maybe its just my opinion that...... you supporting innocent israeli civilians being targeted...... as anti-Israeli.
others can decide for themselves.
It's your opinion that people knowingly living on land stolen from their neighbours qualifies them as being 'innocent'. I disagree. I don't think that these thieves are innocent at all. I think their presence there is itself an act of violence.
I suppose you believe that Germans living in houses stolen from murdered, or deported Jews in occupied Poland during world war 2 were innocent too?
It's your opinion that people knowingly living on land stolen from their neighbours qualifies them as being 'innocent'. I disagree. I don't think that these thieves are innocent at all. I think their presence there is itself an act of violence.
yup, anytime civilians are targeted, its wrong, no matter where they are. you always talk about a fair fight...how is blowing up and unarmed civilian a fair fight? obviously the land they live on is being disputed.
then own up to your response. tongue and cheek my ass.
I thought my response was perfectly justified at the time. A bunch of Americans on here were slagging immigrants and stereotyping them all. I responded to it with a taste of their own medicine. Only a half-wit would have taken what I said 100% literally. Are you admitting to falling within that category?
I thought my response was perfectly justified at the time. A bunch of Americans on here were slagging immigrants and stereotyping them all. I responded to it with a taste of their own medicine. Only a half-wit would have taken what I said 100% literally. Are you admitting to falling within that category?
can you be anymore contradictory? first you say your response was perfectly justified but it shouldnt be taken literally....
yea I guess I'm a half wit.
look steve, I dont dislike you. you are probably a very cool dude who loves pearl jam and throwing back several beers. hell, me too!!!!
obviously we differ when it comes to supporting hamas. I dont. I dont even support Israel all that much. I'm not jewish. and I despise some of the things they do. but I do support Israel because unlike most countries in the Middle East, Israel is a liberal democracy and a developed country. In the region, Israel is the least corrupt. and the most progressive in terms of freedom of the press, economic competition, and human development..
I wish hamas would take a more peaceful route much like abbas does. I have never been to Israel or the west bank. from what I understand, going back to the 1967 borders is impossible. one example is a community in east jerusalem of 25,000 Israeli's living in a disputed spot. those people are never going to leave. A war was fought and borders changed. I would love however if Israel did leave some settlements and put up a fence. a two state solution is the only way to go.
look steve, I dont dislike you. you are probably a very cool dude who loves pearl jam and throwing back several beers. hell, me too!!!!
And if when I come to Chicago in about 1 years time, you make any mention of politics whislt we knock back a few beers, I'll slap ya top side of the head.
And if when I come to Chicago in about 1 years time, you make any mention of politics whislt we knock back a few beers, I'll slap ya top side of the head.
Comments
Run and hide? Me? He he! You really do live in a fantasy land.
It's your opinion that people knowingly living on land stolen from their neighbours qualifies them as being 'innocent'. I disagree. I don't think that these thieves are innocent at all. I think their presence there is itself an act of violence.
I suppose you believe that Germans living in houses stolen from murdered, or deported Jews in occupied Poland during world war 2 were innocent too?
yup, anytime civilians are targeted, its wrong, no matter where they are. you always talk about a fair fight...how is blowing up and unarmed civilian a fair fight? obviously the land they live on is being disputed.
here we go with the hilter reference. different time, different land.
I thought my response was perfectly justified at the time. A bunch of Americans on here were slagging immigrants and stereotyping them all. I responded to it with a taste of their own medicine. Only a half-wit would have taken what I said 100% literally. Are you admitting to falling within that category?
can you be anymore contradictory? first you say your response was perfectly justified but it shouldnt be taken literally....
yea I guess I'm a half wit.
look steve, I dont dislike you. you are probably a very cool dude who loves pearl jam and throwing back several beers. hell, me too!!!!
obviously we differ when it comes to supporting hamas. I dont. I dont even support Israel all that much. I'm not jewish. and I despise some of the things they do. but I do support Israel because unlike most countries in the Middle East, Israel is a liberal democracy and a developed country. In the region, Israel is the least corrupt. and the most progressive in terms of freedom of the press, economic competition, and human development..
I wish hamas would take a more peaceful route much like abbas does. I have never been to Israel or the west bank. from what I understand, going back to the 1967 borders is impossible. one example is a community in east jerusalem of 25,000 Israeli's living in a disputed spot. those people are never going to leave. A war was fought and borders changed. I would love however if Israel did leave some settlements and put up a fence. a two state solution is the only way to go.
Yep.
And if when I come to Chicago in about 1 years time, you make any mention of politics whislt we knock back a few beers, I'll slap ya top side of the head.
you got yourself a deal