Why does Rolling Stone dislike PJ?
rjbukowski
Posts: 117
Every "list" they do never has PJ in it (okay, top 500 albums, they have 2, but still, they are in the top 250, they had to put them there!)
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
They have been on several Rolling Stone lists, as can be seen here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_awards_and_nominations_received_by_Pearl_Jam#Miscellaneous_awards_and_honors
If you think Rolling Stone hates Pearl Jam, you should try Pitchfork Media.
If you hate something, don't you do it too
5/25/06 - Boston
6/28/08 - Mansfield
6/30/08 - Mansfield
8/2/08 - Eddie in Boston (FRONT ROW!)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IcZ2yBcvFQ
2008- Boston I+II
2009- Toronto, Philly III+IV
2010- Bristow, Hartford, Boston, Newark
I don't get why Ed was left off either...I always thought he was held in high regards by his peers.
Pitchfork is laughable, their Pearl Jam reviews are just filled with inaccuracies, like I remember reading the review for Riot Act, and the writer was saying that PJ was claiming that Riot Act was going to be their comeback album or something like that, I mean where do you get that from.
Pitchfork is garbage
Rolling Stone is just bad at making lists.
You beat me to it.
Funniest thing I've seen in years.