypic.com/66j31x.jpg

    (\__/)
    ( o.O)
    (")_(")
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    my2hands wrote:
    is Barack Obama... that is the flat out reality of the situation... realize it


    get them home from where?
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    my2hands wrote:
    there is a major candiate speaking out against the permanent presence and bases in iraq... his name is barack obama, you might want to check him out


    lol.. you seem to have no facts at all... tell us what he is saying??


    why are you believeing half-truths so easily?


    how old are you?
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    my2hands wrote:
    i think you need help man... seriously... you are extremely paranoid and swallow any conspiracy theory that comes your way... you seem like a good guy, but you constantly focus on doomsday scenarios and conspiracies...


    your failure to recognize lies indicates that you need help...

    OBAMA ISNT GOING TO BRING TROOPS HOME


    lol


    UNBELIEVABLE!
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    my2hands wrote:
    is Barack Obama... that is the flat out reality of the situation... realize it

    bottom line...


    cheerleading for nader is not brining 1 single troop home
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    macgyver06 wrote:
    your failure to recognize lies indicates that you need help...

    OBAMA ISNT GOING TO BRING TROOPS HOME


    lol


    UNBELIEVABLE!


    i see i get attacked by virtually everyone that claims to be "liberal" on this board nowadays for simply stating i support Obama... thats why the left in this country cannot figure it out... the elitist, i am smarter then you approach doesnt work and turns people off...


    i still have not seen you articulate 1 thought in the years i have posted here... all you do is throw around 1 line cliche's saying everyone is stupid and brainwashed... its pretty boring dude

    i support Obama so i "need help"... is this what this place has become? :rolleyes:
  • my2hands wrote:
    bottom line...


    cheerleading for nader is not brining 1 single troop home


    But cheerleading for Obama is?

    I'm pulling for Nader because I believe in the things he stands for, period. Obama's not offering the same thing.....bottomline, I know I'll be voting for the best option based on my ideals and didn't vote out of fear... so my conscience will be clear.
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • my2hands wrote:
    i see i get attacked by virtually everyone that claims to be "liberal" on this board nowadays for simply stating i support Obama... thats why the left in this country cannot figure it out... the elitist, i am smarter then you approach doesnt work and turns people off...


    i still have not seen you articulate 1 thought in the years i have posted here... all you do is throw around 1 line cliche's saying everyone is stupid and brainwashed... its pretty boring dude

    i support Obama so i "need help"... is this what this place has become? :rolleyes:


    so you call people elitists for disagreeing with you and expressing it and say they are acting like they are 'smarter than you' then in your next point you look down on someone's ability to articulate a thought?
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    so you call people elitists for disagreeing with you and expressing it and say they are acting like they are 'smarter than you' then in your next point you look down on someone's ability to articulate a thought?


    HE DIDNT DISAGREE WITH ME HE INSULTED ME... AS HE HAS DONE OVER AND OVER AGAIN... I AM POINTING OUT THAT AND CALLING THAT CONTINUED



    so saying i am delusional and need help is expressing his difference of opinion?

    i am fucking done with this place
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    macgyver06 wrote:


    how old are you?

    and another
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    You are naive.

    here is one...
  • my2hands wrote:
    HE DIDNT DISAGREE WITH ME HE INSULTED ME... AS HE HAS DONE OVER AND OVER AGAIN... I AM POINTING OUT THAT AND CALLING THAT CONTINUED



    so saying i am delusional and need help is expressing his difference of opinion?

    i am fucking done with this place

    You generalized your reply as what was wrong with the 'left' not what was wrong with said poster.

    If you hate something don't ya do it, too
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    You generalized your reply as what was wrong with the 'left' not what was wrong with said poster.

    If you hate something don't ya do it, too


    i call it how i see it
  • my2hands wrote:
    i call it how i see it

    As do I
    If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you.

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.
    -Oscar Wilde
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    i am not going to let some hypocrite bash me on here... when i know damn well they have not done anything in the real world to support the anti war movement




    he constantly takes an elitist view, always lamely attacking anyone he disagree's with... so i call him out. and will continue to do so. period.
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    my2hands wrote:
    i see i get attacked by virtually everyone that claims to be "liberal" on this board nowadays for simply stating i support Obama... thats why the left in this country cannot figure it out... the elitist, i am smarter then you approach doesnt work and turns people off...


    i still have not seen you articulate 1 thought in the years i have posted here... all you do is throw around 1 line cliche's saying everyone is stupid and brainwashed... its pretty boring dude

    i support Obama so i "need help"... is this what this place has become? :rolleyes:


    just because you support him doesn't mean you can spread lies about his campaign and get away with it. you choose to lie in your threads... i call you out... YOU HAVE NO REPLY


    THIS IS FACT MY2HANDS
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    my2hands wrote:
    HE DIDNT DISAGREE WITH ME HE INSULTED ME... AS HE HAS DONE OVER AND OVER AGAIN... I AM POINTING OUT THAT AND CALLING THAT CONTINUED



    so saying i am delusional and need help is expressing his difference of opinion?

    i am fucking done with this place


    we dont need opinionated lies on a message board... its a tough job sorting through these messes... hows that for elite?
  • my2handsmy2hands Posts: 17,117
    macgyver06 wrote:
    we dont need opinionated lies on a message board... its a tough job sorting through these messes... hows that for elite?

    please feel free to point out any of these lies i have told...
  • 10 years is the new estimate now?

    We can't afford to keep this war going, period

    I think we'll see the same amount of war with Hillary, Obama or even McCain and then the bottom is going to collapse under us if it's not ended because we have no way of paying for it.

    I wonder if Bush will accept my five loaves and two fishes? :)
    'We're learning songs for baby Jesus' birthday. His mum and dad were Merry and Joseph. He had a bed made of clay and the three kings bought him Gold, Frankenstein and Merv as presents.'

    - the great Sir Leo Harrison
  • JD Sal wrote:
    How did we pay for it the past 5 years? We shouldn't have sustained such a large military presence for this long, but we have.

    have you been in a coma?

    we are borrowing billions from the chinese.
  • macgyver06macgyver06 Posts: 2,500
    my2hands wrote:
    please feel free to point out any of these lies i have told...


    the thread starter is a lie
Sign In or Register to comment.