Is Pornography Becoming an Addiction

2»

Comments

  • aoifeaoife Posts: 126
    Ahnimus wrote:
    It's psychological, I can look at porn every day and still be aroused by an ankle. But my brain rocks, if I really tried, I could probably get off just thinking about it :p
    :)
    "If you remove the English army tomorrow and hoist the green flag over Dublin castle, unless you set about the organisation of the socialist republic then all of your efforts would have been in vain. England will still rule you through her capitalists ,landlords and commercial institutions"
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    Laz wrote:
    does this apply to kiddie porn? a small minority of people are against kiddie porn? I don't think so

    I would think a large majority would be against Kiddie porn.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • LazLaz Posts: 118
    Ahnimus wrote:
    I would think a large majority would be against Kiddie porn.

    yeah they are but how long until more and more people find it acceptable, are you at that point (if you still live) going to accept it as OK?
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    Laz wrote:
    yeah they are but how long until more and more people find it acceptable, are you at that point (if you still live) going to accept it as OK?

    Well, if the majority think it's ok and to the point where laws are ammended, I'll have no choice but to accept it as a part of our society, like homosexuality for example.
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • TremormanTremorman Posts: 385
    The simplest and most direct definition of addiction (as I have learned through many years of listening to Loveline) is repeated destuctive behavior in the face of serious consequnces. These consequences can be damaging of one's relationships, financial situation, health, and even freedom. This isn't necessarily a moral debate, the moral debate lies in the laws ( and the proposition of new ones) that try to limit these destructive consequences. The actual addiction is just someone who cannot pull themselves from an activity, while well knowing the destructive consequences. In an interivew I saw a while back Anthony Keidis described this mindset of an addict as "buying the lie", meaning the addict has the illusion of control and somehow thinks he can cheat the consequences just one more time. This "buying the lie" is what hurts the persons loved ones the most as well and this addiction is no different.
  • AhnimusAhnimus Posts: 10,560
    Tremorman wrote:
    The simplest and most direct definition of addiction (as I have learned through many years of listening to Loveline) is repeated destuctive behavior in the face of serious consequnces. These consequences can be damaging of one's relationships, financial situation, health, and even freedom. This isn't necessarily a moral debate, the moral debate lies in the laws ( and the proposition of new ones) that try to limit these destructive consequences. The actual addiction is just someone who cannot pull themselves from an activity, while well knowing the destructive consequences. In an interivew I saw a while back Anthony Keidis described this mindset of an addict as "buying the lie", meaning the addict has the illusion of control and somehow thinks he can cheat the consequences just one more time. This "buying the lie" is what hurts the persons loved ones the most as well and this addiction is no different.

    I don't have any loved ones, so I guess that's why no one gets hurt. ;)
    I necessarily have the passion for writing this, and you have the passion for condemning me; both of us are equally fools, equally the toys of destiny. Your nature is to do harm, mine is to love truth, and to make it public in spite of you. - Voltaire
  • my2hands wrote:
    coming from someone with 7,000 posts ;)

    That's funny.
    one foot in the door
    the other foot in the gutter
    sweet smell that they adore
    I think I'd rather smother
    -The Replacements-
  • brain of cbrain of c Posts: 5,213
    Pornography is my paycheck. call it the family business.
  • decides2dreamdecides2dream Posts: 14,977
    aoife wrote:
    i personally think that porn desensitises people to sex, and makes it harder for people to become aroused by things that would have aroused them had there been no porn. I mean back in the day women wore long skirts and men would get all horny if they saw their ankles or something. now though a completely naked woman might not even turn people on, its just gonna get harder core until people are doing completely demeaning and revolting things to each other because we have become immune to the concept of sex in itself. so yes its an addiction like that i agree


    exactly.
    i think that is the real/true 'danger.'
    i think too, it HAS been shown for some to actually decrease/interfere with their drive for 'real life' intercourse.....interfere in relationships....etc. as someone else mentioned, that IS the nature of addiction though, no matter what. i think the internet makes it a helluva lot easier. however, i think parents need to parent their children, and adults have free will....and that's that.
    Stay with me...
    Let's just breathe...


    I am myself like you somehow


  • ByrnzieByrnzie Posts: 21,037
    I think the world would be a poorer place without the contributions of such legendary cocksmen as Ron Jeremy, max Hardcore, and Rocco. These guys really know how to please a lady.
    I met ron Jeremy on London Bridge during an anti-Bush demonstration a few years ago when George Dubya visited London. I can't remember much else about the day other than I got to shake the hand of a legend. I remember saying "Ron Jeremy fucks Bush!" And "Make porn, not war!"
  • hailhailkchailhailkc Posts: 582
    Byrnzie wrote:
    I think the world would be a poorer place without the contributions of such legendary cocksmen as Ron Jeremy, max Hardcore, and Rocco. These guys really know how to please a lady.
    I met ron Jeremy on London Bridge during an anti-Bush demonstration a few years ago when George Dubya visited London. I can't remember much else about the day other than I got to shake the hand of a legend. I remember saying "Ron Jeremy fucks Bush!" And "Make porn, not war!"

    I met Ron Jeremy at a Black Crowes concert in Dallas, TX in 1996...maybe 1997. Got him to sign my ticket stub, and I also shook his right hand. That hand has been more places…
    MOSSAD NATO Alphabet Stations (E10)
    High Traffic ART EZI FTJ JSR KPA PCD SYN ULX VLB YHF
    Low Traffic CIO MIW
    Non Traffic ABC BAY FDU GBZ HNC NDP OEM ROV TMS ZWL
  • my2hands wrote:
    coming from someone with 7,000 posts ;)

    how ironic... my2hands being used in a porn thread

    sir/maam, keep your hands where we can see them

    :D:D:D:D
  • bootlegger10bootlegger10 Posts: 16,030
    Ahnimus wrote:
    Well, if the majority think it's ok and to the point where laws are ammended, I'll have no choice but to accept it as a part of our society

    Whatever the majority believes isn't necessarily right. The majority could believe that killing a guy on a park bench for no reason is okay. That doesn't make it moral or ethical. Adults having sex with defenseless children is wrong regardless of whether the majority believe it or not.
Sign In or Register to comment.